CNVD-2016-06470

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-08-20
VLAI Severity ?
Title
ReadyDesk目录遍历漏洞
Description
ReadyDesk是美国ReadyDesk公司的一套基于Web的帮助台软件解决方案。 ReadyDesk 9.1版本中存在目录遍历漏洞,攻击者可借助目录遍历字符‘..’利用该漏洞访问或读取包含敏感信息的任意文件。
Severity
Formal description

目前没有详细解决方案提供: http://www.readydesk.com/

Reference
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92487
Impacted products
Name
ReadyDesk ReadyDesk 9.1
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "92487"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-5049"
    }
  },
  "description": "ReadyDesk\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdReadyDesk\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u57fa\u4e8eWeb\u7684\u5e2e\u52a9\u53f0\u8f6f\u4ef6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u3002\r\n\r\nReadyDesk 9.1\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u76ee\u5f55\u904d\u5386\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u501f\u52a9\u76ee\u5f55\u904d\u5386\u5b57\u7b26\u0026lsquo;..\u0026rsquo;\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u8bbf\u95ee\u6216\u8bfb\u53d6\u5305\u542b\u654f\u611f\u4fe1\u606f\u7684\u4efb\u610f\u6587\u4ef6\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Andrew Tierney of Pen Test Partners",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.readydesk.com/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-06470",
  "openTime": "2016-08-20",
  "products": {
    "product": "ReadyDesk ReadyDesk 9.1"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92487",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-08-18",
  "title": "ReadyDesk\u76ee\u5f55\u904d\u5386\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…