CVE-2024-47825 (GCVE-0-2024-47825)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-10-21 19:05 – Updated: 2024-10-21 19:59
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
CIDR deny policies may not take effect when a more narrow CIDR allow is present
Summary
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.16 and 1.15.10, a policy rule denying a prefix that is broader than `/32` may be ignored if there is a policy rule referencing a more narrow prefix (`CIDRSet` or `toFQDN`) and this narrower policy rule specifies either `enableDefaultDeny: false` or `- toEntities: all`. Note that a rule specifying `toEntities: world` or `toEntities: 0.0.0.0/0` is insufficient, it must be to entity `all`.This issue has been patched in Cilium v1.14.16 and v1.15.10. As this issue only affects policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false` or that set `toEntities` to `all`, some workarounds are available. For users with policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false`, remove this configuration option and explicitly define any allow rules required. For users with egress policies that explicitly specify `toEntities: all`, use `toEntities: world`.
Severity
4 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2024-10-21 19:58 UTC
CWE
- CWE-276 - Incorrect Default Permissions
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "cilium",
"vendor": "cilium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.15.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.15.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.14.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.14.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-47825",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-10-21T19:58:00.432301Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-21T19:59:01.283Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "cilium",
"vendor": "cilium",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.15.0, \u003c 1.15.10"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.14.0, \u003c 1.14.16"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.16 and 1.15.10, a policy rule denying a prefix that is broader than `/32` may be ignored if there is a policy rule referencing a more narrow prefix (`CIDRSet` or `toFQDN`) and this narrower policy rule specifies either `enableDefaultDeny: false` or `- toEntities: all`. Note that a rule specifying `toEntities: world` or `toEntities: 0.0.0.0/0` is insufficient, it must be to entity `all`.This issue has been patched in Cilium v1.14.16 and v1.15.10. As this issue only affects policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false` or that set `toEntities` to `all`, some workarounds are available. For users with policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false`, remove this configuration option and explicitly define any allow rules required. For users with egress policies that explicitly specify `toEntities: all`, use `toEntities: world`."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-276",
"description": "CWE-276: Incorrect Default Permissions",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-21T19:05:55.430Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "CIDR deny policies may not take effect when a more narrow CIDR allow is present"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-47825",
"datePublished": "2024-10-21T19:05:55.430Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-10-03T14:06:12.641Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-21T19:59:01.283Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-47825",
"date": "2026-09-14",
"epss": "0.00397",
"percentile": "0.33225"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"1.14.0\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"1.14.16\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"E72A812D-F216-4165-A98F-AAF9042ECE26\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"1.15.0\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"1.15.10\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"430A4DEE-E609-4186-A882-E0E424D6F232\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.16 and 1.15.10, a policy rule denying a prefix that is broader than `/32` may be ignored if there is a policy rule referencing a more narrow prefix (`CIDRSet` or `toFQDN`) and this narrower policy rule specifies either `enableDefaultDeny: false` or `- toEntities: all`. Note that a rule specifying `toEntities: world` or `toEntities: 0.0.0.0/0` is insufficient, it must be to entity `all`.This issue has been patched in Cilium v1.14.16 and v1.15.10. As this issue only affects policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false` or that set `toEntities` to `all`, some workarounds are available. For users with policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false`, remove this configuration option and explicitly define any allow rules required. For users with egress policies that explicitly specify `toEntities: all`, use `toEntities: world`.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Cilium es una soluci\\u00f3n de redes, observabilidad y seguridad con un plano de datos basado en eBPF. A partir de la versi\\u00f3n 1.14.0 y antes de las versiones 1.14.16 y 1.15.10, una regla de pol\\u00edtica que deniegue un prefijo m\\u00e1s amplio que `/32` puede ignorarse si hay una regla de pol\\u00edtica que haga referencia a un prefijo m\\u00e1s estrecho (`CIDRSet` o `toFQDN`) y esta regla de pol\\u00edtica m\\u00e1s estrecha especifica `enableDefaultDeny: false` o `- toEntities: all`. Tenga en cuenta que una regla que especifique `toEntities: world` o `toEntities: 0.0.0.0/0` no es suficiente, debe ser para la entidad `all`. Este problema se ha corregido en Cilium v1.14.16 y v1.15.10. Como este problema solo afecta a las pol\\u00edticas que utilizan `enableDefaultDeny: false` o que establecen `toEntities` en `all`, hay algunas soluciones alternativas disponibles. Para los usuarios con pol\\u00edticas que utilizan `enableDefaultDeny: false`, elimine esta opci\\u00f3n de configuraci\\u00f3n y defina expl\\u00edcitamente las reglas de permiso requeridas. Para los usuarios con pol\\u00edticas de salida que especifican expl\\u00edcitamente `toEntities: all`, utilice `toEntities: world`.\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2024-47825",
"lastModified": "2024-12-19T15:59:27.760",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 4.0, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.2, \"impactScore\": 1.4}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 8.7, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.2, \"impactScore\": 5.8}]}",
