cve-2013-7311
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2014-01-23 17:00
Modified
2024-09-16 23:32
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
The OSPF implementation in Check Point Gaia OS R75.X and R76 and IPSO OS 6.2 R75.X and R76 does not consider the possibility of duplicate Link State ID values in Link State Advertisement (LSA) packets before performing operations on the LSA database, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (routing disruption) or obtain sensitive packet information via a crafted LSA packet, a related issue to CVE-2013-0149.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T18:01:20.568Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-985QRC" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=\u0026solutionid=sk94490" }, { "name": "VU#229804", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_CERT-VN", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229804" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The OSPF implementation in Check Point Gaia OS R75.X and R76 and IPSO OS 6.2 R75.X and R76 does not consider the possibility of duplicate Link State ID values in Link State Advertisement (LSA) packets before performing operations on the LSA database, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (routing disruption) or obtain sensitive packet information via a crafted LSA packet, a related issue to CVE-2013-0149." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2014-01-23T17:00:00Z", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-985QRC" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=\u0026solutionid=sk94490" }, { "name": "VU#229804", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_CERT-VN" ], "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229804" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2013-7311", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "The OSPF implementation in Check Point Gaia OS R75.X and R76 and IPSO OS 6.2 R75.X and R76 does not consider the possibility of duplicate Link State ID values in Link State Advertisement (LSA) packets before performing operations on the LSA database, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (routing disruption) or obtain sensitive packet information via a crafted LSA packet, a related issue to CVE-2013-0149." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-985QRC", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-985QRC" }, { "name": "https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=\u0026solutionid=sk94490", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=\u0026solutionid=sk94490" }, { "name": "VU#229804", "refsource": "CERT-VN", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229804" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2013-7311", "datePublished": "2014-01-23T17:00:00Z", "dateReserved": "2014-01-23T00:00:00Z", "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T23:32:05.658Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2013-7311\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2014-01-23T17:55:05.477\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T02:00:42.977\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The OSPF implementation in Check Point Gaia OS R75.X and R76 and IPSO OS 6.2 R75.X and R76 does not consider the possibility of duplicate Link State ID values in Link State Advertisement (LSA) packets before performing operations on the LSA database, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (routing disruption) or obtain sensitive packet information via a crafted LSA packet, a related issue to CVE-2013-0149.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"La implementaci\u00f3n OSPF en Check Point Gaia OS R75.X y R76 e IPSO OS 6.2 R75.X y R76 no considera la posibilidad de valores Link State ID duplicados en paquetes Link State Advertisement (LSA) antes de realizar operaciones en la base de datos LSA, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (interrupci\u00f3n de enrutamiento) u obtener informaci\u00f3n sensible de paquetes a trav\u00e9s de un paquete LSA manipulado, una vulnerabilidad relacionada con CVE-2013-0149.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":5.4,\"accessVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":5.5,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:checkpoint:gaia_os:r75.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"108B6F13-FD59-4790-B873-EED143387841\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:checkpoint:gaia_os:r76.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6D082271-E8DE-445C-99AA-A04D8789110F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:checkpoint:ipso_os:6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"89AC8A11-E5F4-4614-9C9D-65122AF92A97\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229804\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"US Government Resource\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-985QRC\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"US Government Resource\"]},{\"url\":\"https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=\u0026solutionid=sk94490\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229804\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"US Government Resource\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-985QRC\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"US Government Resource\"]},{\"url\":\"https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=\u0026solutionid=sk94490\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}],\"evaluatorComment\":\"Per: http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/694.html\\n\\n\\\"CWE-694: Use of Multiple Resources with Duplicate Identifier\\\"\"}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.