Vulnerability-Lookup

CNVD-2025-05702

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2025-03-25

Title

Apache Hive信任管理问题漏洞

Description

Apache Hive是美国阿帕奇（Apache）基金会的一套基于Hadoop（分布式系统基础架构）的数据仓库软件。该软件提供了一个数据集成方法和一种高级的查询语言，以支持在Hadoop上进行大规模数据分析。 Apache Hive存在信任管理问题漏洞，该漏洞源于使用Arrays.equals方法比较消息签名时未采用恒定时间算法，攻击者可利用该漏洞逐字节伪造有效签名。

Severity

中

Patch Name

Apache Hive信任管理问题漏洞的补丁

Patch Description

Formal description

厂商已发布了漏洞修复程序，请及时关注更新： https://lists.apache.org/thread/0nloywj49nbtlc6l3c6363qvq7o1ztb7

Reference

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/28/3

Impacted products

Name
Apache Apache Hive <4.0.0

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2024-23953",
      "cveUrl": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-23953"
    }
  },
  "description": "Apache Hive\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u963f\u5e15\u5947\uff08Apache\uff09\u57fa\u91d1\u4f1a\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u57fa\u4e8eHadoop\uff08\u5206\u5e03\u5f0f\u7cfb\u7edf\u57fa\u7840\u67b6\u6784\uff09\u7684\u6570\u636e\u4ed3\u5e93\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002\u8be5\u8f6f\u4ef6\u63d0\u4f9b\u4e86\u4e00\u4e2a\u6570\u636e\u96c6\u6210\u65b9\u6cd5\u548c\u4e00\u79cd\u9ad8\u7ea7\u7684\u67e5\u8be2\u8bed\u8a00\uff0c\u4ee5\u652f\u6301\u5728Hadoop\u4e0a\u8fdb\u884c\u5927\u89c4\u6a21\u6570\u636e\u5206\u6790\u3002\n\nApache Hive\u5b58\u5728\u4fe1\u4efb\u7ba1\u7406\u95ee\u9898\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u4f7f\u7528Arrays.equals\u65b9\u6cd5\u6bd4\u8f83\u6d88\u606f\u7b7e\u540d\u65f6\u672a\u91c7\u7528\u6052\u5b9a\u65f6\u95f4\u7b97\u6cd5\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9010\u5b57\u8282\u4f2a\u9020\u6709\u6548\u7b7e\u540d\u3002",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u7a0b\u5e8f\uff0c\u8bf7\u53ca\u65f6\u5173\u6ce8\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttps://lists.apache.org/thread/0nloywj49nbtlc6l3c6363qvq7o1ztb7",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2025-05702",
  "openTime": "2025-03-25",
  "patchDescription": "Apache Hive\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u963f\u5e15\u5947\uff08Apache\uff09\u57fa\u91d1\u4f1a\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u57fa\u4e8eHadoop\uff08\u5206\u5e03\u5f0f\u7cfb\u7edf\u57fa\u7840\u67b6\u6784\uff09\u7684\u6570\u636e\u4ed3\u5e93\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002\u8be5\u8f6f\u4ef6\u63d0\u4f9b\u4e86\u4e00\u4e2a\u6570\u636e\u96c6\u6210\u65b9\u6cd5\u548c\u4e00\u79cd\u9ad8\u7ea7\u7684\u67e5\u8be2\u8bed\u8a00\uff0c\u4ee5\u652f\u6301\u5728Hadoop\u4e0a\u8fdb\u884c\u5927\u89c4\u6a21\u6570\u636e\u5206\u6790\u3002\r\n\r\nApache Hive\u5b58\u5728\u4fe1\u4efb\u7ba1\u7406\u95ee\u9898\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u4f7f\u7528Arrays.equals\u65b9\u6cd5\u6bd4\u8f83\u6d88\u606f\u7b7e\u540d\u65f6\u672a\u91c7\u7528\u6052\u5b9a\u65f6\u95f4\u7b97\u6cd5\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9010\u5b57\u8282\u4f2a\u9020\u6709\u6548\u7b7e\u540d\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Apache Hive\u4fe1\u4efb\u7ba1\u7406\u95ee\u9898\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "Apache Apache Hive \u003c4.0.0"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/28/3",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2025-02-18",
  "title": "Apache Hive\u4fe1\u4efb\u7ba1\u7406\u95ee\u9898\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2024-23953 (GCVE-0-2024-23953)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-28 09:07 – Updated: 2025-03-14 15:44

