Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2021-47427 (GCVE-0-2021-47427)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-05-21 15:04 – Updated: 2026-08-05 08:47| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
d39df158518ccc3bf24ee18082b5e100c8f014aa , < 1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c
(git)
Affected: d39df158518ccc3bf24ee18082b5e100c8f014aa , < 258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
5.14
Unaffected: 0 , < 5.14 (semver) Unaffected: 5.14.12 , ≤ 5.14.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T05:39:59.381Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2021-47427",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T15:37:44.486165Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T17:33:37.669Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "d39df158518ccc3bf24ee18082b5e100c8f014aa",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "d39df158518ccc3bf24ee18082b5e100c8f014aa",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.14"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.14",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.14.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.14.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.14",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.14",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free\n\nCommit d39df158518c (\"scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\")\nadded iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but\nthen also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already\ncompleted task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup\ncode. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common\ncleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.\n\nThis reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we\u0027ve checked\nif the iscsi_task is valid."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:N - This is the iSCSI initiator path; a remote target peer can induce SCSI command timeouts and then send completions over TCP so the abort handler hits the buggy early-completion path, making the flaw reachable via the network protocol.\nAC:L - The attacker controlling the iSCSI target controls both sides of the race by withholding responses to force EH abort and then completing the task while abort runs, so success does not depend on conditions outside their influence.\nPR:N - A malicious or compromised iSCSI target needs no privileges on the victim host; once a logged-in session exists (typical SAN/cloud block deployment), the peer can trigger the UAF without local credentials.\nUI:N - No additional user action is required beyond an already-established iSCSI session with in-flight I/O, which is normal for persistent SAN and iSCSI-rooted systems.\nS:U - The UAF corrupts initiator kernel memory in the same host kernel authority and does not cross a VM, IOMMU, or other security boundary.\nC:H - Use-after-free of iscsi_task enables reclaim and controlled reuse of the freed object, which can be leveraged for arbitrary kernel memory disclosure.\nI:H - The same iscsi_task UAF enables heap spray and corruption of adjacent kernel objects, providing write/control-flow primitives suitable for integrity compromise and code execution.\nA:H - The extra put can free the task while still in use or take a NULL task path, causing kernel oops/panic and full availability loss."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T08:47:46.574Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6"
}
],
"title": "scsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-47427",
"datePublished": "2024-05-21T15:04:13.244Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-21T14:58:30.828Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T08:47:46.574Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2021-47427",
"date": "2026-09-28",
"epss": "0.00458",
"percentile": "0.37233"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0212F5AF-8179-4A29-9B5A-E9060BD1F240",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.14.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.14",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E46C74C6-B76B-4C94-A6A4-FD2FFF62D644",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "60134C3A-06E4-48C1-B04F-2903732A4E56",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0460DA88-8FE1-46A2-9DDA-1F1ABA552E71",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AF55383D-4DF2-45DC-93F7-571F4F978EAB",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free\n\nCommit d39df158518c (\"scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\")\nadded iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but\nthen also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already\ncompleted task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup\ncode. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common\ncleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.\n\nThis reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we\u0027ve checked\nif the iscsi_task is valid."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: scsi: iscsi: corrige el uso after free de iscsi_task. Confirmaci\u00f3n d39df158518c (\"scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\") se agregaron llamadas iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() durante el manejo de abortos pero luego tambi\u00e9n cambi\u00f3 el manejo del caso en el que detectamos una tarea ya completada y ahora terminamos haciendo un acceso al c\u00f3digo com\u00fan de put/cleanup. Esto da como resultado un uso de iscsi_task despu\u00e9s de la liberaci\u00f3n, porque el c\u00f3digo de limpieza com\u00fan colocar\u00e1 iscsi_task. Esto revierte el ir a y mueve iscsi_get_conn() a despu\u00e9s de haber verificado si iscsi_task es v\u00e1lido."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2021-47427",
"lastModified": "2024-12-31T20:04:00.207",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-21T15:15:28.117",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "d39df158518ccc3bf24ee18082b5e100c8f014aa",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "d39df158518ccc3bf24ee18082b5e100c8f014aa",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.14"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.14",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.14.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0212F5AF-8179-4A29-9B5A-E9060BD1F240",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.14.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.14",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E46C74C6-B76B-4C94-A6A4-FD2FFF62D644",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "60134C3A-06E4-48C1-B04F-2903732A4E56",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0460DA88-8FE1-46A2-9DDA-1F1ABA552E71",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AF55383D-4DF2-45DC-93F7-571F4F978EAB",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free\n\nCommit d39df158518c (\"scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\")\nadded iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but\nthen also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already\ncompleted task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup\ncode. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common\ncleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.\n\nThis reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we\u0027ve checked\nif the iscsi_task is valid."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: scsi: iscsi: corrige el uso after free de iscsi_task. Confirmaci\u00f3n d39df158518c (\"scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\") se agregaron llamadas iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() durante el manejo de abortos pero luego tambi\u00e9n cambi\u00f3 el manejo del caso en el que detectamos una tarea ya completada y ahora terminamos haciendo un acceso al c\u00f3digo com\u00fan de put/cleanup. Esto da como resultado un uso de iscsi_task despu\u00e9s de la liberaci\u00f3n, porque el c\u00f3digo de limpieza com\u00fan colocar\u00e1 iscsi_task. Esto revierte el ir a y mueve iscsi_get_conn() a despu\u00e9s de haber verificado si iscsi_task es v\u00e1lido."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2021-47427",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T10:17:02.990",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2021-47427",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T15:37:44.486165Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-21T15:15:28.117",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Low",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-04T23:02:59+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2021-47427",
"id": "CVE-2021-47427",
"initial_release_date": "2021-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "90",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "108",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: scsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2021/cve-2021-47427.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-11T16:58:39Z",
"cve": "CVE-2021-47427",
"id": "CVE-2021-47427",
"initial_release_date": "2024-05-25T03:34:24Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "275",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "266",
"product_status:recommended": "452",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2021-47427",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2021-47427.json",
"version": "52"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T05:39:59.381Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2021-47427",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T15:37:44.486165Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T12:42:17.732Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "d39df158518ccc3bf24ee18082b5e100c8f014aa",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "d39df158518ccc3bf24ee18082b5e100c8f014aa",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.14"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.14",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.14.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.14.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.14",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.14",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free\n\nCommit d39df158518c (\"scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\")\nadded iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but\nthen also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already\ncompleted task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup\ncode. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common\ncleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.\n\nThis reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we\u0027ve checked\nif the iscsi_task is valid."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:N - This is the iSCSI initiator path; a remote target peer can induce SCSI command timeouts and then send completions over TCP so the abort handler hits the buggy early-completion path, making the flaw reachable via the network protocol.\nAC:L - The attacker controlling the iSCSI target controls both sides of the race by withholding responses to force EH abort and then completing the task while abort runs, so success does not depend on conditions outside their influence.\nPR:N - A malicious or compromised iSCSI target needs no privileges on the victim host; once a logged-in session exists (typical SAN/cloud block deployment), the peer can trigger the UAF without local credentials.\nUI:N - No additional user action is required beyond an already-established iSCSI session with in-flight I/O, which is normal for persistent SAN and iSCSI-rooted systems.\nS:U - The UAF corrupts initiator kernel memory in the same host kernel authority and does not cross a VM, IOMMU, or other security boundary.\nC:H - Use-after-free of iscsi_task enables reclaim and controlled reuse of the freed object, which can be leveraged for arbitrary kernel memory disclosure.\nI:H - The same iscsi_task UAF enables heap spray and corruption of adjacent kernel objects, providing write/control-flow primitives suitable for integrity compromise and code execution.\nA:H - The extra put can free the task while still in use or take a NULL task path, causing kernel oops/panic and full availability loss."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T08:47:46.574Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6"
}
],
"title": "scsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-47427",
"datePublished": "2024-05-21T15:04:13.244Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-21T14:58:30.828Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T08:47:46.574Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | Basesystem Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE 11-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | Public Cloud Module | Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE 11-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Proxy | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Server | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Real Time Module | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Basesystem Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE 11-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Public Cloud Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE 11-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Proxy",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Real Time Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-39698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-36788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47443",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47443"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-269355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-269355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-06-14T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:1979-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20241979-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:1990-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20241990-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2019-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242019-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:1983-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20241983-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2011-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242011-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2010-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242010-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:1978-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20241978-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2008-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242008-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2005-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242005-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent une élévation de privilèges, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Basesystem Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Development Tools Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Legacy Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 Business Critical Linux 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap Micro 5.4 |
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Basesystem Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Development Tools Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Legacy Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 Business Critical Linux 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-39698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-267600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-267600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-36788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47443",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47443"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-06-28T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2115-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242115-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2143-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242143-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2147-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242147-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2165-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242165-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2135-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242135-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2139-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242139-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2189-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242189-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2166-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242166-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2183-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242183-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2191-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242191-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2208-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242208-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2149-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242149-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2207-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242207-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2216-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242216-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2184-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242184-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2190-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242190-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2130-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242130-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2160-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242160-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2202-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242202-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2145-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242145-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2120-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242120-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2121-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242121-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2156-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242156-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2185-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242185-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2221-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242221-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2164-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242164-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2124-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242124-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2123-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242123-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2163-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242163-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2205-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242205-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2162-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242162-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2209-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242209-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2148-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242148-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2217-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242217-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | Basesystem Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE 11-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | Public Cloud Module | Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE 11-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Proxy | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Server | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Real Time Module | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Basesystem Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE 11-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "Public Cloud Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE 11-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Proxy",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Real Time Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-39698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-36788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47443",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47443"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-269355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-269355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-06-14T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:1979-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20241979-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:1990-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20241990-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2019-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242019-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:1983-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20241983-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2011-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242011-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2010-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242010-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:1978-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20241978-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2008-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242008-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2005-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242005-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent une élévation de privilèges, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Basesystem Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Development Tools Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Legacy Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 Business Critical Linux 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap Micro 5.4 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Basesystem Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Development Tools Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Legacy Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 Business Critical Linux 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-39698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-267600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-267600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-36788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47443",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47443"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-06-28T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2115-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242115-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2143-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242143-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2147-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242147-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2165-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242165-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2135-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242135-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2139-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242139-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2189-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242189-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2166-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242166-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2183-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242183-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2191-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242191-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2208-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242208-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2149-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242149-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2207-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242207-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2216-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242216-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2184-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242184-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2190-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242190-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2130-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242130-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2160-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242160-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2202-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242202-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2145-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242145-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2120-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242120-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2121-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242121-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2156-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242156-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2185-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242185-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2221-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242221-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2164-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242164-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2124-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242124-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2123-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242123-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2163-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242163-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2205-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242205-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2162-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242162-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2209-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242209-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2148-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242148-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-06-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2217-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242217-1"
}
]
}
BDU:2025-07466 (CVE-2021-47427)
Vulnerability from fstec – Published: 2025-06-25 – Updated: 2025-06-25 – View on bdu.fstec.ru Fixed- CWE-416 - Использование после освобождения
| URL |
|---|
| https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6 |
| https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c |
| https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47427 |
| https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024052157-CVE-2021-47427-ffc6@gregkh/ |
| https://git.kernel.org/linus/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6 |
| https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/ChangeLog-5.14.12 |
{
"CVSS 2.0": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"CVSS 3.0": "AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"CVSS 4.0": null,
"remediation_\u0418\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440": null,
"remediation_\u041d\u0430\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435": null,
"\u0412\u0435\u043d\u0434\u043e\u0440 \u041f\u041e": "\u0421\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f",
"\u0412\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f \u041f\u041e": "\u043e\u0442 5.14 \u0434\u043e 5.14.11 \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e (Linux)",
"\u0412\u043e\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043c\u0435\u0440\u044b \u043f\u043e \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e": "\u0412 \u0443\u0441\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0438\u044f\u0445 \u043e\u0442\u0441\u0443\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u044f \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0431\u0435\u0437\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u043e\u0442 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044f \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0443\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \"\u0420\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u043e \u0431\u0435\u0437\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u043a\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c LINUX\", \u0438\u0437\u043b\u043e\u0436\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432 \u043c\u0435\u0442\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043c \u0434\u043e\u043a\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0435 \u0424\u0421\u0422\u042d\u041a \u0420\u043e\u0441\u0441\u0438\u0438, \u0443\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0434\u0451\u043d\u043d\u043e\u043c 25 \u0434\u0435\u043a\u0430\u0431\u0440\u044f 2022 \u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430.\n\n\u0418\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0439:\n\u0414\u043b\u044f Linux:\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024052157-CVE-2021-47427-ffc6@gregkh/\nhttps://git.kernel.org/linus/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6\nhttps://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/ChangeLog-5.14.12\nhttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6\nhttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c",
"\u0414\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0432\u044b\u044f\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f": "04.10.2021",
"\u0414\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0435\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f": "25.06.2025",
"\u0414\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438": "25.06.2025",
"\u0418\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440": "BDU:2025-07466",
"\u0418\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0445 \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c \u043e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "CVE-2021-47427",
"\u0418\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f \u043e\u0431 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438": "\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0430",
"\u041a\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0441 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430",
"\u041d\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u041f\u041e": "Linux",
"\u041d\u0430\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u041e\u0421 \u0438 \u0442\u0438\u043f \u0430\u043f\u043f\u0430\u0440\u0430\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043b\u0430\u0442\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u044b": "\u0421\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f Linux \u043e\u0442 5.14 \u0434\u043e 5.14.11 \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e ",
"\u041d\u0430\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0444\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0446\u0438\u0438 iscsi_eh_abort() \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043b\u044f drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c - \u0434\u0440\u0430\u0439\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u043a\u0438 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432 SCSI \u044f\u0434\u0440\u0430 \u043e\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u044b Linux, \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0449\u0430\u044f \u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044e \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438",
"\u041d\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0447\u0438\u0435 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442\u0430": "\u0414\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0443\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f",
"\u041e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0438 CWE": "\u0418\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435 \u043e\u0441\u0432\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f (CWE-416)",
"\u041e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0444\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0446\u0438\u0438 iscsi_eh_abort() \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043b\u044f drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c - \u0434\u0440\u0430\u0439\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u043a\u0438 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432 SCSI \u044f\u0434\u0440\u0430 \u043e\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u044b Linux \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u0430 \u0441 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043d\u044b\u043c \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u0435 \u043e\u0441\u0432\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0430\u043c\u044f\u0442\u0438. \u042d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u0443\u0430\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044e \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438",
"\u041f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u044f \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u0443\u0430\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": null,
"\u041f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f": null,
"\u0421\u0432\u044f\u0437\u044c \u0441 \u0438\u043d\u0446\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0418\u0411": "\u0414\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0443\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f",
"\u0421\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u041e\u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0430",
"\u0421\u043f\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0431 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f": "\u041e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f",
"\u0421\u043f\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0431 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u0443\u0430\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438": "\u041c\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043f\u0443\u043b\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0441\u0440\u043e\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0438 \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c",
"\u0421\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6\nhttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c\nhttps://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47427\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024052157-CVE-2021-47427-ffc6@gregkh/\nhttps://git.kernel.org/linus/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6\nhttps://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/ChangeLog-5.14.12",
"\u0421\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0443\u0441 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u041f\u043e\u0434\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043c",
"\u0422\u0438\u043f \u041f\u041e": "\u041e\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u0430",
"\u0422\u0438\u043f \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0438 CWE": "CWE-416",
"\u0423\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043d\u044c \u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u0421\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0443\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043d\u044c \u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 (\u0431\u0430\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u044f \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u0430 CVSS 2.0 \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442 6,8)\n\u0412\u044b\u0441\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0443\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043d\u044c \u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 (\u0431\u0430\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u044f \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u0430 CVSS 3.1 \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442 7,8)"
}
FKIE_CVE-2021-47427
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-05-21 15:15 - Updated: 2026-08-04 10:177.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6 | Patch |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 5.15 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 5.15 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 5.15 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 5.15 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "d39df158518ccc3bf24ee18082b5e100c8f014aa",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "d39df158518ccc3bf24ee18082b5e100c8f014aa",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.14"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.14",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.14.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0212F5AF-8179-4A29-9B5A-E9060BD1F240",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.14.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.14",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E46C74C6-B76B-4C94-A6A4-FD2FFF62D644",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "60134C3A-06E4-48C1-B04F-2903732A4E56",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0460DA88-8FE1-46A2-9DDA-1F1ABA552E71",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.15:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AF55383D-4DF2-45DC-93F7-571F4F978EAB",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free\n\nCommit d39df158518c (\"scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\")\nadded iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but\nthen also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already\ncompleted task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup\ncode. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common\ncleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.\n\nThis reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we\u0027ve checked\nif the iscsi_task is valid."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: scsi: iscsi: corrige el uso after free de iscsi_task. Confirmaci\u00f3n d39df158518c (\"scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\") se agregaron llamadas iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() durante el manejo de abortos pero luego tambi\u00e9n cambi\u00f3 el manejo del caso en el que detectamos una tarea ya completada y ahora terminamos haciendo un acceso al c\u00f3digo com\u00fan de put/cleanup. Esto da como resultado un uso de iscsi_task despu\u00e9s de la liberaci\u00f3n, porque el c\u00f3digo de limpieza com\u00fan colocar\u00e1 iscsi_task. Esto revierte el ir a y mueve iscsi_get_conn() a despu\u00e9s de haber verificado si iscsi_task es v\u00e1lido."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2021-47427",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T10:17:02.990",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2021-47427",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T15:37:44.486165Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-21T15:15:28.117",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-RXCF-2W24-J9PQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-21 15:31 – Updated: 2024-12-31 21:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free
Commit d39df158518c ("scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn") added iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but then also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already completed task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup code. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common cleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.
This reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we've checked if the iscsi_task is valid.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-47427"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-416"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-21T15:15:28Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free\n\nCommit d39df158518c (\"scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\")\nadded iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but\nthen also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already\ncompleted task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup\ncode. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common\ncleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.\n\nThis reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we\u0027ve checked\nif the iscsi_task is valid.",
"id": "GHSA-rxcf-2w24-j9pq",
"modified": "2024-12-31T21:30:44Z",
"published": "2024-05-21T15:31:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47427"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1642f51ac0d4f2b55d5748094c49ff8f7191b93c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/258aad75c62146453d03028a44f2f1590d58e1f6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
OESA-2024-1692 (CVE-2021-47239)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-06-07 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: usb: fix possible use-after-free in smsc75xx_bind
The commit 46a8b29c6306 ("net: usb: fix memory leak in smsc75xx_bind") fails to clean up the work scheduled in smsc75xx_reset-> smsc75xx_set_multicast, which leads to use-after-free if the work is scheduled to start after the deallocation. In addition, this patch also removes a dangling pointer - dev->data[0].
This patch calls cancel_work_sync to cancel the scheduled work and set the dangling pointer to NULL.(CVE-2021-47239)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA: Verify port when creating flow rule
Validate port value provided by the user and with that remove no longer needed validation by the driver. The missing check in the mlx5_ib driver could cause to the below oops.
Call trace: _create_flow_rule+0x2d4/0xf28 [mlx5_ib] mlx5_ib_create_flow+0x2d0/0x5b0 [mlx5_ib] ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow+0x4cc/0x624 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0xd4/0x150 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs.isra.7+0xb28/0xc50 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_ioctl+0x158/0x1d0 [ib_uverbs] do_vfs_ioctl+0xd0/0xaf0 ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb4 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0xc4 el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa4/0x254 el0_svc_handler+0x84/0xa0 el0_svc+0x10/0x26c Code: b9401260 f9615681 51000400 8b001c20 (f9403c1a)(CVE-2021-47265)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bcache: avoid oversized read request in cache missing code path
In the cache missing code path of cached device, if a proper location from the internal B+ tree is matched for a cache miss range, function cached_dev_cache_miss() will be called in cache_lookup_fn() in the following code block, [code block 1] 526 unsigned int sectors = KEY_INODE(k) == s->iop.inode 527 ? min_t(uint64_t, INT_MAX, 528 KEY_START(k) - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector) 529 : INT_MAX; 530 int ret = s->d->cache_miss(b, s, bio, sectors);
Here s->d->cache_miss() is the call backfunction pointer initialized as cached_dev_cache_miss(), the last parameter 'sectors' is an important hint to calculate the size of read request to backing device of the missing cache data.
Current calculation in above code block may generate oversized value of 'sectors', which consequently may trigger 2 different potential kernel panics by BUG() or BUG_ON() as listed below,
1) BUG_ON() inside bch_btree_insert_key(), [code block 2] 886 BUG_ON(b->ops->is_extents && !KEY_SIZE(k)); 2) BUG() inside biovec_slab(), [code block 3] 51 default: 52 BUG(); 53 return NULL;
All the above panics are original from cached_dev_cache_miss() by the oversized parameter 'sectors'.
Inside cached_dev_cache_miss(), parameter 'sectors' is used to calculate the size of data read from backing device for the cache missing. This size is stored in s->insert_bio_sectors by the following lines of code, [code block 4] 909 s->insert_bio_sectors = min(sectors, bio_sectors(bio) + reada);
Then the actual key inserting to the internal B+ tree is generated and stored in s->iop.replace_key by the following lines of code, [code block 5] 911 s->iop.replace_key = KEY(s->iop.inode, 912 bio->bi_iter.bi_sector + s->insert_bio_sectors, 913 s->insert_bio_sectors); The oversized parameter 'sectors' may trigger panic 1) by BUG_ON() from the above code block.
And the bio sending to backing device for the missing data is allocated with hint from s->insert_bio_sectors by the following lines of code, [code block 6] 926 cache_bio = bio_alloc_bioset(GFP_NOWAIT, 927 DIV_ROUND_UP(s->insert_bio_sectors, PAGE_SECTORS), 928 &dc->disk.bio_split); The oversized parameter 'sectors' may trigger panic 2) by BUG() from the agove code block.
Now let me explain how the panics happen with the oversized 'sectors'. In code block 5, replace_key is generated by macro KEY(). From the definition of macro KEY(), [code block 7] 71 #define KEY(inode, offset, size) \ 72 ((struct bkey) { \ 73 .high = (1ULL << 63) | ((__u64) (size) << 20) | (inode), \ 74 .low = (offset) \ 75 })
Here 'size' is 16bits width embedded in 64bits member 'high' of struct bkey. But in code block 1, if "KEY_START(k) - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector" is very probably to be larger than (1<<16) - 1, which makes the bkey size calculation in code block 5 is overflowed. In one bug report the value of parameter 'sectors' is 131072 (= 1 << 17), the overflowed 'sectors' results the overflowed s->insert_bio_sectors in code block 4, then makes size field of s->iop.replace_key to be 0 in code block 5. Then the 0- sized s->iop.replace_key is inserted into the internal B+ tree as cache missing check key (a special key to detect and avoid a racing between normal write request and cache missing read request) as, [code block 8] 915 ret = bch_btree_insert_check_key(b, &s->op, &s->iop.replace_key);
Then the 0-sized s->iop.replace_key as 3rd parameter triggers the bkey size check BUG_ON() in code block 2, and causes the kernel panic 1).
Another ke ---truncated---(CVE-2021-47275)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
kvm: avoid speculation-based attacks from out-of-range memslot accesses
KVM's mechanism for accessing guest memory translates a guest physical address (gpa) to a host virtual address using the right-shifted gpa (also known as gfn) and a struct kvm_memory_slot. The translation is performed in __gfn_to_hva_memslot using the following formula:
hva = slot->userspace_addr + (gfn - slot->base_gfn) * PAGE_SIZE
It is expected that gfn falls within the boundaries of the guest's physical memory. However, a guest can access invalid physical addresses in such a way that the gfn is invalid.
__gfn_to_hva_memslot is called from kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_hva_prot, which first retrieves a memslot through __gfn_to_memslot. While __gfn_to_memslot does check that the gfn falls within the boundaries of the guest's physical memory or not, a CPU can speculate the result of the check and continue execution speculatively using an illegal gfn. The speculation can result in calculating an out-of-bounds hva. If the resulting host virtual address is used to load another guest physical address, this is effectively a Spectre gadget consisting of two consecutive reads, the second of which is data dependent on the first.
Right now it's not clear if there are any cases in which this is exploitable. One interesting case was reported by the original author of this patch, and involves visiting guest page tables on x86. Right now these are not vulnerable because the hva read goes through get_user(), which contains an LFENCE speculation barrier. However, there are patches in progress for x86 uaccess.h to mask kernel addresses instead of using LFENCE; once these land, a guest could use speculation to read from the VMM's ring 3 address space. Other architectures such as ARM already use the address masking method, and would be susceptible to this same kind of data-dependent access gadgets. Therefore, this patch proactively protects from these attacks by masking out-of-bounds gfns in __gfn_to_hva_memslot, which blocks speculation of invalid hvas.
Sean Christopherson noted that this patch does not cover kvm_read_guest_offset_cached. This however is limited to a few bytes past the end of the cache, and therefore it is unlikely to be useful in the context of building a chain of data dependent accesses.(CVE-2021-47277)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix uninit-value in caif_seqpkt_sendmsg
When nr_segs equal to zero in iovec_from_user, the object msg->msg_iter.iov is uninit stack memory in caif_seqpkt_sendmsg which is defined in ___sys_sendmsg. So we cann't just judge msg->msg_iter.iov->base directlly. We can use nr_segs to judge msg in caif_seqpkt_sendmsg whether has data buffers.
===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in caif_seqpkt_sendmsg+0x693/0xf60 net/caif/caif_socket.c:542 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x1c9/0x220 lib/dump_stack.c:118 kmsan_report+0xf7/0x1e0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_report.c:118 __msan_warning+0x58/0xa0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:215 caif_seqpkt_sendmsg+0x693/0xf60 net/caif/caif_socket.c:542 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:652 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:672 [inline] _syssendmsg+0x12b6/0x1350 net/socket.c:2343 _sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2397 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x808/0xc90 net/socket.c:2480 __compat_sys_sendmmsg net/compat.c:656 inline
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
memory: fsl_ifc: fix leak of private memory on probe failure
On probe error the driver should free the memory allocated for private structure. Fix this by using resource-managed allocation.(CVE-2021-47314)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
watchdog: sc520_wdt: Fix possible use-after-free in wdt_turnoff()
This module's remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function does not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the timer handler may still be running after the driver's remove function has finished, which would result in a use-after-free.
Fix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler has finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47323)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tty: serial: 8250: serial_cs: Fix a memory leak in error handling path
In the probe function, if the final 'serial_config()' fails, 'info' is leaking.
Add a resource handling path to free this memory.(CVE-2021-47330)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/mm: Fix lockup on kernel exec fault
The powerpc kernel is not prepared to handle exec faults from kernel. Especially, the function is_exec_fault() will return 'false' when an exec fault is taken by kernel, because the check is based on reading current->thread.regs->trap which contains the trap from user.
For instance, when provoking a LKDTM EXEC_USERSPACE test, current->thread.regs->trap is set to SYSCALL trap (0xc00), and the fault taken by the kernel is not seen as an exec fault by set_access_flags_filter().
Commit d7df2443cd5f ("powerpc/mm: Fix spurious segfaults on radix with autonuma") made it clear and handled it properly. But later on commit d3ca587404b3 ("powerpc/mm: Fix reporting of kernel execute faults") removed that handling, introducing test based on error_code. And here is the problem, because on the 603 all upper bits of SRR1 get cleared when the TLB instruction miss handler bails out to ISI.
Until commit cbd7e6ca0210 ("powerpc/fault: Avoid heavy search_exception_tables() verification"), an exec fault from kernel at a userspace address was indirectly caught by the lack of entry for that address in the exception tables. But after that commit the kernel mainly relies on KUAP or on core mm handling to catch wrong user accesses. Here the access is not wrong, so mm handles it. It is a minor fault because PAGE_EXEC is not set, set_access_flags_filter() should set PAGE_EXEC and voila. But as is_exec_fault() returns false as explained in the beginning, set_access_flags_filter() bails out without setting PAGE_EXEC flag, which leads to a forever minor exec fault.
As the kernel is not prepared to handle such exec faults, the thing to do is to fire in bad_kernel_fault() for any exec fault taken by the kernel, as it was prior to commit d3ca587404b3.(CVE-2021-47350)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
udf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in udf_symlink function
In function udf_symlink, epos.bh is assigned with the value returned by udf_tgetblk. The function udf_tgetblk is defined in udf/misc.c and returns the value of sb_getblk function that could be NULL. Then, epos.bh is used without any check, causing a possible NULL pointer dereference when sb_getblk fails.
This fix adds a check to validate the value of epos.bh.(CVE-2021-47353)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
atm: nicstar: Fix possible use-after-free in nicstar_cleanup()
This module's remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function does not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the timer handler may still be running after the driver's remove function has finished, which would result in a use-after-free.
Fix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler has finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47355)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mISDN: fix possible use-after-free in HFC_cleanup()
This module's remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function does not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the timer handler may still be running after the driver's remove function has finished, which would result in a use-after-free.
Fix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler has finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47356)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
atm: iphase: fix possible use-after-free in ia_module_exit()
This module's remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function does not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the timer handler may still be running after the driver's remove function has finished, which would result in a use-after-free.
Fix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler has finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47357)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mcb: fix error handling in mcb_alloc_bus()
There are two bugs: 1) If ida_simple_get() fails then this code calls put_device(carrier) but we haven't yet called get_device(carrier) and probably that leads to a use after free. 2) After device_initialize() then we need to use put_device() to release the bus. This will free the internal resources tied to the device and call mcb_free_bus() which will free the rest.(CVE-2021-47361)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/pm: Update intermediate power state for SI
Update the current state as boot state during dpm initialization. During the subsequent initialization, set_power_state gets called to transition to the final power state. set_power_state refers to values from the current state and without current state populated, it could result in NULL pointer dereference.
