GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CERTA-2008-AVI-133

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Plusieurs vulnérabilités dans Cisco User-Changeable Password permettent d'effectuer un déni de service à distance et une injection de code indirecte.

Description

Plusieurs vulnérabilités ont été identifiées dans Cisco User-Changeable Password. Plusieurs vulnérabilités dans le script UCP CGI permettent à un individu malveillant d'effectuer un dépassement de mémoire tampon, une exécution de code arbitraire à distance ou une injection de code indirecte.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité Cisco 20080312-ucp pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Cisco User-Changeable Password 4.x.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
References

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003eCisco User-Changeable Password 4.x.\u003c/P\u003e",
  "content": "## Description\n\nPlusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 identifi\u00e9es dans Cisco User-Changeable\nPassword. Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le script UCP CGI permettent \u00e0\nun individu malveillant d\u0027effectuer un d\u00e9passement de m\u00e9moire tampon,\nune ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance ou une injection de code\nindirecte.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20080312-ucp pour l\u0027obtention\ndes correctifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2008-0533",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-0533"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2008-0532",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-0532"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2008-AVI-133",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2008-03-13T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance (XSS)"
    },
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Cisco User-Changeable Password permettent\nd\u0027effectuer un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance et une injection de code\nindirecte.\n",
  "title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Cisco User-Changeable Password",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20080312-ucp du 12 mars 2008",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20080312-ucp.shtml"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…