CVE-2026-82586 (GCVE-0-2026-82586)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-07 22:34 – Updated: 2026-09-08 14:44
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
AshLua read operation aggregate bypasses the exposed-field allow-list, exposing private attributes
Summary
Improper Protection of Alternate Path vulnerability in ash-project ash_lua allows a user-supplied Lua script to read attributes that are not on the exposed-field allow-list.
AshLua exposes Ash resources to Lua scripts, gated by a manifest declaring which fields are exposed. The read action's operation aggregate path in AshLua.Runtime took the field name straight from the Lua call and resolved it with only String.to_existing_atom and Ash.Query.Aggregate.new!, neither of which consults the exposed-field allow-list the normal fields path enforces. A script can therefore read the value of any attribute of any record the actor may read, including private sensitive?: true columns, via resource.read({ operation = {"list", "hashed_password"} }); min and max give a value oracle. Anyone able to submit or influence a Lua script can reach this.
This issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.1.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-08 14:44 UTC
CWE
- CWE-424 - Improper Protection of Alternate Path
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua/security/a… | vendor-advisoryrelated |
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82586.html | related |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82586 | related |
| https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua/commit/c0d… | patch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash_lua |
Affected:
0.1.0 , < 0.2.1
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
||
| ash-project | ash_lua |
Affected:
8675e47cca81f36594083a7e63379bac9e123e72 , < c0dfcd9494766d548178c37df0bd01cff378e1c7
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82586",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-08T14:44:32.288129Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T14:44:37.935Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_lua",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_lua",
"product": "ash_lua",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_lua/runtime.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027:eval!/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.2.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_lua",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_lua",
"product": "ash_lua",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_lua/runtime.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027:eval!/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "c0dfcd9494766d548178c37df0bd01cff378e1c7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8675e47cca81f36594083a7e63379bac9e123e72",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eReachable only when an application exposes AshLua scripting (the \u003ccode\u003eAshLua.Resource\u003c/code\u003e / \u003ccode\u003eAshLua.Domain\u003c/code\u003e extensions) to callers who can submit or influence Lua scripts, and the exposed resource has attributes that are not on the exposed-field surface.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Reachable only when an application exposes AshLua scripting (the `AshLua.Resource` / `AshLua.Domain` extensions) to callers who can submit or influence Lua scripts, and the exposed resource has attributes that are not on the exposed-field surface."
}
],
"value": "Reachable only when an application exposes AshLua scripting (the AshLua.Resource / AshLua.Domain extensions) to callers who can submit or influence Lua scripts, and the exposed resource has attributes that are not on the exposed-field surface."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "0.2.1",
"versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper Protection of Alternate Path vulnerability in ash-project ash_lua allows a user-supplied Lua script to read attributes that are not on the exposed-field allow-list.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAshLua exposes Ash resources to Lua scripts, gated by a manifest declaring which fields are exposed. The \u003ccode\u003eread\u003c/code\u003e action\u0027s \u003ccode\u003eoperation\u003c/code\u003e aggregate path in \u003ccode\u003eAshLua.Runtime\u003c/code\u003e took the field name straight from the Lua call and resolved it with only \u003ccode\u003eString.to_existing_atom\u003c/code\u003e and \u003ccode\u003eAsh.Query.Aggregate.new!\u003c/code\u003e, neither of which consults the exposed-field allow-list the normal \u003ccode\u003efields\u003c/code\u003e path enforces. A script can therefore read the value of any attribute of any record the actor may read, including private \u003ccode\u003esensitive?: true\u003c/code\u003e columns, via \u003ccode\u003eresource.read({ operation = {\"list\", \"hashed_password\"} })\u003c/code\u003e; \u003ccode\u003emin\u003c/code\u003e and \u003ccode\u003emax\u003c/code\u003e give a value oracle. Anyone able to submit or influence a Lua script can reach this.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.1.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Improper Protection of Alternate Path vulnerability in ash-project ash_lua allows a user-supplied Lua script to read attributes that are not on the exposed-field allow-list.\n\nAshLua exposes Ash resources to Lua scripts, gated by a manifest declaring which fields are exposed. The `read` action\u0027s `operation` aggregate path in `AshLua.Runtime` took the field name straight from the Lua call and resolved it with only `String.to_existing_atom` and `Ash.Query.Aggregate.new!`, neither of which consults the exposed-field allow-list the normal `fields` path enforces. A script can therefore read the value of any attribute of any record the actor may read, including private `sensitive?: true` columns, via `resource.read({ operation = {\"list\", \"hashed_password\"} })`; `min` and `max` give a value oracle. Anyone able to submit or influence a Lua script can reach this.\n\nThis issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.1."
