Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16.
UpdateCacheMiddleware and the cache_page() decorator cache responses that vary on cookies when the incoming request carries unrelated cookies, which allows remote attackers to read private data from the shared cache.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Chris Whyland for reporting this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Bitnami",
"name": "django",
"purl": "pkg:bitnami/django"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.2.16"
},
{
"introduced": "6.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.0.7"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-48588"
],
"database_specific": {
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"severity": "Medium"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16.\n`UpdateCacheMiddleware` and the `cache_page()` decorator cache responses that vary on cookies when the incoming request carries unrelated cookies, which allows remote attackers to read private data from the shared cache.\nEarlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.\nDjango would like to thank Chris Whyland for reporting this issue.",
"id": "BIT-django-2026-48588",
"modified": "2026-09-10T15:46:03.895Z",
"published": "2026-07-12T23:39:37.767Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/"
},
{
"type": "ARTICLE",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48588"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/jul/07/security-releases/"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.6.2",
"summary": "Potential exposure of private data via cached Set-Cookie response"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.