cve-2024-53090
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-11-21 18:17
Modified
2024-12-19 09:38
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: afs: Fix lock recursion afs_wake_up_async_call() can incur lock recursion. The problem is that it is called from AF_RXRPC whilst holding the ->notify_lock, but it tries to take a ref on the afs_call struct in order to pass it to a work queue - but if the afs_call is already queued, we then have an extraneous ref that must be put... calling afs_put_call() may call back down into AF_RXRPC through rxrpc_kernel_shutdown_call(), however, which might try taking the ->notify_lock again. This case isn't very common, however, so defer it to a workqueue. The oops looks something like: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, krxrpcio/7001/1646 lock: 0xffff888141399b30, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: krxrpcio/7001/1646, .owner_cpu: 0 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1646 Comm: krxrpcio/7001 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-build3+ #4351 Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x70 do_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x90 rxrpc_kernel_shutdown_call+0x83/0xb0 afs_put_call+0xd7/0x180 rxrpc_notify_socket+0xa0/0x190 rxrpc_input_split_jumbo+0x198/0x1d0 rxrpc_input_data+0x14b/0x1e0 ? rxrpc_input_call_packet+0xc2/0x1f0 rxrpc_input_call_event+0xad/0x6b0 rxrpc_input_packet_on_conn+0x1e1/0x210 rxrpc_input_packet+0x3f2/0x4d0 rxrpc_io_thread+0x243/0x410 ? __pfx_rxrpc_io_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xcf/0xe0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>
References
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/610a79ffea02102899a1373fe226d949944a7ed6Patch
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7cbf81df996b1eae2dee8deb6df08e2eba78661Patch
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Linux Linux Version: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2
Version: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2
 Create a notification for this product.
   Linux Linux Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
   containers: {
      cna: {
         affected: [
            {
               defaultStatus: "unaffected",
               product: "Linux",
               programFiles: [
                  "fs/afs/internal.h",
                  "fs/afs/rxrpc.c",
               ],
               repo: "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
               vendor: "Linux",
               versions: [
                  {
                     lessThan: "d7cbf81df996b1eae2dee8deb6df08e2eba78661",
                     status: "affected",
                     version: "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
                     versionType: "git",
                  },
                  {
                     lessThan: "610a79ffea02102899a1373fe226d949944a7ed6",
                     status: "affected",
                     version: "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
                     versionType: "git",
                  },
               ],
            },
            {
               defaultStatus: "affected",
               product: "Linux",
               programFiles: [
                  "fs/afs/internal.h",
                  "fs/afs/rxrpc.c",
               ],
               repo: "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
               vendor: "Linux",
               versions: [
                  {
                     lessThanOrEqual: "6.11.*",
                     status: "unaffected",
                     version: "6.11.9",
                     versionType: "semver",
                  },
                  {
                     lessThanOrEqual: "*",
                     status: "unaffected",
                     version: "6.12",
                     versionType: "original_commit_for_fix",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         descriptions: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nafs: Fix lock recursion\n\nafs_wake_up_async_call() can incur lock recursion.  The problem is that it\nis called from AF_RXRPC whilst holding the ->notify_lock, but it tries to\ntake a ref on the afs_call struct in order to pass it to a work queue - but\nif the afs_call is already queued, we then have an extraneous ref that must\nbe put... calling afs_put_call() may call back down into AF_RXRPC through\nrxrpc_kernel_shutdown_call(), however, which might try taking the\n->notify_lock again.\n\nThis case isn't very common, however, so defer it to a workqueue.  The oops\nlooks something like:\n\n  BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, krxrpcio/7001/1646\n   lock: 0xffff888141399b30, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: krxrpcio/7001/1646, .owner_cpu: 0\n  CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1646 Comm: krxrpcio/7001 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-build3+ #4351\n  Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014\n  Call Trace:\n   <TASK>\n   dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x70\n   do_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x90\n   rxrpc_kernel_shutdown_call+0x83/0xb0\n   afs_put_call+0xd7/0x180\n   rxrpc_notify_socket+0xa0/0x190\n   rxrpc_input_split_jumbo+0x198/0x1d0\n   rxrpc_input_data+0x14b/0x1e0\n   ? rxrpc_input_call_packet+0xc2/0x1f0\n   rxrpc_input_call_event+0xad/0x6b0\n   rxrpc_input_packet_on_conn+0x1e1/0x210\n   rxrpc_input_packet+0x3f2/0x4d0\n   rxrpc_io_thread+0x243/0x410\n   ? __pfx_rxrpc_io_thread+0x10/0x10\n   kthread+0xcf/0xe0\n   ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n   ret_from_fork+0x24/0x40\n   ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n   </TASK>",