For ex: on platforms where PCI speed change is supported through ACPI ATCS method, the link speed of current state needs to be queried before deciding on changing to final power state's link speed. The logic to query ATCS-support was broken on certain platforms. The issue became visible when broken ATCS-support logic got fixed with commit f9b7f3703ff9 ("drm/amdgpu/acpi: make ATPX/ATCS structures global (v2)").
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1698(CVE-2021-47362)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mac80211: fix use-after-free in CCMP/GCMP RX
When PN checking is done in mac80211, for fragmentation we need to copy the PN to the RX struct so we can later use it to do a comparison, since commit bf30ca922a0c ("mac80211: check defrag PN against current frame").
Unfortunately, in that commit I used the 'hdr' variable without it being necessarily valid, so use-after-free could occur if it was necessary to reallocate (parts of) the frame.
Fix this by reloading the variable after the code that results in the reallocations, if any.
This fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214401.(CVE-2021-47388)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mac80211: limit injected vht mcs/nss in ieee80211_parse_tx_radiotap
Limit max values for vht mcs and nss in ieee80211_parse_tx_radiotap routine in order to fix the following warning reported by syzbot:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10717 at include/net/mac80211.h:989 ieee80211_rate_set_vht include/net/mac80211.h:989 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10717 at include/net/mac80211.h:989 ieee80211_parse_tx_radiotap+0x101e/0x12d0 net/mac80211/tx.c:2244 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 10717 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 5.14.0-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:ieee80211_rate_set_vht include/net/mac80211.h:989 [inline] RIP: 0010:ieee80211_parse_tx_radiotap+0x101e/0x12d0 net/mac80211/tx.c:2244 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000186f3e8 EFLAGS: 00010216 RAX: 0000000000000618 RBX: ffff88804ef76500 RCX: ffffc900143a5000 RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff888f478e RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00000000ffffffff R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000100 R10: ffffffff888f46f9 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000fffffff8 R13: ffff88804ef7653c R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000004 FS: 00007fbf5718f700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b2de23000 CR3: 000000006a671000 CR4: 00000000001506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600 Call Trace: ieee80211_monitor_select_queue+0xa6/0x250 net/mac80211/iface.c:740 netdev_core_pick_tx+0x169/0x2e0 net/core/dev.c:4089 __dev_queue_xmit+0x6f9/0x3710 net/core/dev.c:4165 __bpf_tx_skb net/core/filter.c:2114 [inline] __bpf_redirect_no_mac net/core/filter.c:2139 [inline] __bpf_redirect+0x5ba/0xd20 net/core/filter.c:2162 _bpfclone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2429 [inline] bpf_clone_redirect+0x2ae/0x420 net/core/filter.c:2401 bpf_prog_eeb6f53a69e5c6a2+0x59/0x234 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:717 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:624 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:631 [inline] bpf_test_run+0x381/0xa30 net/bpf/test_run.c:119 bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0xb84/0x1ee0 net/bpf/test_run.c:663 bpf_prog_test_run kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3307 [inline] __sys_bpf+0x2137/0x5df0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4605 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4691 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4689 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xb0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4689 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x4665f9(CVE-2021-47395)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sctp: break out if skb_header_pointer returns NULL in sctp_rcv_ootb
We should always check if skb_header_pointer's return is NULL before using it, otherwise it may cause null-ptr-deref, as syzbot reported:
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] RIP: 0010:sctp_rcv_ootb net/sctp/input.c:705 [inline] RIP: 0010:sctp_rcv+0x1d84/0x3220 net/sctp/input.c:196 Call Trace: <IRQ> sctp6_rcv+0x38/0x60 net/sctp/ipv6.c:1109 ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x2e9/0x1ca0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:422 ip6_input_finish+0x62/0x170 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:463 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:307 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:301 [inline] ip6_input+0x9c/0xd0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:472 dst_input include/net/dst.h:460 [inline] ip6_rcv_finish net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:76 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:307 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:301 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0x28c/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:297(CVE-2021-47397)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipack: ipoctal: fix stack information leak
The tty driver name is used also after registering the driver and must specifically not be allocated on the stack to avoid leaking information to user space (or triggering an oops).
Drivers should not try to encode topology information in the tty device name but this one snuck in through staging without anyone noticing and another driver has since copied this malpractice.
Fixing the ABI is a separate issue, but this at least plugs the security hole.(CVE-2021-47401)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: betop: fix slab-out-of-bounds Write in betop_probe
Syzbot reported slab-out-of-bounds Write bug in hid-betopff driver. The problem is the driver assumes the device must have an input report but some malicious devices violate this assumption.
So this patch checks hid_device's input is non empty before it's been used.(CVE-2021-47404)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: usbhid: free raw_report buffers in usbhid_stop
Free the unsent raw_report buffers when the device is removed.
Fixes a memory leak reported by syzbot at: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=7b4fa7cb1a7c2d3342a2a8a6c53371c8c418ab47(CVE-2021-47405)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: conntrack: serialize hash resizes and cleanups
Syzbot was able to trigger the following warning [1]
No repro found by syzbot yet but I was able to trigger similar issue by having 2 scripts running in parallel, changing conntrack hash sizes, and:
for j in seq 1 1000 ; do unshare -n /bin/true >/dev/null ; done
It would take more than 5 minutes for net_namespace structures to be cleaned up.
This is because nf_ct_iterate_cleanup() has to restart everytime a resize happened.
By adding a mutex, we can serialize hash resizes and cleanups and also make get_next_corpse() faster by skipping over empty buckets.
Even without resizes in the picture, this patch considerably speeds up network namespace dismantles.
[1] INFO: task syz-executor.0:8312 can't die for more than 144 seconds. task:syz-executor.0 state:R running task stack:25672 pid: 8312 ppid: 6573 flags:0x00004006 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4955 [inline] __schedule+0x940/0x26f0 kernel/sched/core.c:6236 preempt_schedule_common+0x45/0xc0 kernel/sched/core.c:6408 preempt_schedule_thunk+0x16/0x18 arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S:35 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x109/0x120 kernel/softirq.c:390 local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:32 [inline] get_next_corpse net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:2252 [inline] nf_ct_iterate_cleanup+0x15a/0x450 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:2275 nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list+0x14c/0x4f0 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:2469 ops_exit_list+0x10d/0x160 net/core/net_namespace.c:171 setup_net+0x639/0xa30 net/core/net_namespace.c:349 copy_net_ns+0x319/0x760 net/core/net_namespace.c:470 create_new_namespaces+0x3f6/0xb20 kernel/nsproxy.c:110 unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0xc1/0x1f0 kernel/nsproxy.c:226 ksys_unshare+0x445/0x920 kernel/fork.c:3128 __do_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3202 [inline] __se_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3200 [inline] __x64_sys_unshare+0x2d/0x40 kernel/fork.c:3200 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f63da68e739 RSP: 002b:00007f63d7c05188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000110 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f63da792f80 RCX: 00007f63da68e739 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000040000000 RBP: 00007f63da6e8cc4 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f63da792f80 R13: 00007fff50b75d3f R14: 00007f63d7c05300 R15: 0000000000022000
Showing all locks held in the system: 1 lock held by khungtaskd/27: #0: ffffffff8b980020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x53/0x260 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6446 2 locks held by kworker/u4:2/153: #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic64_set arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:34 [inline] #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic_long_set include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:41 [inline] #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic_long_set include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:1198 [inline] #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_data kernel/workqueue.c:634 [inline] #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_pool_and_clear_pending kernel/workqueue.c:661 [inline] #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x896/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2268 #1: ffffc9000140fdb0 ((kfence_timer).work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x8ca/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2272 1 lock held by systemd-udevd/2970: 1 lock held by in:imklog/6258: #0: ffff88807f970ff0 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0xe9/0x100 fs/file.c:990 3 locks held by kworker/1:6/8158: 1 lock held by syz-executor.0/8312: 2 locks held by kworker/u4:13/9320: 1 lock held by ---truncated---(CVE-2021-47408)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/nouveau/debugfs: fix file release memory leak
When using single_open() for opening, single_release() should be called, otherwise the 'op' allocated in single_open() will be leaked.(CVE-2021-47423)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free
Commit d39df158518c ("scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn") added iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but then also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already completed task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup code. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common cleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.
This reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we've checked if the iscsi_task is valid.(CVE-2021-47427)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix memory leak in mlx5_core_destroy_cq() error path
Prior to this patch in case mlx5_core_destroy_cq() failed it returns without completing all destroy operations and that leads to memory leak. Instead, complete the destroy flow before return error.
Also move mlx5_debug_cq_remove() to the beginning of mlx5_core_destroy_cq() to be symmetrical with mlx5_core_create_cq().
kmemleak complains on:
unreferenced object 0xc000000038625100 (size 64): comm "ethtool", pid 28301, jiffies 4298062946 (age 785.380s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 60 01 48 94 00 00 00 c0 b8 05 34 c3 00 00 00 c0 `.H.......4..... 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 db 7d c1 00 00 00 c0 ..........}..... backtrace: [<000000009e8643cb>] add_res_tree+0xd0/0x270 [mlx5_core] [<00000000e7cb8e6c>] mlx5_debug_cq_add+0x5c/0xc0 [mlx5_core] [<000000002a12918f>] mlx5_core_create_cq+0x1d0/0x2d0 [mlx5_core] [<00000000cef0a696>] mlx5e_create_cq+0x210/0x3f0 [mlx5_core] [<000000009c642c26>] mlx5e_open_cq+0xb4/0x130 [mlx5_core] [<0000000058dfa578>] mlx5e_ptp_open+0x7f4/0xe10 [mlx5_core] [<0000000081839561>] mlx5e_open_channels+0x9cc/0x13e0 [mlx5_core] [<0000000009cf05d4>] mlx5e_switch_priv_channels+0xa4/0x230 [mlx5_core] [<0000000042bbedd8>] mlx5e_safe_switch_params+0x14c/0x300 [mlx5_core] [<0000000004bc9db8>] set_pflag_tx_port_ts+0x9c/0x160 [mlx5_core] [<00000000a0553443>] mlx5e_set_priv_flags+0xd0/0x1b0 [mlx5_core] [<00000000a8f3d84b>] ethnl_set_privflags+0x234/0x2d0 [<00000000fd27f27c>] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x108/0x1d0 [<00000000f495e2bb>] genl_family_rcv_msg+0xe4/0x1f0 [<00000000646c5c2c>] genl_rcv_msg+0x78/0x120 [<00000000d53e384e>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x74/0x1a0(CVE-2021-47438)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NFC: digital: fix possible memory leak in digital_in_send_sdd_req()
'skb' is allocated in digital_in_send_sdd_req(), but not free when digital_in_send_cmd() failed, which will cause memory leak. Fix it by freeing 'skb' if digital_in_send_cmd() return failed.(CVE-2021-47442)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NFC: digital: fix possible memory leak in digital_tg_listen_mdaa()
'params' is allocated in digital_tg_listen_mdaa(), but not free when digital_send_cmd() failed, which will cause memory leak. Fix it by freeing 'params' if digital_send_cmd() return failed.(CVE-2021-47443)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm: Fix null pointer dereference on pointer edp
The initialization of pointer dev dereferences pointer edp before edp is null checked, so there is a potential null pointer deference issue. Fix this by only dereferencing edp after edp has been null checked.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference before null check")(CVE-2021-47445)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: mount fails with buffer overflow in strlen
Starting with kernel 5.11 built with CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE mouting an ocfs2 filesystem with either o2cb or pcmk cluster stack fails with the trace below. Problem seems to be that strings for cluster stack and cluster name are not guaranteed to be null terminated in the disk representation, while strlcpy assumes that the source string is always null terminated. This causes a read outside of the source string triggering the buffer overflow detection.
detected buffer overflow in strlen ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at lib/string.c:1149! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 1 PID: 910 Comm: mount.ocfs2 Not tainted 5.14.0-1-amd64 #1 Debian 5.14.6-2 RIP: 0010:fortify_panic+0xf/0x11 ... Call Trace: ocfs2_initialize_super.isra.0.cold+0xc/0x18 [ocfs2] ocfs2_fill_super+0x359/0x19b0 [ocfs2] mount_bdev+0x185/0x1b0 legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x25/0xb0 path_mount+0x454/0xa20 __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae(CVE-2021-47458)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: j1939: j1939_netdev_start(): fix UAF for rx_kref of j1939_priv
It will trigger UAF for rx_kref of j1939_priv as following.
cpu0 cpu1
j1939_sk_bind(socket0, ndev0, ...) j1939_netdev_start j1939_sk_bind(socket1, ndev0, ...) j1939_netdev_start j1939_priv_set j1939_priv_get_by_ndev_locked j1939_jsk_add ..... j1939_netdev_stop kref_put_lock(&priv->rx_kref, ...) kref_get(&priv->rx_kref, ...) REFCOUNT_WARN("addition on 0;...")
==================================================== refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 20874 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0x169/0x1e0 RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x169/0x1e0 Call Trace: j1939_netdev_start+0x68b/0x920 j1939_sk_bind+0x426/0xeb0 ? security_socket_bind+0x83/0xb0
The rx_kref's kref_get() and kref_put() should use j1939_netdev_lock to protect.(CVE-2021-47459)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
comedi: vmk80xx: fix transfer-buffer overflows
The driver uses endpoint-sized USB transfer buffers but up until recently had no sanity checks on the sizes.
Commit e1f13c879a7c ("staging: comedi: check validity of wMaxPacketSize of usb endpoints found") inadvertently fixed NULL-pointer dereferences when accessing the transfer buffers in case a malicious device has a zero wMaxPacketSize.
Make sure to allocate buffers large enough to handle also the other accesses that are done without a size check (e.g. byte 18 in vmk80xx_cnt_insn_read() for the VMK8061_MODEL) to avoid writing beyond the buffers, for example, when doing descriptor fuzzing.
The original driver was for a low-speed device with 8-byte buffers. Support was later added for a device that uses bulk transfers and is presumably a full-speed device with a maximum 64-byte wMaxPacketSize.(CVE-2021-47475)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
comedi: dt9812: fix DMA buffers on stack
USB transfer buffers are typically mapped for DMA and must not be allocated on the stack or transfers will fail.
Allocate proper transfer buffers in the various command helpers and return an error on short transfers instead of acting on random stack data.
Note that this also fixes a stack info leak on systems where DMA is not used as 32 bytes are always sent to the device regardless of how short the command is.(CVE-2021-47477)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usbnet: sanity check for maxpacket
maxpacket of 0 makes no sense and oopses as we need to divide by it. Give up.
V2: fixed typo in log and stylistic issues(CVE-2021-47495)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf hist: Fix memory leak of a perf_hpp_fmt
perf_hpp__column_unregister() removes an entry from a list but doesn't free the memory causing a memory leak spotted by leak sanitizer.
Add the free while at the same time reducing the scope of the function to static.(CVE-2021-47545)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port()
The if statement: if (port >= DSAF_GE_NUM) return;
limits the value of port less than DSAF_GE_NUM (i.e., 8). However, if the value of port is 6 or 7, an array overflow could occur: port_rst_off = dsaf_dev->mac_cb[port]->port_rst_off;
because the length of dsaf_dev->mac_cb is DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM (i.e., 6).
To fix this possible array overflow, we first check port and if it is greater than or equal to DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM, the function returns.(CVE-2021-47548)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sata_fsl: fix UAF in sata_fsl_port_stop when rmmod sata_fsl
When the rmmod sata_fsl.ko command is executed in the PPC64 GNU/Linux,
a bug is reported:
==================================================================
BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0x80000800805b502c
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
NIP [c0000000000388a4] .ioread32+0x4/0x20
LR [80000000000c6034] .sata_fsl_port_stop+0x44/0xe0 [sata_fsl]
Call Trace:
.free_irq+0x1c/0x4e0 (unreliable)
.ata_host_stop+0x74/0xd0 [libata]
.release_nodes+0x330/0x3f0
.device_release_driver_internal+0x178/0x2c0
.driver_detach+0x64/0xd0
.bus_remove_driver+0x70/0xf0
.driver_unregister+0x38/0x80
.platform_driver_unregister+0x14/0x30
.fsl_sata_driver_exit+0x18/0xa20 [sata_fsl]
.__se_sys_delete_module+0x1ec/0x2d0
.system_call_exception+0xfc/0x1f0
system_call_common+0xf8/0x200
==================================================================
The triggering of the BUG is shown in the following stack:
driver_detach device_release_driver_internal __device_release_driver drv->remove(dev) --> platform_drv_remove/platform_remove drv->remove(dev) --> sata_fsl_remove iounmap(host_priv->hcr_base); <---- unmap kfree(host_priv); <---- free devres_release_all release_nodes dr->node.release(dev, dr->data) --> ata_host_stop ap->ops->port_stop(ap) --> sata_fsl_port_stop ioread32(hcr_base + HCONTROL) <---- UAF host->ops->host_stop(host)
The iounmap(host_priv->hcr_base) and kfree(host_priv) functions should not be executed in drv->remove. These functions should be executed in host_stop after port_stop. Therefore, we move these functions to the new function sata_fsl_host_stop and bind the new function to host_stop.(CVE-2021-47549)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/smc: Fix NULL pointer dereferencing in smc_vlan_by_tcpsk()
Coverity reports a possible NULL dereferencing problem:
in smc_vlan_by_tcpsk(): 6. returned_null: netdev_lower_get_next returns NULL (checked 29 out of 30 times). 7. var_assigned: Assigning: ndev = NULL return value from netdev_lower_get_next. 1623 ndev = (struct net_device *)netdev_lower_get_next(ndev, &lower); CID 1468509 (#1 of 1): Dereference null return value (NULL_RETURNS) 8. dereference: Dereferencing a pointer that might be NULL ndev when calling is_vlan_dev. 1624 if (is_vlan_dev(ndev)) {
Remove the manual implementation and use netdev_walk_all_lower_dev() to iterate over the lower devices. While on it remove an obsolete function parameter comment.(CVE-2021-47559)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pinctrl: single: fix potential NULL dereference
Added checking of pointer "function" in pcs_set_mux(). pinmux_generic_get_function() can return NULL and the pointer "function" was dereferenced without checking against NULL.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2022-48708)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: s390/aes - Fix buffer overread in CTR mode
When processing the last block, the s390 ctr code will always read a whole block, even if there isn't a whole block of data left. Fix this by using the actual length left and copy it into a buffer first for processing.(CVE-2023-52669)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ACPI: video: check for error while searching for backlight device parent
If acpi_get_parent() called in acpi_video_dev_register_backlight() fails, for example, because acpi_ut_acquire_mutex() fails inside acpi_get_parent), this can lead to incorrect (uninitialized) acpi_parent handle being passed to acpi_get_pci_dev() for detecting the parent pci device.
Check acpi_get_parent() result and set parent device only in case of success.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2023-52693)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sysv: don't call sb_bread() with pointers_lock held
syzbot is reporting sleep in atomic context in SysV filesystem [1], for sb_bread() is called with rw_spinlock held.
A "write_lock(&pointers_lock) => read_lock(&pointers_lock) deadlock" bug and a "sb_bread() with write_lock(&pointers_lock)" bug were introduced by "Replace BKL for chain locking with sysvfs-private rwlock" in Linux 2.5.12.
Then, "[PATCH] err1-40: sysvfs locking fix" in Linux 2.6.8 fixed the former bug by moving pointers_lock lock to the callers, but instead introduced a "sb_bread() with read_lock(&pointers_lock)" bug (which made this problem easier to hit).
Al Viro suggested that why not to do like get_branch()/get_block()/ find_shared() in Minix filesystem does. And doing like that is almost a revert of "[PATCH] err1-40: sysvfs locking fix" except that get_branch() from with find_shared() is called without write_lock(&pointers_lock).(CVE-2023-52699)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/usb: kalmia: Don't pass act_len in usb_bulk_msg error path
syzbot reported that act_len in kalmia_send_init_packet() is uninitialized when passing it to the first usb_bulk_msg error path. Jiri Pirko noted that it's pointless to pass it in the error path, and that the value that would be printed in the second error path would be the value of act_len from the first call to usb_bulk_msg.[1]
With this in mind, let's just not pass act_len to the usb_bulk_msg error paths.
1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y9pY61y1nwTuzMOa@nanopsycho/(CVE-2023-52703)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64: Restrict CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to GNU as or LLVM IAS 15.x or newer
Prior to LLVM 15.0.0, LLVM's integrated assembler would incorrectly byte-swap NOP when compiling for big-endian, and the resulting series of bytes happened to match the encoding of FNMADD S21, S30, S0, S0.
This went unnoticed until commit:
34f66c4c4d5518c1 ("arm64: Use a positive cpucap for FP/SIMD")
Prior to that commit, the kernel would always enable the use of FPSIMD early in boot when __cpu_setup() initialized CPACR_EL1, and so usage of FNMADD within the kernel was not detected, but could result in the corruption of user or kernel FPSIMD state.
After that commit, the instructions happen to trap during boot prior to FPSIMD being detected and enabled, e.g.
| Unhandled 64-bit el1h sync exception on CPU0, ESR 0x000000001fe00000 -- ASIMD | CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00013-g34f66c4c4d55 #1 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 400000c9 (nZcv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) | pc : __pi_strcmp+0x1c/0x150 | lr : populate_properties+0xe4/0x254 | sp : ffffd014173d3ad0 | x29: ffffd014173d3af0 x28: fffffbfffddffcb8 x27: 0000000000000000 | x26: 0000000000000058 x25: fffffbfffddfe054 x24: 0000000000000008 | x23: fffffbfffddfe000 x22: fffffbfffddfe000 x21: fffffbfffddfe044 | x20: ffffd014173d3b70 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: 0000000000000005 | x17: 0000000000000010 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 00000000413e7000 | x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000001bcc x12: 0000000000000000 | x11: 00000000d00dfeed x10: ffffd414193f2cd0 x9 : 0000000000000000 | x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : ffffffffffffffc0 x6 : 0000000000000000 | x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0101010101010101 x3 : 000000000000002a | x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : ffffd014171f2988 x0 : fffffbfffddffcb8 | Kernel panic - not syncing: Unhandled exception | CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00013-g34f66c4c4d55 #1 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0xec/0x108 | show_stack+0x18/0x2c | dump_stack_lvl+0x50/0x68 | dump_stack+0x18/0x24 | panic+0x13c/0x340 | el1t_64_irq_handler+0x0/0x1c | el1_abort+0x0/0x5c | el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 | __pi_strcmp+0x1c/0x150 | unflatten_dt_nodes+0x1e8/0x2d8 | __unflatten_device_tree+0x5c/0x15c | unflatten_device_tree+0x38/0x50 | setup_arch+0x164/0x1e0 | start_kernel+0x64/0x38c | __primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4
Restrict CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to a known good assembler, which is either GNU as or LLVM's IAS 15.0.0 and newer, which contains the linked commit.(CVE-2023-52750)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smb: client: fix use-after-free bug in cifs_debug_data_proc_show()
Skip SMB sessions that are being teared down (e.g. @ses->ses_status == SES_EXITING) in cifs_debug_data_proc_show() to avoid use-after-free in @ses.
This fixes the following GPF when reading from /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData while mounting and umounting
[ 816.251274] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6d81: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI ... [ 816.260138] Call Trace: [ 816.260329] <TASK> [ 816.260499] ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 [ 816.260762] ? exc_general_protection+0x1b3/0x410 [ 816.261126] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 [ 816.261502] ? cifs_debug_tcon+0xbd/0x240 [cifs] [ 816.261878] ? cifs_debug_tcon+0xab/0x240 [cifs] [ 816.262249] cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0x516/0xdb0 [cifs] [ 816.262689] ? seq_read_iter+0x379/0x470 [ 816.262995] seq_read_iter+0x118/0x470 [ 816.263291] proc_reg_read_iter+0x53/0x90 [ 816.263596] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f [ 816.263945] vfs_read+0x201/0x350 [ 816.264211] ksys_read+0x75/0x100 [ 816.264472] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 [ 816.264750] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 [ 816.265135] RIP: 0033:0x7fd5e669d381(CVE-2023-52752)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gfs2: ignore negated quota changes
When lots of quota changes are made, there may be cases in which an inode's quota information is increased and then decreased, such as when blocks are added to a file, then deleted from it. If the timing is right, function do_qc can add pending quota changes to a transaction, then later, another call to do_qc can negate those changes, resulting in a net gain of 0. The quota_change information is recorded in the qc buffer (and qd element of the inode as well). The buffer is added to the transaction by the first call to do_qc, but a subsequent call changes the value from non-zero back to zero. At that point it's too late to remove the buffer_head from the transaction. Later, when the quota sync code is called, the zero-change qd element is discovered and flagged as an assert warning. If the fs is mounted with errors=panic, the kernel will panic.
This is usually seen when files are truncated and the quota changes are negated by punch_hole/truncate which uses gfs2_quota_hold and gfs2_quota_unhold rather than block allocations that use gfs2_quota_lock and gfs2_quota_unlock which automatically do quota sync.
This patch solves the problem by adding a check to qd_check_sync such that net-zero quota changes already added to the transaction are no longer deemed necessary to be synced, and skipped.
In this case references are taken for the qd and the slot from do_qc so those need to be put. The normal sequence of events for a normal non-zero quota change is as follows:
gfs2_quota_change do_qc qd_hold slot_hold
Later, when the changes are to be synced:
gfs2_quota_sync qd_fish qd_check_sync gets qd ref via lockref_get_not_dead do_sync do_qc(QC_SYNC) qd_put lockref_put_or_lock qd_unlock qd_put lockref_put_or_lock
In the net-zero change case, we add a check to qd_check_sync so it puts the qd and slot references acquired in gfs2_quota_change and skip the unneeded sync.(CVE-2023-52759)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tty: vcc: Add check for kstrdup() in vcc_probe()
Add check for the return value of kstrdup() and return the error, if it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52789)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipvlan: add ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() helper
Inspired by syzbot reports using a stack of multiple ipvlan devices.
Reduce stack size needed in ipvlan_process_v6_outbound() by moving the flowi6 struct used for the route lookup in an non inlined helper. ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() needs 120 bytes on the stack, immediately reclaimed.
Also make sure ipvlan_process_v4_outbound() is not inlined.
We might also have to lower MAX_NEST_DEV, because only syzbot uses setups with more than four stacked devices.
BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at ffffc9000e803ff8 (stack is ffffc9000e804000..ffffc9000e808000) stack guard page: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 13442 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.1.52-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/09/2023 RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x4/0x2a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:188 Code: 48 01 c6 48 89 c7 e8 db 4e c1 03 31 c0 5d c3 cc 0f 0b eb 02 0f 0b b8 ea ff ff ff 5d c3 cc 00 00 cc cc 00 00 cc cc 55 48 89 e5 <41> 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 b0 01 48 85 f6 0f 84 a4 01 00 00 48 89 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000e804000 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff817e5bf2 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffffffff887c6568 RBP: ffffc9000e804000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: dffffc0000000001 R12: 1ffff92001d0080c R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff87e6b100 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fd0c55826c0(0000) GS:ffff8881f6800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffc9000e803ff8 CR3: 0000000170ef7000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <#DF> </#DF> <TASK> [<ffffffff81f281d1>] __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/shadow.c:31 [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:72 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] cpumask_test_cpu include/linux/cpumask.h:506 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] cpu_online include/linux/cpumask.h:1092 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:24 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] lock_acquire+0xe2/0x590 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5632 [<ffffffff8563221e>] rcu_lock_acquire+0x2e/0x40 include/linux/rcupdate.h:306 [<ffffffff8561464d>] rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:747 [inline] [<ffffffff8561464d>] ip6_pol_route+0x15d/0x1440 net/ipv6/route.c:2221 [<ffffffff85618120>] ip6_pol_route_output+0x50/0x80 net/ipv6/route.c:2606 [<ffffffff856f65b5>] pol_lookup_func include/net/ip6_fib.h:584 [inline] [<ffffffff856f65b5>] fib6_rule_lookup+0x265/0x620 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:116 [<ffffffff85618009>] ip6_route_output_flags_noref+0x2d9/0x3a0 net/ipv6/route.c:2638 [<ffffffff8561821a>] ip6_route_output_flags+0xca/0x340 net/ipv6/route.c:2651 [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:100 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_process_v6_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:473 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_process_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:529 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_xmit_mode_l3 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:602 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_queue_xmit+0xc33/0x1be0 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:677 [<ffffffff838c2909>] ipvlan_start_xmit+0x49/0x100 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c:229 [<ffffffff84d03900>] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4966 [inline] [<ffffffff84d03900>] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3644 [inline] [<ffffffff84d03900>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x320/0x980 net/core/dev.c:3660 [<ffffffff84d080e2>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x16b2/0x3370 net/core/dev.c:4324 [<ffffffff855ce4cd>] dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3067 [inline] [<ffffffff855ce4cd>] neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:529 [inline] [<f ---truncated---(CVE-2023-52796)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbFindLeaf
Currently while searching for dmtree_t for sufficient free blocks there is an array out of bounds while getting element in tp->dm_stree. To add the required check for out of bound we first need to determine the type of dmtree. Thus added an extra parameter to dbFindLeaf so that the type of tree can be determined and the required check can be applied.(CVE-2023-52799)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iio: adc: stm32-adc: harden against NULL pointer deref in stm32_adc_probe()
of_match_device() may fail and returns a NULL pointer.
In practice there is no known reasonable way to trigger this, but in case one is added in future, harden the code by adding the check(CVE-2023-52802)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agpref
Both db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of the db_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check for db_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.