}
],
"value": "Improper Protection of Alternate Path vulnerability in ash-project ash_lua allows a user-supplied Lua script to read attributes that are not on the exposed-field allow-list.\n\nAshLua exposes Ash resources to Lua scripts, gated by a manifest declaring which fields are exposed. The read action\u0027s operation aggregate path in AshLua.Runtime took the field name straight from the Lua call and resolved it with only String.to_existing_atom and Ash.Query.Aggregate.new!, neither of which consults the exposed-field allow-list the normal fields path enforces. A script can therefore read the value of any attribute of any record the actor may read, including private sensitive?: true columns, via resource.read({ operation = {\"list\", \"hashed_password\"} }); min and max give a value oracle. Anyone able to submit or influence a Lua script can reach this.\n\nThis issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.1."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-554",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-554 Functionality Bypass"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-424",
"description": "CWE-424 Improper Protection of Alternate Path",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-07T22:34:14.837Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua/security/advisories/GHSA-37jv-wc37-fhcw"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82586.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82586"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua/commit/c0dfcd9494766d548178c37df0bd01cff378e1c7"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "AshLua read operation aggregate bypasses the exposed-field allow-list, exposing private attributes"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82586",
"datePublished": "2026-09-07T22:34:14.837Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-07T19:30:01.631Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T14:44:37.935Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-82586",
"date": "2026-09-18",
"epss": "0.00329",
"percentile": "0.26255"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_lua",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_lua",
"product": "ash_lua",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_lua/runtime.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027:eval!/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.2.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_lua",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_lua",
"product": "ash_lua",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_lua/runtime.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027:eval!/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "c0dfcd9494766d548178c37df0bd01cff378e1c7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8675e47cca81f36594083a7e63379bac9e123e72",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper Protection of Alternate Path vulnerability in ash-project ash_lua allows a user-supplied Lua script to read attributes that are not on the exposed-field allow-list.\n\nAshLua exposes Ash resources to Lua scripts, gated by a manifest declaring which fields are exposed. The read action\u0027s operation aggregate path in AshLua.Runtime took the field name straight from the Lua call and resolved it with only String.to_existing_atom and Ash.Query.Aggregate.new!, neither of which consults the exposed-field allow-list the normal fields path enforces. A script can therefore read the value of any attribute of any record the actor may read, including private sensitive?: true columns, via resource.read({ operation = {\"list\", \"hashed_password\"} }); min and max give a value oracle. Anyone able to submit or influence a Lua script can reach this.\n\nThis issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.1."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-82586",
"lastModified": "2026-09-08T15:18:49.860",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82586",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-08T14:44:32.288129Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-09-07T23:16:52.093",
"references": [
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82586.html"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua/commit/c0dfcd9494766d548178c37df0bd01cff378e1c7"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua/security/advisories/GHSA-37jv-wc37-fhcw"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82586"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-424"
}
],
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82586",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-08T14:44:32.288129Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T14:44:35.009Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_lua",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_lua",
"product": "ash_lua",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_lua/runtime.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027:eval!/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.2.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_lua",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_lua",
"product": "ash_lua",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_lua/runtime.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshLua.Runtime\u0027:eval!/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "c0dfcd9494766d548178c37df0bd01cff378e1c7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8675e47cca81f36594083a7e63379bac9e123e72",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eReachable only when an application exposes AshLua scripting (the \u003ccode\u003eAshLua.Resource\u003c/code\u003e / \u003ccode\u003eAshLua.Domain\u003c/code\u003e extensions) to callers who can submit or influence Lua scripts, and the exposed resource has attributes that are not on the exposed-field surface.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Reachable only when an application exposes AshLua scripting (the `AshLua.Resource` / `AshLua.Domain` extensions) to callers who can submit or influence Lua scripts, and the exposed resource has attributes that are not on the exposed-field surface."
