CERTA-2012-AVI-370

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Une vulnérabilité a été corrigée dans Pidgin. Il s'agit d'une erreur dans la gestion des images reçues lors d'une conversation. Ce problème conduit à un dépassement de tampon et potentiellement à une exécution de code arbitraire à distance.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Pidgin versions antérieures à 2.10.5.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
References

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cp\u003ePidgin versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.10.5.\u003c/p\u003e",
  "content": "## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-3374",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-3374"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2012-AVI-370",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2012-07-09T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9e dans \u003cspan\nclass=\"textit\"\u003ePidgin\u003c/span\u003e. Il s\u0027agit d\u0027une erreur dans la gestion des\nimages re\u00e7ues lors d\u0027une conversation. Ce probl\u00e8me conduit \u00e0 un\nd\u00e9passement de tampon et potentiellement \u00e0 une ex\u00e9cution de code\narbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Pidgin",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Pidgin du 05 Juillet 2012",
      "url": "http://www.pidgin.im/news/security/index.php?id=64"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…