The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20 index 7936 is out of range for type 'atomic_t[128]'
Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are valid indexes for the db_agfree array.(CVE-2023-52804)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diAlloc
Currently there is not check against the agno of the iag while allocating new inodes to avoid fragmentation problem. Added the check which is required.(CVE-2023-52805)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: libfc: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in fc_lport_ptp_setup()
fc_lport_ptp_setup() did not check the return value of fc_rport_create() which can return NULL and would cause a NULL pointer dereference. Address this issue by checking return value of fc_rport_create() and log error message on fc_rport_create() failed.(CVE-2023-52809)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd: Fix UBSAN array-index-out-of-bounds for Polaris and Tonga
For pptable structs that use flexible array sizes, use flexible arrays.(CVE-2023-52819)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cpu/hotplug: Don't offline the last non-isolated CPU
If a system has isolated CPUs via the "isolcpus=" command line parameter, then an attempt to offline the last housekeeping CPU will result in a WARN_ON() when rebuilding the scheduler domains and a subsequent panic due to and unhandled empty CPU mas in partition_sched_domains_locked().
cpuset_hotplug_workfn() rebuild_sched_domains_locked() ndoms = generate_sched_domains(&doms, &attr); cpumask_and(doms[0], top_cpuset.effective_cpus, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_DOMAIN));
Thus results in an empty CPU mask which triggers the warning and then the subsequent crash:
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 80 at kernel/sched/topology.c:2366 build_sched_domains+0x120c/0x1408 Call trace: build_sched_domains+0x120c/0x1408 partition_sched_domains_locked+0x234/0x880 rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x37c/0x798 rebuild_sched_domains+0x30/0x58 cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x2a8/0x930
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffe80027ab37080 partition_sched_domains_locked+0x318/0x880 rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x37c/0x798
Aside of the resulting crash, it does not make any sense to offline the last last housekeeping CPU.
Prevent this by masking out the non-housekeeping CPUs when selecting a target CPU for initiating the CPU unplug operation via the work queue.(CVE-2023-52831)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: don't return unset power in ieee80211_get_tx_power()
We can get a UBSAN warning if ieee80211_get_tx_power() returns the INT_MIN value mac80211 internally uses for "unset power level".
UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in net/wireless/nl80211.c:3816:5 -2147483648 * 100 cannot be represented in type 'int' CPU: 0 PID: 20433 Comm: insmod Tainted: G WC OE Call Trace: dump_stack+0x74/0x92 ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x50 handle_overflow+0x8d/0xd0 __ubsan_handle_mul_overflow+0xe/0x10 nl80211_send_iface+0x688/0x6b0 [cfg80211] [...] cfg80211_register_wdev+0x78/0xb0 [cfg80211] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x200/0x620 [cfg80211] [...] ieee80211_if_add+0x60e/0x8f0 [mac80211] ieee80211_register_hw+0xda5/0x1170 [mac80211]
In this case, simply return an error instead, to indicate that no data is available.(CVE-2023-52832)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: Change nla_policy for bearer-related names to NLA_NUL_STRING
syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1]:
===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in strlen lib/string.c:418 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in strstr+0xb8/0x2f0 lib/string.c:756 strlen lib/string.c:418 [inline] strstr+0xb8/0x2f0 lib/string.c:756 tipc_nl_node_reset_link_stats+0x3ea/0xb50 net/tipc/node.c:2595 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit net/netlink/genetlink.c:971 [inline] genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1051 [inline] genl_rcv_msg+0x11ec/0x1290 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1066 netlink_rcv_skb+0x371/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2545 genl_rcv+0x40/0x60 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1075 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xf47/0x1250 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1368 netlink_sendmsg+0x1238/0x13d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1910 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:753 [inline] _syssendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2541 _sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2595 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2624 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2633 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2631 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x490 net/socket.c:2631 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook+0x12f/0xb70 mm/slab.h:767 slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x577/0xa80 mm/slub.c:3523 kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:559 __alloc_skb+0x318/0x740 net/core/skbuff.c:650 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1286 [inline] netlink_alloc_large_skb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1214 [inline] netlink_sendmsg+0xb34/0x13d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1885 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:753 [inline] _syssendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2541 _sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2595 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2624 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2633 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2631 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x490 net/socket.c:2631 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
TIPC bearer-related names including link names must be null-terminated strings. If a link name which is not null-terminated is passed through netlink, strstr() and similar functions can cause buffer overrun. This causes the above issue.
This patch changes the nla_policy for bearer-related names from NLA_STRING to NLA_NUL_STRING. This resolves the issue by ensuring that only null-terminated strings are accepted as bearer-related names.
syzbot reported similar uninit-value issue related to bearer names [2]. The root cause of this issue is that a non-null-terminated bearer name was passed. This patch also resolved this issue.(CVE-2023-52845)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: dev: can_put_echo_skb(): don't crash kernel if can_priv::echo_skb is accessed out of bounds
If the "struct can_priv::echoo_skb" is accessed out of bounds, this would cause a kernel crash. Instead, issue a meaningful warning message and return with an error.(CVE-2023-52878)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: core: Fix deadlock in usb_deauthorize_interface()
Among the attribute file callback routines in drivers/usb/core/sysfs.c, the interface_authorized_store() function is the only one which acquires a device lock on an ancestor device: It calls usb_deauthorize_interface(), which locks the interface's parent USB device.
The will lead to deadlock if another process already owns that lock and tries to remove the interface, whether through a configuration change or because the device has been disconnected. As part of the removal procedure, device_del() waits for all ongoing sysfs attribute callbacks to complete. But usb_deauthorize_interface() can't complete until the device lock has been released, and the lock won't be released until the removal has finished.
The mechanism provided by sysfs to prevent this kind of deadlock is to use the sysfs_break_active_protection() function, which tells sysfs not to wait for the attribute callback.
Reported-and-tested by: Yue Sun <samsun1006219@gmail.com> Reported by: xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>(CVE-2024-26934)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_expr_type_get()
nft_unregister_expr() can concurrent with __nft_expr_type_get(), and there is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_expressions list in __nft_expr_type_get(). Therefore, there is potential data-race of nf_tables_expressions list entry.
Use list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_expressions list in __nft_expr_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller nft_expr_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-27020)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: l2cap: fix null-ptr-deref in l2cap_chan_timeout
There is a race condition between l2cap_chan_timeout() and l2cap_chan_del(). When we use l2cap_chan_del() to delete the channel, the chan->conn will be set to null. But the conn could be dereferenced again in the mutex_lock() of l2cap_chan_timeout(). As a result the null pointer dereference bug will happen. The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:
[ 472.074580] ================================================================== [ 472.075284] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000158 by task kworker/0:0/7 [ 472.075308] [ 472.075308] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36 [ 472.075308] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4 [ 472.075308] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout [ 472.075308] Call Trace: [ 472.075308] <TASK> [ 472.075308] dump_stack_lvl+0x137/0x1a0 [ 472.075308] print_report+0x101/0x250 [ 472.075308] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x77/0x160 [ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] kasan_report+0x139/0x170 [ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] kasan_check_range+0x2c3/0x2e0 [ 472.075308] mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x181/0x300 [ 472.075308] process_one_work+0x5d2/0xe00 [ 472.075308] worker_thread+0xe1d/0x1660 [ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [ 472.075308] kthread+0x2b7/0x350 [ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0 [ 472.075308] ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 [ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0 [ 472.075308] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 472.075308] </TASK> [ 472.075308] ================================================================== [ 472.094860] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint [ 472.096136] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000158 [ 472.096136] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ 472.096136] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ 472.096136] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 472.096136] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI [ 472.096136] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G B 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36 [ 472.096136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4 [ 472.096136] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout [ 472.096136] RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0 [ 472.096136] Code: be 08 00 00 00 e8 f8 23 1f fd 4c 89 f7 be 08 00 00 00 e8 eb 23 1f fd 42 80 3c 23 00 74 08 48 88 [ 472.096136] RSP: 0018:ffff88800744fc78 EFLAGS: 00000246 [ 472.096136] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 1ffff11000e89f8f RCX: ffffffff8457c865 [ 472.096136] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff88800744fc78 [ 472.096136] RBP: 0000000000000158 R08: ffff88800744fc7f R09: 1ffff11000e89f8f [ 472.096136] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed1000e89f90 R12: dffffc0000000000 [ 472.096136] R13: 0000000000000158 R14: ffff88800744fc78 R15: ffff888007405a00 [ 472.096136] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88806d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 472.096136] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 472.096136] CR2: 0000000000000158 CR3: 000000000da32000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [ 472.096136] Call Trace: [ 472.096136] <TASK> [ 472.096136] ? __die_body+0x8d/0xe0 [ 472.096136] ? page_fault_oops+0x6b8/0x9a0 [ 472.096136] ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x20c/0x2a0 [ 472.096136] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1027/0x1340 [ 472.096136] ? _printk+0x7a/0xa0 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.096136] ? add_taint+0x42/0xd0 [ 472.096136] ? exc_page_fault+0x6a/0x1b0 [ 472.096136] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0 [ 472.096136] l2cap_chan_timeo ---truncated---(CVE-2024-27399)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
firewire: nosy: ensure user_length is taken into account when fetching packet contents
Ensure that packet_buffer_get respects the user_length provided. If the length of the head packet exceeds the user_length, packet_buffer_get will now return 0 to signify to the user that no data were read and a larger buffer size is required. Helps prevent user space overflows.(CVE-2024-27401)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: check/clear fast rx for non-4addr sta VLAN changes
When moving a station out of a VLAN and deleting the VLAN afterwards, the fast_rx entry still holds a pointer to the VLAN's netdev, which can cause use-after-free bugs. Fix this by immediately calling ieee80211_check_fast_rx after the VLAN change.(CVE-2024-35789)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/dm-raid: don't call md_reap_sync_thread() directly
Currently md_reap_sync_thread() is called from raid_message() directly without holding 'reconfig_mutex', this is definitely unsafe because md_reap_sync_thread() can change many fields that is protected by 'reconfig_mutex'.
However, hold 'reconfig_mutex' here is still problematic because this will cause deadlock, for example, commit 130443d60b1b ("md: refactor idle/frozen_sync_thread() to fix deadlock").
Fix this problem by using stop_sync_thread() to unregister sync_thread, like md/raid did.(CVE-2024-35808)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: udc: remove warning when queue disabled ep
It is possible trigger below warning message from mass storage function,
WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 3839 at drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c:294 usb_ep_queue+0x7c/0x104 pc : usb_ep_queue+0x7c/0x104 lr : fsg_main_thread+0x494/0x1b3c
Root cause is mass storage function try to queue request from main thread, but other thread may already disable ep when function disable.
As there is no function failure in the driver, in order to avoid effort to fix warning, change WARN_ON_ONCE() in usb_ep_queue() to pr_debug().(CVE-2024-35822)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vt: fix unicode buffer corruption when deleting characters
This is the same issue that was fixed for the VGA text buffer in commit 39cdb68c64d8 ("vt: fix memory overlapping when deleting chars in the buffer"). The cure is also the same i.e. replace memcpy() with memmove() due to the overlaping buffers.(CVE-2024-35823)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/mm/pat: fix VM_PAT handling in COW mappings
PAT handling won't do the right thing in COW mappings: the first PTE (or, in fact, all PTEs) can be replaced during write faults to point at anon folios. Reliably recovering the correct PFN and cachemode using follow_phys() from PTEs will not work in COW mappings.
Using follow_phys(), we might just get the address+protection of the anon folio (which is very wrong), or fail on swap/nonswap entries, failing follow_phys() and triggering a WARN_ON_ONCE() in untrack_pfn() and track_pfn_copy(), not properly calling free_pfn_range().
In free_pfn_range(), we either wouldn't call memtype_free() or would call it with the wrong range, possibly leaking memory.
To fix that, let's update follow_phys() to refuse returning anon folios, and fallback to using the stored PFN inside vma->vm_pgoff for COW mappings if we run into that.
We will now properly handle untrack_pfn() with COW mappings, where we don't need the cachemode. We'll have to fail fork()->track_pfn_copy() if the first page was replaced by an anon folio, though: we'd have to store the cachemode in the VMA to make this work, likely growing the VMA size.
For now, lets keep it simple and let track_pfn_copy() just fail in that case: it would have failed in the past with swap/nonswap entries already, and it would have done the wrong thing with anon folios.
Simple reproducer to trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE() in untrack_pfn():
<--- C reproducer ---> #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/mman.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <liburing.h>
int main(void) { struct io_uring_params p = {}; int ring_fd; size_t size; char *map;
ring_fd = io_uring_setup(1, &p);
if (ring_fd < 0) {
perror("io_uring_setup");
return 1;
}
size = p.sq_off.array + p.sq_entries * sizeof(unsigned);
/* Map the submission queue ring MAP_PRIVATE */
map = mmap(0, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE,
ring_fd, IORING_OFF_SQ_RING);
if (map == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap");
return 1;
}
/* We have at least one page. Let's COW it. */
*map = 0;
pause();
return 0;
} <--- C reproducer --->
On a system with 16 GiB RAM and swap configured: # ./iouring & # memhog 16G # killall iouring [ 301.552930] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 301.553285] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1402 at arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:1060 untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100 [ 301.553989] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_g [ 301.558232] CPU: 7 PID: 1402 Comm: iouring Not tainted 6.7.5-100.fc38.x86_64 #1 [ 301.558772] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebu4 [ 301.559569] RIP: 0010:untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100 [ 301.559893] Code: 75 c4 eb cf 48 8b 43 10 8b a8 e8 00 00 00 3b 6b 28 74 b8 48 8b 7b 30 e8 ea 1a f7 000 [ 301.561189] RSP: 0018:ffffba2c0377fab8 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 301.561590] RAX: 00000000ffffffea RBX: ffff9208c8ce9cc0 RCX: 000000010455e047 [ 301.562105] RDX: 07fffffff0eb1e0a RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9208c391d200 [ 301.562628] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffba2c0377fab8 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 301.563145] R10: ffff9208d2292d50 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 00007fea890e0000 [ 301.563669] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffba2c0377fc08 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 301.564186] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff920c2fbc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 301.564773] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 301.565197] CR2: 00007fea88ee8a20 CR3: 00000001033a8000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 [ 301.565725] PKRU: 55555554 [ 301.565944] Call Trace: [ 301.566148] <TASK> [ 301.566325] ? untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100 [ 301.566618] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 [ 301.566876] ? untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100 [ 3 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35877)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
selinux: avoid dereference of garbage after mount failure
In case kern_mount() fails and returns an error pointer return in the error branch instead of continuing and dereferencing the error pointer.
While on it drop the never read static variable selinuxfs_mount.(CVE-2024-35904)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: prevent division by zero in blk_rq_stat_sum()
The expression dst->nr_samples + src->nr_samples may have zero value on overflow. It is necessary to add a check to avoid division by zero.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.(CVE-2024-35925)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Properly link new fs rules into the tree
Previously, add_rule_fg would only add newly created rules from the handle into the tree when they had a refcount of 1. On the other hand, create_flow_handle tries hard to find and reference already existing identical rules instead of creating new ones.
These two behaviors can result in a situation where create_flow_handle 1) creates a new rule and references it, then 2) in a subsequent step during the same handle creation references it again, resulting in a rule with a refcount of 2 that is not linked into the tree, will have a NULL parent and root and will result in a crash when the flow group is deleted because del_sw_hw_rule, invoked on rule deletion, assumes node->parent is != NULL.
This happened in the wild, due to another bug related to incorrect handling of duplicate pkt_reformat ids, which lead to the code in create_flow_handle incorrectly referencing a just-added rule in the same flow handle, resulting in the problem described above. Full details are at [1].
This patch changes add_rule_fg to add new rules without parents into the tree, properly initializing them and avoiding the crash. This makes it more consistent with how rules are added to an FTE in create_flow_handle.(CVE-2024-35960)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: Fix memory leak in hci_req_sync_complete()
In 'hci_req_sync_complete()', always free the previous sync request state before assigning reference to a new one.(CVE-2024-35978)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses
To align with ACPI 6.3+, since bit_width can be any 8-bit value, it cannot be depended on to be always on a clean 8b boundary. This was uncovered on the Cobalt 100 platform.
SError Interrupt on CPU26, code 0xbe000011 -- SError CPU: 26 PID: 1510 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.15.2.1-13 #1 Hardware name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, BIOS MICROSOFT CORPORATION pstate: 62400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : cppc_get_perf_caps+0xec/0x410 lr : cppc_get_perf_caps+0xe8/0x410 sp : ffff8000155ab730 x29: ffff8000155ab730 x28: ffff0080139d0038 x27: ffff0080139d0078 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0080139d0058 x24: 00000000ffffffff x23: ffff0080139d0298 x22: ffff0080139d0278 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: ffff00802b251910 x19: ffff0080139d0000 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffdc7e111bad04 x15: ffff00802b251008 x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: ffff013f1fd63300 x12: 0000000000000006 x11: ffffdc7e128f4420 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffffdc7e111badec x8 : ffff00802b251980 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0080139d0028 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff0080139d0018 x3 : 00000000ffffffff x2 : 0000000000000008 x1 : ffff8000155ab7a0 x0 : 0000000000000000 Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt CPU: 26 PID: 1510 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.15.2.1-13 #1 Hardware name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, BIOS MICROSOFT CORPORATION Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1e0 show_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xb8 dump_stack+0x18/0x34 panic+0x16c/0x384 add_taint+0x0/0xc0 arm64_serror_panic+0x7c/0x90 arm64_is_fatal_ras_serror+0x34/0xa4 do_serror+0x50/0x6c el1h_64_error_handler+0x40/0x74 el1h_64_error+0x7c/0x80 cppc_get_perf_caps+0xec/0x410 cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init+0x74/0x400 [cppc_cpufreq] cpufreq_online+0x2dc/0xa30 cpufreq_add_dev+0xc0/0xd4 subsys_interface_register+0x134/0x14c cpufreq_register_driver+0x1b0/0x354 cppc_cpufreq_init+0x1a8/0x1000 [cppc_cpufreq] do_one_initcall+0x50/0x250 do_init_module+0x60/0x27c load_module+0x2300/0x2570 __do_sys_finit_module+0xa8/0x114 __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x2c/0x3c invoke_syscall+0x78/0x100 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x180/0x1a0 do_el0_svc+0x84/0xa0 el0_svc+0x2c/0xc0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa4/0x12c el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8
Instead, use access_width to determine the size and use the offset and width to shift and mask the bits to read/write out. Make sure to add a check for system memory since pcc redefines the access_width to subspace id.
If access_width is not set, then fall back to using bit_width.
rjw: Subject and changelog edits, comment adjustments
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i40e: Do not use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag for workqueue
Issue reported by customer during SRIOV testing, call trace: When both i40e and the i40iw driver are loaded, a warning in check_flush_dependency is being triggered. This seems to be because of the i40e driver workqueue is allocated with the WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag, and the i40iw one is not.
Similar error was encountered on ice too and it was fixed by removing the flag. Do the same for i40e too.
[Feb 9 09:08] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ +0.000004] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM i40e:i40e_service_task [i40e] is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM infiniband:0x0 [ +0.000060] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 937 at kernel/workqueue.c:2966 check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000007] Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device snd soundcore nls_utf8 cifs cifs_arc4 nls_ucs2_utils rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm cifs_md4 dns_resolver netfs qrtr rfkill sunrpc vfat fat intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common irdma intel_uncore_frequency intel_uncore_frequency_common ice ipmi_ssif isst_if_common skx_edac nfit libnvdimm x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp gnss coretemp ib_uverbs rapl intel_cstate ib_core iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support acpi_ipmi mei_me ipmi_si intel_uncore ioatdma i2c_i801 joydev pcspkr mei ipmi_devintf lpc_ich intel_pch_thermal i2c_smbus ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter acpi_pad xfs libcrc32c ast sd_mod drm_shmem_helper t10_pi drm_kms_helper sg ixgbe drm i40e ahci crct10dif_pclmul libahci crc32_pclmul igb crc32c_intel libata ghash_clmulni_intel i2c_algo_bit mdio dca wmi dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse [ +0.000050] CPU: 0 PID: 937 Comm: kworker/0:3 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-Feb-net_dev-Qiueue-00279-gbd43c5687e05 #1 [ +0.000003] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600BPB/S2600BPB, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0013.121520200651 12/15/2020 [ +0.000001] Workqueue: i40e i40e_service_task [i40e] [ +0.000024] RIP: 0010:check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000003] Code: ff 49 8b 54 24 18 48 8d 8b b0 00 00 00 49 89 e8 48 81 c6 b0 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 b0 97 fa 9f c6 05 8a cc 1f 02 01 e8 35 b3 fd ff <0f> 0b e9 10 ff ff ff 80 3d 78 cc 1f 02 00 75 94 e9 46 ff ff ff 90 [ +0.000002] RSP: 0018:ffffbd294976bcf8 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ +0.000002] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff94d4c483c000 RCX: 0000000000000027 [ +0.000001] RDX: ffff94d47f620bc8 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff94d47f620bc0 [ +0.000001] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffff7fff [ +0.000001] R10: ffffbd294976bb98 R11: ffffffffa0be65e8 R12: ffff94c5451ea180 [ +0.000001] R13: ffff94c5ab5e8000 R14: ffff94c5c20b6e05 R15: ffff94c5f1330ab0 [ +0.000001] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff94d47f600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ +0.000002] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ +0.000001] CR2: 00007f9e6f1fca70 CR3: 0000000038e20004 CR4: 00000000007706f0 [ +0.000000] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ +0.000001] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ +0.000001] PKRU: 55555554 [ +0.000001] Call Trace: [ +0.000001] <TASK> [ +0.000002] ? __warn+0x80/0x130 [ +0.000003] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000002] ? report_bug+0x195/0x1a0 [ +0.000005] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 [ +0.000003] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 [ +0.000002] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [ +0.000006] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000002] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000002] __flush_workqueue+0x126/0x3f0 [ +0.000015] ib_cache_cleanup_one+0x1c/0xe0 [ib_core] [ +0.000056] __ib_unregister_device+0x6a/0xb0 [ib_core] [ +0.000023] ib_unregister_device_and_put+0x34/0x50 [ib_core] [ +0.000020] i40iw_close+0x4b/0x90 [irdma] [ +0.000022] i40e_notify_client_of_netdev_close+0x54/0xc0 [i40e] [ +0.000035] i40e_service_task+0x126/0x190 [i40e] [ +0.000024] process_one_work+0x174/0x340 [ +0.000003] worker_th ---truncated---(CVE-2024-36004)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ppdev: Add an error check in register_device
In register_device, the return value of ida_simple_get is unchecked, in witch ida_simple_get will use an invalid index value.
To address this issue, index should be checked after ida_simple_get. When the index value is abnormal, a warning message should be printed, the port should be dropped, and the value should be recorded.(CVE-2024-36015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pinctrl: core: delete incorrect free in pinctrl_enable()
The "pctldev" struct is allocated in devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(). It's a devm_ managed pointer that is freed by devm_pinctrl_dev_release(), so freeing it in pinctrl_enable() will lead to a double free.