Title

Apache Hive: Timing Attack Against Signature in LLAP util

Summary

Use of Arrays.equals() in LlapSignerImpl in Apache Hive to compare message signatures allows attacker to forge a valid signature for an arbitrary message byte by byte. The attacker should be an authorized user of the product to perform this attack. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.0, which fixes this issue. The problem occurs when an application doesn’t use a constant-time algorithm for validating a signature. The method Arrays.equals() returns false right away when it sees that one of the input’s bytes are different. It means that the comparison time depends on the contents of the arrays. This little thing may allow an attacker to forge a valid signature for an arbitrary message byte by byte. So it might allow malicious users to submit splits/work with selected signatures to LLAP without running as a privileged user, potentially leading to DDoS attack. More details in the reference section.

Severity

6.5 (Medium)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

SSVC

Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial

CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)

Decision recorded 2025-01-28 14:18 UTC

CWE

CWE-208 - Observable Timing Discrepancy

Assigner

apache mitre root

References

7 references

URL	Tags
https://github.com/apache/hive	product
https://github.com/apache/hive/commit/b418e3c9f47…	patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-28030	issue-tracking
https://blog.gypsyengineer.com/en/security/preven…	technical-description
https://cqr.company/web-vulnerabilities/timing-attacks/	technical-description
https://lists.apache.org/thread/0nloywj49nbtlc6l3…	vendor-advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/28/3

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version
Apache Software Foundation	Apache Hive	Affected: 2.2.0 , < 4.0.0 (semver)

Credits

Andrea Cosentino

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 6.5,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-23953",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-01-28T14:18:48.359282Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-03-14T15:44:14.787Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-01-28T18:03:23.249Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/28/3"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "org.apache.hive:hive-llap-common",
          "product": "Apache Hive",
          "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "4.0.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.2.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Andrea Cosentino"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Use of Arrays.equals() in \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eLlapSignerImpl in\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eApache Hive to compare message signatures\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: var(--wht);\"\u003eallows attacker to forge a valid signature for an arbitrary message byte by byte. The attacker should be an authorized user of the product to perform this attack.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.0, which fixes this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(253, 253, 253);\"\u003eThe problem occurs when an application doesn\u2019t use a constant-time algorithm for validating a signature.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(253, 253, 253);\"\u003eThe method \u003c/span\u003e\u003ccode\u003eArrays.equals()\u003c/code\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(253, 253, 253);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;returns \u003c/span\u003e\u003ccode\u003efalse\u003c/code\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(253, 253, 253);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;right away when it sees that one of the input\u2019s bytes are different. It means that the comparison time depends on the contents of the arrays. This little thing may allow an attacker to forge a valid signature for an arbitrary message byte by byte.\u0026nbsp;So it might allow malicious users to submit splits/work with selected signatures to LLAP without running as a privileged user, potentially leading to DDoS attack.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003eMore details in the reference section.\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Use of Arrays.equals() in LlapSignerImpl in\u00a0Apache Hive to compare message signatures\u00a0allows attacker to forge a valid signature for an arbitrary message byte by byte. The attacker should be an authorized user of the product to perform this attack.\u00a0Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.0, which fixes this issue.\n\nThe problem occurs when an application doesn\u2019t use a constant-time algorithm for validating a signature.\u00a0The method Arrays.equals()\u00a0returns false\u00a0right away when it sees that one of the input\u2019s bytes are different. It means that the comparison time depends on the contents of the arrays. This little thing may allow an attacker to forge a valid signature for an arbitrary message byte by byte.\u00a0So it might allow malicious users to submit splits/work with selected signatures to LLAP without running as a privileged user, potentially leading to DDoS attack.\n\nMore details in the reference section."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "important"
            },
            "type": "Textual description of severity"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-208",
              "description": "CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-01-28T09:07:22.333Z",
        "orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
        "shortName": "apache"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "product"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/apache/hive"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/apache/hive/commit/b418e3c9f479ba8e7d31e6470306111002ffa809"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "issue-tracking"
          ],
          "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-28030"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://blog.gypsyengineer.com/en/security/preventing-timing-attacks-with-codeql.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://cqr.company/web-vulnerabilities/timing-attacks/"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/0nloywj49nbtlc6l3c6363qvq7o1ztb7"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "defect": [
          "HIVE-28030"
        ],
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Apache Hive: Timing Attack Against Signature in LLAP util",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
    "assignerShortName": "apache",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-23953",
    "datePublished": "2025-01-28T09:07:22.333Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-01-24T15:37:56.409Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-03-14T15:44:14.787Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.