CVE-2024-12208 (GCVE-0-2024-12208)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-07 04:22 – Updated: 2025-01-17 16:51
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-43269. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2024-43269. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-43269 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-17T16:51:27.104Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-43269. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2024-43269. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-43269 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-12208",
"datePublished": "2025-01-07T04:22:21.646Z",
"dateRejected": "2025-01-17T16:51:27.104Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-04T17:45:38.437Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-17T16:51:27.104Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Backup and Restore WordPress \u2013 Backup Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.50. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_queue_manual_backup() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger backups via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El complemento Backup and Restore WordPress \u2013 Backup Plugin para WordPress es vulnerable a Cross-Site Request Forgery en todas las versiones hasta la 1.50 incluida. Esto se debe a la falta o la validaci\u00f3n incorrecta de nonce en la funci\u00f3n ajax_queue_manual_backup(). Esto hace posible que atacantes no autenticados activen copias de seguridad a trav\u00e9s de una solicitud falsificada, siempre que puedan enga\u00f1ar a un administrador del sitio para que realice una acci\u00f3n como hacer clic en un enlace."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-12208",
"lastModified": "2025-01-07T05:15:16.270",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-01-07T05:15:16.270",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-backitup/"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/e461a04b-6456-4930-b3e7-0f808825aa6b?source=cve"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-352"
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-43269. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2024-43269. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-43269 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-12208",
"lastModified": "2025-01-17T17:15:10.740",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2025-01-07T05:15:16.270",
"references": [],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-17T16:51:27.104Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-43269. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2024-43269. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-43269 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-12208",
"datePublished": "2025-01-07T04:22:21.646Z",
"dateRejected": "2025-01-17T16:51:27.104Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-04T17:45:38.437Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-17T16:51:27.104Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…