The devm_pinctrl_dev_release() function frees the pindescs and destroys the mutex as well.(CVE-2024-36940)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.19.90-2406.1.0.0279.oe2003sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: usb: fix possible use-after-free in smsc75xx_bind\r\n\r\nThe commit 46a8b29c6306 (\u0026quot;net: usb: fix memory leak in smsc75xx_bind\u0026quot;)\nfails to clean up the work scheduled in smsc75xx_reset-\u0026gt;\nsmsc75xx_set_multicast, which leads to use-after-free if the work is\nscheduled to start after the deallocation. In addition, this patch\nalso removes a dangling pointer - dev-\u0026gt;data[0].\r\n\r\nThis patch calls cancel_work_sync to cancel the scheduled work and set\nthe dangling pointer to NULL.(CVE-2021-47239)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA: Verify port when creating flow rule\r\n\r\nValidate port value provided by the user and with that remove no longer\nneeded validation by the driver. The missing check in the mlx5_ib driver\ncould cause to the below oops.\r\n\r\nCall trace:\n _create_flow_rule+0x2d4/0xf28 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5_ib_create_flow+0x2d0/0x5b0 [mlx5_ib]\n ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow+0x4cc/0x624 [ib_uverbs]\n ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0xd4/0x150 [ib_uverbs]\n ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs.isra.7+0xb28/0xc50 [ib_uverbs]\n ib_uverbs_ioctl+0x158/0x1d0 [ib_uverbs]\n do_vfs_ioctl+0xd0/0xaf0\n ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb4\n __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0xc4\n el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa4/0x254\n el0_svc_handler+0x84/0xa0\n el0_svc+0x10/0x26c\n Code: b9401260 f9615681 51000400 8b001c20 (f9403c1a)(CVE-2021-47265)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbcache: avoid oversized read request in cache missing code path\r\n\r\nIn the cache missing code path of cached device, if a proper location\nfrom the internal B+ tree is matched for a cache miss range, function\ncached_dev_cache_miss() will be called in cache_lookup_fn() in the\nfollowing code block,\n[code block 1]\n 526 unsigned int sectors = KEY_INODE(k) == s-\u0026gt;iop.inode\n 527 ? min_t(uint64_t, INT_MAX,\n 528 KEY_START(k) - bio-\u0026gt;bi_iter.bi_sector)\n 529 : INT_MAX;\n 530 int ret = s-\u0026gt;d-\u0026gt;cache_miss(b, s, bio, sectors);\r\n\r\nHere s-\u0026gt;d-\u0026gt;cache_miss() is the call backfunction pointer initialized as\ncached_dev_cache_miss(), the last parameter \u0026apos;sectors\u0026apos; is an important\nhint to calculate the size of read request to backing device of the\nmissing cache data.\r\n\r\nCurrent calculation in above code block may generate oversized value of\n\u0026apos;sectors\u0026apos;, which consequently may trigger 2 different potential kernel\npanics by BUG() or BUG_ON() as listed below,\r\n\r\n1) BUG_ON() inside bch_btree_insert_key(),\n[code block 2]\n 886 BUG_ON(b-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;is_extents \u0026amp;\u0026amp; !KEY_SIZE(k));\n2) BUG() inside biovec_slab(),\n[code block 3]\n 51 default:\n 52 BUG();\n 53 return NULL;\r\n\r\nAll the above panics are original from cached_dev_cache_miss() by the\noversized parameter \u0026apos;sectors\u0026apos;.\r\n\r\nInside cached_dev_cache_miss(), parameter \u0026apos;sectors\u0026apos; is used to calculate\nthe size of data read from backing device for the cache missing. This\nsize is stored in s-\u0026gt;insert_bio_sectors by the following lines of code,\n[code block 4]\n 909 s-\u0026gt;insert_bio_sectors = min(sectors, bio_sectors(bio) + reada);\r\n\r\nThen the actual key inserting to the internal B+ tree is generated and\nstored in s-\u0026gt;iop.replace_key by the following lines of code,\n[code block 5]\n 911 s-\u0026gt;iop.replace_key = KEY(s-\u0026gt;iop.inode,\n 912 bio-\u0026gt;bi_iter.bi_sector + s-\u0026gt;insert_bio_sectors,\n 913 s-\u0026gt;insert_bio_sectors);\nThe oversized parameter \u0026apos;sectors\u0026apos; may trigger panic 1) by BUG_ON() from\nthe above code block.\r\n\r\nAnd the bio sending to backing device for the missing data is allocated\nwith hint from s-\u0026gt;insert_bio_sectors by the following lines of code,\n[code block 6]\n 926 cache_bio = bio_alloc_bioset(GFP_NOWAIT,\n 927 DIV_ROUND_UP(s-\u0026gt;insert_bio_sectors, PAGE_SECTORS),\n 928 \u0026amp;dc-\u0026gt;disk.bio_split);\nThe oversized parameter \u0026apos;sectors\u0026apos; may trigger panic 2) by BUG() from the\nagove code block.\r\n\r\nNow let me explain how the panics happen with the oversized \u0026apos;sectors\u0026apos;.\nIn code block 5, replace_key is generated by macro KEY(). From the\ndefinition of macro KEY(),\n[code block 7]\n 71 #define KEY(inode, offset, size) \\\n 72 ((struct bkey) { \\\n 73 .high = (1ULL \u0026lt;\u0026lt; 63) | ((__u64) (size) \u0026lt;\u0026lt; 20) | (inode), \\\n 74 .low = (offset) \\\n 75 })\r\n\r\nHere \u0026apos;size\u0026apos; is 16bits width embedded in 64bits member \u0026apos;high\u0026apos; of struct\nbkey. But in code block 1, if \u0026quot;KEY_START(k) - bio-\u0026gt;bi_iter.bi_sector\u0026quot; is\nvery probably to be larger than (1\u0026lt;\u0026lt;16) - 1, which makes the bkey size\ncalculation in code block 5 is overflowed. In one bug report the value\nof parameter \u0026apos;sectors\u0026apos; is 131072 (= 1 \u0026lt;\u0026lt; 17), the overflowed \u0026apos;sectors\u0026apos;\nresults the overflowed s-\u0026gt;insert_bio_sectors in code block 4, then makes\nsize field of s-\u0026gt;iop.replace_key to be 0 in code block 5. Then the 0-\nsized s-\u0026gt;iop.replace_key is inserted into the internal B+ tree as cache\nmissing check key (a special key to detect and avoid a racing between\nnormal write request and cache missing read request) as,\n[code block 8]\n 915 ret = bch_btree_insert_check_key(b, \u0026amp;s-\u0026gt;op, \u0026amp;s-\u0026gt;iop.replace_key);\r\n\r\nThen the 0-sized s-\u0026gt;iop.replace_key as 3rd parameter triggers the bkey\nsize check BUG_ON() in code block 2, and causes the kernel panic 1).\r\n\r\nAnother ke\n---truncated---(CVE-2021-47275)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nkvm: avoid speculation-based attacks from out-of-range memslot accesses\r\n\r\nKVM\u0026apos;s mechanism for accessing guest memory translates a guest physical\naddress (gpa) to a host virtual address using the right-shifted gpa\n(also known as gfn) and a struct kvm_memory_slot. The translation is\nperformed in __gfn_to_hva_memslot using the following formula:\r\n\r\n hva = slot-\u0026gt;userspace_addr + (gfn - slot-\u0026gt;base_gfn) * PAGE_SIZE\r\n\r\nIt is expected that gfn falls within the boundaries of the guest\u0026apos;s\nphysical memory. However, a guest can access invalid physical addresses\nin such a way that the gfn is invalid.\r\n\r\n__gfn_to_hva_memslot is called from kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_hva_prot, which first\nretrieves a memslot through __gfn_to_memslot. While __gfn_to_memslot\ndoes check that the gfn falls within the boundaries of the guest\u0026apos;s\nphysical memory or not, a CPU can speculate the result of the check and\ncontinue execution speculatively using an illegal gfn. The speculation\ncan result in calculating an out-of-bounds hva. If the resulting host\nvirtual address is used to load another guest physical address, this\nis effectively a Spectre gadget consisting of two consecutive reads,\nthe second of which is data dependent on the first.\r\n\r\nRight now it\u0026apos;s not clear if there are any cases in which this is\nexploitable. One interesting case was reported by the original author\nof this patch, and involves visiting guest page tables on x86. Right\nnow these are not vulnerable because the hva read goes through get_user(),\nwhich contains an LFENCE speculation barrier. However, there are\npatches in progress for x86 uaccess.h to mask kernel addresses instead of\nusing LFENCE; once these land, a guest could use speculation to read\nfrom the VMM\u0026apos;s ring 3 address space. Other architectures such as ARM\nalready use the address masking method, and would be susceptible to\nthis same kind of data-dependent access gadgets. Therefore, this patch\nproactively protects from these attacks by masking out-of-bounds gfns\nin __gfn_to_hva_memslot, which blocks speculation of invalid hvas.\r\n\r\nSean Christopherson noted that this patch does not cover\nkvm_read_guest_offset_cached. This however is limited to a few bytes\npast the end of the cache, and therefore it is unlikely to be useful in\nthe context of building a chain of data dependent accesses.(CVE-2021-47277)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: fix uninit-value in caif_seqpkt_sendmsg\r\n\r\nWhen nr_segs equal to zero in iovec_from_user, the object\nmsg-\u0026gt;msg_iter.iov is uninit stack memory in caif_seqpkt_sendmsg\nwhich is defined in ___sys_sendmsg. So we cann\u0026apos;t just judge\nmsg-\u0026gt;msg_iter.iov-\u0026gt;base directlly. We can use nr_segs to judge\nmsg in caif_seqpkt_sendmsg whether has data buffers.\r\n\r\n=====================================================\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in caif_seqpkt_sendmsg+0x693/0xf60 net/caif/caif_socket.c:542\nCall Trace:\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]\n dump_stack+0x1c9/0x220 lib/dump_stack.c:118\n kmsan_report+0xf7/0x1e0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_report.c:118\n __msan_warning+0x58/0xa0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:215\n caif_seqpkt_sendmsg+0x693/0xf60 net/caif/caif_socket.c:542\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:652 [inline]\n sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:672 [inline]\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x12b6/0x1350 net/socket.c:2343\n ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2397 [inline]\n __sys_sendmmsg+0x808/0xc90 net/socket.c:2480\n __compat_sys_sendmmsg net/compat.c:656 [inline](CVE-2021-47297)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmemory: fsl_ifc: fix leak of private memory on probe failure\r\n\r\nOn probe error the driver should free the memory allocated for private\nstructure. Fix this by using resource-managed allocation.(CVE-2021-47314)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwatchdog: sc520_wdt: Fix possible use-after-free in wdt_turnoff()\r\n\r\nThis module\u0026apos;s remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function\ndoes not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the\ntimer handler may still be running after the driver\u0026apos;s remove function\nhas finished, which would result in a use-after-free.\r\n\r\nFix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler\nhas finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47323)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntty: serial: 8250: serial_cs: Fix a memory leak in error handling path\r\n\r\nIn the probe function, if the final \u0026apos;serial_config()\u0026apos; fails, \u0026apos;info\u0026apos; is\nleaking.\r\n\r\nAdd a resource handling path to free this memory.(CVE-2021-47330)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npowerpc/mm: Fix lockup on kernel exec fault\r\n\r\nThe powerpc kernel is not prepared to handle exec faults from kernel.\nEspecially, the function is_exec_fault() will return \u0026apos;false\u0026apos; when an\nexec fault is taken by kernel, because the check is based on reading\ncurrent-\u0026gt;thread.regs-\u0026gt;trap which contains the trap from user.\r\n\r\nFor instance, when provoking a LKDTM EXEC_USERSPACE test,\ncurrent-\u0026gt;thread.regs-\u0026gt;trap is set to SYSCALL trap (0xc00), and\nthe fault taken by the kernel is not seen as an exec fault by\nset_access_flags_filter().\r\n\r\nCommit d7df2443cd5f (\u0026quot;powerpc/mm: Fix spurious segfaults on radix\nwith autonuma\u0026quot;) made it clear and handled it properly. But later on\ncommit d3ca587404b3 (\u0026quot;powerpc/mm: Fix reporting of kernel execute\nfaults\u0026quot;) removed that handling, introducing test based on error_code.\nAnd here is the problem, because on the 603 all upper bits of SRR1\nget cleared when the TLB instruction miss handler bails out to ISI.\r\n\r\nUntil commit cbd7e6ca0210 (\u0026quot;powerpc/fault: Avoid heavy\nsearch_exception_tables() verification\u0026quot;), an exec fault from kernel\nat a userspace address was indirectly caught by the lack of entry for\nthat address in the exception tables. But after that commit the\nkernel mainly relies on KUAP or on core mm handling to catch wrong\nuser accesses. Here the access is not wrong, so mm handles it.\nIt is a minor fault because PAGE_EXEC is not set,\nset_access_flags_filter() should set PAGE_EXEC and voila.\nBut as is_exec_fault() returns false as explained in the beginning,\nset_access_flags_filter() bails out without setting PAGE_EXEC flag,\nwhich leads to a forever minor exec fault.\r\n\r\nAs the kernel is not prepared to handle such exec faults, the thing to\ndo is to fire in bad_kernel_fault() for any exec fault taken by the\nkernel, as it was prior to commit d3ca587404b3.(CVE-2021-47350)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nudf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in udf_symlink function\r\n\r\nIn function udf_symlink, epos.bh is assigned with the value returned\nby udf_tgetblk. The function udf_tgetblk is defined in udf/misc.c\nand returns the value of sb_getblk function that could be NULL.\nThen, epos.bh is used without any check, causing a possible\nNULL pointer dereference when sb_getblk fails.\r\n\r\nThis fix adds a check to validate the value of epos.bh.(CVE-2021-47353)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\natm: nicstar: Fix possible use-after-free in nicstar_cleanup()\r\n\r\nThis module\u0026apos;s remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function\ndoes not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the\ntimer handler may still be running after the driver\u0026apos;s remove function\nhas finished, which would result in a use-after-free.\r\n\r\nFix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler\nhas finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47355)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmISDN: fix possible use-after-free in HFC_cleanup()\r\n\r\nThis module\u0026apos;s remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function\ndoes not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the\ntimer handler may still be running after the driver\u0026apos;s remove function\nhas finished, which would result in a use-after-free.\r\n\r\nFix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler\nhas finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47356)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\natm: iphase: fix possible use-after-free in ia_module_exit()\r\n\r\nThis module\u0026apos;s remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function\ndoes not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the\ntimer handler may still be running after the driver\u0026apos;s remove function\nhas finished, which would result in a use-after-free.\r\n\r\nFix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler\nhas finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47357)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmcb: fix error handling in mcb_alloc_bus()\r\n\r\nThere are two bugs:\n1) If ida_simple_get() fails then this code calls put_device(carrier)\n but we haven\u0026apos;t yet called get_device(carrier) and probably that\n leads to a use after free.\n2) After device_initialize() then we need to use put_device() to\n release the bus. This will free the internal resources tied to the\n device and call mcb_free_bus() which will free the rest.(CVE-2021-47361)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/pm: Update intermediate power state for SI\r\n\r\nUpdate the current state as boot state during dpm initialization.\nDuring the subsequent initialization, set_power_state gets called to\ntransition to the final power state. set_power_state refers to values\nfrom the current state and without current state populated, it could\nresult in NULL pointer dereference.\r\n\r\nFor ex: on platforms where PCI speed change is supported through ACPI\nATCS method, the link speed of current state needs to be queried before\ndeciding on changing to final power state\u0026apos;s link speed. The logic to query\nATCS-support was broken on certain platforms. The issue became visible\nwhen broken ATCS-support logic got fixed with commit\nf9b7f3703ff9 (\u0026quot;drm/amdgpu/acpi: make ATPX/ATCS structures global (v2)\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nBug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1698(CVE-2021-47362)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmac80211: fix use-after-free in CCMP/GCMP RX\r\n\r\nWhen PN checking is done in mac80211, for fragmentation we need\nto copy the PN to the RX struct so we can later use it to do a\ncomparison, since commit bf30ca922a0c (\u0026quot;mac80211: check defrag\nPN against current frame\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nUnfortunately, in that commit I used the \u0026apos;hdr\u0026apos; variable without\nit being necessarily valid, so use-after-free could occur if it\nwas necessary to reallocate (parts of) the frame.\r\n\r\nFix this by reloading the variable after the code that results\nin the reallocations, if any.\r\n\r\nThis fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214401.(CVE-2021-47388)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmac80211: limit injected vht mcs/nss in ieee80211_parse_tx_radiotap\r\n\r\nLimit max values for vht mcs and nss in ieee80211_parse_tx_radiotap\nroutine in order to fix the following warning reported by syzbot:\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10717 at include/net/mac80211.h:989 ieee80211_rate_set_vht include/net/mac80211.h:989 [inline]\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10717 at include/net/mac80211.h:989 ieee80211_parse_tx_radiotap+0x101e/0x12d0 net/mac80211/tx.c:2244\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 PID: 10717 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 5.14.0-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011\nRIP: 0010:ieee80211_rate_set_vht include/net/mac80211.h:989 [inline]\nRIP: 0010:ieee80211_parse_tx_radiotap+0x101e/0x12d0 net/mac80211/tx.c:2244\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000186f3e8 EFLAGS: 00010216\nRAX: 0000000000000618 RBX: ffff88804ef76500 RCX: ffffc900143a5000\nRDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff888f478e RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00000000ffffffff R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000100\nR10: ffffffff888f46f9 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000fffffff8\nR13: ffff88804ef7653c R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000004\nFS: 00007fbf5718f700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000001b2de23000 CR3: 000000006a671000 CR4: 00000000001506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600\nCall Trace:\n ieee80211_monitor_select_queue+0xa6/0x250 net/mac80211/iface.c:740\n netdev_core_pick_tx+0x169/0x2e0 net/core/dev.c:4089\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x6f9/0x3710 net/core/dev.c:4165\n __bpf_tx_skb net/core/filter.c:2114 [inline]\n __bpf_redirect_no_mac net/core/filter.c:2139 [inline]\n __bpf_redirect+0x5ba/0xd20 net/core/filter.c:2162\n ____bpf_clone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2429 [inline]\n bpf_clone_redirect+0x2ae/0x420 net/core/filter.c:2401\n bpf_prog_eeb6f53a69e5c6a2+0x59/0x234\n bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:717 [inline]\n __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:624 [inline]\n bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:631 [inline]\n bpf_test_run+0x381/0xa30 net/bpf/test_run.c:119\n bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0xb84/0x1ee0 net/bpf/test_run.c:663\n bpf_prog_test_run kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3307 [inline]\n __sys_bpf+0x2137/0x5df0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4605\n __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4691 [inline]\n __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4689 [inline]\n __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xb0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4689\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\nRIP: 0033:0x4665f9(CVE-2021-47395)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsctp: break out if skb_header_pointer returns NULL in sctp_rcv_ootb\r\n\r\nWe should always check if skb_header_pointer\u0026apos;s return is NULL before\nusing it, otherwise it may cause null-ptr-deref, as syzbot reported:\r\n\r\n KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]\n RIP: 0010:sctp_rcv_ootb net/sctp/input.c:705 [inline]\n RIP: 0010:sctp_rcv+0x1d84/0x3220 net/sctp/input.c:196\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n sctp6_rcv+0x38/0x60 net/sctp/ipv6.c:1109\n ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x2e9/0x1ca0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:422\n ip6_input_finish+0x62/0x170 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:463\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:307 [inline]\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:301 [inline]\n ip6_input+0x9c/0xd0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:472\n dst_input include/net/dst.h:460 [inline]\n ip6_rcv_finish net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:76 [inline]\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:307 [inline]\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:301 [inline]\n ipv6_rcv+0x28c/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:297(CVE-2021-47397)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipack: ipoctal: fix stack information leak\r\n\r\nThe tty driver name is used also after registering the driver and must\nspecifically not be allocated on the stack to avoid leaking information\nto user space (or triggering an oops).\r\n\r\nDrivers should not try to encode topology information in the tty device\nname but this one snuck in through staging without anyone noticing and\nanother driver has since copied this malpractice.\r\n\r\nFixing the ABI is a separate issue, but this at least plugs the security\nhole.(CVE-2021-47401)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nHID: betop: fix slab-out-of-bounds Write in betop_probe\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported slab-out-of-bounds Write bug in hid-betopff driver.\nThe problem is the driver assumes the device must have an input report but\nsome malicious devices violate this assumption.\r\n\r\nSo this patch checks hid_device\u0026apos;s input is non empty before it\u0026apos;s been used.(CVE-2021-47404)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nHID: usbhid: free raw_report buffers in usbhid_stop\r\n\r\nFree the unsent raw_report buffers when the device is removed.\r\n\r\nFixes a memory leak reported by syzbot at:\nhttps://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=7b4fa7cb1a7c2d3342a2a8a6c53371c8c418ab47(CVE-2021-47405)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: conntrack: serialize hash resizes and cleanups\r\n\r\nSyzbot was able to trigger the following warning [1]\r\n\r\nNo repro found by syzbot yet but I was able to trigger similar issue\nby having 2 scripts running in parallel, changing conntrack hash sizes,\nand:\r\n\r\nfor j in `seq 1 1000` ; do unshare -n /bin/true \u0026gt;/dev/null ; done\r\n\r\nIt would take more than 5 minutes for net_namespace structures\nto be cleaned up.\r\n\r\nThis is because nf_ct_iterate_cleanup() has to restart everytime\na resize happened.\r\n\r\nBy adding a mutex, we can serialize hash resizes and cleanups\nand also make get_next_corpse() faster by skipping over empty\nbuckets.\r\n\r\nEven without resizes in the picture, this patch considerably\nspeeds up network namespace dismantles.\r\n\r\n[1]\nINFO: task syz-executor.0:8312 can\u0026apos;t die for more than 144 seconds.\ntask:syz-executor.0 state:R running task stack:25672 pid: 8312 ppid: 6573 flags:0x00004006\nCall Trace:\n context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4955 [inline]\n __schedule+0x940/0x26f0 kernel/sched/core.c:6236\n preempt_schedule_common+0x45/0xc0 kernel/sched/core.c:6408\n preempt_schedule_thunk+0x16/0x18 arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S:35\n __local_bh_enable_ip+0x109/0x120 kernel/softirq.c:390\n local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:32 [inline]\n get_next_corpse net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:2252 [inline]\n nf_ct_iterate_cleanup+0x15a/0x450 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:2275\n nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list+0x14c/0x4f0 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:2469\n ops_exit_list+0x10d/0x160 net/core/net_namespace.c:171\n setup_net+0x639/0xa30 net/core/net_namespace.c:349\n copy_net_ns+0x319/0x760 net/core/net_namespace.c:470\n create_new_namespaces+0x3f6/0xb20 kernel/nsproxy.c:110\n unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0xc1/0x1f0 kernel/nsproxy.c:226\n ksys_unshare+0x445/0x920 kernel/fork.c:3128\n __do_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3202 [inline]\n __se_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3200 [inline]\n __x64_sys_unshare+0x2d/0x40 kernel/fork.c:3200\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\nRIP: 0033:0x7f63da68e739\nRSP: 002b:00007f63d7c05188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000110\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f63da792f80 RCX: 00007f63da68e739\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000040000000\nRBP: 00007f63da6e8cc4 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f63da792f80\nR13: 00007fff50b75d3f R14: 00007f63d7c05300 R15: 0000000000022000\r\n\r\nShowing all locks held in the system:\n1 lock held by khungtaskd/27:\n #0: ffffffff8b980020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x53/0x260 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6446\n2 locks held by kworker/u4:2/153:\n #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic64_set arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:34 [inline]\n #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic_long_set include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:41 [inline]\n #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic_long_set include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:1198 [inline]\n #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_data kernel/workqueue.c:634 [inline]\n #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_pool_and_clear_pending kernel/workqueue.c:661 [inline]\n #0: ffff888010c69138 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x896/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2268\n #1: ffffc9000140fdb0 ((kfence_timer).work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x8ca/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2272\n1 lock held by systemd-udevd/2970:\n1 lock held by in:imklog/6258:\n #0: ffff88807f970ff0 (\u0026amp;f-\u0026gt;f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0xe9/0x100 fs/file.c:990\n3 locks held by kworker/1:6/8158:\n1 lock held by syz-executor.0/8312:\n2 locks held by kworker/u4:13/9320:\n1 lock held by\n---truncated---(CVE-2021-47408)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/nouveau/debugfs: fix file release memory leak\r\n\r\nWhen using single_open() for opening, single_release() should be\ncalled, otherwise the \u0026apos;op\u0026apos; allocated in single_open() will be leaked.(CVE-2021-47423)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free\r\n\r\nCommit d39df158518c (\u0026quot;scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\u0026quot;)\nadded iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but\nthen also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already\ncompleted task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup\ncode. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common\ncleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.\r\n\r\nThis reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we\u0026apos;ve checked\nif the iscsi_task is valid.(CVE-2021-47427)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Fix memory leak in mlx5_core_destroy_cq() error path\r\n\r\nPrior to this patch in case mlx5_core_destroy_cq() failed it returns\nwithout completing all destroy operations and that leads to memory leak.\nInstead, complete the destroy flow before return error.\r\n\r\nAlso move mlx5_debug_cq_remove() to the beginning of mlx5_core_destroy_cq()\nto be symmetrical with mlx5_core_create_cq().\r\n\r\nkmemleak complains on:\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xc000000038625100 (size 64):\n comm \u0026quot;ethtool\u0026quot;, pid 28301, jiffies 4298062946 (age 785.380s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 60 01 48 94 00 00 00 c0 b8 05 34 c3 00 00 00 c0 `.H.......4.....\n 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 db 7d c1 00 00 00 c0 ..........}.....\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;000000009e8643cb\u0026gt;] add_res_tree+0xd0/0x270 [mlx5_core]\n [\u0026lt;00000000e7cb8e6c\u0026gt;] mlx5_debug_cq_add+0x5c/0xc0 [mlx5_core]\n [\u0026lt;000000002a12918f\u0026gt;] mlx5_core_create_cq+0x1d0/0x2d0 [mlx5_core]\n [\u0026lt;00000000cef0a696\u0026gt;] mlx5e_create_cq+0x210/0x3f0 [mlx5_core]\n [\u0026lt;000000009c642c26\u0026gt;] mlx5e_open_cq+0xb4/0x130 [mlx5_core]\n [\u0026lt;0000000058dfa578\u0026gt;] mlx5e_ptp_open+0x7f4/0xe10 [mlx5_core]\n [\u0026lt;0000000081839561\u0026gt;] mlx5e_open_channels+0x9cc/0x13e0 [mlx5_core]\n [\u0026lt;0000000009cf05d4\u0026gt;] mlx5e_switch_priv_channels+0xa4/0x230\n[mlx5_core]\n [\u0026lt;0000000042bbedd8\u0026gt;] mlx5e_safe_switch_params+0x14c/0x300\n[mlx5_core]\n [\u0026lt;0000000004bc9db8\u0026gt;] set_pflag_tx_port_ts+0x9c/0x160 [mlx5_core]\n [\u0026lt;00000000a0553443\u0026gt;] mlx5e_set_priv_flags+0xd0/0x1b0 [mlx5_core]\n [\u0026lt;00000000a8f3d84b\u0026gt;] ethnl_set_privflags+0x234/0x2d0\n [\u0026lt;00000000fd27f27c\u0026gt;] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x108/0x1d0\n [\u0026lt;00000000f495e2bb\u0026gt;] genl_family_rcv_msg+0xe4/0x1f0\n [\u0026lt;00000000646c5c2c\u0026gt;] genl_rcv_msg+0x78/0x120\n [\u0026lt;00000000d53e384e\u0026gt;] netlink_rcv_skb+0x74/0x1a0(CVE-2021-47438)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nNFC: digital: fix possible memory leak in digital_in_send_sdd_req()\r\n\r\n\u0026apos;skb\u0026apos; is allocated in digital_in_send_sdd_req(), but not free when\ndigital_in_send_cmd() failed, which will cause memory leak. Fix it\nby freeing \u0026apos;skb\u0026apos; if digital_in_send_cmd() return failed.(CVE-2021-47442)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nNFC: digital: fix possible memory leak in digital_tg_listen_mdaa()\r\n\r\n\u0026apos;params\u0026apos; is allocated in digital_tg_listen_mdaa(), but not free when\ndigital_send_cmd() failed, which will cause memory leak. Fix it by\nfreeing \u0026apos;params\u0026apos; if digital_send_cmd() return failed.(CVE-2021-47443)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/msm: Fix null pointer dereference on pointer edp\r\n\r\nThe initialization of pointer dev dereferences pointer edp before\nedp is null checked, so there is a potential null pointer deference\nissue. Fix this by only dereferencing edp after edp has been null\nchecked.\r\n\r\nAddresses-Coverity: (\u0026quot;Dereference before null check\u0026quot;)(CVE-2021-47445)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocfs2: mount fails with buffer overflow in strlen\r\n\r\nStarting with kernel 5.11 built with CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE mouting an\nocfs2 filesystem with either o2cb or pcmk cluster stack fails with the\ntrace below. Problem seems to be that strings for cluster stack and\ncluster name are not guaranteed to be null terminated in the disk\nrepresentation, while strlcpy assumes that the source string is always\nnull terminated. This causes a read outside of the source string\ntriggering the buffer overflow detection.\r\n\r\n detected buffer overflow in strlen\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n kernel BUG at lib/string.c:1149!\n invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI\n CPU: 1 PID: 910 Comm: mount.ocfs2 Not tainted 5.14.0-1-amd64 #1\n Debian 5.14.6-2\n RIP: 0010:fortify_panic+0xf/0x11\n ...\n Call Trace:\n ocfs2_initialize_super.isra.0.cold+0xc/0x18 [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_fill_super+0x359/0x19b0 [ocfs2]\n mount_bdev+0x185/0x1b0\n legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40\n vfs_get_tree+0x25/0xb0\n path_mount+0x454/0xa20\n __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140\n do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae(CVE-2021-47458)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncan: j1939: j1939_netdev_start(): fix UAF for rx_kref of j1939_priv\r\n\r\nIt will trigger UAF for rx_kref of j1939_priv as following.\r\n\r\n cpu0 cpu1\nj1939_sk_bind(socket0, ndev0, ...)\nj1939_netdev_start\n j1939_sk_bind(socket1, ndev0, ...)\n j1939_netdev_start\nj1939_priv_set\n j1939_priv_get_by_ndev_locked\nj1939_jsk_add\n.....\nj1939_netdev_stop\nkref_put_lock(\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;rx_kref, ...)\n kref_get(\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;rx_kref, ...)\n REFCOUNT_WARN(\u0026quot;addition on 0;...\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\n====================================================\nrefcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 20874 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0x169/0x1e0\nRIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x169/0x1e0\nCall Trace:\n j1939_netdev_start+0x68b/0x920\n j1939_sk_bind+0x426/0xeb0\n ? security_socket_bind+0x83/0xb0\r\n\r\nThe rx_kref\u0026apos;s kref_get() and kref_put() should use j1939_netdev_lock to\nprotect.(CVE-2021-47459)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncomedi: vmk80xx: fix transfer-buffer overflows\r\n\r\nThe driver uses endpoint-sized USB transfer buffers but up until\nrecently had no sanity checks on the sizes.\r\n\r\nCommit e1f13c879a7c (\u0026quot;staging: comedi: check validity of wMaxPacketSize\nof usb endpoints found\u0026quot;) inadvertently fixed NULL-pointer dereferences\nwhen accessing the transfer buffers in case a malicious device has a\nzero wMaxPacketSize.\r\n\r\nMake sure to allocate buffers large enough to handle also the other\naccesses that are done without a size check (e.g. byte 18 in\nvmk80xx_cnt_insn_read() for the VMK8061_MODEL) to avoid writing beyond\nthe buffers, for example, when doing descriptor fuzzing.\r\n\r\nThe original driver was for a low-speed device with 8-byte buffers.\nSupport was later added for a device that uses bulk transfers and is\npresumably a full-speed device with a maximum 64-byte wMaxPacketSize.(CVE-2021-47475)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncomedi: dt9812: fix DMA buffers on stack\r\n\r\nUSB transfer buffers are typically mapped for DMA and must not be\nallocated on the stack or transfers will fail.\r\n\r\nAllocate proper transfer buffers in the various command helpers and\nreturn an error on short transfers instead of acting on random stack\ndata.\r\n\r\nNote that this also fixes a stack info leak on systems where DMA is not\nused as 32 bytes are always sent to the device regardless of how short\nthe command is.(CVE-2021-47477)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusbnet: sanity check for maxpacket\r\n\r\nmaxpacket of 0 makes no sense and oopses as we need to divide\nby it. Give up.\r\n\r\nV2: fixed typo in log and stylistic issues(CVE-2021-47495)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nperf hist: Fix memory leak of a perf_hpp_fmt\r\n\r\nperf_hpp__column_unregister() removes an entry from a list but doesn\u0026apos;t\nfree the memory causing a memory leak spotted by leak sanitizer.\r\n\r\nAdd the free while at the same time reducing the scope of the function\nto static.(CVE-2021-47545)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port()\r\n\r\nThe if statement:\n if (port \u0026gt;= DSAF_GE_NUM)\n return;\r\n\r\nlimits the value of port less than DSAF_GE_NUM (i.e., 8).\nHowever, if the value of port is 6 or 7, an array overflow could occur:\n port_rst_off = dsaf_dev-\u0026gt;mac_cb[port]-\u0026gt;port_rst_off;\r\n\r\nbecause the length of dsaf_dev-\u0026gt;mac_cb is DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM (i.e., 6).