CVE-2012-3372 (GCVE-0-2012-3372)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2012-07-09 10:00 – Updated: 2025-01-27 21:07 Disputed
VLAI
Summary
The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance "does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.
Severity
7.4 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T20:05:12.354Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"
          },
          {
            "name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 7.4,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2012-3372",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-01-21T19:32:24.195135Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "description": "CWE-noinfo Not enough information",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"
        },
        {
          "name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2012-3372",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "** DISPUTED ** The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\""
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"
            },
            {
              "name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2012-3372",
    "datePublished": "2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2012-06-14T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2012-3372",
      "date": "2026-07-31",
      "epss": "0.00938",
      "percentile": "0.57391"
    },
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:h:elitecore:cyberoam_unified_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"9F6D1E67-3012-4230-AAA8-3770ADC6BD0C\"}]}]}]",
      "cveTags": "[{\"sourceIdentifier\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"disputed\"]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \\\"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"** EN DISPUTA ** La configuraci\\u00f3n por defecto del dispositivo Cyberoam UTM utiliza la misma clave privada en distintas instalaciones de clientes, lo que que facilita a atacantes MITM (man-in-the-Middle u hombre-en-medio) a espiar servidores SSL aprovechando la presencia del certificado Cyberoam_SSL_CA en una lista de confianza de autoridades emisoras de certificados ra\\u00edz. NOTA: el vendedor se opone a la importancia de esta cuesti\\u00f3n, porque el dispositivo \\\"no permite la importaci\\u00f3n o exportaci\\u00f3n de la mencionada clave privada\\\"\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2012-3372",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:40:43.900",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.8, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 8.6, \"impactScore\": 4.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": true}]}",
      "published": "2012-07-09T10:20:44.417",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-310\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-3372\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2012-07-09T10:20:44.417\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-29T01:13:23.040\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[{\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"disputed\"]}],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \\\"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"** EN DISPUTA ** La configuraci\u00f3n por defecto del dispositivo Cyberoam UTM utiliza la misma clave privada en distintas instalaciones de clientes, lo que que facilita a atacantes MITM (man-in-the-Middle u hombre-en-medio) a espiar servidores SSL aprovechando la presencia del certificado Cyberoam_SSL_CA en una lista de confianza de autoridades emisoras de certificados ra\u00edz. NOTA: el vendedor se opone a la importancia de esta cuesti\u00f3n, porque el dispositivo \\\"no permite la importaci\u00f3n o exportaci\u00f3n de la mencionada clave privada\\\"\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.4,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":5.2}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":4.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-310\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:elitecore:cyberoam_unified_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9F6D1E67-3012-4230-AAA8-3770ADC6BD0C\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"product\": \"n/a\", \"vendor\": \"n/a\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \\\"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"description\": \"n/a\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"text\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"dateUpdated\": \"2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z\", \"orgId\": \"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749\", \"shortName\": \"redhat\"}, \"references\": [{\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\"}, {\"name\": \"20120703 Cyberoam advisory\", \"tags\": [\"mailing-list\", \"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ\"], \"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\"}], \"tags\": [\"disputed\"], \"x_legacyV4Record\": {\"CVE_data_meta\": {\"ASSIGNER\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"ID\": \"CVE-2012-3372\", \"STATE\": \"PUBLIC\"}, \"affects\": {\"vendor\": {\"vendor_data\": [{\"product\": {\"product_data\": [{\"product_name\": \"n/a\", \"version\": {\"version_data\": [{\"version_value\": \"n/a\"}]}}]}, \"vendor_name\": \"n/a\"}]}}, \"data_format\": \"MITRE\", \"data_type\": \"CVE\", \"data_version\": \"4.0\", \"description\": {\"description_data\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"** DISPUTED ** The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \\\"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\\\"\"}]}, \"problemtype\": {\"problemtype_data\": [{\"description\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"n/a\"}]}]}, \"references\": {\"reference_data\": [{\"name\": \"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\", \"url\": \"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\"}, {\"name\": \"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\", \"url\": \"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\"}, {\"name\": \"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\", \"url\": \"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\"}, {\"name\": \"20120703 Cyberoam advisory\", \"refsource\": \"BUGTRAQ\", \"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\"}, {\"name\": \"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\", \"url\": \"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\"}]}}}, \"adp\": [{\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-06T20:05:12.354Z\"}, \"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\"}, {\"name\": \"20120703 Cyberoam advisory\", \"tags\": [\"mailing-list\", \"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\"}]}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.4, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2012-3372\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-01-21T19:32:24.195135Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"description\": \"CWE-noinfo Not enough information\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-21T19:32:09.694Z\"}}]}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"assignerOrgId\": \"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749\", \"assignerShortName\": \"redhat\", \"cveId\": \"CVE-2012-3372\", \"datePublished\": \"2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2012-06-14T00:00:00.000Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.