CNVD-2016-02193

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-04-13
VLAI
Title
Red Hat Enterprise Linux glibc拒绝服务漏洞
Description
Red Hat Enterprise Linux(RHEL)是美国红帽(Red Hat)公司维护和发布的一套面向企业用户的Linux操作系统。 Red Hat Enterprise Linux(RHEL) 6.7版本和7.2版本的glibc程序包中的‘calloc’函数存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于程序未能正确初始化内存空间。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务(挂起或崩溃)。
Severity
中
Patch Name
Red Hat Enterprise Linux glibc拒绝服务漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
Red Hat Enterprise Linux(RHEL)是美国红帽(Red Hat)公司维护和发布的一套面向企业用户的Linux操作系统。 Red Hat Enterprise Linux(RHEL) 6.7版本和7.2版本的glibc程序包中的‘calloc’函数存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于程序未能正确初始化内存空间。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务(挂起或崩溃)。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复此安全问题,补丁获取链接: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0176.html

Reference
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256285
Impacted products
Name
['Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 6。7', 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 7.2']
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-5229"
    }
  },
  "description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux\uff08RHEL\uff09\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7ef4\u62a4\u548c\u53d1\u5e03\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u9762\u5411\u4f01\u4e1a\u7528\u6237\u7684Linux\u64cd\u4f5c\u7cfb\u7edf\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat Enterprise Linux\uff08RHEL\uff09 6.7\u7248\u672c\u548c7.2\u7248\u672c\u7684glibc\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5305\u4e2d\u7684\u2018calloc\u2019\u51fd\u6570\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u521d\u59cb\u5316\u5185\u5b58\u7a7a\u95f4\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u6302\u8d77\u6216\u5d29\u6e83\uff09\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Florian Weimer\uff0c Josef Bacik",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0176.html",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-02193",
  "openTime": "2016-04-13",
  "patchDescription": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux\uff08RHEL\uff09\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7ef4\u62a4\u548c\u53d1\u5e03\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u9762\u5411\u4f01\u4e1a\u7528\u6237\u7684Linux\u64cd\u4f5c\u7cfb\u7edf\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat Enterprise Linux\uff08RHEL\uff09 6.7\u7248\u672c\u548c7.2\u7248\u672c\u7684glibc\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5305\u4e2d\u7684\u2018calloc\u2019\u51fd\u6570\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u521d\u59cb\u5316\u5185\u5b58\u7a7a\u95f4\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u6302\u8d77\u6216\u5d29\u6e83\uff09\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux glibc\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 6\u30027",
      "Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 7.2"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256285",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-04-12",
  "title": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux glibc\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…