\r\n\r\nTo fix this possible array overflow, we first check port and if it is\ngreater than or equal to DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM, the function returns.(CVE-2021-47548)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsata_fsl: fix UAF in sata_fsl_port_stop when rmmod sata_fsl\r\n\r\nWhen the `rmmod sata_fsl.ko` command is executed in the PPC64 GNU/Linux,\na bug is reported:\n ==================================================================\n BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0x80000800805b502c\n Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]\n NIP [c0000000000388a4] .ioread32+0x4/0x20\n LR [80000000000c6034] .sata_fsl_port_stop+0x44/0xe0 [sata_fsl]\n Call Trace:\n .free_irq+0x1c/0x4e0 (unreliable)\n .ata_host_stop+0x74/0xd0 [libata]\n .release_nodes+0x330/0x3f0\n .device_release_driver_internal+0x178/0x2c0\n .driver_detach+0x64/0xd0\n .bus_remove_driver+0x70/0xf0\n .driver_unregister+0x38/0x80\n .platform_driver_unregister+0x14/0x30\n .fsl_sata_driver_exit+0x18/0xa20 [sata_fsl]\n .__se_sys_delete_module+0x1ec/0x2d0\n .system_call_exception+0xfc/0x1f0\n system_call_common+0xf8/0x200\n ==================================================================\r\n\r\nThe triggering of the BUG is shown in the following stack:\r\n\r\ndriver_detach\n device_release_driver_internal\n __device_release_driver\n drv-\u0026gt;remove(dev) --\u0026gt; platform_drv_remove/platform_remove\n drv-\u0026gt;remove(dev) --\u0026gt; sata_fsl_remove\n iounmap(host_priv-\u0026gt;hcr_base);\t\t\t\u0026lt;---- unmap\n kfree(host_priv); \u0026lt;---- free\n devres_release_all\n release_nodes\n dr-\u0026gt;node.release(dev, dr-\u0026gt;data) --\u0026gt; ata_host_stop\n ap-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;port_stop(ap) --\u0026gt; sata_fsl_port_stop\n ioread32(hcr_base + HCONTROL) \u0026lt;---- UAF\n host-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;host_stop(host)\r\n\r\nThe iounmap(host_priv-\u0026gt;hcr_base) and kfree(host_priv) functions should\nnot be executed in drv-\u0026gt;remove. These functions should be executed in\nhost_stop after port_stop. Therefore, we move these functions to the\nnew function sata_fsl_host_stop and bind the new function to host_stop.(CVE-2021-47549)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/smc: Fix NULL pointer dereferencing in smc_vlan_by_tcpsk()\r\n\r\nCoverity reports a possible NULL dereferencing problem:\r\n\r\nin smc_vlan_by_tcpsk():\n6. returned_null: netdev_lower_get_next returns NULL (checked 29 out of 30 times).\n7. var_assigned: Assigning: ndev = NULL return value from netdev_lower_get_next.\n1623 ndev = (struct net_device *)netdev_lower_get_next(ndev, \u0026amp;lower);\nCID 1468509 (#1 of 1): Dereference null return value (NULL_RETURNS)\n8. dereference: Dereferencing a pointer that might be NULL ndev when calling is_vlan_dev.\n1624 if (is_vlan_dev(ndev)) {\r\n\r\nRemove the manual implementation and use netdev_walk_all_lower_dev() to\niterate over the lower devices. While on it remove an obsolete function\nparameter comment.(CVE-2021-47559)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npinctrl: single: fix potential NULL dereference\r\n\r\nAdded checking of pointer \u0026quot;function\u0026quot; in pcs_set_mux().\npinmux_generic_get_function() can return NULL and the pointer\n\u0026quot;function\u0026quot; was dereferenced without checking against NULL.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2022-48708)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: s390/aes - Fix buffer overread in CTR mode\r\n\r\nWhen processing the last block, the s390 ctr code will always read\na whole block, even if there isn\u0026apos;t a whole block of data left. Fix\nthis by using the actual length left and copy it into a buffer first\nfor processing.(CVE-2023-52669)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nACPI: video: check for error while searching for backlight device parent\r\n\r\nIf acpi_get_parent() called in acpi_video_dev_register_backlight()\nfails, for example, because acpi_ut_acquire_mutex() fails inside\nacpi_get_parent), this can lead to incorrect (uninitialized)\nacpi_parent handle being passed to acpi_get_pci_dev() for detecting\nthe parent pci device.\r\n\r\nCheck acpi_get_parent() result and set parent device only in case of success.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2023-52693)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsysv: don\u0026apos;t call sb_bread() with pointers_lock held\r\n\r\nsyzbot is reporting sleep in atomic context in SysV filesystem [1], for\nsb_bread() is called with rw_spinlock held.\r\n\r\nA \u0026quot;write_lock(\u0026amp;pointers_lock) =\u0026gt; read_lock(\u0026amp;pointers_lock) deadlock\u0026quot; bug\nand a \u0026quot;sb_bread() with write_lock(\u0026amp;pointers_lock)\u0026quot; bug were introduced by\n\u0026quot;Replace BKL for chain locking with sysvfs-private rwlock\u0026quot; in Linux 2.5.12.\r\n\r\nThen, \u0026quot;[PATCH] err1-40: sysvfs locking fix\u0026quot; in Linux 2.6.8 fixed the\nformer bug by moving pointers_lock lock to the callers, but instead\nintroduced a \u0026quot;sb_bread() with read_lock(\u0026amp;pointers_lock)\u0026quot; bug (which made\nthis problem easier to hit).\r\n\r\nAl Viro suggested that why not to do like get_branch()/get_block()/\nfind_shared() in Minix filesystem does. And doing like that is almost a\nrevert of \u0026quot;[PATCH] err1-40: sysvfs locking fix\u0026quot; except that get_branch()\n from with find_shared() is called without write_lock(\u0026amp;pointers_lock).(CVE-2023-52699)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/usb: kalmia: Don\u0026apos;t pass act_len in usb_bulk_msg error path\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported that act_len in kalmia_send_init_packet() is\nuninitialized when passing it to the first usb_bulk_msg error path. Jiri\nPirko noted that it\u0026apos;s pointless to pass it in the error path, and that\nthe value that would be printed in the second error path would be the\nvalue of act_len from the first call to usb_bulk_msg.[1]\r\n\r\nWith this in mind, let\u0026apos;s just not pass act_len to the usb_bulk_msg error\npaths.\r\n\r\n1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y9pY61y1nwTuzMOa@nanopsycho/(CVE-2023-52703)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\narm64: Restrict CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to GNU as or LLVM IAS 15.x or newer\r\n\r\nPrior to LLVM 15.0.0, LLVM\u0026apos;s integrated assembler would incorrectly\nbyte-swap NOP when compiling for big-endian, and the resulting series of\nbytes happened to match the encoding of FNMADD S21, S30, S0, S0.\r\n\r\nThis went unnoticed until commit:\r\n\r\n 34f66c4c4d5518c1 (\u0026quot;arm64: Use a positive cpucap for FP/SIMD\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nPrior to that commit, the kernel would always enable the use of FPSIMD\nearly in boot when __cpu_setup() initialized CPACR_EL1, and so usage of\nFNMADD within the kernel was not detected, but could result in the\ncorruption of user or kernel FPSIMD state.\r\n\r\nAfter that commit, the instructions happen to trap during boot prior to\nFPSIMD being detected and enabled, e.g.\r\n\r\n| Unhandled 64-bit el1h sync exception on CPU0, ESR 0x000000001fe00000 -- ASIMD\n| CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00013-g34f66c4c4d55 #1\n| Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)\n| pstate: 400000c9 (nZcv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n| pc : __pi_strcmp+0x1c/0x150\n| lr : populate_properties+0xe4/0x254\n| sp : ffffd014173d3ad0\n| x29: ffffd014173d3af0 x28: fffffbfffddffcb8 x27: 0000000000000000\n| x26: 0000000000000058 x25: fffffbfffddfe054 x24: 0000000000000008\n| x23: fffffbfffddfe000 x22: fffffbfffddfe000 x21: fffffbfffddfe044\n| x20: ffffd014173d3b70 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: 0000000000000005\n| x17: 0000000000000010 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 00000000413e7000\n| x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000001bcc x12: 0000000000000000\n| x11: 00000000d00dfeed x10: ffffd414193f2cd0 x9 : 0000000000000000\n| x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : ffffffffffffffc0 x6 : 0000000000000000\n| x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0101010101010101 x3 : 000000000000002a\n| x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : ffffd014171f2988 x0 : fffffbfffddffcb8\n| Kernel panic - not syncing: Unhandled exception\n| CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00013-g34f66c4c4d55 #1\n| Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)\n| Call trace:\n| dump_backtrace+0xec/0x108\n| show_stack+0x18/0x2c\n| dump_stack_lvl+0x50/0x68\n| dump_stack+0x18/0x24\n| panic+0x13c/0x340\n| el1t_64_irq_handler+0x0/0x1c\n| el1_abort+0x0/0x5c\n| el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68\n| __pi_strcmp+0x1c/0x150\n| unflatten_dt_nodes+0x1e8/0x2d8\n| __unflatten_device_tree+0x5c/0x15c\n| unflatten_device_tree+0x38/0x50\n| setup_arch+0x164/0x1e0\n| start_kernel+0x64/0x38c\n| __primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4\r\n\r\nRestrict CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to a known good assembler, which is\neither GNU as or LLVM\u0026apos;s IAS 15.0.0 and newer, which contains the linked\ncommit.(CVE-2023-52750)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsmb: client: fix use-after-free bug in cifs_debug_data_proc_show()\r\n\r\nSkip SMB sessions that are being teared down\n(e.g. @ses-\u0026gt;ses_status == SES_EXITING) in cifs_debug_data_proc_show()\nto avoid use-after-free in @ses.\r\n\r\nThis fixes the following GPF when reading from /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData\nwhile mounting and umounting\r\n\r\n [ 816.251274] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical\n address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6d81: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n ...\n [ 816.260138] Call Trace:\n [ 816.260329] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n [ 816.260499] ? die_addr+0x36/0x90\n [ 816.260762] ? exc_general_protection+0x1b3/0x410\n [ 816.261126] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30\n [ 816.261502] ? cifs_debug_tcon+0xbd/0x240 [cifs]\n [ 816.261878] ? cifs_debug_tcon+0xab/0x240 [cifs]\n [ 816.262249] cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0x516/0xdb0 [cifs]\n [ 816.262689] ? seq_read_iter+0x379/0x470\n [ 816.262995] seq_read_iter+0x118/0x470\n [ 816.263291] proc_reg_read_iter+0x53/0x90\n [ 816.263596] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f\n [ 816.263945] vfs_read+0x201/0x350\n [ 816.264211] ksys_read+0x75/0x100\n [ 816.264472] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90\n [ 816.264750] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n [ 816.265135] RIP: 0033:0x7fd5e669d381(CVE-2023-52752)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngfs2: ignore negated quota changes\r\n\r\nWhen lots of quota changes are made, there may be cases in which an\ninode\u0026apos;s quota information is increased and then decreased, such as when\nblocks are added to a file, then deleted from it. If the timing is\nright, function do_qc can add pending quota changes to a transaction,\nthen later, another call to do_qc can negate those changes, resulting\nin a net gain of 0. The quota_change information is recorded in the qc\nbuffer (and qd element of the inode as well). The buffer is added to the\ntransaction by the first call to do_qc, but a subsequent call changes\nthe value from non-zero back to zero. At that point it\u0026apos;s too late to\nremove the buffer_head from the transaction. Later, when the quota sync\ncode is called, the zero-change qd element is discovered and flagged as\nan assert warning. If the fs is mounted with errors=panic, the kernel\nwill panic.\r\n\r\nThis is usually seen when files are truncated and the quota changes are\nnegated by punch_hole/truncate which uses gfs2_quota_hold and\ngfs2_quota_unhold rather than block allocations that use gfs2_quota_lock\nand gfs2_quota_unlock which automatically do quota sync.\r\n\r\nThis patch solves the problem by adding a check to qd_check_sync such\nthat net-zero quota changes already added to the transaction are no\nlonger deemed necessary to be synced, and skipped.\r\n\r\nIn this case references are taken for the qd and the slot from do_qc\nso those need to be put. The normal sequence of events for a normal\nnon-zero quota change is as follows:\r\n\r\ngfs2_quota_change\n do_qc\n qd_hold\n slot_hold\r\n\r\nLater, when the changes are to be synced:\r\n\r\ngfs2_quota_sync\n qd_fish\n qd_check_sync\n gets qd ref via lockref_get_not_dead\n do_sync\n do_qc(QC_SYNC)\n qd_put\n\t lockref_put_or_lock\n qd_unlock\n qd_put\n lockref_put_or_lock\r\n\r\nIn the net-zero change case, we add a check to qd_check_sync so it puts\nthe qd and slot references acquired in gfs2_quota_change and skip the\nunneeded sync.(CVE-2023-52759)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntty: vcc: Add check for kstrdup() in vcc_probe()\r\n\r\nAdd check for the return value of kstrdup() and return the error, if it\nfails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52789)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipvlan: add ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() helper\r\n\r\nInspired by syzbot reports using a stack of multiple ipvlan devices.\r\n\r\nReduce stack size needed in ipvlan_process_v6_outbound() by moving\nthe flowi6 struct used for the route lookup in an non inlined\nhelper. ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() needs 120 bytes on the stack,\nimmediately reclaimed.\r\n\r\nAlso make sure ipvlan_process_v4_outbound() is not inlined.\r\n\r\nWe might also have to lower MAX_NEST_DEV, because only syzbot uses\nsetups with more than four stacked devices.\r\n\r\nBUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at ffffc9000e803ff8 (stack is ffffc9000e804000..ffffc9000e808000)\nstack guard page: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN\nCPU: 0 PID: 13442 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.1.52-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/09/2023\nRIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x4/0x2a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:188\nCode: 48 01 c6 48 89 c7 e8 db 4e c1 03 31 c0 5d c3 cc 0f 0b eb 02 0f 0b b8 ea ff ff ff 5d c3 cc 00 00 cc cc 00 00 cc cc 55 48 89 e5 \u0026lt;41\u0026gt; 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 b0 01 48 85 f6 0f 84 a4 01 00 00 48 89\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000e804000 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff817e5bf2\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffffffff887c6568\nRBP: ffffc9000e804000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: dffffc0000000001 R12: 1ffff92001d0080c\nR13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff87e6b100 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 00007fd0c55826c0(0000) GS:ffff8881f6800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: ffffc9000e803ff8 CR3: 0000000170ef7000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n\u0026lt;#DF\u0026gt;\n\u0026lt;/#DF\u0026gt;\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff81f281d1\u0026gt;] __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/shadow.c:31\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:72 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] cpumask_test_cpu include/linux/cpumask.h:506 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] cpu_online include/linux/cpumask.h:1092 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:24 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] lock_acquire+0xe2/0x590 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5632\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8563221e\u0026gt;] rcu_lock_acquire+0x2e/0x40 include/linux/rcupdate.h:306\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8561464d\u0026gt;] rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:747 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8561464d\u0026gt;] ip6_pol_route+0x15d/0x1440 net/ipv6/route.c:2221\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff85618120\u0026gt;] ip6_pol_route_output+0x50/0x80 net/ipv6/route.c:2606\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff856f65b5\u0026gt;] pol_lookup_func include/net/ip6_fib.h:584 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff856f65b5\u0026gt;] fib6_rule_lookup+0x265/0x620 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:116\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff85618009\u0026gt;] ip6_route_output_flags_noref+0x2d9/0x3a0 net/ipv6/route.c:2638\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8561821a\u0026gt;] ip6_route_output_flags+0xca/0x340 net/ipv6/route.c:2651\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:100 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_process_v6_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:473 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_process_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:529 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_xmit_mode_l3 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:602 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_queue_xmit+0xc33/0x1be0 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:677\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838c2909\u0026gt;] ipvlan_start_xmit+0x49/0x100 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c:229\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d03900\u0026gt;] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4966 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d03900\u0026gt;] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3644 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d03900\u0026gt;] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x320/0x980 net/core/dev.c:3660\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d080e2\u0026gt;] __dev_queue_xmit+0x16b2/0x3370 net/core/dev.c:4324\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff855ce4cd\u0026gt;] dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3067 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff855ce4cd\u0026gt;] neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:529 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;f\n---truncated---(CVE-2023-52796)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbFindLeaf\r\n\r\nCurrently while searching for dmtree_t for sufficient free blocks there\nis an array out of bounds while getting element in tp-\u0026gt;dm_stree. To add\nthe required check for out of bound we first need to determine the type\nof dmtree. Thus added an extra parameter to dbFindLeaf so that the type\nof tree can be determined and the required check can be applied.(CVE-2023-52799)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\niio: adc: stm32-adc: harden against NULL pointer deref in stm32_adc_probe()\r\n\r\nof_match_device() may fail and returns a NULL pointer.\r\n\r\nIn practice there is no known reasonable way to trigger this, but\nin case one is added in future, harden the code by adding the check(CVE-2023-52802)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agpref\r\n\r\nBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of the\ndb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check for\ndb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.\r\n\r\nThe following is related bug reported by Syzbot:\r\n\r\nUBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20\nindex 7936 is out of range for type \u0026apos;atomic_t[128]\u0026apos;\r\n\r\nAdd checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are valid\nindexes for the db_agfree array.(CVE-2023-52804)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diAlloc\r\n\r\nCurrently there is not check against the agno of the iag while\nallocating new inodes to avoid fragmentation problem. Added the check\nwhich is required.(CVE-2023-52805)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: libfc: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in fc_lport_ptp_setup()\r\n\r\nfc_lport_ptp_setup() did not check the return value of fc_rport_create()\nwhich can return NULL and would cause a NULL pointer dereference. Address\nthis issue by checking return value of fc_rport_create() and log error\nmessage on fc_rport_create() failed.(CVE-2023-52809)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd: Fix UBSAN array-index-out-of-bounds for Polaris and Tonga\r\n\r\nFor pptable structs that use flexible array sizes, use flexible arrays.(CVE-2023-52819)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncpu/hotplug: Don\u0026apos;t offline the last non-isolated CPU\r\n\r\nIf a system has isolated CPUs via the \u0026quot;isolcpus=\u0026quot; command line parameter,\nthen an attempt to offline the last housekeeping CPU will result in a\nWARN_ON() when rebuilding the scheduler domains and a subsequent panic due\nto and unhandled empty CPU mas in partition_sched_domains_locked().\r\n\r\ncpuset_hotplug_workfn()\n rebuild_sched_domains_locked()\n ndoms = generate_sched_domains(\u0026amp;doms, \u0026amp;attr);\n cpumask_and(doms[0], top_cpuset.effective_cpus, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_DOMAIN));\r\n\r\nThus results in an empty CPU mask which triggers the warning and then the\nsubsequent crash:\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 80 at kernel/sched/topology.c:2366 build_sched_domains+0x120c/0x1408\nCall trace:\n build_sched_domains+0x120c/0x1408\n partition_sched_domains_locked+0x234/0x880\n rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x37c/0x798\n rebuild_sched_domains+0x30/0x58\n cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x2a8/0x930\r\n\r\nUnable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffe80027ab37080\n partition_sched_domains_locked+0x318/0x880\n rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x37c/0x798\r\n\r\nAside of the resulting crash, it does not make any sense to offline the last\nlast housekeeping CPU.\r\n\r\nPrevent this by masking out the non-housekeeping CPUs when selecting a\ntarget CPU for initiating the CPU unplug operation via the work queue.(CVE-2023-52831)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: mac80211: don\u0026apos;t return unset power in ieee80211_get_tx_power()\r\n\r\nWe can get a UBSAN warning if ieee80211_get_tx_power() returns the\nINT_MIN value mac80211 internally uses for \u0026quot;unset power level\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\n UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in net/wireless/nl80211.c:3816:5\n -2147483648 * 100 cannot be represented in type \u0026apos;int\u0026apos;\n CPU: 0 PID: 20433 Comm: insmod Tainted: G WC OE\n Call Trace:\n dump_stack+0x74/0x92\n ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x50\n handle_overflow+0x8d/0xd0\n __ubsan_handle_mul_overflow+0xe/0x10\n nl80211_send_iface+0x688/0x6b0 [cfg80211]\n [...]\n cfg80211_register_wdev+0x78/0xb0 [cfg80211]\n cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x200/0x620 [cfg80211]\n [...]\n ieee80211_if_add+0x60e/0x8f0 [mac80211]\n ieee80211_register_hw+0xda5/0x1170 [mac80211]\r\n\r\nIn this case, simply return an error instead, to indicate\nthat no data is available.(CVE-2023-52832)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: Change nla_policy for bearer-related names to NLA_NUL_STRING\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1]:\r\n\r\n=====================================================\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in strlen lib/string.c:418 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in strstr+0xb8/0x2f0 lib/string.c:756\n strlen lib/string.c:418 [inline]\n strstr+0xb8/0x2f0 lib/string.c:756\n tipc_nl_node_reset_link_stats+0x3ea/0xb50 net/tipc/node.c:2595\n genl_family_rcv_msg_doit net/netlink/genetlink.c:971 [inline]\n genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1051 [inline]\n genl_rcv_msg+0x11ec/0x1290 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1066\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x371/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2545\n genl_rcv+0x40/0x60 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1075\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0xf47/0x1250 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1368\n netlink_sendmsg+0x1238/0x13d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1910\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:753 [inline]\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2541\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2595\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2624 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2633 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2631 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x490 net/socket.c:2631\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook+0x12f/0xb70 mm/slab.h:767\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x577/0xa80 mm/slub.c:3523\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:559\n __alloc_skb+0x318/0x740 net/core/skbuff.c:650\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1286 [inline]\n netlink_alloc_large_skb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1214 [inline]\n netlink_sendmsg+0xb34/0x13d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1885\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:753 [inline]\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2541\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2595\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2624 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2633 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2631 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x490 net/socket.c:2631\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\r\n\r\nTIPC bearer-related names including link names must be null-terminated\nstrings. If a link name which is not null-terminated is passed through\nnetlink, strstr() and similar functions can cause buffer overrun. This\ncauses the above issue.\r\n\r\nThis patch changes the nla_policy for bearer-related names from NLA_STRING\nto NLA_NUL_STRING. This resolves the issue by ensuring that only\nnull-terminated strings are accepted as bearer-related names.\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported similar uninit-value issue related to bearer names [2]. The\nroot cause of this issue is that a non-null-terminated bearer name was\npassed. This patch also resolved this issue.(CVE-2023-52845)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncan: dev: can_put_echo_skb(): don\u0026apos;t crash kernel if can_priv::echo_skb is accessed out of bounds\r\n\r\nIf the \u0026quot;struct can_priv::echoo_skb\u0026quot; is accessed out of bounds, this\nwould cause a kernel crash. Instead, issue a meaningful warning\nmessage and return with an error.(CVE-2023-52878)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nUSB: core: Fix deadlock in usb_deauthorize_interface()\r\n\r\nAmong the attribute file callback routines in\ndrivers/usb/core/sysfs.c, the interface_authorized_store() function is\nthe only one which acquires a device lock on an ancestor device: It\ncalls usb_deauthorize_interface(), which locks the interface\u0026apos;s parent\nUSB device.\r\n\r\nThe will lead to deadlock if another process already owns that lock\nand tries to remove the interface, whether through a configuration\nchange or because the device has been disconnected. As part of the\nremoval procedure, device_del() waits for all ongoing sysfs attribute\ncallbacks to complete. But usb_deauthorize_interface() can\u0026apos;t complete\nuntil the device lock has been released, and the lock won\u0026apos;t be\nreleased until the removal has finished.\r\n\r\nThe mechanism provided by sysfs to prevent this kind of deadlock is\nto use the sysfs_break_active_protection() function, which tells sysfs\nnot to wait for the attribute callback.\r\n\r\nReported-and-tested by: Yue Sun \u0026lt;samsun1006219@gmail.com\u0026gt;\nReported by: xingwei lee \u0026lt;xrivendell7@gmail.com\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-26934)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_expr_type_get()\r\n\r\nnft_unregister_expr() can concurrent with __nft_expr_type_get(),\nand there is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_expressions\nlist in __nft_expr_type_get(). Therefore, there is potential data-race\nof nf_tables_expressions list entry.\r\n\r\nUse list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_expressions\nlist in __nft_expr_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller\nnft_expr_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-27020)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: l2cap: fix null-ptr-deref in l2cap_chan_timeout\r\n\r\nThere is a race condition between l2cap_chan_timeout() and\nl2cap_chan_del(). When we use l2cap_chan_del() to delete the\nchannel, the chan-\u0026gt;conn will be set to null. But the conn could\nbe dereferenced again in the mutex_lock() of l2cap_chan_timeout().\nAs a result the null pointer dereference bug will happen. The\nKASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:\r\n\r\n[ 472.074580] ==================================================================\n[ 472.075284] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000158 by task kworker/0:0/7\n[ 472.075308]\n[ 472.075308] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36\n[ 472.075308] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4\n[ 472.075308] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout\n[ 472.075308] Call Trace:\n[ 472.075308] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 472.075308] dump_stack_lvl+0x137/0x1a0\n[ 472.075308] print_report+0x101/0x250\n[ 472.075308] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x77/0x160\n[ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] kasan_report+0x139/0x170\n[ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] kasan_check_range+0x2c3/0x2e0\n[ 472.075308] mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x181/0x300\n[ 472.075308] process_one_work+0x5d2/0xe00\n[ 472.075308] worker_thread+0xe1d/0x1660\n[ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0\n[ 472.075308] kthread+0x2b7/0x350\n[ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0\n[ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 472.075308] ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n[ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 472.075308] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n[ 472.075308] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 472.075308] ==================================================================\n[ 472.094860] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint\n[ 472.096136] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000158\n[ 472.096136] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode\n[ 472.096136] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page\n[ 472.096136] PGD 0 P4D 0\n[ 472.096136] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\n[ 472.096136] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G B 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36\n[ 472.096136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4\n[ 472.096136] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout\n[ 472.096136] RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] Code: be 08 00 00 00 e8 f8 23 1f fd 4c 89 f7 be 08 00 00 00 e8 eb 23 1f fd 42 80 3c 23 00 74 08 48 88\n[ 472.096136] RSP: 0018:ffff88800744fc78 EFLAGS: 00000246\n[ 472.096136] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 1ffff11000e89f8f RCX: ffffffff8457c865\n[ 472.096136] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff88800744fc78\n[ 472.096136] RBP: 0000000000000158 R08: ffff88800744fc7f R09: 1ffff11000e89f8f\n[ 472.096136] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed1000e89f90 R12: dffffc0000000000\n[ 472.096136] R13: 0000000000000158 R14: ffff88800744fc78 R15: ffff888007405a00\n[ 472.096136] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88806d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 472.096136] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 472.096136] CR2: 0000000000000158 CR3: 000000000da32000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\n[ 472.096136] Call Trace:\n[ 472.096136] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 472.096136] ? __die_body+0x8d/0xe0\n[ 472.096136] ? page_fault_oops+0x6b8/0x9a0\n[ 472.096136] ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x20c/0x2a0\n[ 472.096136] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1027/0x1340\n[ 472.096136] ? _printk+0x7a/0xa0\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] ? add_taint+0x42/0xd0\n[ 472.096136] ? exc_page_fault+0x6a/0x1b0\n[ 472.096136] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] l2cap_chan_timeo\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-27399)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfirewire: nosy: ensure user_length is taken into account when fetching packet contents\r\n\r\nEnsure that packet_buffer_get respects the user_length provided. If\nthe length of the head packet exceeds the user_length, packet_buffer_get\nwill now return 0 to signify to the user that no data were read\nand a larger buffer size is required. Helps prevent user space overflows.(CVE-2024-27401)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: mac80211: check/clear fast rx for non-4addr sta VLAN changes\r\n\r\nWhen moving a station out of a VLAN and deleting the VLAN afterwards, the\nfast_rx entry still holds a pointer to the VLAN\u0026apos;s netdev, which can cause\nuse-after-free bugs. Fix this by immediately calling ieee80211_check_fast_rx\nafter the VLAN change.(CVE-2024-35789)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmd/dm-raid: don\u0026apos;t call md_reap_sync_thread() directly\r\n\r\nCurrently md_reap_sync_thread() is called from raid_message() directly\nwithout holding \u0026apos;reconfig_mutex\u0026apos;, this is definitely unsafe because\nmd_reap_sync_thread() can change many fields that is protected by\n\u0026apos;reconfig_mutex\u0026apos;.\r\n\r\nHowever, hold \u0026apos;reconfig_mutex\u0026apos; here is still problematic because this\nwill cause deadlock, for example, commit 130443d60b1b (\u0026quot;md: refactor\nidle/frozen_sync_thread() to fix deadlock\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nFix this problem by using stop_sync_thread() to unregister sync_thread,\nlike md/raid did.(CVE-2024-35808)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: udc: remove warning when queue disabled ep\r\n\r\nIt is possible trigger below warning message from mass storage function,\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 3839 at drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c:294 usb_ep_queue+0x7c/0x104\npc : usb_ep_queue+0x7c/0x104\nlr : fsg_main_thread+0x494/0x1b3c\r\n\r\nRoot cause is mass storage function try to queue request from main thread,\nbut other thread may already disable ep when function disable.\r\n\r\nAs there is no function failure in the driver, in order to avoid effort\nto fix warning, change WARN_ON_ONCE() in usb_ep_queue() to pr_debug().(CVE-2024-35822)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nvt: fix unicode buffer corruption when deleting characters\r\n\r\nThis is the same issue that was fixed for the VGA text buffer in commit\n39cdb68c64d8 (\u0026quot;vt: fix memory overlapping when deleting chars in the\nbuffer\u0026quot;). The cure is also the same i.e. replace memcpy() with memmove()\ndue to the overlaping buffers.(CVE-2024-35823)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nx86/mm/pat: fix VM_PAT handling in COW mappings\r\n\r\nPAT handling won\u0026apos;t do the right thing in COW mappings: the first PTE (or,\nin fact, all PTEs) can be replaced during write faults to point at anon\nfolios. Reliably recovering the correct PFN and cachemode using\nfollow_phys() from PTEs will not work in COW mappings.\r\n\r\nUsing follow_phys(), we might just get the address+protection of the anon\nfolio (which is very wrong), or fail on swap/nonswap entries, failing\nfollow_phys() and triggering a WARN_ON_ONCE() in untrack_pfn() and\ntrack_pfn_copy(), not properly calling free_pfn_range().\r\n\r\nIn free_pfn_range(), we either wouldn\u0026apos;t call memtype_free() or would call\nit with the wrong range, possibly leaking memory.\r\n\r\nTo fix that, let\u0026apos;s update follow_phys() to refuse returning anon folios,\nand fallback to using the stored PFN inside vma-\u0026gt;vm_pgoff for COW mappings\nif we run into that.