cve-2010-2799
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2010-09-14 20:03
Modified
2024-09-25 22:46
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Stack-based buffer overflow in the nestlex function in nestlex.c in Socat 1.5.0.0 through 1.7.1.2 and 2.0.0-b1 through 2.0.0-b3, when bidirectional data relay is enabled, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via long command-line arguments.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-09-25T22:46:51.804Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://github.com/msmania/poodim/commit/6340d5d2c81e55e61522c4b40a6cdd5c39738cc6" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620426" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/download/socat-1.7.1.3.patch" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/contrib/socat-secadv2.html" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330785" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591443" }, { "name": "DSA-2090", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_DEBIAN", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2090" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container", "x_generator": { "engine": "ADPogram 0.0.1" } } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the nestlex function in nestlex.c in Socat 1.5.0.0 through 1.7.1.2 and 2.0.0-b1 through 2.0.0-b3, when bidirectional data relay is enabled, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via long command-line arguments." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2010-09-14T20:03:00Z", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620426" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/download/socat-1.7.1.3.patch" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/contrib/socat-secadv2.html" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330785" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591443" }, { "name": "DSA-2090", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_DEBIAN" ], "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2090" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2010-2799", "datePublished": "2010-09-14T20:03:00Z", "dateReserved": "2010-07-22T00:00:00Z", "dateUpdated": "2024-09-25T22:46:51.804Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2010-2799\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2010-09-14T21:00:01.703\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:17:23.980\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Stack-based buffer overflow in the nestlex function in nestlex.c in Socat 1.5.0.0 through 1.7.1.2 and 2.0.0-b1 through 2.0.0-b3, when bidirectional data relay is enabled, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via long command-line arguments.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en pila en la funci\u00f3n nestlex en nestlex.c en Socat 1.5.0.0 a 1.7.1.2 y 2.0.0-b1 a 2.0.0-b3, cuando el reenv\u00edo bidireccional de datos est\u00e1 habilitado, permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto ejecutar c\u00f3digo de su elecci\u00f3n a trav\u00e9s de argumentos de l\u00ednea de comandos largos.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":6.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dest-unreach:socat:1.5.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"43189B21-C2E3-4066-82A1-456344B10131\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dest-unreach:socat:1.6.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"15DA6703-CECF-4456-B8F6-18888629C122\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dest-unreach:socat:1.6.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6320B213-6E09-4A64-9C44-3565A6006C74\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dest-unreach:socat:1.7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4C577A55-72B0-4F75-B7A3-558DBF2B7BFD\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dest-unreach:socat:1.7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"34FFD979-165A-4465-8CCD-BA6CCEDC0016\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dest-unreach:socat:1.7.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B7B050A1-ECDE-47E8-8B7D-6AFD3923BA49\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dest-unreach:socat:1.7.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D82983A5-0BBF-4131-AF82-1036FAFC0ABF\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dest-unreach:socat:2.0.0:b1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7BE19927-5110-4C8D-8E3E-C075CA61023B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dest-unreach:socat:2.0.0:b2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9F7C7910-5259-40D9-848D-402017952540\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:dest-unreach:socat:2.0.0:b3:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3E50A8D8-00A8-4578-85ED-C3A11A9CA955\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591443\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330785\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2090\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/contrib/socat-secadv2.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/download/socat-1.7.1.3.patch\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620426\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591443\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330785\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2090\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/contrib/socat-secadv2.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/download/socat-1.7.1.3.patch\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620426\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/msmania/poodim/commit/6340d5d2c81e55e61522c4b40a6cdd5c39738cc6\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.