GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CNVD-2015-05644

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-08-27
VLAI
Title
Red Hat PicketLink Service Provider和Identity Provider存在未明漏洞
Description
Red Hat PicketLink是美国红帽(Red Hat)公司的一套用于Java应用程序的统一身份管理框架。 Red Hat PicketLink 2.7.0之前版本的Service Provider(SP)和Identity Provider(IdP)中存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于程序未能正确验证SAML断言的Response元素中的Destination属性。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞登录受影响用户的账户。
Severity
Patch Name
Red Hat PicketLink Service Provider和Identity Provider存在未明漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
Red Hat PicketLink是美国红帽(Red Hat)公司的一套用于Java应用程序的统一身份管理框架。Red Hat PicketLink 2.7.0之前版本的Service Provider(SP)和Identity Provider(IdP)中存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于程序未能正确验证SAML断言的Response元素中的Destination属性。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞登录受影响用户的账户。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复这个安全问题,请到厂商的主页下载: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-680

Reference
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html
Impacted products
Name
Red Hat PicketLink <2.7.0
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-6254"
    }
  },
  "description": "Red Hat PicketLink\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u7528\u4e8eJava\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u7684\u7edf\u4e00\u8eab\u4efd\u7ba1\u7406\u6846\u67b6\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat PicketLink 2.7.0\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672c\u7684Service Provider(SP)\u548cIdentity Provider(IdP)\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u9a8c\u8bc1SAML\u65ad\u8a00\u7684Response\u5143\u7d20\u4e2d\u7684Destination\u5c5e\u6027\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u767b\u5f55\u53d7\u5f71\u54cd\u7528\u6237\u7684\u8d26\u6237\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Red Hat",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u8fd9\u4e2a\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8bf7\u5230\u5382\u5546\u7684\u4e3b\u9875\u4e0b\u8f7d\uff1a https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-680",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-05644",
  "openTime": "2015-08-27",
  "patchDescription": "Red Hat PicketLink\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u7528\u4e8eJava\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u7684\u7edf\u4e00\u8eab\u4efd\u7ba1\u7406\u6846\u67b6\u3002Red Hat PicketLink 2.7.0\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672c\u7684Service Provider(SP)\u548cIdentity Provider(IdP)\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u9a8c\u8bc1SAML\u65ad\u8a00\u7684Response\u5143\u7d20\u4e2d\u7684Destination\u5c5e\u6027\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u767b\u5f55\u53d7\u5f71\u54cd\u7528\u6237\u7684\u8d26\u6237\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Red Hat PicketLink Service Provider\u548cIdentity Provider\u5b58\u5728\u672a\u660e\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "Red Hat PicketLink \u003c2.7.0"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2015-08-19",
  "title": "Red Hat PicketLink Service Provider\u548cIdentity Provider\u5b58\u5728\u672a\u660e\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…