\r\n\r\nWe will now properly handle untrack_pfn() with COW mappings, where we\ndon\u0026apos;t need the cachemode. We\u0026apos;ll have to fail fork()-\u0026gt;track_pfn_copy() if\nthe first page was replaced by an anon folio, though: we\u0026apos;d have to store\nthe cachemode in the VMA to make this work, likely growing the VMA size.\r\n\r\nFor now, lets keep it simple and let track_pfn_copy() just fail in that\ncase: it would have failed in the past with swap/nonswap entries already,\nand it would have done the wrong thing with anon folios.\r\n\r\nSimple reproducer to trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE() in untrack_pfn():\r\n\r\n\u0026lt;--- C reproducer ---\u0026gt;\n #include \u0026lt;stdio.h\u0026gt;\n #include \u0026lt;sys/mman.h\u0026gt;\n #include \u0026lt;unistd.h\u0026gt;\n #include \u0026lt;liburing.h\u0026gt;\r\n\r\n int main(void)\n {\n struct io_uring_params p = {};\n int ring_fd;\n size_t size;\n char *map;\r\n\r\n ring_fd = io_uring_setup(1, \u0026amp;p);\n if (ring_fd \u0026lt; 0) {\n perror(\u0026quot;io_uring_setup\u0026quot;);\n return 1;\n }\n size = p.sq_off.array + p.sq_entries * sizeof(unsigned);\r\n\r\n /* Map the submission queue ring MAP_PRIVATE */\n map = mmap(0, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE,\n ring_fd, IORING_OFF_SQ_RING);\n if (map == MAP_FAILED) {\n perror(\u0026quot;mmap\u0026quot;);\n return 1;\n }\r\n\r\n /* We have at least one page. Let\u0026apos;s COW it. */\n *map = 0;\n pause();\n return 0;\n }\n\u0026lt;--- C reproducer ---\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nOn a system with 16 GiB RAM and swap configured:\n # ./iouring \u0026amp;\n # memhog 16G\n # killall iouring\n[ 301.552930] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 301.553285] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1402 at arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:1060 untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100\n[ 301.553989] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_g\n[ 301.558232] CPU: 7 PID: 1402 Comm: iouring Not tainted 6.7.5-100.fc38.x86_64 #1\n[ 301.558772] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebu4\n[ 301.559569] RIP: 0010:untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100\n[ 301.559893] Code: 75 c4 eb cf 48 8b 43 10 8b a8 e8 00 00 00 3b 6b 28 74 b8 48 8b 7b 30 e8 ea 1a f7 000\n[ 301.561189] RSP: 0018:ffffba2c0377fab8 EFLAGS: 00010282\n[ 301.561590] RAX: 00000000ffffffea RBX: ffff9208c8ce9cc0 RCX: 000000010455e047\n[ 301.562105] RDX: 07fffffff0eb1e0a RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9208c391d200\n[ 301.562628] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffba2c0377fab8 R09: 0000000000000000\n[ 301.563145] R10: ffff9208d2292d50 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 00007fea890e0000\n[ 301.563669] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffba2c0377fc08 R15: 0000000000000000\n[ 301.564186] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff920c2fbc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 301.564773] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 301.565197] CR2: 00007fea88ee8a20 CR3: 00000001033a8000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0\n[ 301.565725] PKRU: 55555554\n[ 301.565944] Call Trace:\n[ 301.566148] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 301.566325] ? untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100\n[ 301.566618] ? __warn+0x81/0x130\n[ 301.566876] ? untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100\n[ 3\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35877)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nselinux: avoid dereference of garbage after mount failure\r\n\r\nIn case kern_mount() fails and returns an error pointer return in the\nerror branch instead of continuing and dereferencing the error pointer.\r\n\r\nWhile on it drop the never read static variable selinuxfs_mount.(CVE-2024-35904)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblock: prevent division by zero in blk_rq_stat_sum()\r\n\r\nThe expression dst-\u0026gt;nr_samples + src-\u0026gt;nr_samples may\nhave zero value on overflow. It is necessary to add\na check to avoid division by zero.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.(CVE-2024-35925)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5: Properly link new fs rules into the tree\r\n\r\nPreviously, add_rule_fg would only add newly created rules from the\nhandle into the tree when they had a refcount of 1. On the other hand,\ncreate_flow_handle tries hard to find and reference already existing\nidentical rules instead of creating new ones.\r\n\r\nThese two behaviors can result in a situation where create_flow_handle\n1) creates a new rule and references it, then\n2) in a subsequent step during the same handle creation references it\n again,\nresulting in a rule with a refcount of 2 that is not linked into the\ntree, will have a NULL parent and root and will result in a crash when\nthe flow group is deleted because del_sw_hw_rule, invoked on rule\ndeletion, assumes node-\u0026gt;parent is != NULL.\r\n\r\nThis happened in the wild, due to another bug related to incorrect\nhandling of duplicate pkt_reformat ids, which lead to the code in\ncreate_flow_handle incorrectly referencing a just-added rule in the same\nflow handle, resulting in the problem described above. Full details are\nat [1].\r\n\r\nThis patch changes add_rule_fg to add new rules without parents into\nthe tree, properly initializing them and avoiding the crash. This makes\nit more consistent with how rules are added to an FTE in\ncreate_flow_handle.(CVE-2024-35960)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: Fix memory leak in hci_req_sync_complete()\r\n\r\nIn \u0026apos;hci_req_sync_complete()\u0026apos;, always free the previous sync\nrequest state before assigning reference to a new one.(CVE-2024-35978)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses\r\n\r\nTo align with ACPI 6.3+, since bit_width can be any 8-bit value, it\ncannot be depended on to be always on a clean 8b boundary. This was\nuncovered on the Cobalt 100 platform.\r\n\r\nSError Interrupt on CPU26, code 0xbe000011 -- SError\n CPU: 26 PID: 1510 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.15.2.1-13 #1\n Hardware name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, BIOS MICROSOFT CORPORATION\n pstate: 62400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : cppc_get_perf_caps+0xec/0x410\n lr : cppc_get_perf_caps+0xe8/0x410\n sp : ffff8000155ab730\n x29: ffff8000155ab730 x28: ffff0080139d0038 x27: ffff0080139d0078\n x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0080139d0058 x24: 00000000ffffffff\n x23: ffff0080139d0298 x22: ffff0080139d0278 x21: 0000000000000000\n x20: ffff00802b251910 x19: ffff0080139d0000 x18: ffffffffffffffff\n x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffdc7e111bad04 x15: ffff00802b251008\n x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: ffff013f1fd63300 x12: 0000000000000006\n x11: ffffdc7e128f4420 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffffdc7e111badec\n x8 : ffff00802b251980 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0080139d0028\n x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff0080139d0018 x3 : 00000000ffffffff\n x2 : 0000000000000008 x1 : ffff8000155ab7a0 x0 : 0000000000000000\n Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt\n CPU: 26 PID: 1510 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted\n5.15.2.1-13 #1\n Hardware name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, BIOS MICROSOFT CORPORATION\n Call trace:\n dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1e0\n show_stack+0x24/0x30\n dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xb8\n dump_stack+0x18/0x34\n panic+0x16c/0x384\n add_taint+0x0/0xc0\n arm64_serror_panic+0x7c/0x90\n arm64_is_fatal_ras_serror+0x34/0xa4\n do_serror+0x50/0x6c\n el1h_64_error_handler+0x40/0x74\n el1h_64_error+0x7c/0x80\n cppc_get_perf_caps+0xec/0x410\n cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init+0x74/0x400 [cppc_cpufreq]\n cpufreq_online+0x2dc/0xa30\n cpufreq_add_dev+0xc0/0xd4\n subsys_interface_register+0x134/0x14c\n cpufreq_register_driver+0x1b0/0x354\n cppc_cpufreq_init+0x1a8/0x1000 [cppc_cpufreq]\n do_one_initcall+0x50/0x250\n do_init_module+0x60/0x27c\n load_module+0x2300/0x2570\n __do_sys_finit_module+0xa8/0x114\n __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x2c/0x3c\n invoke_syscall+0x78/0x100\n el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x180/0x1a0\n do_el0_svc+0x84/0xa0\n el0_svc+0x2c/0xc0\n el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa4/0x12c\n el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8\r\n\r\nInstead, use access_width to determine the size and use the offset and\nwidth to shift and mask the bits to read/write out. Make sure to add a\ncheck for system memory since pcc redefines the access_width to\nsubspace id.\r\n\r\nIf access_width is not set, then fall back to using bit_width.\r\n\r\n[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits, comment adjustments ](CVE-2024-35995)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni40e: Do not use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag for workqueue\r\n\r\nIssue reported by customer during SRIOV testing, call trace:\nWhen both i40e and the i40iw driver are loaded, a warning\nin check_flush_dependency is being triggered. This seems\nto be because of the i40e driver workqueue is allocated with\nthe WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag, and the i40iw one is not.\r\n\r\nSimilar error was encountered on ice too and it was fixed by\nremoving the flag. Do the same for i40e too.\r\n\r\n[Feb 9 09:08] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ +0.000004] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM i40e:i40e_service_task [i40e] is\nflushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM infiniband:0x0\n[ +0.000060] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 937 at kernel/workqueue.c:2966\ncheck_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000007] Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq\nsnd_timer snd_seq_device snd soundcore nls_utf8 cifs cifs_arc4\nnls_ucs2_utils rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm cifs_md4 dns_resolver netfs qrtr\nrfkill sunrpc vfat fat intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common irdma\nintel_uncore_frequency intel_uncore_frequency_common ice ipmi_ssif\nisst_if_common skx_edac nfit libnvdimm x86_pkg_temp_thermal\nintel_powerclamp gnss coretemp ib_uverbs rapl intel_cstate ib_core\niTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support acpi_ipmi mei_me ipmi_si intel_uncore\nioatdma i2c_i801 joydev pcspkr mei ipmi_devintf lpc_ich\nintel_pch_thermal i2c_smbus ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter acpi_pad\nxfs libcrc32c ast sd_mod drm_shmem_helper t10_pi drm_kms_helper sg ixgbe\ndrm i40e ahci crct10dif_pclmul libahci crc32_pclmul igb crc32c_intel\nlibata ghash_clmulni_intel i2c_algo_bit mdio dca wmi dm_mirror\ndm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse\n[ +0.000050] CPU: 0 PID: 937 Comm: kworker/0:3 Kdump: loaded Not\ntainted 6.8.0-rc2-Feb-net_dev-Qiueue-00279-gbd43c5687e05 #1\n[ +0.000003] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600BPB/S2600BPB, BIOS\nSE5C620.86B.02.01.0013.121520200651 12/15/2020\n[ +0.000001] Workqueue: i40e i40e_service_task [i40e]\n[ +0.000024] RIP: 0010:check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000003] Code: ff 49 8b 54 24 18 48 8d 8b b0 00 00 00 49 89 e8 48\n81 c6 b0 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 b0 97 fa 9f c6 05 8a cc 1f 02 01 e8 35 b3 fd\nff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e9 10 ff ff ff 80 3d 78 cc 1f 02 00 75 94 e9 46 ff ff ff 90\n[ +0.000002] RSP: 0018:ffffbd294976bcf8 EFLAGS: 00010282\n[ +0.000002] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff94d4c483c000 RCX:\n0000000000000027\n[ +0.000001] RDX: ffff94d47f620bc8 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI:\nffff94d47f620bc0\n[ +0.000001] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:\n00000000ffff7fff\n[ +0.000001] R10: ffffbd294976bb98 R11: ffffffffa0be65e8 R12:\nffff94c5451ea180\n[ +0.000001] R13: ffff94c5ab5e8000 R14: ffff94c5c20b6e05 R15:\nffff94c5f1330ab0\n[ +0.000001] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff94d47f600000(0000)\nknlGS:0000000000000000\n[ +0.000002] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ +0.000001] CR2: 00007f9e6f1fca70 CR3: 0000000038e20004 CR4:\n00000000007706f0\n[ +0.000000] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:\n0000000000000000\n[ +0.000001] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:\n0000000000000400\n[ +0.000001] PKRU: 55555554\n[ +0.000001] Call Trace:\n[ +0.000001] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ +0.000002] ? __warn+0x80/0x130\n[ +0.000003] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000002] ? report_bug+0x195/0x1a0\n[ +0.000005] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70\n[ +0.000003] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70\n[ +0.000002] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20\n[ +0.000006] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000002] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000002] __flush_workqueue+0x126/0x3f0\n[ +0.000015] ib_cache_cleanup_one+0x1c/0xe0 [ib_core]\n[ +0.000056] __ib_unregister_device+0x6a/0xb0 [ib_core]\n[ +0.000023] ib_unregister_device_and_put+0x34/0x50 [ib_core]\n[ +0.000020] i40iw_close+0x4b/0x90 [irdma]\n[ +0.000022] i40e_notify_client_of_netdev_close+0x54/0xc0 [i40e]\n[ +0.000035] i40e_service_task+0x126/0x190 [i40e]\n[ +0.000024] process_one_work+0x174/0x340\n[ +0.000003] worker_th\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-36004)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nppdev: Add an error check in register_device\r\n\r\nIn register_device, the return value of ida_simple_get is unchecked,\nin witch ida_simple_get will use an invalid index value.\r\n\r\nTo address this issue, index should be checked after ida_simple_get. When\nthe index value is abnormal, a warning message should be printed, the port\nshould be dropped, and the value should be recorded.(CVE-2024-36015)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npinctrl: core: delete incorrect free in pinctrl_enable()\r\n\r\nThe \u0026quot;pctldev\u0026quot; struct is allocated in devm_pinctrl_register_and_init().\nIt\u0026apos;s a devm_ managed pointer that is freed by devm_pinctrl_dev_release(),\nso freeing it in pinctrl_enable() will lead to a double free.\r\n\r\nThe devm_pinctrl_dev_release() function frees the pindescs and destroys\nthe mutex as well.(CVE-2024-36940)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1692",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:09Z",
"published": "2024-06-07T11:07:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1692"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47239"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47265"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47275"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47277"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47297"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47314"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47323"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47330"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47350"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47353"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47355"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47356"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47357"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47361"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47362"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47388"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47395"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47397"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47401"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47404"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47405"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47408"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47423"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47427"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47442"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47443"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47445"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47458"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47459"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47475"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47477"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47495"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47545"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47548"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47549"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48708"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52703"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52750"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52802"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52831"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36940"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47239",
"CVE-2021-47265",
"CVE-2021-47275",
"CVE-2021-47277",
"CVE-2021-47297",
"CVE-2021-47314",
"CVE-2021-47323",
"CVE-2021-47330",
"CVE-2021-47350",
"CVE-2021-47353",
"CVE-2021-47355",
"CVE-2021-47356",
"CVE-2021-47357",
"CVE-2021-47361",
"CVE-2021-47362",
"CVE-2021-47388",
"CVE-2021-47395",
"CVE-2021-47397",
"CVE-2021-47401",
"CVE-2021-47404",
"CVE-2021-47405",
"CVE-2021-47408",
"CVE-2021-47423",
"CVE-2021-47427",
"CVE-2021-47438",
"CVE-2021-47442",
"CVE-2021-47443",
"CVE-2021-47445",
"CVE-2021-47458",
"CVE-2021-47459",
"CVE-2021-47475",
"CVE-2021-47477",
"CVE-2021-47495",
"CVE-2021-47545",
"CVE-2021-47548",
"CVE-2021-47549",
"CVE-2021-47559",
"CVE-2022-48708",
"CVE-2023-52669",
"CVE-2023-52693",
"CVE-2023-52699",
"CVE-2023-52703",
"CVE-2023-52750",
"CVE-2023-52752",
"CVE-2023-52759",
"CVE-2023-52789",
"CVE-2023-52796",
"CVE-2023-52799",
"CVE-2023-52802",
"CVE-2023-52804",
"CVE-2023-52805",
"CVE-2023-52809",
"CVE-2023-52819",
"CVE-2023-52831",
"CVE-2023-52832",
"CVE-2023-52845",
"CVE-2023-52878",
"CVE-2024-26934",
"CVE-2024-27020",
"CVE-2024-27399",
"CVE-2024-27401",
"CVE-2024-35789",
"CVE-2024-35808",
"CVE-2024-35822",
"CVE-2024-35823",
"CVE-2024-35877",
"CVE-2024-35904",
"CVE-2024-35925",
"CVE-2024-35960",
"CVE-2024-35978",
"CVE-2024-35995",
"CVE-2024-36004",
"CVE-2024-36015",
"CVE-2024-36940"
]
}
OESA-2024-1694 (CVE-2021-47265)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-06-07 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA: Verify port when creating flow rule
Validate port value provided by the user and with that remove no longer needed validation by the driver. The missing check in the mlx5_ib driver could cause to the below oops.
Call trace: _create_flow_rule+0x2d4/0xf28 [mlx5_ib] mlx5_ib_create_flow+0x2d0/0x5b0 [mlx5_ib] ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow+0x4cc/0x624 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0xd4/0x150 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs.isra.7+0xb28/0xc50 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_ioctl+0x158/0x1d0 [ib_uverbs] do_vfs_ioctl+0xd0/0xaf0 ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb4 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0xc4 el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa4/0x254 el0_svc_handler+0x84/0xa0 el0_svc+0x10/0x26c Code: b9401260 f9615681 51000400 8b001c20 (f9403c1a)(CVE-2021-47265)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mISDN: fix possible use-after-free in HFC_cleanup()
This module's remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function does not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the timer handler may still be running after the driver's remove function has finished, which would result in a use-after-free.
Fix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler has finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47356)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: ensure tx skbs always have the MPTCP ext
Due to signed/unsigned comparison, the expression:
info->size_goal - skb->len > 0
evaluates to true when the size goal is smaller than the skb size. That results in lack of tx cache refill, so that the skb allocated by the core TCP code lacks the required MPTCP skb extensions.
Due to the above, syzbot is able to trigger the following WARN_ON():
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 810 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1366 mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x1362/0x1bc0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1366 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 810 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 5.14.0-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x1362/0x1bc0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1366 Code: ff 4c 8b 74 24 50 48 8b 5c 24 58 e9 0f fb ff ff e8 13 44 8b f8 4c 89 e7 45 31 ed e8 98 57 2e fe e9 81 f4 ff ff e8 fe 43 8b f8 <0f> 0b 41 bd ea ff ff ff e9 6f f4 ff ff 4c 89 e7 e8 b9 8e d2 f8 e9 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000531f6a0 EFLAGS: 00010216 RAX: 000000000000697f RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffc90012107000 RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff88eac9e2 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: ffff888078b15780 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffffff88eac017 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88801de0a280 R13: 0000000000006b58 R14: ffff888066278280 R15: ffff88803c2fe9c0 FS: 00007fd9f866e700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007faebcb2f718 CR3: 00000000267cb000 CR4: 00000000001506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: __mptcp_push_pending+0x1fb/0x6b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1547 mptcp_release_cb+0xfe/0x210 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3003 release_sock+0xb4/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3206 sk_stream_wait_memory+0x604/0xed0 net/core/stream.c:145 mptcp_sendmsg+0xc39/0x1bc0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1749 inet6_sendmsg+0x99/0xe0 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:643 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724 sock_write_iter+0x2a0/0x3e0 net/socket.c:1057 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2163 [inline] new_sync_write+0x40b/0x640 fs/read_write.c:507 vfs_write+0x7cf/0xae0 fs/read_write.c:594 ksys_write+0x1ee/0x250 fs/read_write.c:647 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x4665f9 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fd9f866e188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000056c038 RCX: 00000000004665f9 RDX: 00000000000e7b78 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00000000004bfcc4 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000056c038 R13: 0000000000a9fb1f R14: 00007fd9f866e300 R15: 0000000000022000
Fix the issue rewriting the relevant expression to avoid sign-related problems - note: size_goal is always >= 0.
Additionally, ensure that the skb in the tx cache always carries the relevant extension.(CVE-2021-47370)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free
Commit d39df158518c ("scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn") added iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but then also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already completed task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup code. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common cleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.
This reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we've checked if the iscsi_task is valid.(CVE-2021-47427)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Fix even more out of bound writes from debugfs
CVE-2021-42327 was fixed by:
commit f23750b5b3d98653b31d4469592935ef6364ad67 Author: Thelford Williams <tdwilliamsiv@gmail.com> Date: Wed Oct 13 16:04:13 2021 -0400
drm/amdgpu: fix out of bounds write
but amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c contains more of the same issue so fix the remaining ones.
v2: * Add missing fix in dp_max_bpc_write (Harry Wentland)(CVE-2021-47489)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: TX zerocopy should not sense pfmemalloc status
We got a recent syzbot report [1] showing a possible misuse of pfmemalloc page status in TCP zerocopy paths.
Indeed, for pages coming from user space or other layers, using page_is_pfmemalloc() is moot, and possibly could give false positives.
There has been attempts to make page_is_pfmemalloc() more robust, but not using it in the first place in this context is probably better, removing cpu cycles.
Note to stable teams :
You need to backport 84ce071e38a6 ("net: introduce __skb_fill_page_desc_noacc") as a prereq.
Race is more probable after commit c07aea3ef4d4 ("mm: add a signature in struct page") because page_is_pfmemalloc() is now using low order bit from page->lru.next, which can change more often than page->index.
Low order bit should never be set for lru.next (when used as an anchor in LRU list), so KCSAN report is mostly a false positive.
Backporting to older kernel versions seems not necessary.
[1] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in lru_add_fn / tcp_build_frag
write to 0xffffea0004a1d2c8 of 8 bytes by task 18600 on cpu 0: __list_add include/linux/list.h:73 [inline] list_add include/linux/list.h:88 [inline] lruvec_add_folio include/linux/mm_inline.h:105 [inline] lru_add_fn+0x440/0x520 mm/swap.c:228 folio_batch_move_lru+0x1e1/0x2a0 mm/swap.c:246 folio_batch_add_and_move mm/swap.c:263 [inline] folio_add_lru+0xf1/0x140 mm/swap.c:490 filemap_add_folio+0xf8/0x150 mm/filemap.c:948 __filemap_get_folio+0x510/0x6d0 mm/filemap.c:1981 pagecache_get_page+0x26/0x190 mm/folio-compat.c:104 grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x2a/0x30 mm/folio-compat.c:116 ext4_da_write_begin+0x2dd/0x5f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:2988 generic_perform_write+0x1d4/0x3f0 mm/filemap.c:3738 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x235/0x3e0 fs/ext4/file.c:270 ext4_file_write_iter+0x2e3/0x1210 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2187 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline] vfs_write+0x468/0x760 fs/read_write.c:578 ksys_write+0xe8/0x1a0 fs/read_write.c:631 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:643 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:640 [inline] __x64_sys_write+0x3e/0x50 fs/read_write.c:640 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
read to 0xffffea0004a1d2c8 of 8 bytes by task 18611 on cpu 1: page_is_pfmemalloc include/linux/mm.h:1740 [inline] __skb_fill_page_desc include/linux/skbuff.h:2422 [inline] skb_fill_page_desc include/linux/skbuff.h:2443 [inline] tcp_build_frag+0x613/0xb20 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1018 do_tcp_sendpages+0x3e8/0xaf0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1075 tcp_sendpage_locked net/ipv4/tcp.c:1140 [inline] tcp_sendpage+0x89/0xb0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1150 inet_sendpage+0x7f/0xc0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:833 kernel_sendpage+0x184/0x300 net/socket.c:3561 sock_sendpage+0x5a/0x70 net/socket.c:1054 pipe_to_sendpage+0x128/0x160 fs/splice.c:361 splice_from_pipe_feed fs/splice.c:415 [inline] __splice_from_pipe+0x222/0x4d0 fs/splice.c:559 splice_from_pipe fs/splice.c:594 [inline] generic_splice_sendpage+0x89/0xc0 fs/splice.c:743 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:764 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x80/0xa0 fs/splice.c:931 splice_direct_to_actor+0x305/0x620 fs/splice.c:886 do_splice_direct+0xfb/0x180 fs/splice.c:974 do_sendfile+0x3bf/0x910 fs/read_write.c:1249 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1317 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1303 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x10c/0x150 fs/read_write.c:1303 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
value changed: 0x0000000000000000 -> 0xffffea0004a1d288
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 1 PID: 18611 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc2-syzkaller-00248-ge022620b5d05-dirty #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/22/2022(CVE-2022-48689)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
io_uring/af_unix: disable sending io_uring over sockets
File reference cycles have caused lots of problems for io_uring in the past, and it still doesn't work exactly right and races with unix_stream_read_generic(). The safest fix would be to completely disallow sending io_uring files via sockets via SCM_RIGHT, so there are no possible cycles invloving registered files and thus rendering SCM accounting on the io_uring side unnecessary.(CVE-2023-52654)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: s390/aes - Fix buffer overread in CTR mode
When processing the last block, the s390 ctr code will always read a whole block, even if there isn't a whole block of data left. Fix this by using the actual length left and copy it into a buffer first for processing.(CVE-2023-52669)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
riscv: Check if the code to patch lies in the exit section
Otherwise we fall through to vmalloc_to_page() which panics since the address does not lie in the vmalloc region.(CVE-2023-52677)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/powernv: Add a null pointer check in opal_powercap_init()
kasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory which can be NULL upon failure.(CVE-2023-52696)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sysv: don't call sb_bread() with pointers_lock held
syzbot is reporting sleep in atomic context in SysV filesystem [1], for sb_bread() is called with rw_spinlock held.
A "write_lock(&pointers_lock) => read_lock(&pointers_lock) deadlock" bug and a "sb_bread() with write_lock(&pointers_lock)" bug were introduced by "Replace BKL for chain locking with sysvfs-private rwlock" in Linux 2.5.12.
Then, "[PATCH] err1-40: sysvfs locking fix" in Linux 2.6.8 fixed the former bug by moving pointers_lock lock to the callers, but instead introduced a "sb_bread() with read_lock(&pointers_lock)" bug (which made this problem easier to hit).
Al Viro suggested that why not to do like get_branch()/get_block()/ find_shared() in Minix filesystem does. And doing like that is almost a revert of "[PATCH] err1-40: sysvfs locking fix" except that get_branch() from with find_shared() is called without write_lock(&pointers_lock).(CVE-2023-52699)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64: Restrict CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to GNU as or LLVM IAS 15.x or newer
Prior to LLVM 15.0.0, LLVM's integrated assembler would incorrectly byte-swap NOP when compiling for big-endian, and the resulting series of bytes happened to match the encoding of FNMADD S21, S30, S0, S0.
This went unnoticed until commit:
34f66c4c4d5518c1 ("arm64: Use a positive cpucap for FP/SIMD")
Prior to that commit, the kernel would always enable the use of FPSIMD early in boot when __cpu_setup() initialized CPACR_EL1, and so usage of FNMADD within the kernel was not detected, but could result in the corruption of user or kernel FPSIMD state.
After that commit, the instructions happen to trap during boot prior to FPSIMD being detected and enabled, e.g.
| Unhandled 64-bit el1h sync exception on CPU0, ESR 0x000000001fe00000 -- ASIMD | CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00013-g34f66c4c4d55 #1 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 400000c9 (nZcv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) | pc : __pi_strcmp+0x1c/0x150 | lr : populate_properties+0xe4/0x254 | sp : ffffd014173d3ad0 | x29: ffffd014173d3af0 x28: fffffbfffddffcb8 x27: 0000000000000000 | x26: 0000000000000058 x25: fffffbfffddfe054 x24: 0000000000000008 | x23: fffffbfffddfe000 x22: fffffbfffddfe000 x21: fffffbfffddfe044 | x20: ffffd014173d3b70 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: 0000000000000005 | x17: 0000000000000010 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 00000000413e7000 | x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000001bcc x12: 0000000000000000 | x11: 00000000d00dfeed x10: ffffd414193f2cd0 x9 : 0000000000000000 | x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : ffffffffffffffc0 x6 : 0000000000000000 | x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0101010101010101 x3 : 000000000000002a | x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : ffffd014171f2988 x0 : fffffbfffddffcb8 | Kernel panic - not syncing: Unhandled exception | CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00013-g34f66c4c4d55 #1 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0xec/0x108 | show_stack+0x18/0x2c | dump_stack_lvl+0x50/0x68 | dump_stack+0x18/0x24 | panic+0x13c/0x340 | el1t_64_irq_handler+0x0/0x1c | el1_abort+0x0/0x5c | el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 | __pi_strcmp+0x1c/0x150 | unflatten_dt_nodes+0x1e8/0x2d8 | __unflatten_device_tree+0x5c/0x15c | unflatten_device_tree+0x38/0x50 | setup_arch+0x164/0x1e0 | start_kernel+0x64/0x38c | __primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4
Restrict CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to a known good assembler, which is either GNU as or LLVM's IAS 15.0.0 and newer, which contains the linked commit.(CVE-2023-52750)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smb: client: fix use-after-free bug in cifs_debug_data_proc_show()
Skip SMB sessions that are being teared down (e.g. @ses->ses_status == SES_EXITING) in cifs_debug_data_proc_show() to avoid use-after-free in @ses.
This fixes the following GPF when reading from /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData while mounting and umounting
[ 816.251274] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6d81: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI ... [ 816.260138] Call Trace: [ 816.260329] <TASK> [ 816.260499] ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 [ 816.260762] ? exc_general_protection+0x1b3/0x410 [ 816.261126] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 [ 816.261502] ? cifs_debug_tcon+0xbd/0x240 [cifs] [ 816.261878] ? cifs_debug_tcon+0xab/0x240 [cifs] [ 816.262249] cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0x516/0xdb0 [cifs] [ 816.262689] ? seq_read_iter+0x379/0x470 [ 816.262995] seq_read_iter+0x118/0x470 [ 816.263291] proc_reg_read_iter+0x53/0x90 [ 816.263596] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f [ 816.263945] vfs_read+0x201/0x350 [ 816.264211] ksys_read+0x75/0x100 [ 816.264472] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 [ 816.264750] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 [ 816.265135] RIP: 0033:0x7fd5e669d381(CVE-2023-52752)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Avoid NULL dereference of timing generator
[Why & How] Check whether assigned timing generator is NULL or not before accessing its funcs to prevent NULL dereference.(CVE-2023-52753)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pwm: Fix double shift bug
These enums are passed to set/test_bit(). The set/test_bit() functions take a bit number instead of a shifted value. Passing a shifted value is a double shift bug like doing BIT(BIT(1)). The double shift bug doesn't cause a problem here because we are only checking 0 and 1 but if the value was 5 or above then it can lead to a buffer overflow.(CVE-2023-52756)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gfs2: ignore negated quota changes
When lots of quota changes are made, there may be cases in which an inode's quota information is increased and then decreased, such as when blocks are added to a file, then deleted from it. If the timing is right, function do_qc can add pending quota changes to a transaction, then later, another call to do_qc can negate those changes, resulting in a net gain of 0. The quota_change information is recorded in the qc buffer (and qd element of the inode as well). The buffer is added to the transaction by the first call to do_qc, but a subsequent call changes the value from non-zero back to zero. At that point it's too late to remove the buffer_head from the transaction. Later, when the quota sync code is called, the zero-change qd element is discovered and flagged as an assert warning. If the fs is mounted with errors=panic, the kernel will panic.
