CVE-2015-7267 (GCVE-0-2015-7267)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-11-27 22:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 07:43
VLAI
Summary
Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when in sleep mode and operating in Opal or eDrive mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32; ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21; Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16; or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by leveraging failure to detect when SATA drives are unplugged in Sleep Mode, aka a "Hot Plug attack."
Severity
4.2 (Medium)
CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Date Public
2015-11-02 00:00
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T07:43:46.159Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2015-11-02T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when in sleep mode and operating in Opal or eDrive mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32; ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21; Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16; or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by leveraging failure to detect when SATA drives are unplugged in Sleep Mode, aka a \"Hot Plug attack.\""
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-11-27T21:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
        "shortName": "certcc"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2015-7267",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when in sleep mode and operating in Opal or eDrive mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32; ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21; Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16; or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by leveraging failure to detect when SATA drives are unplugged in Sleep Mode, aka a \"Hot Plug attack.\""
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
    "assignerShortName": "certcc",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-7267",
    "datePublished": "2017-11-27T22:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2015-09-18T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T07:43:46.159Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2015-7267",
      "date": "2026-06-24",
      "epss": "0.0033",
      "percentile": "0.24637"
    },
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"operator\": \"AND\", \"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:samsung:850_pro_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"32302DB9-927F-4232-88DF-11C134266EBB\"}]}, {\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:h:samsung:850_pro:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"811049BE-1584-4E45-A157-1BEDBB74D6C0\"}]}]}, {\"operator\": \"AND\", \"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:samsung:pm851_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"9513E12E-A0EF-4789-8D2D-B97032C5A65C\"}]}, {\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:h:samsung:pm851:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"8040B236-B936-4642-8CF7-237CE39EE7F0\"}]}]}, {\"operator\": \"AND\", \"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:seagate:st500lt015_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"05C36534-C9F5-4FE1-B8C8-5BA6D021C5C7\"}]}, {\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:h:seagate:st500lt015:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"E60BC85A-FE1F-44EB-A049-6EA987C48AE0\"}]}]}, {\"operator\": \"AND\", \"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:seagate:st500lt025_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"2B999BEA-6A98-46B5-832F-76231DAA3BEA\"}]}, {\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:h:seagate:st500lt025:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"C625B6AD-4665-42EF-91DD-F45180719768\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when in sleep mode and operating in Opal or eDrive mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32; ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21; Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16; or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by leveraging failure to detect when SATA drives are unplugged in Sleep Mode, aka a \\\"Hot Plug attack.\\\"\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Las unidades de estado s\\u00f3lido Samsung 850 Pro y PM851 y las unidades de disco duro Seagate ST500LT015 y ST500LT025, cuando est\\u00e1n en modo de espera y operando en modo Opal o eDrive en port\\u00e1tiles Lenovo ThinkPad T440s con BIOS 2.32; port\\u00e1tiles ThinkPad W541 con BIOS 2.21; port\\u00e1tiles Dell Latitude E6410 con BIOS A16; o port\\u00e1tiles Latitude E6430 con BIOS A16, permiten que atacantes cercanos f\\u00edsicamente omitan la protecci\\u00f3n Self-Encrypting Drive (SED) aprovechando el fracaso a la hora de detectar cu\\u00e1ndo est\\u00e1n desconectados los discos SATA en modo de espera. Esto tambi\\u00e9n se conoce como \\\"Hot Plug attack\\\".\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2015-7267",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:36:28.127",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV30\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 4.2, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"PHYSICAL\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 0.5, \"impactScore\": 3.6}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 1.9, \"accessVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"accessComplexity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.4, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2017-11-27T22:29:00.237",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf\", \"source\": \"cret@cert.org\", \"tags\": [\"Technical Description\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html\", \"source\": \"cret@cert.org\", \"tags\": [\"Technical Description\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Technical Description\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Technical Description\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cret@cert.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-254\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2015-7267\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"published\":\"2017-11-27T22:29:00.237\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-13T00:24:29.033\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when in sleep mode and operating in Opal or eDrive mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32; ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21; Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16; or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by leveraging failure to detect when SATA drives are unplugged in Sleep Mode, aka a \\\"Hot Plug attack.\\\"\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Las unidades de estado s\u00f3lido Samsung 850 Pro y PM851 y las unidades de disco duro Seagate ST500LT015 y ST500LT025, cuando est\u00e1n en modo de espera y operando en modo Opal o eDrive en port\u00e1tiles Lenovo ThinkPad T440s con BIOS 2.32; port\u00e1tiles ThinkPad W541 con BIOS 2.21; port\u00e1tiles Dell Latitude E6410 con BIOS A16; o port\u00e1tiles Latitude E6430 con BIOS A16, permiten que atacantes cercanos f\u00edsicamente omitan la protecci\u00f3n Self-Encrypting Drive (SED) aprovechando el fracaso a la hora de detectar cu\u00e1ndo est\u00e1n desconectados los discos SATA en modo de espera. Esto tambi\u00e9n se conoce como \\\"Hot Plug attack\\\".\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.2,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"PHYSICAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":0.5,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":1.9,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.4,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-254\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"operator\":\"AND\",\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:samsung:850_pro_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"32302DB9-927F-4232-88DF-11C134266EBB\"}]},{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:samsung:850_pro:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"811049BE-1584-4E45-A157-1BEDBB74D6C0\"}]}]},{\"operator\":\"AND\",\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:samsung:pm851_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9513E12E-A0EF-4789-8D2D-B97032C5A65C\"}]},{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:samsung:pm851:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8040B236-B936-4642-8CF7-237CE39EE7F0\"}]}]},{\"operator\":\"AND\",\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:seagate:st500lt015_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"05C36534-C9F5-4FE1-B8C8-5BA6D021C5C7\"}]},{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:seagate:st500lt015:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E60BC85A-FE1F-44EB-A049-6EA987C48AE0\"}]}]},{\"operator\":\"AND\",\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:seagate:st500lt025_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2B999BEA-6A98-46B5-832F-76231DAA3BEA\"}]},{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:seagate:st500lt025:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C625B6AD-4665-42EF-91DD-F45180719768\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.