CVE-2024-56788
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-01-11 12:35
Modified
2025-01-20 06:28
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ethernet: oa_tc6: fix tx skb race condition between reference pointers
There are two skb pointers to manage tx skb's enqueued from n/w stack.
waiting_tx_skb pointer points to the tx skb which needs to be processed
and ongoing_tx_skb pointer points to the tx skb which is being processed.
SPI thread prepares the tx data chunks from the tx skb pointed by the
ongoing_tx_skb pointer. When the tx skb pointed by the ongoing_tx_skb is
processed, the tx skb pointed by the waiting_tx_skb is assigned to
ongoing_tx_skb and the waiting_tx_skb pointer is assigned with NULL.
Whenever there is a new tx skb from n/w stack, it will be assigned to
waiting_tx_skb pointer if it is NULL. Enqueuing and processing of a tx skb
handled in two different threads.
Consider a scenario where the SPI thread processed an ongoing_tx_skb and
it moves next tx skb from waiting_tx_skb pointer to ongoing_tx_skb pointer
without doing any NULL check. At this time, if the waiting_tx_skb pointer
is NULL then ongoing_tx_skb pointer is also assigned with NULL. After
that, if a new tx skb is assigned to waiting_tx_skb pointer by the n/w
stack and there is a chance to overwrite the tx skb pointer with NULL in
the SPI thread. Finally one of the tx skb will be left as unhandled,
resulting packet missing and memory leak.
- Consider the below scenario where the TXC reported from the previous
transfer is 10 and ongoing_tx_skb holds an tx ethernet frame which can be
transported in 20 TXCs and waiting_tx_skb is still NULL.
tx_credits = 10; /* 21 are filled in the previous transfer */
ongoing_tx_skb = 20;
waiting_tx_skb = NULL; /* Still NULL */
- So, (tc6->ongoing_tx_skb || tc6->waiting_tx_skb) becomes true.
- After oa_tc6_prepare_spi_tx_buf_for_tx_skbs()
ongoing_tx_skb = 10;
waiting_tx_skb = NULL; /* Still NULL */
- Perform SPI transfer.
- Process SPI rx buffer to get the TXC from footers.
- Now let's assume previously filled 21 TXCs are freed so we are good to
transport the next remaining 10 tx chunks from ongoing_tx_skb.
tx_credits = 21;
ongoing_tx_skb = 10;
waiting_tx_skb = NULL;
- So, (tc6->ongoing_tx_skb || tc6->waiting_tx_skb) becomes true again.
- In the oa_tc6_prepare_spi_tx_buf_for_tx_skbs()
ongoing_tx_skb = NULL;
waiting_tx_skb = NULL;
- Now the below bad case might happen,
Thread1 (oa_tc6_start_xmit) Thread2 (oa_tc6_spi_thread_handler)
--------------------------- -----------------------------------
- if waiting_tx_skb is NULL
- if ongoing_tx_skb is NULL
- ongoing_tx_skb = waiting_tx_skb
- waiting_tx_skb = skb
- waiting_tx_skb = NULL
...
- ongoing_tx_skb = NULL
- if waiting_tx_skb is NULL
- waiting_tx_skb = skb
To overcome the above issue, protect the moving of tx skb reference from
waiting_tx_skb pointer to ongoing_tx_skb pointer and assigning new tx skb
to waiting_tx_skb pointer, so that the other thread can't access the
waiting_tx_skb pointer until the current thread completes moving the tx
skb reference safely.