This is usually seen when files are truncated and the quota changes are negated by punch_hole/truncate which uses gfs2_quota_hold and gfs2_quota_unhold rather than block allocations that use gfs2_quota_lock and gfs2_quota_unlock which automatically do quota sync.
This patch solves the problem by adding a check to qd_check_sync such that net-zero quota changes already added to the transaction are no longer deemed necessary to be synced, and skipped.
In this case references are taken for the qd and the slot from do_qc so those need to be put. The normal sequence of events for a normal non-zero quota change is as follows:
gfs2_quota_change do_qc qd_hold slot_hold
Later, when the changes are to be synced:
gfs2_quota_sync qd_fish qd_check_sync gets qd ref via lockref_get_not_dead do_sync do_qc(QC_SYNC) qd_put lockref_put_or_lock qd_unlock qd_put lockref_put_or_lock
In the net-zero change case, we add a check to qd_check_sync so it puts the qd and slot references acquired in gfs2_quota_change and skip the unneeded sync.(CVE-2023-52759)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/dasd: protect device queue against concurrent access
In dasd_profile_start() the amount of requests on the device queue are counted. The access to the device queue is unprotected against concurrent access. With a lot of parallel I/O, especially with alias devices enabled, the device queue can change while dasd_profile_start() is accessing the queue. In the worst case this leads to a kernel panic due to incorrect pointer accesses.
Fix this by taking the device lock before accessing the queue and counting the requests. Additionally the check for a valid profile data pointer can be done earlier to avoid unnecessary locking in a hot path.(CVE-2023-52774)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tty: vcc: Add check for kstrdup() in vcc_probe()
Add check for the return value of kstrdup() and return the error, if it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52789)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vhost-vdpa: fix use after free in vhost_vdpa_probe()
The put_device() calls vhost_vdpa_release_dev() which calls ida_simple_remove() and frees "v". So this call to ida_simple_remove() is a use after free and a double free.(CVE-2023-52795)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipvlan: add ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() helper
Inspired by syzbot reports using a stack of multiple ipvlan devices.
Reduce stack size needed in ipvlan_process_v6_outbound() by moving the flowi6 struct used for the route lookup in an non inlined helper. ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() needs 120 bytes on the stack, immediately reclaimed.
Also make sure ipvlan_process_v4_outbound() is not inlined.
We might also have to lower MAX_NEST_DEV, because only syzbot uses setups with more than four stacked devices.
BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at ffffc9000e803ff8 (stack is ffffc9000e804000..ffffc9000e808000) stack guard page: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 13442 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.1.52-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/09/2023 RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x4/0x2a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:188 Code: 48 01 c6 48 89 c7 e8 db 4e c1 03 31 c0 5d c3 cc 0f 0b eb 02 0f 0b b8 ea ff ff ff 5d c3 cc 00 00 cc cc 00 00 cc cc 55 48 89 e5 <41> 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 b0 01 48 85 f6 0f 84 a4 01 00 00 48 89 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000e804000 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff817e5bf2 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffffffff887c6568 RBP: ffffc9000e804000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: dffffc0000000001 R12: 1ffff92001d0080c R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff87e6b100 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fd0c55826c0(0000) GS:ffff8881f6800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffc9000e803ff8 CR3: 0000000170ef7000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <#DF> </#DF> <TASK> [<ffffffff81f281d1>] __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/shadow.c:31 [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:72 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] cpumask_test_cpu include/linux/cpumask.h:506 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] cpu_online include/linux/cpumask.h:1092 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:24 [inline] [<ffffffff817e5bf2>] lock_acquire+0xe2/0x590 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5632 [<ffffffff8563221e>] rcu_lock_acquire+0x2e/0x40 include/linux/rcupdate.h:306 [<ffffffff8561464d>] rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:747 [inline] [<ffffffff8561464d>] ip6_pol_route+0x15d/0x1440 net/ipv6/route.c:2221 [<ffffffff85618120>] ip6_pol_route_output+0x50/0x80 net/ipv6/route.c:2606 [<ffffffff856f65b5>] pol_lookup_func include/net/ip6_fib.h:584 [inline] [<ffffffff856f65b5>] fib6_rule_lookup+0x265/0x620 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:116 [<ffffffff85618009>] ip6_route_output_flags_noref+0x2d9/0x3a0 net/ipv6/route.c:2638 [<ffffffff8561821a>] ip6_route_output_flags+0xca/0x340 net/ipv6/route.c:2651 [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:100 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_process_v6_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:473 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_process_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:529 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_xmit_mode_l3 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:602 [inline] [<ffffffff838bd5a3>] ipvlan_queue_xmit+0xc33/0x1be0 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:677 [<ffffffff838c2909>] ipvlan_start_xmit+0x49/0x100 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c:229 [<ffffffff84d03900>] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4966 [inline] [<ffffffff84d03900>] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3644 [inline] [<ffffffff84d03900>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x320/0x980 net/core/dev.c:3660 [<ffffffff84d080e2>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x16b2/0x3370 net/core/dev.c:4324 [<ffffffff855ce4cd>] dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3067 [inline] [<ffffffff855ce4cd>] neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:529 [inline] [<f ---truncated---(CVE-2023-52796)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath11k: fix dfs radar event locking
The ath11k active pdevs are protected by RCU but the DFS radar event handling code calling ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_pdev_id() was not marked as a read-side critical section.
Mark the code in question as an RCU read-side critical section to avoid any potential use-after-free issues.
Compile tested only.(CVE-2023-52798)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbFindLeaf
Currently while searching for dmtree_t for sufficient free blocks there is an array out of bounds while getting element in tp->dm_stree. To add the required check for out of bound we first need to determine the type of dmtree. Thus added an extra parameter to dbFindLeaf so that the type of tree can be determined and the required check can be applied.(CVE-2023-52799)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath11k: fix htt pktlog locking
The ath11k active pdevs are protected by RCU but the htt pktlog handling code calling ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_pdev_id() was not marked as a read-side critical section.
Mark the code in question as an RCU read-side critical section to avoid any potential use-after-free issues.
Compile tested only.(CVE-2023-52800)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iio: adc: stm32-adc: harden against NULL pointer deref in stm32_adc_probe()
of_match_device() may fail and returns a NULL pointer.
In practice there is no known reasonable way to trigger this, but in case one is added in future, harden the code by adding the check(CVE-2023-52802)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Fix potential null pointer derefernce
The amdgpu_ras_get_context may return NULL if device not support ras feature, so add check before using.(CVE-2023-52814)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd: Fix UBSAN array-index-out-of-bounds for Polaris and Tonga
For pptable structs that use flexible array sizes, use flexible arrays.(CVE-2023-52819)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/panel/panel-tpo-tpg110: fix a possible null pointer dereference
In tpg110_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mode, which will lead to a NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2023-52826)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cpu/hotplug: Don't offline the last non-isolated CPU
If a system has isolated CPUs via the "isolcpus=" command line parameter, then an attempt to offline the last housekeeping CPU will result in a WARN_ON() when rebuilding the scheduler domains and a subsequent panic due to and unhandled empty CPU mas in partition_sched_domains_locked().
cpuset_hotplug_workfn() rebuild_sched_domains_locked() ndoms = generate_sched_domains(&doms, &attr); cpumask_and(doms[0], top_cpuset.effective_cpus, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_DOMAIN));
Thus results in an empty CPU mask which triggers the warning and then the subsequent crash:
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 80 at kernel/sched/topology.c:2366 build_sched_domains+0x120c/0x1408 Call trace: build_sched_domains+0x120c/0x1408 partition_sched_domains_locked+0x234/0x880 rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x37c/0x798 rebuild_sched_domains+0x30/0x58 cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x2a8/0x930
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffe80027ab37080 partition_sched_domains_locked+0x318/0x880 rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x37c/0x798
Aside of the resulting crash, it does not make any sense to offline the last last housekeeping CPU.
Prevent this by masking out the non-housekeeping CPUs when selecting a target CPU for initiating the CPU unplug operation via the work queue.(CVE-2023-52831)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: don't return unset power in ieee80211_get_tx_power()
We can get a UBSAN warning if ieee80211_get_tx_power() returns the INT_MIN value mac80211 internally uses for "unset power level".
UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in net/wireless/nl80211.c:3816:5 -2147483648 * 100 cannot be represented in type 'int' CPU: 0 PID: 20433 Comm: insmod Tainted: G WC OE Call Trace: dump_stack+0x74/0x92 ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x50 handle_overflow+0x8d/0xd0 __ubsan_handle_mul_overflow+0xe/0x10 nl80211_send_iface+0x688/0x6b0 [cfg80211] [...] cfg80211_register_wdev+0x78/0xb0 [cfg80211] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x200/0x620 [cfg80211] [...] ieee80211_if_add+0x60e/0x8f0 [mac80211] ieee80211_register_hw+0xda5/0x1170 [mac80211]
In this case, simply return an error instead, to indicate that no data is available.(CVE-2023-52832)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
locking/ww_mutex/test: Fix potential workqueue corruption
In some cases running with the test-ww_mutex code, I was seeing odd behavior where sometimes it seemed flush_workqueue was returning before all the work threads were finished.
Often this would cause strange crashes as the mutexes would be freed while they were being used.
Looking at the code, there is a lifetime problem as the controlling thread that spawns the work allocates the "struct stress" structures that are passed to the workqueue threads. Then when the workqueue threads are finished, they free the stress struct that was passed to them.
Unfortunately the workqueue work_struct node is in the stress struct. Which means the work_struct is freed before the work thread returns and while flush_workqueue is waiting.
It seems like a better idea to have the controlling thread both allocate and free the stress structures, so that we can be sure we don't corrupt the workqueue by freeing the structure prematurely.
So this patch reworks the test to do so, and with this change I no longer see the early flush_workqueue returns.(CVE-2023-52836)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fbdev: imsttfb: fix a resource leak in probe
I've re-written the error handling but the bug is that if init_imstt() fails we need to call iounmap(par->cmap_regs).(CVE-2023-52838)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
platform/x86: wmi: Fix opening of char device
Since commit fa1f68db6ca7 ("drivers: misc: pass miscdevice pointer via file private data"), the miscdevice stores a pointer to itself inside filp->private_data, which means that private_data will not be NULL when wmi_char_open() is called. This might cause memory corruption should wmi_char_open() be unable to find its driver, something which can happen when the associated WMI device is deleted in wmi_free_devices().
Fix the problem by using the miscdevice pointer to retrieve the WMI device data associated with a char device using container_of(). This also avoids wmi_char_open() picking a wrong WMI device bound to a driver with the same name as the original driver.(CVE-2023-52864)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: mediatek: clk-mt6797: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data
Add the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52865)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: llcc: Handle a second device without data corruption
Usually there is only one llcc device. But if there were a second, even a failed probe call would modify the global drv_data pointer. So check if drv_data is valid before overwriting it.(CVE-2023-52871)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: mediatek: clk-mt2701: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data
Add the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52875)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: dev: can_put_echo_skb(): don't crash kernel if can_priv::echo_skb is accessed out of bounds
If the "struct can_priv::echoo_skb" is accessed out of bounds, this would cause a kernel crash. Instead, issue a meaningful warning message and return with an error.(CVE-2023-52878)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix memory leak in dm_sw_fini()
After destroying dmub_srv, the memory associated with it is not freed, causing a memory leak:
unreferenced object 0xffff896302b45800 (size 1024): comm "(udev-worker)", pid 222, jiffies 4294894636 hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace (crc 6265fd77): [<ffffffff993495ed>] kmalloc_trace+0x29d/0x340 [<ffffffffc0ea4a94>] dm_dmub_sw_init+0xb4/0x450 [amdgpu] [<ffffffffc0ea4e55>] dm_sw_init+0x15/0x2b0 [amdgpu] [<ffffffffc0ba8557>] amdgpu_device_init+0x1417/0x24e0 [amdgpu] [<ffffffffc0bab285>] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x15/0x190 [amdgpu] [<ffffffffc0ba09c7>] amdgpu_pci_probe+0x187/0x4e0 [amdgpu] [<ffffffff9968fd1e>] local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90 [<ffffffff996918a3>] pci_device_probe+0xc3/0x230 [<ffffffff99805872>] really_probe+0xe2/0x480 [<ffffffff99805c98>] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x160 [<ffffffff99805daf>] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0x90 [<ffffffff9980601e>] __driver_attach+0xce/0x1c0 [<ffffffff99803170>] bus_for_each_dev+0x70/0xc0 [<ffffffff99804822>] bus_add_driver+0x112/0x210 [<ffffffff99807245>] driver_register+0x55/0x100 [<ffffffff990012d1>] do_one_initcall+0x41/0x300
Fix this by freeing dmub_srv after destroying it.(CVE-2024-26833)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: xilinx - call finalize with bh disabled
When calling crypto_finalize_request, BH should be disabled to avoid triggering the following calltrace:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 74 at crypto/crypto_engine.c:58 crypto_finalize_request+0xa0/0x118
Modules linked in: cryptodev(O)
CPU: 2 PID: 74 Comm: firmware:zynqmp Tainted: G O 6.8.0-rc1-yocto-standard #323
Hardware name: ZynqMP ZCU102 Rev1.0 (DT)
pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : crypto_finalize_request+0xa0/0x118
lr : crypto_finalize_request+0x104/0x118
sp : ffffffc085353ce0
x29: ffffffc085353ce0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffffff8808ea8688
x26: ffffffc081715038 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffffff880100db00
x23: ffffff880100da80 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 0000000000000000
x20: ffffff8805b14000 x19: ffffff880100da80 x18: 0000000000010450
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000
x14: 0000000000000003 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: ffffff880100dad0
x11: 0000000000000000 x10: ffffffc0832dcd08 x9 : ffffffc0812416d8
x8 : 00000000000001f4 x7 : ffffffc0830d2830 x6 : 0000000000000001
x5 : ffffffc082091000 x4 : ffffffc082091658 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : ffffffc7f9653000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffff8802d20000
Call trace:
crypto_finalize_request+0xa0/0x118
crypto_finalize_aead_request+0x18/0x30
zynqmp_handle_aes_req+0xcc/0x388
crypto_pump_work+0x168/0x2d8
kthread_worker_fn+0xfc/0x3a0
kthread+0x118/0x138
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
irq event stamp: 40
hardirqs last enabled at (39): [<ffffffc0812416f8>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x70/0xb0
hardirqs last disabled at (40): [<ffffffc08122d208>] el1_dbg+0x28/0x90
softirqs last enabled at (36): [<ffffffc080017dec>] kernel_neon_begin+0x8c/0xf0
softirqs last disabled at (34): [<ffffffc080017dc0>] kernel_neon_begin+0x60/0xf0
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-26877)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: core: Fix deadlock in usb_deauthorize_interface()
Among the attribute file callback routines in drivers/usb/core/sysfs.c, the interface_authorized_store() function is the only one which acquires a device lock on an ancestor device: It calls usb_deauthorize_interface(), which locks the interface's parent USB device.
The will lead to deadlock if another process already owns that lock and tries to remove the interface, whether through a configuration change or because the device has been disconnected. As part of the removal procedure, device_del() waits for all ongoing sysfs attribute callbacks to complete. But usb_deauthorize_interface() can't complete until the device lock has been released, and the lock won't be released until the removal has finished.
The mechanism provided by sysfs to prevent this kind of deadlock is to use the sysfs_break_active_protection() function, which tells sysfs not to wait for the attribute callback.
Reported-and-tested by: Yue Sun <samsun1006219@gmail.com> Reported by: xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>(CVE-2024-26934)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_expr_type_get()
nft_unregister_expr() can concurrent with __nft_expr_type_get(), and there is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_expressions list in __nft_expr_type_get(). Therefore, there is potential data-race of nf_tables_expressions list entry.
Use list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_expressions list in __nft_expr_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller nft_expr_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-27020)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: l2cap: fix null-ptr-deref in l2cap_chan_timeout
There is a race condition between l2cap_chan_timeout() and l2cap_chan_del(). When we use l2cap_chan_del() to delete the channel, the chan->conn will be set to null. But the conn could be dereferenced again in the mutex_lock() of l2cap_chan_timeout(). As a result the null pointer dereference bug will happen. The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:
[ 472.074580] ================================================================== [ 472.075284] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000158 by task kworker/0:0/7 [ 472.075308] [ 472.075308] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36 [ 472.075308] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4 [ 472.075308] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout [ 472.075308] Call Trace: [ 472.075308] <TASK> [ 472.075308] dump_stack_lvl+0x137/0x1a0 [ 472.075308] print_report+0x101/0x250 [ 472.075308] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x77/0x160 [ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] kasan_report+0x139/0x170 [ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] kasan_check_range+0x2c3/0x2e0 [ 472.075308] mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.075308] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x181/0x300 [ 472.075308] process_one_work+0x5d2/0xe00 [ 472.075308] worker_thread+0xe1d/0x1660 [ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [ 472.075308] kthread+0x2b7/0x350 [ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0 [ 472.075308] ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 [ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0 [ 472.075308] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 472.075308] </TASK> [ 472.075308] ================================================================== [ 472.094860] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint [ 472.096136] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000158 [ 472.096136] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ 472.096136] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ 472.096136] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 472.096136] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI [ 472.096136] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G B 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36 [ 472.096136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4 [ 472.096136] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout [ 472.096136] RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0 [ 472.096136] Code: be 08 00 00 00 e8 f8 23 1f fd 4c 89 f7 be 08 00 00 00 e8 eb 23 1f fd 42 80 3c 23 00 74 08 48 88 [ 472.096136] RSP: 0018:ffff88800744fc78 EFLAGS: 00000246 [ 472.096136] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 1ffff11000e89f8f RCX: ffffffff8457c865 [ 472.096136] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff88800744fc78 [ 472.096136] RBP: 0000000000000158 R08: ffff88800744fc7f R09: 1ffff11000e89f8f [ 472.096136] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed1000e89f90 R12: dffffc0000000000 [ 472.096136] R13: 0000000000000158 R14: ffff88800744fc78 R15: ffff888007405a00 [ 472.096136] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88806d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 472.096136] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 472.096136] CR2: 0000000000000158 CR3: 000000000da32000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [ 472.096136] Call Trace: [ 472.096136] <TASK> [ 472.096136] ? __die_body+0x8d/0xe0 [ 472.096136] ? page_fault_oops+0x6b8/0x9a0 [ 472.096136] ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x20c/0x2a0 [ 472.096136] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1027/0x1340 [ 472.096136] ? _printk+0x7a/0xa0 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0 [ 472.096136] ? add_taint+0x42/0xd0 [ 472.096136] ? exc_page_fault+0x6a/0x1b0 [ 472.096136] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0 [ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0 [ 472.096136] l2cap_chan_timeo ---truncated---(CVE-2024-27399)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
firewire: nosy: ensure user_length is taken into account when fetching packet contents
Ensure that packet_buffer_get respects the user_length provided. If the length of the head packet exceeds the user_length, packet_buffer_get will now return 0 to signify to the user that no data were read and a larger buffer size is required. Helps prevent user space overflows.(CVE-2024-27401)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
efi/capsule-loader: fix incorrect allocation size
gcc-14 notices that the allocation with sizeof(void) on 32-bit architectures is not enough for a 64-bit phys_addr_t:
drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c: In function 'efi_capsule_open': drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c:295:24: error: allocation of insufficient size '4' for type 'phys_addr_t' {aka 'long long unsigned int'} with size '8' [-Werror=alloc-size] 295 | cap_info->phys = kzalloc(sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); | ^
Use the correct type instead here.(CVE-2024-27413)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack
conntrack nf_confirm logic cannot handle cloned skbs referencing the same nf_conn entry, which will happen for multicast (broadcast) frames on bridges.
Example: macvlan0 | br0 / \ ethX ethY
ethX (or Y) receives a L2 multicast or broadcast packet containing an IP packet, flow is not yet in conntrack table.
- skb passes through bridge and fake-ip (br_netfilter)Prerouting. -> skb->_nfct now references a unconfirmed entry
- skb is broad/mcast packet. bridge now passes clones out on each bridge interface.
- skb gets passed up the stack.
-
In macvlan case, macvlan driver retains clone(s) of the mcast skb and schedules a work queue to send them out on the lower devices.
The clone skb->_nfct is not a copy, it is the same entry as the original skb. The macvlan rx handler then returns RX_HANDLER_PASS. 5. Normal conntrack hooks (in NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) confirm the orig skb.
The Macvlan broadcast worker and normal confirm path will race.
This race will not happen if step 2 already confirmed a clone. In that case later steps perform skb_clone() with skb->_nfct already confirmed (in hash table). This works fine.
But such confirmation won't happen when eb/ip/nftables rules dropped the packets before they reached the nf_confirm step in postrouting.
Pablo points out that nf_conntrack_bridge doesn't allow use of stateful nat, so we can safely discard the nf_conn entry and let inet call conntrack again.
This doesn't work for bridge netfilter: skb could have a nat transformation. Also bridge nf prevents re-invocation of inet prerouting via 'sabotage_in' hook.
Work around this problem by explicit confirmation of the entry at LOCAL_IN time, before upper layer has a chance to clone the unconfirmed entry.
The downside is that this disables NAT and conntrack helpers.
Alternative fix would be to add locking to all code parts that deal with unconfirmed packets, but even if that could be done in a sane way this opens up other problems, for example:
-m physdev --physdev-out eth0 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.4 -m physdev --physdev-out eth1 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.5
For multicast case, only one of such conflicting mappings will be created, conntrack only handles 1:1 NAT mappings.
Users should set create a setup that explicitly marks such traffic NOTRACK (conntrack bypass) to avoid this, but we cannot auto-bypass them, ruleset might have accept rules for untracked traffic already, so user-visible behaviour would change.(CVE-2024-27415)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: check/clear fast rx for non-4addr sta VLAN changes
When moving a station out of a VLAN and deleting the VLAN afterwards, the fast_rx entry still holds a pointer to the VLAN's netdev, which can cause use-after-free bugs. Fix this by immediately calling ieee80211_check_fast_rx after the VLAN change.(CVE-2024-35789)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/dm-raid: don't call md_reap_sync_thread() directly
Currently md_reap_sync_thread() is called from raid_message() directly without holding 'reconfig_mutex', this is definitely unsafe because md_reap_sync_thread() can change many fields that is protected by 'reconfig_mutex'.
However, hold 'reconfig_mutex' here is still problematic because this will cause deadlock, for example, commit 130443d60b1b ("md: refactor idle/frozen_sync_thread() to fix deadlock").
Fix this problem by using stop_sync_thread() to unregister sync_thread, like md/raid did.(CVE-2024-35808)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: udc: remove warning when queue disabled ep
It is possible trigger below warning message from mass storage function,
WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 3839 at drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c:294 usb_ep_queue+0x7c/0x104 pc : usb_ep_queue+0x7c/0x104 lr : fsg_main_thread+0x494/0x1b3c
Root cause is mass storage function try to queue request from main thread, but other thread may already disable ep when function disable.
As there is no function failure in the driver, in order to avoid effort to fix warning, change WARN_ON_ONCE() in usb_ep_queue() to pr_debug().(CVE-2024-35822)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vt: fix unicode buffer corruption when deleting characters
This is the same issue that was fixed for the VGA text buffer in commit 39cdb68c64d8 ("vt: fix memory overlapping when deleting chars in the buffer"). The cure is also the same i.e. replace memcpy() with memmove() due to the overlaping buffers.(CVE-2024-35823)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: use OPTION_MPTCP_MPJ_SYNACK in subflow_finish_connect()
subflow_finish_connect() uses four fields (backup, join_id, thmac, none) that may contain garbage unless OPTION_MPTCP_MPJ_SYNACK has been set in mptcp_parse_option()(CVE-2024-35840)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix possible use-after-free during activity update
The rule activity update delayed work periodically traverses the list of configured rules and queries their activity from the device.
As part of this task it accesses the entry pointed by 'ventry->entry', but this entry can be changed concurrently by the rehash delayed work, leading to a use-after-free [1].
Fix by closing the race and perform the activity query under the 'vregion->lock' mutex.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_flower_rule_activity_get+0x121/0x140 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881054ed808 by task kworker/0:18/181
CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00781-gd5ab772d32f7 #2 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_activity_update_work Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xc6/0x120 print_report+0xce/0x670 kasan_report+0xd7/0x110 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_flower_rule_activity_get+0x121/0x140 mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_activity_update_work+0x219/0x400 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>
Allocated by task 1039: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0 __kmalloc+0x19c/0x360 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x7b/0x1f0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x30d/0xb50 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
Freed by task 1039: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 poison_slab_object+0x102/0x170 __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x30 kfree+0xc1/0x290 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x3d7/0xb50 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300 process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0 worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70 kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30(CVE-2024-35855)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/mm/pat: fix VM_PAT handling in COW mappings
PAT handling won't do the right thing in COW mappings: the first PTE (or, in fact, all PTEs) can be replaced during write faults to point at anon folios. Reliably recovering the correct PFN and cachemode using follow_phys() from PTEs will not work in COW mappings.
Using follow_phys(), we might just get the address+protection of the anon folio (which is very wrong), or fail on swap/nonswap entries, failing follow_phys() and triggering a WARN_ON_ONCE() in untrack_pfn() and track_pfn_copy(), not properly calling free_pfn_range().
In free_pfn_range(), we either wouldn't call memtype_free() or would call it with the wrong range, possibly leaking memory.
To fix that, let's update follow_phys() to refuse returning anon folios, and fallback to using the stored PFN inside vma->vm_pgoff for COW mappings if we run into that.
We will now properly handle untrack_pfn() with COW mappings, where we don't need the cachemode. We'll have to fail fork()->track_pfn_copy() if the first page was replaced by an anon folio, though: we'd have to store the cachemode in the VMA to make this work, likely growing the VMA size.
For now, lets keep it simple and let track_pfn_copy() just fail in that case: it would have failed in the past with swap/nonswap entries already, and it would have done the wrong thing with anon folios.
Simple reproducer to trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE() in untrack_pfn():
<--- C reproducer ---> #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/mman.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <liburing.h>
int main(void) { struct io_uring_params p = {}; int ring_fd; size_t size; char *map;
ring_fd = io_uring_setup(1, &p);
if (ring_fd < 0) {
perror("io_uring_setup");
return 1;
}
size = p.sq_off.array + p.sq_entries * sizeof(unsigned);
/* Map the submission queue ring MAP_PRIVATE */
map = mmap(0, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE,
ring_fd, IORING_OFF_SQ_RING);
if (map == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap");
return 1;
}
/* We have at least one page. Let's COW it. */
*map = 0;
pause();
return 0;
} <--- C reproducer --->
On a system with 16 GiB RAM and swap configured: # ./iouring & # memhog 16G # killall iouring [ 301.552930] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 301.553285] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1402 at arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:1060 untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100 [ 301.553989] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_g [ 301.558232] CPU: 7 PID: 1402 Comm: iouring Not tainted 6.7.5-100.fc38.x86_64 #1 [ 301.558772] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebu4 [ 301.559569] RIP: 0010:untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100 [ 301.559893] Code: 75 c4 eb cf 48 8b 43 10 8b a8 e8 00 00 00 3b 6b 28 74 b8 48 8b 7b 30 e8 ea 1a f7 000 [ 301.561189] RSP: 0018:ffffba2c0377fab8 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 301.561590] RAX: 00000000ffffffea RBX: ffff9208c8ce9cc0 RCX: 000000010455e047 [ 301.562105] RDX: 07fffffff0eb1e0a RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9208c391d200 [ 301.562628] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffba2c0377fab8 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 301.563145] R10: ffff9208d2292d50 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 00007fea890e0000 [ 301.563669] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffba2c0377fc08 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 301.564186] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff920c2fbc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 301.564773] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 301.565197] CR2: 00007fea88ee8a20 CR3: 00000001033a8000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 [ 301.565725] PKRU: 55555554 [ 301.565944] Call Trace: [ 301.566148] <TASK> [ 301.566325] ? untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100 [ 301.566618] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 [ 301.566876] ? untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100 [ 3 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35877)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: reject new basechain after table flag update
When dormant flag is toggled, hooks are disabled in the commit phase by iterating over current chains in table (existing and new).
The following configuration allows for an inconsistent state:
add table x add chain x y { type filter hook input priority 0; } add table x { flags dormant; } add chain x w { type filter hook input priority 1; }
which triggers the following warning when trying to unregister chain w which is already unregistered.
[ 127.322252] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1211 at net/netfilter/core.c:50 1 __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260 [...] [ 127.322519] Call Trace: [ 127.322521] <TASK> [ 127.322524] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0 [ 127.322531] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260 [ 127.322537] ? report_bug+0x1b1/0x1e0 [ 127.322545] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 [ 127.322552] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40 [ 127.322556] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 127.322563] ? kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 [ 127.322570] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x6a/0x260 [ 127.322577] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260 [ 127.322583] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x6a/0x260 [ 127.322590] ? __nf_tables_unregister_hook+0x8a/0xe0 [nf_tables] [ 127.322655] nft_table_disable+0x75/0xf0 [nf_tables] [ 127.322717] nf_tables_commit+0x2571/0x2620 nf_tables
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
selinux: avoid dereference of garbage after mount failure
In case kern_mount() fails and returns an error pointer return in the error branch instead of continuing and dereferencing the error pointer.
