cve-2025-22150
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-01-21 17:46
Modified
2025-02-12 20:41
Summary
Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
nodejs undici Version: >= 4.5.0, < 5.28.5
Version: >= 6.0.0, < 6.21.1
Version: >= 7.0.0, < 7.2.3
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-22150",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-01-21T18:34:22.789606Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:41:22.041Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "undici",
          "vendor": "nodejs",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 4.5.0, \u003c 5.28.5"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 6.0.0, \u003c 6.21.1"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 7.0.0, \u003c 7.2.3"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.8,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-330",
              "description": "CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-01-21T17:46:58.872Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Undici Uses Insufficiently Random Values"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-22150",
    "datePublished": "2025-01-21T17:46:58.872Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-12-30T03:00:33.654Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:41:22.041Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-22150\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2025-01-21T18:15:14.887\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-01-21T18:15:14.887\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.6,\"impactScore\":5.2}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-330\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-22150\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-01-21T18:34:22.789606Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-12T20:33:10.324Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Undici Uses Insufficiently Random Values\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 6.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"nodejs\", \"product\": \"undici\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 4.5.0, \u003c 5.28.5\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 6.0.0, \u003c 6.21.1\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 7.0.0, \u003c 7.2.3\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312\", \"name\": \"https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f\", \"name\": \"https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-330\", \"description\": \"CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-21T17:46:58.872Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-22150\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-12T20:41:22.041Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-12-30T03:00:33.654Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-01-21T17:46:58.872Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.