CVE-2025-68710 (GCVE-0-2025-68710)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-26 00:00 – Updated: 2026-05-27 20:34
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
Easyelife App lock (aka Fingerprint,Applock or locker.app.safe.applocker) 1.9.2 for Android allows a local attacker with physical access to bypass the PIN lock. The lock is implemented as an overlay rather than by using Android's secure authentication APIs. By navigating cascading interface flows - insecure navigation through exposed routes facilitates app control evasion {I.N.T.E.R.F.A.C.E] via advertisement or browser intents - an attacker can evade lockscreen verification and access protected apps (e.g., Chrome), resulting in information disclosure and privilege escalation.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- n/a
- CWE-288 - Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel
Assigner
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 2.4,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-68710",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-27T20:34:17.976943Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-288",
"description": "CWE-288 Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T20:34:21.650Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Easyelife App lock (aka Fingerprint,Applock or locker.app.safe.applocker) 1.9.2 for Android allows a local attacker with physical access to bypass the PIN lock. The lock is implemented as an overlay rather than by using Android\u0027s secure authentication APIs. By navigating cascading interface flows - insecure navigation through exposed routes facilitates app control evasion {I.N.T.E.R.F.A.C.E] via advertisement or browser intents - an attacker can evade lockscreen verification and access protected apps (e.g., Chrome), resulting in information disclosure and privilege escalation."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-26T19:21:17.610Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=locker.app.safe.applocker"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/actuator/locker.app.safe.applocker"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/actuator/locker.app.safe.applocker/blob/main/CVE-2025-68710"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-68710",
"datePublished": "2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T20:34:21.650Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-68710",
"date": "2026-08-05",
"epss": "0.00179",
"percentile": "0.07641"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-68710\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2026-05-26T20:16:16.317\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-24T11:10:00.170\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Easyelife App lock (aka Fingerprint,Applock or locker.app.safe.applocker) 1.9.2 for Android allows a local attacker with physical access to bypass the PIN lock. The lock is implemented as an overlay rather than by using Android\u0027s secure authentication APIs. By navigating cascading interface flows - insecure navigation through exposed routes facilitates app control evasion {I.N.T.E.R.F.A.C.E] via advertisement or browser intents - an attacker can evade lockscreen verification and access protected apps (e.g., Chrome), resulting in information disclosure and privilege escalation.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Easyelife App lock (tambi\u00e9n conocido como Fingerprint,Applock o locker.app.safe.applocker) 1.9.2 para Android permite a un atacante local con acceso f\u00edsico eludir el bloqueo por PIN. El bloqueo se implementa como una superposici\u00f3n en lugar de utilizar las API de autenticaci\u00f3n seguras de Android. Al navegar por flujos de interfaz en cascada - la navegaci\u00f3n insegura a trav\u00e9s de rutas expuestas facilita la evasi\u00f3n del control de la aplicaci\u00f3n {I.N.T.E.R.F.A.C.E] a trav\u00e9s de anuncios o intents del navegador - un atacante puede evadir la verificaci\u00f3n de la pantalla de bloqueo y acceder a aplicaciones protegidas (por ejemplo, Chrome), lo que resulta en revelaci\u00f3n de informaci\u00f3n y escalada de privilegios.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"n/a\",\"product\":\"n/a\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"n/a\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":2.4,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"PHYSICAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":0.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-05-27T20:34:17.976943Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2025-68710\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-288\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/actuator/locker.app.safe.applocker\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/actuator/locker.app.safe.applocker/blob/main/CVE-2025-68710\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=locker.app.safe.applocker\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"}]}}",
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-05-28T02:12:52+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-68710",
"id": "CVE-2025-68710",
"initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "CVE-2025-68710",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-68710.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 2.4, \"attackVector\": \"PHYSICAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-68710\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-05-27T20:34:17.976943Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-288\", \"description\": \"CWE-288 Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-27T20:34:12.644Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"n/a\", \"product\": \"n/a\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=locker.app.safe.applocker\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/actuator/locker.app.safe.applocker\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/actuator/locker.app.safe.applocker/blob/main/CVE-2025-68710\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Easyelife App lock (aka Fingerprint,Applock or locker.app.safe.applocker) 1.9.2 for Android allows a local attacker with physical access to bypass the PIN lock. The lock is implemented as an overlay rather than by using Android\u0027s secure authentication APIs. By navigating cascading interface flows - insecure navigation through exposed routes facilitates app control evasion {I.N.T.E.R.F.A.C.E] via advertisement or browser intents - an attacker can evade lockscreen verification and access protected apps (e.g., Chrome), resulting in information disclosure and privilege escalation.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"text\", \"description\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"shortName\": \"mitre\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-26T19:21:17.610Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-68710\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-27T20:34:21.650Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-12-24T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"mitre\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
Loading…
Loading…