References
Impacted products
{ "containers": { "cna": { "affected": [ { "defaultStatus": "unaffected", "product": "Linux", "programFiles": [ "drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c" ], "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "vendor": "Linux", "versions": [ { "lessThan": "1f2eb6c32bae04b375bb7a0aedbeefb6dbbcb775", "status": "affected", "version": "53fbde8ab21e8c2c6187159cc17fc10cbf20900a", "versionType": "git" }, { "lessThan": "e592b5110b3e9393881b0a019d86832bbf71a47f", "status": "affected", "version": "53fbde8ab21e8c2c6187159cc17fc10cbf20900a", "versionType": "git" } ] }, { "defaultStatus": "affected", "product": "Linux", "programFiles": [ "drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c" ], "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "vendor": "Linux", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "6.12" }, { "lessThan": "6.12", "status": "unaffected", "version": "0", "versionType": "semver" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "6.12.7", "versionType": "semver" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "6.13", "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: ethernet: oa_tc6: fix tx skb race condition between reference pointers\n\nThere are two skb pointers to manage tx skb\u0027s enqueued from n/w stack.\nwaiting_tx_skb pointer points to the tx skb which needs to be processed\nand ongoing_tx_skb pointer points to the tx skb which is being processed.\n\nSPI thread prepares the tx data chunks from the tx skb pointed by the\nongoing_tx_skb pointer. When the tx skb pointed by the ongoing_tx_skb is\nprocessed, the tx skb pointed by the waiting_tx_skb is assigned to\nongoing_tx_skb and the waiting_tx_skb pointer is assigned with NULL.\nWhenever there is a new tx skb from n/w stack, it will be assigned to\nwaiting_tx_skb pointer if it is NULL. Enqueuing and processing of a tx skb\nhandled in two different threads.\n\nConsider a scenario where the SPI thread processed an ongoing_tx_skb and\nit moves next tx skb from waiting_tx_skb pointer to ongoing_tx_skb pointer\nwithout doing any NULL check. At this time, if the waiting_tx_skb pointer\nis NULL then ongoing_tx_skb pointer is also assigned with NULL. After\nthat, if a new tx skb is assigned to waiting_tx_skb pointer by the n/w\nstack and there is a chance to overwrite the tx skb pointer with NULL in\nthe SPI thread. Finally one of the tx skb will be left as unhandled,\nresulting packet missing and memory leak.\n\n- Consider the below scenario where the TXC reported from the previous\ntransfer is 10 and ongoing_tx_skb holds an tx ethernet frame which can be\ntransported in 20 TXCs and waiting_tx_skb is still NULL.\n\ttx_credits = 10; /* 21 are filled in the previous transfer */\n\tongoing_tx_skb = 20;\n\twaiting_tx_skb = NULL; /* Still NULL */\n- So, (tc6-\u003eongoing_tx_skb || tc6-\u003ewaiting_tx_skb) becomes true.\n- After oa_tc6_prepare_spi_tx_buf_for_tx_skbs()\n\tongoing_tx_skb = 10;\n\twaiting_tx_skb = NULL; /* Still NULL */\n- Perform SPI transfer.\n- Process SPI rx buffer to get the TXC from footers.\n- Now let\u0027s assume previously filled 21 TXCs are freed so we are good to\ntransport the next remaining 10 tx chunks from ongoing_tx_skb.\n\ttx_credits = 21;\n\tongoing_tx_skb = 10;\n\twaiting_tx_skb = NULL;\n- So, (tc6-\u003eongoing_tx_skb || tc6-\u003ewaiting_tx_skb) becomes true again.\n- In the oa_tc6_prepare_spi_tx_buf_for_tx_skbs()\n\tongoing_tx_skb = NULL;\n\twaiting_tx_skb = NULL;\n\n- Now the below bad case might happen,\n\nThread1 (oa_tc6_start_xmit)\tThread2 (oa_tc6_spi_thread_handler)\n---------------------------\t-----------------------------------\n- if waiting_tx_skb is NULL\n\t\t\t\t- if ongoing_tx_skb is NULL\n\t\t\t\t- ongoing_tx_skb = waiting_tx_skb\n- waiting_tx_skb = skb\n\t\t\t\t- waiting_tx_skb = NULL\n\t\t\t\t...