CVE-2023-4533 (GCVE-0-2023-4533)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: – Updated: 2025-04-30 21:40
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Red Hat Product Security has come to the conclusion that this CVE is not needed. It was assigned as a duplicate of CVE-2023-52440
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-30T21:40:42.281Z",
"orgId": "92fb86c3-55a5-4fb5-9c3f-4757b9e96dc5",
"shortName": "fedora"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Red Hat Product Security has come to the conclusion that this CVE is not needed. It was assigned as a duplicate of CVE-2023-52440"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "92fb86c3-55a5-4fb5-9c3f-4757b9e96dc5",
"assignerShortName": "fedora",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-4533",
"dateRejected": "2025-04-30T21:40:42.281Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-08-25T07:23:15.913Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-30T21:40:42.281Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: Red Hat Product Security has come to the conclusion that this CVE is not needed. It was assigned as a duplicate of CVE-2023-52440"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-4533",
"lastModified": "2025-04-30T22:15:16.370",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2025-04-30T22:15:16.370",
"references": [],
"sourceIdentifier": "patrick@puiterwijk.org",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…