CVE-2026-32887 (GCVE-0-2026-32887)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-20 21:35 – Updated: 2026-03-25 13:37
VLAI?
Title
Effect Bug: `AsyncLocalStorage` context lost/contaminated inside Effect fibers under concurrent load with RPC
Summary
Effect is a TypeScript framework that consists of several packages that work together to help build TypeScript applications. Prior to version 3.20.0, when using `RpcServer.toWebHandler` (or `HttpApp.toWebHandlerRuntime`) inside a Next.js App Router route handler, any Node.js `AsyncLocalStorage`-dependent API called from within an Effect fiber can read another concurrent request's context — or no context at all. Under production traffic, `auth()` from `@clerk/nextjs/server` returns a different user's session. Version 3.20.0 contains a fix for the issue.
Severity ?
7.4 (High)
CWE
- CWE-362 - Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32887",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-25T13:36:39.114796Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-25T13:37:15.940Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "effect",
"vendor": "Effect-TS",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.20.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Effect is a TypeScript framework that consists of several packages that work together to help build TypeScript applications. Prior to version 3.20.0, when using `RpcServer.toWebHandler` (or `HttpApp.toWebHandlerRuntime`) inside a Next.js App Router route handler, any Node.js `AsyncLocalStorage`-dependent API called from within an Effect fiber can read another concurrent request\u0027s context \u2014 or no context at all. Under production traffic, `auth()` from `@clerk/nextjs/server` returns a different user\u0027s session. Version 3.20.0 contains a fix for the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-362",
"description": "CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization (\u0027Race Condition\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-20T21:35:05.853Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/Effect-TS/effect/security/advisories/GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2g",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Effect-TS/effect/security/advisories/GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2g"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2g",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Effect Bug: `AsyncLocalStorage` context lost/contaminated inside Effect fibers under concurrent load with RPC"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32887",
"datePublished": "2026-03-20T21:35:05.853Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-16T21:03:44.421Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-25T13:37:15.940Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-32887",
"date": "2026-04-30",
"epss": "0.00012",
"percentile": "0.01769"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-32887\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-03-20T22:16:27.980\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-14T18:41:28.923\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Effect is a TypeScript framework that consists of several packages that work together to help build TypeScript applications. Prior to version 3.20.0, when using `RpcServer.toWebHandler` (or `HttpApp.toWebHandlerRuntime`) inside a Next.js App Router route handler, any Node.js `AsyncLocalStorage`-dependent API called from within an Effect fiber can read another concurrent request\u0027s context \u2014 or no context at all. Under production traffic, `auth()` from `@clerk/nextjs/server` returns a different user\u0027s session. Version 3.20.0 contains a fix for the issue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Effect es un framework de TypeScript que consta de varios paquetes que trabajan juntos para ayudar a construir aplicaciones TypeScript. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 3.20.0, al usar `RpcServer.toWebHandler` (o `HttpApp.toWebHandlerRuntime`) dentro de un gestor de rutas del App Router de Next.js, cualquier API de Node.js dependiente de `AsyncLocalStorage` llamada desde dentro de una fibra de Effect puede leer el contexto de otra solicitud concurrente \u2014 o ning\u00fan contexto en absoluto. Bajo tr\u00e1fico de producci\u00f3n, `auth()` de `@clerk/nextjs/server` devuelve la sesi\u00f3n de un usuario diferente. La versi\u00f3n 3.20.0 contiene una soluci\u00f3n para el problema.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.4,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":5.2}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-362\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:effectful:effect:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.20.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"720488DF-FC4E-43E2-9D3B-5FB783EF8BEC\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/Effect-TS/effect/security/advisories/GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2g\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-32887\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-03-25T13:36:39.114796Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-03-25T13:37:05.082Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Effect Bug: `AsyncLocalStorage` context lost/contaminated inside Effect fibers under concurrent load with RPC\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2g\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.4, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Effect-TS\", \"product\": \"effect\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 3.20.0\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/Effect-TS/effect/security/advisories/GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2g\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/Effect-TS/effect/security/advisories/GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2g\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Effect is a TypeScript framework that consists of several packages that work together to help build TypeScript applications. Prior to version 3.20.0, when using `RpcServer.toWebHandler` (or `HttpApp.toWebHandlerRuntime`) inside a Next.js App Router route handler, any Node.js `AsyncLocalStorage`-dependent API called from within an Effect fiber can read another concurrent request\u0027s context \\u2014 or no context at all. Under production traffic, `auth()` from `@clerk/nextjs/server` returns a different user\u0027s session. Version 3.20.0 contains a fix for the issue.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-362\", \"description\": \"CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization (\u0027Race Condition\u0027)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-03-20T21:35:05.853Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-32887\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-03-25T13:37:15.940Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-03-16T21:03:44.421Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-03-20T21:35:05.853Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…