\n\t\t\t\t- ongoing_tx_skb = NULL\n- if waiting_tx_skb is NULL\n- waiting_tx_skb = skb\n\nTo overcome the above issue, protect the moving of tx skb reference from\nwaiting_tx_skb pointer to ongoing_tx_skb pointer and assigning new tx skb\nto waiting_tx_skb pointer, so that the other thread can\u0027t access the\nwaiting_tx_skb pointer until the current thread completes moving the tx\nskb reference safely." } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-01-20T06:28:11.456Z", "orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "shortName": "Linux" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f2eb6c32bae04b375bb7a0aedbeefb6dbbcb775" }, { "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e592b5110b3e9393881b0a019d86832bbf71a47f" } ], "title": "net: ethernet: oa_tc6: fix tx skb race condition between reference pointers", "x_generator": { "engine": "bippy-5f407fcff5a0" } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "assignerShortName": "Linux", "cveId": "CVE-2024-56788", "datePublished": "2025-01-11T12:35:47.985Z", "dateReserved": "2024-12-29T11:26:39.770Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-01-20T06:28:11.456Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-56788\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2025-01-11T13:15:29.090\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-01-11T13:15:29.090\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nnet: ethernet: oa_tc6: fix tx skb race condition between reference pointers\\n\\nThere are two skb pointers to manage tx skb\u0027s enqueued from n/w stack.\\nwaiting_tx_skb pointer points to the tx skb which needs to be processed\\nand ongoing_tx_skb pointer points to the tx skb which is being processed.\\n\\nSPI thread prepares the tx data chunks from the tx skb pointed by the\\nongoing_tx_skb pointer. When the tx skb pointed by the ongoing_tx_skb is\\nprocessed, the tx skb pointed by the waiting_tx_skb is assigned to\\nongoing_tx_skb and the waiting_tx_skb pointer is assigned with NULL.\\nWhenever there is a new tx skb from n/w stack, it will be assigned to\\nwaiting_tx_skb pointer if it is NULL. Enqueuing and processing of a tx skb\\nhandled in two different threads.\\n\\nConsider a scenario where the SPI thread processed an ongoing_tx_skb and\\nit moves next tx skb from waiting_tx_skb pointer to ongoing_tx_skb pointer\\nwithout doing any NULL check. At this time, if the waiting_tx_skb pointer\\nis NULL then ongoing_tx_skb pointer is also assigned with NULL. After\\nthat, if a new tx skb is assigned to waiting_tx_skb pointer by the n/w\\nstack and there is a chance to overwrite the tx skb pointer with NULL in\\nthe SPI thread. Finally one of the tx skb will be left as unhandled,\\nresulting packet missing and memory leak.\\n\\n- Consider the below scenario where the TXC reported from the previous\\ntransfer is 10 and ongoing_tx_skb holds an tx ethernet frame which can be\\ntransported in 20 TXCs and waiting_tx_skb is still NULL.\\n\\ttx_credits = 10; /* 21 are filled in the previous transfer */\\n\\tongoing_tx_skb = 20;\\n\\twaiting_tx_skb = NULL; /* Still NULL */\\n- So, (tc6-\u003eongoing_tx_skb || tc6-\u003ewaiting_tx_skb) becomes true.\\n- After oa_tc6_prepare_spi_tx_buf_for_tx_skbs()\\n\\tongoing_tx_skb = 10;\\n\\twaiting_tx_skb = NULL; /* Still NULL */\\n- Perform SPI transfer.\\n- Process SPI rx buffer to get the TXC from footers.\\n- Now let\u0027s assume previously filled 21 TXCs are freed so we are good to\\ntransport the next remaining 10 tx chunks from ongoing_tx_skb.\\n\\ttx_credits = 21;\\n\\tongoing_tx_skb = 10;\\n\\twaiting_tx_skb = NULL;\\n- So, (tc6-\u003eongoing_tx_skb || tc6-\u003ewaiting_tx_skb) becomes true again.\\n- In the oa_tc6_prepare_spi_tx_buf_for_tx_skbs()\\n\\tongoing_tx_skb = NULL;\\n\\twaiting_tx_skb = NULL;\\n\\n- Now the below bad case might happen,\\n\\nThread1 (oa_tc6_start_xmit)\\tThread2 (oa_tc6_spi_thread_handler)\\n---------------------------\\t-----------------------------------\\n- if waiting_tx_skb is NULL\\n\\t\\t\\t\\t- if ongoing_tx_skb is NULL\\n\\t\\t\\t\\t- ongoing_tx_skb = waiting_tx_skb\\n- waiting_tx_skb = skb\\n\\t\\t\\t\\t- waiting_tx_skb = NULL\\n\\t\\t\\t\\t...\\n\\t\\t\\t\\t- ongoing_tx_skb = NULL\\n- if waiting_tx_skb is NULL\\n- waiting_tx_skb = skb\\n\\nTo overcome the above issue, protect the moving of tx skb reference from\\nwaiting_tx_skb pointer to ongoing_tx_skb pointer and assigning new tx skb\\nto waiting_tx_skb pointer, so that the other thread can\u0027t access the\\nwaiting_tx_skb pointer until the current thread completes moving the tx\\nskb reference safely.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f2eb6c32bae04b375bb7a0aedbeefb6dbbcb775\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e592b5110b3e9393881b0a019d86832bbf71a47f\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.