Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2025-10-15 08:51
Modified
2026-02-11 09:09
Summary
Org.wildfly.core:wildfly-server: wildfly improper rbac permission
Details

A flaw was found in the Wildfly Server Role Based Access Control (RBAC) provider. When authorization to control management operations is secured using the Role Based Access Control provider, a user without the required privileges can suspend or resume the server. A user with a Monitor or Auditor role is supposed to have only read access permissions and should not be able to suspend the server. The vulnerability is caused by the Suspend and Resume handlers not performing authorization checks to validate whether the current user has the required permissions to proceed with the action.

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Bitnami",
        "name": "wildfly",
        "purl": "pkg:bitnami/wildfly"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "27.0.1"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "28.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "31.0.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "severity": [
        {
          "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "type": "CVSS_V3"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-23367"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cpes": [
      "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:wildfly:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
    ],
    "severity": "Medium"
  },
  "details": "A flaw was found in the Wildfly Server Role Based Access Control (RBAC) provider. When authorization to control management operations is secured using the Role Based Access Control provider, a user without the required privileges can suspend or resume the server. A user with a Monitor or Auditor role is supposed to have only read access permissions and should not be able to suspend the server. \nThe vulnerability is caused by the Suspend and Resume handlers not performing authorization checks to validate whether the current user has the required permissions to proceed with the action.",
  "id": "BIT-wildfly-2025-23367",
  "modified": "2026-02-11T09:09:18.507Z",
  "published": "2025-10-15T08:51:55.776Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3467"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3989"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23367"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337620"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qr6x-62gq-4ccp"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23367"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3990"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3992"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3465"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.6.2",
  "summary": "Org.wildfly.core:wildfly-server: wildfly improper rbac permission"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.