cve-2017-16671
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2017-11-09 00:00
Modified
2024-08-05 20:35
Severity ?
Summary
A Buffer Overflow issue was discovered in Asterisk Open Source 13 before 13.18.1, 14 before 14.7.1, and 15 before 15.1.1 and Certified Asterisk 13.13 before 13.13-cert7. No size checking is done when setting the user field for Party B on a CDR. Thus, it is possible for someone to use an arbitrarily large string and write past the end of the user field storage buffer. NOTE: this is different from CVE-2017-7617, which was only about the Party A buffer.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a n/a Version: n/a
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T20:35:19.933Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "101760",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101760"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2017-010.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "GLSA-201811-11",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_GENTOO",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-11"
          },
          {
            "name": "DSA-4076",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_DEBIAN",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4076"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-27337"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2017-11-08T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A Buffer Overflow issue was discovered in Asterisk Open Source 13 before 13.18.1, 14 before 14.7.1, and 15 before 15.1.1 and Certified Asterisk 13.13 before 13.13-cert7. No size checking is done when setting the user field for Party B on a CDR. Thus, it is possible for someone to use an arbitrarily large string and write past the end of the user field storage buffer. NOTE: this is different from CVE-2017-7617, which was only about the Party A buffer."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2018-11-25T10:57:01",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "101760",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101760"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2017-010.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "GLSA-201811-11",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_GENTOO"
          ],
          "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-11"
        },
        {
          "name": "DSA-4076",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_DEBIAN"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4076"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-27337"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2017-16671",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "A Buffer Overflow issue was discovered in Asterisk Open Source 13 before 13.18.1, 14 before 14.7.1, and 15 before 15.1.1 and Certified Asterisk 13.13 before 13.13-cert7. No size checking is done when setting the user field for Party B on a CDR. Thus, it is possible for someone to use an arbitrarily large string and write past the end of the user field storage buffer. NOTE: this is different from CVE-2017-7617, which was only about the Party A buffer."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "101760",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101760"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2017-010.html",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2017-010.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "GLSA-201811-11",
              "refsource": "GENTOO",
              "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-11"
            },
            {
              "name": "DSA-4076",
              "refsource": "DEBIAN",
              "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4076"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-27337",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-27337"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2017-16671",
    "datePublished": "2017-11-09T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2017-11-08T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T20:35:19.933Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-16671\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2017-11-09T00:29:00.473\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T03:16:47.930\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A Buffer Overflow issue was discovered in Asterisk Open Source 13 before 13.18.1, 14 before 14.7.1, and 15 before 15.1.1 and Certified Asterisk 13.13 before 13.13-cert7. No size checking is done when setting the user field for Party B on a CDR. Thus, it is possible for someone to use an arbitrarily large string and write past the end of the user field storage buffer. NOTE: this is different from CVE-2017-7617, which was only about the Party A buffer.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de b\u00fafer se descubri\u00f3 en Asterisk Open Source en versiones 13 anteriores a la 13.18.1, versiones 14 anteriores a la 14.7.1 y versiones 15 antes de la 15.1.1 y en Certified Asterisk 13.13 en versiones anteriores a la 13.13-cert7. No se realizan chequeos de tama\u00f1o cuando se configura el campo user para Party B en un CDR. Por ello, es posible que alguien utilice una cadena arbitraria con una longitud larga y escriba m\u00e1s all\u00e1 del final del b\u00fafer de almacenamiento del campo user. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad es diferente de CVE-2017-7617, que solo trataba del b\u00fafer Party A.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"SINGLE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:asterisk:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"13.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"13.18.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"88EDB1A9-AC31-4A47-A222-0C4E17274A02\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:asterisk:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"14.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"14.7.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5861B3BC-A35A-4617-A24E-F88D27DBE3F6\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:asterisk:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"15.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"15.1.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"651DC4FA-A4EF-40DC-9B54-3ED928A7531A\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:certified_asterisk:13.13.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7233B5A2-E1CE-4B7E-99FA-26369B892B25\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:certified_asterisk:13.13.0:cert1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F051FE7D-0695-4552-BC1C-836076825606\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:certified_asterisk:13.13.0:cert1_rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2E9DFD7C-9ED1-4561-8AFF-69D98E8E398D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:certified_asterisk:13.13.0:cert1_rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CA8BFAC6-17A7-4B80-B436-0FFA4B9EA22A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:certified_asterisk:13.13.0:cert1_rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"954376A0-A03C-47D9-BC5E-14B005DB3940\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:certified_asterisk:13.13.0:cert1_rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"07BB081F-504D-42E3-9CDE-4005572CA0CF\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:certified_asterisk:13.13.0:cert2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9F379170-DC3B-41B8-B950-7E0E1E6002AD\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:certified_asterisk:13.13.0:cert3:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"338BFA7B-AA84-483F-B298-BC932728E0EF\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:certified_asterisk:13.13.0:cert4:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0A4D417F-485E-4CAD-8542-A22BBA2869E3\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:certified_asterisk:13.13.0:cert5:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"61F70CD2-1727-4955-A81B-8927AEF468ED\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:digium:certified_asterisk:13.13.0:cert6:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A9437455-90FB-4F90-B246-A37E558C9CE5\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2017-010.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101760\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-27337\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-11\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4076\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2017-010.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101760\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-27337\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-11\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4076\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.