GHSA-MWM8-39RW-8826

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-02 23:11 – Updated: 2026-10-02 23:11
VLAI
Summary
sqlite3-ruby: Use-After-Free in SQLite Aggregate Arguments in Heap-Allocated Argument Array
Details

Summary

Using Database#create_aggregate, #create_aggregate_handler, or Database#define_aggregator to define an aggregate function that takes two or more arguments, and then evaluating it over TEXT or BLOB column values, can free the Ruby objects holding those arguments while a later argument is still being converted, during ordinary garbage collection. The aggregate's step method then receives an incorrect object, or the process crashes with a segmentation fault.

Mitigation

Upgrade to sqlite3 gem v2.9.6 or later.

There is no reliable workaround. If you cannot upgrade, avoid defining aggregate functions that take two or more arguments. Restricting column value sizes is not a mitigation: smaller values make the defect fire less often but do not prevent it.

Severity

The sqlite3-ruby maintainers assess this as Medium severity (CVSS 4.0 score 6.3). It is reached through ordinary garbage collection without any unusual code structuring: an application is exposed whenever it evaluates a multi-argument aggregate over TEXT or BLOB values whose size an attacker can influence. The demonstrated impact is an incorrect value passed to the aggregate's step method, or a process crash; no controlled memory write or general denial-of-service exploit has been demonstrated.

Credits

Reported by Jeremy Daer (@jeremy).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.9.5"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "sqlite3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.9.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-02T23:11:51Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nUsing `Database#create_aggregate`, `#create_aggregate_handler`, or `Database#define_aggregator` to define an aggregate function that takes two or more arguments, and then evaluating it over TEXT or BLOB column values, can free the Ruby objects holding those arguments while a later argument is still being converted, during ordinary garbage collection. The aggregate\u0027s `step` method then receives an incorrect object, or the process crashes with a segmentation fault.\n\n## Mitigation\n\nUpgrade to sqlite3 gem v2.9.6 or later.\n\nThere is no reliable workaround. If you cannot upgrade, avoid defining aggregate functions that take two or more arguments. Restricting column value sizes is not a mitigation: smaller values make the defect fire less often but do not prevent it.\n\n## Severity\n\nThe sqlite3-ruby maintainers assess this as Medium severity (CVSS 4.0 score 6.3). It is reached through ordinary garbage collection without any unusual code structuring: an application is exposed whenever it evaluates a multi-argument aggregate over TEXT or BLOB values whose size an attacker can influence. The demonstrated impact is an incorrect value passed to the aggregate\u0027s `step` method, or a process crash; no controlled memory write or general denial-of-service exploit has been demonstrated.\n\n## Credits\n\nReported by Jeremy Daer ([@jeremy](https://github.com/jeremy)).",
  "id": "GHSA-mwm8-39rw-8826",
  "modified": "2026-10-02T23:11:51Z",
  "published": "2026-10-02T23:11:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sparklemotion/sqlite3-ruby/security/advisories/GHSA-mwm8-39rw-8826"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sparklemotion/sqlite3-ruby/pull/733"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sparklemotion/sqlite3-ruby/commit/cc5ac0cdf05af8148f4363410da0ba32508d9c97"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/sparklemotion/sqlite3-ruby"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sparklemotion/sqlite3-ruby/releases/tag/v2.9.6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "sqlite3-ruby: Use-After-Free in SQLite Aggregate Arguments in Heap-Allocated Argument Array"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…