}
],
"value": "Reachable only when an application exposes AshLua scripting (the AshLua.Resource / AshLua.Domain extensions) to callers who can submit or influence Lua scripts, and the exposed resource has attributes that are not on the exposed-field surface."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "0.2.1",
"versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper Protection of Alternate Path vulnerability in ash-project ash_lua allows a user-supplied Lua script to read attributes that are not on the exposed-field allow-list.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAshLua exposes Ash resources to Lua scripts, gated by a manifest declaring which fields are exposed. The \u003ccode\u003eread\u003c/code\u003e action\u0027s \u003ccode\u003eoperation\u003c/code\u003e aggregate path in \u003ccode\u003eAshLua.Runtime\u003c/code\u003e took the field name straight from the Lua call and resolved it with only \u003ccode\u003eString.to_existing_atom\u003c/code\u003e and \u003ccode\u003eAsh.Query.Aggregate.new!\u003c/code\u003e, neither of which consults the exposed-field allow-list the normal \u003ccode\u003efields\u003c/code\u003e path enforces. A script can therefore read the value of any attribute of any record the actor may read, including private \u003ccode\u003esensitive?: true\u003c/code\u003e columns, via \u003ccode\u003eresource.read({ operation = {\"list\", \"hashed_password\"} })\u003c/code\u003e; \u003ccode\u003emin\u003c/code\u003e and \u003ccode\u003emax\u003c/code\u003e give a value oracle. Anyone able to submit or influence a Lua script can reach this.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.1.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Improper Protection of Alternate Path vulnerability in ash-project ash_lua allows a user-supplied Lua script to read attributes that are not on the exposed-field allow-list.\n\nAshLua exposes Ash resources to Lua scripts, gated by a manifest declaring which fields are exposed. The `read` action\u0027s `operation` aggregate path in `AshLua.Runtime` took the field name straight from the Lua call and resolved it with only `String.to_existing_atom` and `Ash.Query.Aggregate.new!`, neither of which consults the exposed-field allow-list the normal `fields` path enforces. A script can therefore read the value of any attribute of any record the actor may read, including private `sensitive?: true` columns, via `resource.read({ operation = {\"list\", \"hashed_password\"} })`; `min` and `max` give a value oracle. Anyone able to submit or influence a Lua script can reach this.\n\nThis issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.1."
}
],
"value": "Improper Protection of Alternate Path vulnerability in ash-project ash_lua allows a user-supplied Lua script to read attributes that are not on the exposed-field allow-list.\n\nAshLua exposes Ash resources to Lua scripts, gated by a manifest declaring which fields are exposed. The read action\u0027s operation aggregate path in AshLua.Runtime took the field name straight from the Lua call and resolved it with only String.to_existing_atom and Ash.Query.Aggregate.new!, neither of which consults the exposed-field allow-list the normal fields path enforces. A script can therefore read the value of any attribute of any record the actor may read, including private sensitive?: true columns, via resource.read({ operation = {\"list\", \"hashed_password\"} }); min and max give a value oracle. Anyone able to submit or influence a Lua script can reach this.\n\nThis issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.1."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-554",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-554 Functionality Bypass"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-424",
"description": "CWE-424 Improper Protection of Alternate Path",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-07T22:34:14.837Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua/security/advisories/GHSA-37jv-wc37-fhcw"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82586.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82586"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_lua/commit/c0dfcd9494766d548178c37df0bd01cff378e1c7"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "AshLua read operation aggregate bypasses the exposed-field allow-list, exposing private attributes"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82586",
"datePublished": "2026-09-07T22:34:14.837Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-07T19:30:01.631Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-07T22:34:14.837Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…