CVE-2023-49312 (GCVE-0-2023-49312)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-11-26 00:00 – Updated: 2024-08-02 21:53
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
Precision Bridge PrecisionBridge.exe (aka the thick client) before 7.3.21 allows an integrity violation in which the same license key is used on multiple systems, via vectors involving a Process Hacker memory dump, error message inspection, and modification of a MAC address.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T21:53:44.977Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://precisionbridge.net/738vulnerability"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://processhacker.sourceforge.io/archive/website_v2/features.php"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Precision Bridge PrecisionBridge.exe (aka the thick client) before 7.3.21 allows an integrity violation in which the same license key is used on multiple systems, via vectors involving a Process Hacker memory dump, error message inspection, and modification of a MAC address."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-11-26T21:23:30.903Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://precisionbridge.net/738vulnerability"
},
{
"url": "https://processhacker.sourceforge.io/archive/website_v2/features.php"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-49312",
"datePublished": "2023-11-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-11-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T21:53:44.977Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2023-49312",
"date": "2026-07-12",
"epss": "0.00676",
"percentile": "0.47903"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:precisionbridge:precision_bridge:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"7.3.21\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"95A7A652-C5B3-4DBB-B1CC-713D7225A7ED\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Precision Bridge PrecisionBridge.exe (aka the thick client) before 7.3.21 allows an integrity violation in which the same license key is used on multiple systems, via vectors involving a Process Hacker memory dump, error message inspection, and modification of a MAC address.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Precision Bridge PrecisionBridge.exe (tambi\\u00e9n conocido como cliente pesado) anterior a 7.3.21 permite una violaci\\u00f3n de integridad en la que se utiliza la misma clave de licencia en m\\u00faltiples sistemas, a trav\\u00e9s de vectores que involucran un volcado de memoria de Process Hacker, inspecci\\u00f3n de mensajes de error y modificaci\\u00f3n de una direcci\\u00f3n MAC. .\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2023-49312",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T08:33:13.480",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 9.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 5.2}]}",
"published": "2023-11-26T22:15:06.907",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"https://precisionbridge.net/738vulnerability\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://processhacker.sourceforge.io/archive/website_v2/features.php\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Not Applicable\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://precisionbridge.net/738vulnerability\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://processhacker.sourceforge.io/archive/website_v2/features.php\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Not Applicable\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-295\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2023-49312\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2023-11-26T22:15:06.907\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-17T06:35:48.293\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Precision Bridge PrecisionBridge.exe (aka the thick client) before 7.3.21 allows an integrity violation in which the same license key is used on multiple systems, via vectors involving a Process Hacker memory dump, error message inspection, and modification of a MAC address.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Precision Bridge PrecisionBridge.exe (tambi\u00e9n conocido como cliente pesado) anterior a 7.3.21 permite una violaci\u00f3n de integridad en la que se utiliza la misma clave de licencia en m\u00faltiples sistemas, a trav\u00e9s de vectores que involucran un volcado de memoria de Process Hacker, inspecci\u00f3n de mensajes de error y modificaci\u00f3n de una direcci\u00f3n MAC. .\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"n/a\",\"product\":\"n/a\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"n/a\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":9.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.2}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:precisionbridge:precision_bridge:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"7.3.21\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"95A7A652-C5B3-4DBB-B1CC-713D7225A7ED\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://precisionbridge.net/738vulnerability\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://processhacker.sourceforge.io/archive/website_v2/features.php\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Not Applicable\"]},{\"url\":\"https://precisionbridge.net/738vulnerability\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://processhacker.sourceforge.io/archive/website_v2/features.php\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Not Applicable\"]}]}}",
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-03-27T11:01:12+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2023-49312",
"id": "CVE-2023-49312",
"initial_release_date": "2023-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "CVE-2023-49312",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2023/cve-2023-49312.json",
"version": "3"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…