            },
         ],
         providerMetadata: {
            dateUpdated: "2024-12-19T09:38:56.303Z",
            orgId: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
            shortName: "Linux",
         },
         references: [
            {
               url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7cbf81df996b1eae2dee8deb6df08e2eba78661",
            },
            {
               url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/610a79ffea02102899a1373fe226d949944a7ed6",
            },
         ],
         title: "afs: Fix lock recursion",
         x_generator: {
            engine: "bippy-5f407fcff5a0",
         },
      },
   },
   cveMetadata: {
      assignerOrgId: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      assignerShortName: "Linux",
      cveId: "CVE-2024-53090",
      datePublished: "2024-11-21T18:17:07.366Z",
      dateReserved: "2024-11-19T17:17:24.981Z",
      dateUpdated: "2024-12-19T09:38:56.303Z",
      state: "PUBLISHED",
   },
   dataType: "CVE_RECORD",
   dataVersion: "5.1",
   "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
      nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-53090\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2024-11-21T19:15:12.010\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-12-24T14:52:35.750\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nafs: Fix lock recursion\\n\\nafs_wake_up_async_call() can incur lock recursion.  The problem is that it\\nis called from AF_RXRPC whilst holding the ->notify_lock, but it tries to\\ntake a ref on the afs_call struct in order to pass it to a work queue - but\\nif the afs_call is already queued, we then have an extraneous ref that must\\nbe put... calling afs_put_call() may call back down into AF_RXRPC through\\nrxrpc_kernel_shutdown_call(), however, which might try taking the\\n->notify_lock again.\\n\\nThis case isn't very common, however, so defer it to a workqueue.  The oops\\nlooks something like:\\n\\n  BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, krxrpcio/7001/1646\\n   lock: 0xffff888141399b30, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: krxrpcio/7001/1646, .owner_cpu: 0\\n  CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1646 Comm: krxrpcio/7001 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-build3+ #4351\\n  Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014\\n  Call Trace:\\n   <TASK>\\n   dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x70\\n   do_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x90\\n   rxrpc_kernel_shutdown_call+0x83/0xb0\\n   afs_put_call+0xd7/0x180\\n   rxrpc_notify_socket+0xa0/0x190\\n   rxrpc_input_split_jumbo+0x198/0x1d0\\n   rxrpc_input_data+0x14b/0x1e0\\n   ? rxrpc_input_call_packet+0xc2/0x1f0\\n   rxrpc_input_call_event+0xad/0x6b0\\n   rxrpc_input_packet_on_conn+0x1e1/0x210\\n   rxrpc_input_packet+0x3f2/0x4d0\\n   rxrpc_io_thread+0x243/0x410\\n   ? __pfx_rxrpc_io_thread+0x10/0x10\\n   kthread+0xcf/0xe0\\n   ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\\n   ret_from_fork+0x24/0x40\\n   ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\\n   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\\n   </TASK>\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: afs: Fix lock recursion afs_wake_up_async_call() puede generar recursión de bloqueo. El problema es que se llama desde AF_RXRPC mientras se mantiene el -&gt;notify_lock, pero intenta tomar una referencia en la estructura afs_call para pasarla a una cola de trabajo; pero si afs_call ya está en cola, entonces tenemos una referencia extraña que se debe poner... sin embargo, llamar a afs_put_call() puede volver a llamar a AF_RXRPC a través de rxrpc_kernel_shutdown_call(), que podría intentar tomar el -&gt;notify_lock nuevamente. Sin embargo, este caso no es muy común, por lo que se debe diferir a una cola de trabajo. El error se parece a algo como esto: ERROR: recursión de spinlock en CPU#0, krxrpcio/7001/1646 bloqueo: 0xffff888141399b30, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: krxrpcio/7001/1646, .owner_cpu: 0 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1646 Comm: krxrpcio/7001 No contaminado 6.12.0-rc2-build3+ #4351 Nombre del hardware: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014 Seguimiento de llamadas:  dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x70 do_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x90 rxrpc_input_call_event+0xad/0x6b0 rxrpc_input_packet_on_conn+0x1e1/0x210 rxrpc_input_packet+0x3f2/0x4d0 rxrpc_io_thread+0x243/0x410 ? __pfx_rxrpc_io_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xcf/0xe0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_de_la_bifurcación+0x24/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_de_la_bifurcación_asm+0x1a/0x30 \"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-674\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.11.9\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5163F80F-8D8E-4FFD-B327-624A8CAF902D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7F361E1D-580F-4A2D-A509-7615F73167A1\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"925478D0-3E3D-4E6F-ACD5-09F28D5DF82C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3C95E234-D335-4B6C-96BF-E2CEBD8654ED\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E0F717D8-3014-4F84-8086-0124B2111379\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/610a79ffea02102899a1373fe226d949944a7ed6\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7cbf81df996b1eae2dee8deb6df08e2eba78661\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]}]}}",
   },
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.