"published": "2024-10-21T19:15:03.500",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-276\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-47825\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2024-10-21T19:15:03.500\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-17T07:57:49.363\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.16 and 1.15.10, a policy rule denying a prefix that is broader than `/32` may be ignored if there is a policy rule referencing a more narrow prefix (`CIDRSet` or `toFQDN`) and this narrower policy rule specifies either `enableDefaultDeny: false` or `- toEntities: all`. Note that a rule specifying `toEntities: world` or `toEntities: 0.0.0.0/0` is insufficient, it must be to entity `all`.This issue has been patched in Cilium v1.14.16 and v1.15.10. As this issue only affects policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false` or that set `toEntities` to `all`, some workarounds are available. For users with policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false`, remove this configuration option and explicitly define any allow rules required. For users with egress policies that explicitly specify `toEntities: all`, use `toEntities: world`.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Cilium es una soluci\u00f3n de redes, observabilidad y seguridad con un plano de datos basado en eBPF. A partir de la versi\u00f3n 1.14.0 y antes de las versiones 1.14.16 y 1.15.10, una regla de pol\u00edtica que deniegue un prefijo m\u00e1s amplio que `/32` puede ignorarse si hay una regla de pol\u00edtica que haga referencia a un prefijo m\u00e1s estrecho (`CIDRSet` o `toFQDN`) y esta regla de pol\u00edtica m\u00e1s estrecha especifica `enableDefaultDeny: false` o `- toEntities: all`. Tenga en cuenta que una regla que especifique `toEntities: world` o `toEntities: 0.0.0.0/0` no es suficiente, debe ser para la entidad `all`. Este problema se ha corregido en Cilium v1.14.16 y v1.15.10. Como este problema solo afecta a las pol\u00edticas que utilizan `enableDefaultDeny: false` o que establecen `toEntities` en `all`, hay algunas soluciones alternativas disponibles. Para los usuarios con pol\u00edticas que utilizan `enableDefaultDeny: false`, elimine esta opci\u00f3n de configuraci\u00f3n y defina expl\u00edcitamente las reglas de permiso requeridas. Para los usuarios con pol\u00edticas de salida que especifican expl\u00edcitamente `toEntities: all`, utilice `toEntities: world`.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"cilium\",\"product\":\"cilium\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003e= 1.15.0, \u003c 1.15.10\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"\u003e= 1.14.0, \u003c 1.14.16\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]},{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"cilium\",\"product\":\"cilium\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unknown\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"],\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"1.15.0\",\"lessThan\":\"1.15.10\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"1.14.0\",\"lessThan\":\"1.14.16\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":1.4},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":8.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":5.8}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2024-10-21T19:58:00.432301Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2024-47825\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"poc\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-276\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.14.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.14.16\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E72A812D-F216-4165-A98F-AAF9042ECE26\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.15.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.15.10\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"430A4DEE-E609-4186-A882-E0E424D6F232\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-05-28T21:25:31+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-47825",
"id": "CVE-2024-47825",
"initial_release_date": "2024-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "CIDR deny policies may not take effect when a more narrow CIDR allow is present",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-47825.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "important",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-22T16:39:47Z",
"cve": "CVE-2024-47825",
"id": "CVE-2024-47825",
"initial_release_date": "2024-11-02T03:49:33Z",
"product_status:recommended": "4",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2024-47825",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2024-47825.json",
"version": "17"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-47825\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-10-21T19:58:00.432301Z\"}}}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"vendor\": \"cilium\", \"product\": \"cilium\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.15.0\", \"lessThan\": \"1.15.10\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.14.0\", \"lessThan\": \"1.14.16\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-10-21T19:58:55.920Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"CIDR deny policies may not take effect when a more narrow CIDR allow is present\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 4, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"cilium\", \"product\": \"cilium\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 1.15.0, \u003c 1.15.10\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 1.14.0, \u003c 1.14.16\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.16 and 1.15.10, a policy rule denying a prefix that is broader than `/32` may be ignored if there is a policy rule referencing a more narrow prefix (`CIDRSet` or `toFQDN`) and this narrower policy rule specifies either `enableDefaultDeny: false` or `- toEntities: all`. Note that a rule specifying `toEntities: world` or `toEntities: 0.0.0.0/0` is insufficient, it must be to entity `all`.This issue has been patched in Cilium v1.14.16 and v1.15.10. As this issue only affects policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false` or that set `toEntities` to `all`, some workarounds are available. For users with policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false`, remove this configuration option and explicitly define any allow rules required. For users with egress policies that explicitly specify `toEntities: all`, use `toEntities: world`.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-276\", \"description\": \"CWE-276: Incorrect Default Permissions\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-10-21T19:05:55.430Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-47825\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-10-21T19:59:01.283Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-10-03T14:06:12.641Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-10-21T19:05:55.430Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…