While on it drop the never read static variable selinuxfs_mount.(CVE-2024-35904)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: prevent division by zero in blk_rq_stat_sum()
The expression dst->nr_samples + src->nr_samples may have zero value on overflow. It is necessary to add a check to avoid division by zero.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.(CVE-2024-35925)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dma-direct: Leak pages on dma_set_decrypted() failure
On TDX it is possible for the untrusted host to cause set_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an error is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to take care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared) memory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security issues.
DMA could free decrypted/shared pages if dma_set_decrypted() fails. This should be a rare case. Just leak the pages in this case instead of freeing them.(CVE-2024-35939)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/client: Fully protect modes[] with dev->mode_config.mutex
The modes[] array contains pointers to modes on the connectors' mode lists, which are protected by dev->mode_config.mutex. Thus we need to extend modes[] the same protection or by the time we use it the elements may already be pointing to freed/reused memory.(CVE-2024-35950)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: qgroup: fix qgroup prealloc rsv leak in subvolume operations
Create subvolume, create snapshot and delete subvolume all use btrfs_subvolume_reserve_metadata() to reserve metadata for the changes done to the parent subvolume's fs tree, which cannot be mediated in the normal way via start_transaction. When quota groups (squota or qgroups) are enabled, this reserves qgroup metadata of type PREALLOC. Once the operation is associated to a transaction, we convert PREALLOC to PERTRANS, which gets cleared in bulk at the end of the transaction.
However, the error paths of these three operations were not implementing this lifecycle correctly. They unconditionally converted the PREALLOC to PERTRANS in a generic cleanup step regardless of errors or whether the operation was fully associated to a transaction or not. This resulted in error paths occasionally converting this rsv to PERTRANS without calling record_root_in_trans successfully, which meant that unless that root got recorded in the transaction by some other thread, the end of the transaction would not free that root's PERTRANS, leaking it. Ultimately, this resulted in hitting a WARN in CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG builds at unmount for the leaked reservation.
The fix is to ensure that every qgroup PREALLOC reservation observes the following properties:
- any failure before record_root_in_trans is called successfully results in freeing the PREALLOC reservation.
- after record_root_in_trans, we convert to PERTRANS, and now the transaction owns freeing the reservation.
This patch enforces those properties on the three operations. Without it, generic/269 with squotas enabled at mkfs time would fail in ~5-10 runs on my system. With this patch, it ran successfully 1000 times in a row.(CVE-2024-35956)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ena: Fix incorrect descriptor free behavior
ENA has two types of TX queues: - queues which only process TX packets arriving from the network stack - queues which only process TX packets forwarded to it by XDP_REDIRECT or XDP_TX instructions
The ena_free_tx_bufs() cycles through all descriptors in a TX queue and unmaps + frees every descriptor that hasn't been acknowledged yet by the device (uncompleted TX transactions). The function assumes that the processed TX queue is necessarily from the first category listed above and ends up using napi_consume_skb() for descriptors belonging to an XDP specific queue.
This patch solves a bug in which, in case of a VF reset, the descriptors aren't freed correctly, leading to crashes.(CVE-2024-35958)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Properly link new fs rules into the tree
Previously, add_rule_fg would only add newly created rules from the handle into the tree when they had a refcount of 1. On the other hand, create_flow_handle tries hard to find and reference already existing identical rules instead of creating new ones.
These two behaviors can result in a situation where create_flow_handle 1) creates a new rule and references it, then 2) in a subsequent step during the same handle creation references it again, resulting in a rule with a refcount of 2 that is not linked into the tree, will have a NULL parent and root and will result in a crash when the flow group is deleted because del_sw_hw_rule, invoked on rule deletion, assumes node->parent is != NULL.
This happened in the wild, due to another bug related to incorrect handling of duplicate pkt_reformat ids, which lead to the code in create_flow_handle incorrectly referencing a just-added rule in the same flow handle, resulting in the problem described above. Full details are at [1].
This patch changes add_rule_fg to add new rules without parents into the tree, properly initializing them and avoiding the crash. This makes it more consistent with how rules are added to an FTE in create_flow_handle.(CVE-2024-35960)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: Fix memory leak in hci_req_sync_complete()
In 'hci_req_sync_complete()', always free the previous sync request state before assigning reference to a new one.(CVE-2024-35978)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: idxd: Fix oops during rmmod on single-CPU platforms
During the removal of the idxd driver, registered offline callback is invoked as part of the clean up process. However, on systems with only one CPU online, no valid target is available to migrate the perf context, resulting in a kernel oops:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 000000000002a2b8
#PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
PGD 1470e1067 P4D 0
Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 0 PID: 20 Comm: cpuhp/0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc6-dsa+ #57
Hardware name: Intel Corporation AvenueCity/AvenueCity, BIOS BHSDCRB1.86B.2492.D03.2307181620 07/18/2023
RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x2e/0x50
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__die+0x24/0x70
page_fault_oops+0x82/0x160
do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x6b0
__pfx___rdmsr_safe_on_cpu+0x10/0x10
exc_page_fault+0x7d/0x170
asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
mutex_lock+0x2e/0x50
mutex_lock+0x1e/0x50
perf_pmu_migrate_context+0x87/0x1f0
perf_event_cpu_offline+0x76/0x90 [idxd]
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xa2/0x4f0
__pfx_perf_event_cpu_offline+0x10/0x10 [idxd]
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x98/0x150
smpboot_thread_fn+0x27/0x260
smpboot_thread_fn+0x1af/0x260
__pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x103/0x140
__pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
__pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
<TASK>
Fix the issue by preventing the migration of the perf context to an invalid target.(CVE-2024-35989)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge
There is a recent report on UFFDIO_COPY over hugetlb:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000ee06de0616177560@google.com/
350: lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock);
Should be an issue in hugetlb but triggered in an userfault context, where it goes into the unlikely path where two threads modifying the resv map together. Mike has a fix in that path for resv uncharge but it looks like the locking criteria was overlooked: hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd() will update the cgroup pointer, so it requires to be called with the lock held.(CVE-2024-36000)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i40e: Do not use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag for workqueue
Issue reported by customer during SRIOV testing, call trace: When both i40e and the i40iw driver are loaded, a warning in check_flush_dependency is being triggered. This seems to be because of the i40e driver workqueue is allocated with the WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag, and the i40iw one is not.
Similar error was encountered on ice too and it was fixed by removing the flag. Do the same for i40e too.
[Feb 9 09:08] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ +0.000004] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM i40e:i40e_service_task [i40e] is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM infiniband:0x0 [ +0.000060] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 937 at kernel/workqueue.c:2966 check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000007] Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device snd soundcore nls_utf8 cifs cifs_arc4 nls_ucs2_utils rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm cifs_md4 dns_resolver netfs qrtr rfkill sunrpc vfat fat intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common irdma intel_uncore_frequency intel_uncore_frequency_common ice ipmi_ssif isst_if_common skx_edac nfit libnvdimm x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp gnss coretemp ib_uverbs rapl intel_cstate ib_core iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support acpi_ipmi mei_me ipmi_si intel_uncore ioatdma i2c_i801 joydev pcspkr mei ipmi_devintf lpc_ich intel_pch_thermal i2c_smbus ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter acpi_pad xfs libcrc32c ast sd_mod drm_shmem_helper t10_pi drm_kms_helper sg ixgbe drm i40e ahci crct10dif_pclmul libahci crc32_pclmul igb crc32c_intel libata ghash_clmulni_intel i2c_algo_bit mdio dca wmi dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse [ +0.000050] CPU: 0 PID: 937 Comm: kworker/0:3 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-Feb-net_dev-Qiueue-00279-gbd43c5687e05 #1 [ +0.000003] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600BPB/S2600BPB, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0013.121520200651 12/15/2020 [ +0.000001] Workqueue: i40e i40e_service_task [i40e] [ +0.000024] RIP: 0010:check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000003] Code: ff 49 8b 54 24 18 48 8d 8b b0 00 00 00 49 89 e8 48 81 c6 b0 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 b0 97 fa 9f c6 05 8a cc 1f 02 01 e8 35 b3 fd ff <0f> 0b e9 10 ff ff ff 80 3d 78 cc 1f 02 00 75 94 e9 46 ff ff ff 90 [ +0.000002] RSP: 0018:ffffbd294976bcf8 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ +0.000002] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff94d4c483c000 RCX: 0000000000000027 [ +0.000001] RDX: ffff94d47f620bc8 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff94d47f620bc0 [ +0.000001] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffff7fff [ +0.000001] R10: ffffbd294976bb98 R11: ffffffffa0be65e8 R12: ffff94c5451ea180 [ +0.000001] R13: ffff94c5ab5e8000 R14: ffff94c5c20b6e05 R15: ffff94c5f1330ab0 [ +0.000001] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff94d47f600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ +0.000002] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ +0.000001] CR2: 00007f9e6f1fca70 CR3: 0000000038e20004 CR4: 00000000007706f0 [ +0.000000] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ +0.000001] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ +0.000001] PKRU: 55555554 [ +0.000001] Call Trace: [ +0.000001] <TASK> [ +0.000002] ? __warn+0x80/0x130 [ +0.000003] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000002] ? report_bug+0x195/0x1a0 [ +0.000005] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 [ +0.000003] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 [ +0.000002] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [ +0.000006] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000002] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000002] __flush_workqueue+0x126/0x3f0 [ +0.000015] ib_cache_cleanup_one+0x1c/0xe0 [ib_core] [ +0.000056] __ib_unregister_device+0x6a/0xb0 [ib_core] [ +0.000023] ib_unregister_device_and_put+0x34/0x50 [ib_core] [ +0.000020] i40iw_close+0x4b/0x90 [irdma] [ +0.000022] i40e_notify_client_of_netdev_close+0x54/0xc0 [i40e] [ +0.000035] i40e_service_task+0x126/0x190 [i40e] [ +0.000024] process_one_work+0x174/0x340 [ +0.000003] worker_th ---truncated---(CVE-2024-36004)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix warning during rehash
As previously explained, the rehash delayed work migrates filters from one region to another. This is done by iterating over all chunks (all the filters with the same priority) in the region and in each chunk iterating over all the filters.
When the work runs out of credits it stores the current chunk and entry as markers in the per-work context so that it would know where to resume the migration from the next time the work is scheduled.
Upon error, the chunk marker is reset to NULL, but without resetting the entry markers despite being relative to it. This can result in migration being resumed from an entry that does not belong to the chunk being migrated. In turn, this will eventually lead to a chunk being iterated over as if it is an entry. Because of how the two structures happen to be defined, this does not lead to KASAN splats, but to warnings such as [1].
Fix by creating a helper that resets all the markers and call it from all the places the currently only reset the chunk marker. For good measures also call it when starting a completely new rehash. Add a warning to avoid future cases.
[1] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1076 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core_acl_flex_keys.c:407 mlxsw_afk_encode+0x242/0x2f0 Modules linked in: CPU: 7 PID: 1076 Comm: kworker/7:24 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc3-custom-00880-g29e61d91b77b #29 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:mlxsw_afk_encode+0x242/0x2f0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xd9/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x109/0x290 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x6c/0x470 process_one_work+0x151/0x370 worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0 kthread+0xd0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 </TASK>(CVE-2024-36007)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ppdev: Add an error check in register_device
In register_device, the return value of ida_simple_get is unchecked, in witch ida_simple_get will use an invalid index value.
To address this issue, index should be checked after ida_simple_get. When the index value is abnormal, a warning message should be printed, the port should be dropped, and the value should be recorded.(CVE-2024-36015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pinctrl: core: delete incorrect free in pinctrl_enable()
The "pctldev" struct is allocated in devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(). It's a devm_ managed pointer that is freed by devm_pinctrl_dev_release(), so freeing it in pinctrl_enable() will lead to a double free.
The devm_pinctrl_dev_release() function frees the pindescs and destroys the mutex as well.(CVE-2024-36940)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"perf-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-202.0.0.115.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA: Verify port when creating flow rule\r\n\r\nValidate port value provided by the user and with that remove no longer\nneeded validation by the driver. The missing check in the mlx5_ib driver\ncould cause to the below oops.\r\n\r\nCall trace:\n _create_flow_rule+0x2d4/0xf28 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5_ib_create_flow+0x2d0/0x5b0 [mlx5_ib]\n ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow+0x4cc/0x624 [ib_uverbs]\n ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0xd4/0x150 [ib_uverbs]\n ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs.isra.7+0xb28/0xc50 [ib_uverbs]\n ib_uverbs_ioctl+0x158/0x1d0 [ib_uverbs]\n do_vfs_ioctl+0xd0/0xaf0\n ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb4\n __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0xc4\n el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa4/0x254\n el0_svc_handler+0x84/0xa0\n el0_svc+0x10/0x26c\n Code: b9401260 f9615681 51000400 8b001c20 (f9403c1a)(CVE-2021-47265)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmISDN: fix possible use-after-free in HFC_cleanup()\r\n\r\nThis module\u0026apos;s remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function\ndoes not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the\ntimer handler may still be running after the driver\u0026apos;s remove function\nhas finished, which would result in a use-after-free.\r\n\r\nFix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler\nhas finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47356)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmptcp: ensure tx skbs always have the MPTCP ext\r\n\r\nDue to signed/unsigned comparison, the expression:\r\n\r\n\tinfo-\u0026gt;size_goal - skb-\u0026gt;len \u0026gt; 0\r\n\r\nevaluates to true when the size goal is smaller than the\nskb size. That results in lack of tx cache refill, so that\nthe skb allocated by the core TCP code lacks the required\nMPTCP skb extensions.\r\n\r\nDue to the above, syzbot is able to trigger the following WARN_ON():\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 810 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1366 mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x1362/0x1bc0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1366\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 1 PID: 810 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 5.14.0-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011\nRIP: 0010:mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x1362/0x1bc0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1366\nCode: ff 4c 8b 74 24 50 48 8b 5c 24 58 e9 0f fb ff ff e8 13 44 8b f8 4c 89 e7 45 31 ed e8 98 57 2e fe e9 81 f4 ff ff e8 fe 43 8b f8 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 41 bd ea ff ff ff e9 6f f4 ff ff 4c 89 e7 e8 b9 8e d2 f8 e9\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000531f6a0 EFLAGS: 00010216\nRAX: 000000000000697f RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffc90012107000\nRDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff88eac9e2 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: ffff888078b15780 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: ffffffff88eac017 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88801de0a280\nR13: 0000000000006b58 R14: ffff888066278280 R15: ffff88803c2fe9c0\nFS: 00007fd9f866e700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007faebcb2f718 CR3: 00000000267cb000 CR4: 00000000001506e0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n __mptcp_push_pending+0x1fb/0x6b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1547\n mptcp_release_cb+0xfe/0x210 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3003\n release_sock+0xb4/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3206\n sk_stream_wait_memory+0x604/0xed0 net/core/stream.c:145\n mptcp_sendmsg+0xc39/0x1bc0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1749\n inet6_sendmsg+0x99/0xe0 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:643\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline]\n sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724\n sock_write_iter+0x2a0/0x3e0 net/socket.c:1057\n call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2163 [inline]\n new_sync_write+0x40b/0x640 fs/read_write.c:507\n vfs_write+0x7cf/0xae0 fs/read_write.c:594\n ksys_write+0x1ee/0x250 fs/read_write.c:647\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\nRIP: 0033:0x4665f9\nCode: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007fd9f866e188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000056c038 RCX: 00000000004665f9\nRDX: 00000000000e7b78 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00000000004bfcc4 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000056c038\nR13: 0000000000a9fb1f R14: 00007fd9f866e300 R15: 0000000000022000\r\n\r\nFix the issue rewriting the relevant expression to avoid\nsign-related problems - note: size_goal is always \u0026gt;= 0.\r\n\r\nAdditionally, ensure that the skb in the tx cache always carries\nthe relevant extension.(CVE-2021-47370)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free\r\n\r\nCommit d39df158518c (\u0026quot;scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\u0026quot;)\nadded iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but\nthen also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already\ncompleted task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup\ncode. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common\ncleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.\r\n\r\nThis reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we\u0026apos;ve checked\nif the iscsi_task is valid.(CVE-2021-47427)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Fix even more out of bound writes from debugfs\r\n\r\nCVE-2021-42327 was fixed by:\r\n\r\ncommit f23750b5b3d98653b31d4469592935ef6364ad67\nAuthor: Thelford Williams \u0026lt;tdwilliamsiv@gmail.com\u0026gt;\nDate: Wed Oct 13 16:04:13 2021 -0400\r\n\r\n drm/amdgpu: fix out of bounds write\r\n\r\nbut amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c contains more of the same issue so fix the\nremaining ones.\r\n\r\nv2:\n\t* Add missing fix in dp_max_bpc_write (Harry Wentland)(CVE-2021-47489)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: TX zerocopy should not sense pfmemalloc status\r\n\r\nWe got a recent syzbot report [1] showing a possible misuse\nof pfmemalloc page status in TCP zerocopy paths.\r\n\r\nIndeed, for pages coming from user space or other layers,\nusing page_is_pfmemalloc() is moot, and possibly could give\nfalse positives.\r\n\r\nThere has been attempts to make page_is_pfmemalloc() more robust,\nbut not using it in the first place in this context is probably better,\nremoving cpu cycles.\r\n\r\nNote to stable teams :\r\n\r\nYou need to backport 84ce071e38a6 (\u0026quot;net: introduce\n__skb_fill_page_desc_noacc\u0026quot;) as a prereq.\r\n\r\nRace is more probable after commit c07aea3ef4d4\n(\u0026quot;mm: add a signature in struct page\u0026quot;) because page_is_pfmemalloc()\nis now using low order bit from page-\u0026gt;lru.next, which can change\nmore often than page-\u0026gt;index.\r\n\r\nLow order bit should never be set for lru.next (when used as an anchor\nin LRU list), so KCSAN report is mostly a false positive.\r\n\r\nBackporting to older kernel versions seems not necessary.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KCSAN: data-race in lru_add_fn / tcp_build_frag\r\n\r\nwrite to 0xffffea0004a1d2c8 of 8 bytes by task 18600 on cpu 0:\n__list_add include/linux/list.h:73 [inline]\nlist_add include/linux/list.h:88 [inline]\nlruvec_add_folio include/linux/mm_inline.h:105 [inline]\nlru_add_fn+0x440/0x520 mm/swap.c:228\nfolio_batch_move_lru+0x1e1/0x2a0 mm/swap.c:246\nfolio_batch_add_and_move mm/swap.c:263 [inline]\nfolio_add_lru+0xf1/0x140 mm/swap.c:490\nfilemap_add_folio+0xf8/0x150 mm/filemap.c:948\n__filemap_get_folio+0x510/0x6d0 mm/filemap.c:1981\npagecache_get_page+0x26/0x190 mm/folio-compat.c:104\ngrab_cache_page_write_begin+0x2a/0x30 mm/folio-compat.c:116\next4_da_write_begin+0x2dd/0x5f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:2988\ngeneric_perform_write+0x1d4/0x3f0 mm/filemap.c:3738\next4_buffered_write_iter+0x235/0x3e0 fs/ext4/file.c:270\next4_file_write_iter+0x2e3/0x1210\ncall_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2187 [inline]\nnew_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]\nvfs_write+0x468/0x760 fs/read_write.c:578\nksys_write+0xe8/0x1a0 fs/read_write.c:631\n__do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:643 [inline]\n__se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:640 [inline]\n__x64_sys_write+0x3e/0x50 fs/read_write.c:640\ndo_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\ndo_syscall_64+0x2b/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\r\n\r\nread to 0xffffea0004a1d2c8 of 8 bytes by task 18611 on cpu 1:\npage_is_pfmemalloc include/linux/mm.h:1740 [inline]\n__skb_fill_page_desc include/linux/skbuff.h:2422 [inline]\nskb_fill_page_desc include/linux/skbuff.h:2443 [inline]\ntcp_build_frag+0x613/0xb20 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1018\ndo_tcp_sendpages+0x3e8/0xaf0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1075\ntcp_sendpage_locked net/ipv4/tcp.c:1140 [inline]\ntcp_sendpage+0x89/0xb0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1150\ninet_sendpage+0x7f/0xc0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:833\nkernel_sendpage+0x184/0x300 net/socket.c:3561\nsock_sendpage+0x5a/0x70 net/socket.c:1054\npipe_to_sendpage+0x128/0x160 fs/splice.c:361\nsplice_from_pipe_feed fs/splice.c:415 [inline]\n__splice_from_pipe+0x222/0x4d0 fs/splice.c:559\nsplice_from_pipe fs/splice.c:594 [inline]\ngeneric_splice_sendpage+0x89/0xc0 fs/splice.c:743\ndo_splice_from fs/splice.c:764 [inline]\ndirect_splice_actor+0x80/0xa0 fs/splice.c:931\nsplice_direct_to_actor+0x305/0x620 fs/splice.c:886\ndo_splice_direct+0xfb/0x180 fs/splice.c:974\ndo_sendfile+0x3bf/0x910 fs/read_write.c:1249\n__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1317 [inline]\n__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1303 [inline]\n__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x10c/0x150 fs/read_write.c:1303\ndo_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\ndo_syscall_64+0x2b/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\r\n\r\nvalue changed: 0x0000000000000000 -\u0026gt; 0xffffea0004a1d288\r\n\r\nReported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:\nCPU: 1 PID: 18611 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc2-syzkaller-00248-ge022620b5d05-dirty #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/22/2022(CVE-2022-48689)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nio_uring/af_unix: disable sending io_uring over sockets\r\n\r\nFile reference cycles have caused lots of problems for io_uring\nin the past, and it still doesn\u0026apos;t work exactly right and races with\nunix_stream_read_generic(). The safest fix would be to completely\ndisallow sending io_uring files via sockets via SCM_RIGHT, so there\nare no possible cycles invloving registered files and thus rendering\nSCM accounting on the io_uring side unnecessary.(CVE-2023-52654)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: s390/aes - Fix buffer overread in CTR mode\r\n\r\nWhen processing the last block, the s390 ctr code will always read\na whole block, even if there isn\u0026apos;t a whole block of data left. Fix\nthis by using the actual length left and copy it into a buffer first\nfor processing.(CVE-2023-52669)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nriscv: Check if the code to patch lies in the exit section\r\n\r\nOtherwise we fall through to vmalloc_to_page() which panics since the\naddress does not lie in the vmalloc region.(CVE-2023-52677)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npowerpc/powernv: Add a null pointer check in opal_powercap_init()\r\n\r\nkasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory\nwhich can be NULL upon failure.(CVE-2023-52696)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsysv: don\u0026apos;t call sb_bread() with pointers_lock held\r\n\r\nsyzbot is reporting sleep in atomic context in SysV filesystem [1], for\nsb_bread() is called with rw_spinlock held.\r\n\r\nA \u0026quot;write_lock(\u0026amp;pointers_lock) =\u0026gt; read_lock(\u0026amp;pointers_lock) deadlock\u0026quot; bug\nand a \u0026quot;sb_bread() with write_lock(\u0026amp;pointers_lock)\u0026quot; bug were introduced by\n\u0026quot;Replace BKL for chain locking with sysvfs-private rwlock\u0026quot; in Linux 2.5.12.\r\n\r\nThen, \u0026quot;[PATCH] err1-40: sysvfs locking fix\u0026quot; in Linux 2.6.8 fixed the\nformer bug by moving pointers_lock lock to the callers, but instead\nintroduced a \u0026quot;sb_bread() with read_lock(\u0026amp;pointers_lock)\u0026quot; bug (which made\nthis problem easier to hit).\r\n\r\nAl Viro suggested that why not to do like get_branch()/get_block()/\nfind_shared() in Minix filesystem does. And doing like that is almost a\nrevert of \u0026quot;[PATCH] err1-40: sysvfs locking fix\u0026quot; except that get_branch()\n from with find_shared() is called without write_lock(\u0026amp;pointers_lock).(CVE-2023-52699)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\narm64: Restrict CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to GNU as or LLVM IAS 15.x or newer\r\n\r\nPrior to LLVM 15.0.0, LLVM\u0026apos;s integrated assembler would incorrectly\nbyte-swap NOP when compiling for big-endian, and the resulting series of\nbytes happened to match the encoding of FNMADD S21, S30, S0, S0.\r\n\r\nThis went unnoticed until commit:\r\n\r\n 34f66c4c4d5518c1 (\u0026quot;arm64: Use a positive cpucap for FP/SIMD\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nPrior to that commit, the kernel would always enable the use of FPSIMD\nearly in boot when __cpu_setup() initialized CPACR_EL1, and so usage of\nFNMADD within the kernel was not detected, but could result in the\ncorruption of user or kernel FPSIMD state.\r\n\r\nAfter that commit, the instructions happen to trap during boot prior to\nFPSIMD being detected and enabled, e.g.\r\n\r\n| Unhandled 64-bit el1h sync exception on CPU0, ESR 0x000000001fe00000 -- ASIMD\n| CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00013-g34f66c4c4d55 #1\n| Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)\n| pstate: 400000c9 (nZcv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n| pc : __pi_strcmp+0x1c/0x150\n| lr : populate_properties+0xe4/0x254\n| sp : ffffd014173d3ad0\n| x29: ffffd014173d3af0 x28: fffffbfffddffcb8 x27: 0000000000000000\n| x26: 0000000000000058 x25: fffffbfffddfe054 x24: 0000000000000008\n| x23: fffffbfffddfe000 x22: fffffbfffddfe000 x21: fffffbfffddfe044\n| x20: ffffd014173d3b70 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: 0000000000000005\n| x17: 0000000000000010 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 00000000413e7000\n| x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000001bcc x12: 0000000000000000\n| x11: 00000000d00dfeed x10: ffffd414193f2cd0 x9 : 0000000000000000\n| x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : ffffffffffffffc0 x6 : 0000000000000000\n| x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0101010101010101 x3 : 000000000000002a\n| x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : ffffd014171f2988 x0 : fffffbfffddffcb8\n| Kernel panic - not syncing: Unhandled exception\n| CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00013-g34f66c4c4d55 #1\n| Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)\n| Call trace:\n| dump_backtrace+0xec/0x108\n| show_stack+0x18/0x2c\n| dump_stack_lvl+0x50/0x68\n| dump_stack+0x18/0x24\n| panic+0x13c/0x340\n| el1t_64_irq_handler+0x0/0x1c\n| el1_abort+0x0/0x5c\n| el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68\n| __pi_strcmp+0x1c/0x150\n| unflatten_dt_nodes+0x1e8/0x2d8\n| __unflatten_device_tree+0x5c/0x15c\n| unflatten_device_tree+0x38/0x50\n| setup_arch+0x164/0x1e0\n| start_kernel+0x64/0x38c\n| __primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4\r\n\r\nRestrict CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to a known good assembler, which is\neither GNU as or LLVM\u0026apos;s IAS 15.0.0 and newer, which contains the linked\ncommit.(CVE-2023-52750)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsmb: client: fix use-after-free bug in cifs_debug_data_proc_show()\r\n\r\nSkip SMB sessions that are being teared down\n(e.g. @ses-\u0026gt;ses_status == SES_EXITING) in cifs_debug_data_proc_show()\nto avoid use-after-free in @ses.\r\n\r\nThis fixes the following GPF when reading from /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData\nwhile mounting and umounting\r\n\r\n [ 816.251274] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical\n address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6d81: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n ...\n [ 816.260138] Call Trace:\n [ 816.260329] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n [ 816.260499] ? die_addr+0x36/0x90\n [ 816.260762] ? exc_general_protection+0x1b3/0x410\n [ 816.261126] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30\n [ 816.261502] ? cifs_debug_tcon+0xbd/0x240 [cifs]\n [ 816.261878] ? cifs_debug_tcon+0xab/0x240 [cifs]\n [ 816.262249] cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0x516/0xdb0 [cifs]\n [ 816.262689] ? seq_read_iter+0x379/0x470\n [ 816.262995] seq_read_iter+0x118/0x470\n [ 816.263291] proc_reg_read_iter+0x53/0x90\n [ 816.263596] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f\n [ 816.263945] vfs_read+0x201/0x350\n [ 816.264211] ksys_read+0x75/0x100\n [ 816.264472] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90\n [ 816.264750] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n [ 816.265135] RIP: 0033:0x7fd5e669d381(CVE-2023-52752)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Avoid NULL dereference of timing generator\r\n\r\n[Why \u0026amp; How]\nCheck whether assigned timing generator is NULL or not before\naccessing its funcs to prevent NULL dereference.(CVE-2023-52753)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npwm: Fix double shift bug\r\n\r\nThese enums are passed to set/test_bit(). The set/test_bit() functions\ntake a bit number instead of a shifted value. Passing a shifted value\nis a double shift bug like doing BIT(BIT(1)). The double shift bug\ndoesn\u0026apos;t cause a problem here because we are only checking 0 and 1 but\nif the value was 5 or above then it can lead to a buffer overflow.(CVE-2023-52756)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngfs2: ignore negated quota changes\r\n\r\nWhen lots of quota changes are made, there may be cases in which an\ninode\u0026apos;s quota information is increased and then decreased, such as when\nblocks are added to a file, then deleted from it. If the timing is\nright, function do_qc can add pending quota changes to a transaction,\nthen later, another call to do_qc can negate those changes, resulting\nin a net gain of 0. The quota_change information is recorded in the qc\nbuffer (and qd element of the inode as well). The buffer is added to the\ntransaction by the first call to do_qc, but a subsequent call changes\nthe value from non-zero back to zero. At that point it\u0026apos;s too late to\nremove the buffer_head from the transaction. Later, when the quota sync\ncode is called, the zero-change qd element is discovered and flagged as\nan assert warning. If the fs is mounted with errors=panic, the kernel\nwill panic.\r\n\r\nThis is usually seen when files are truncated and the quota changes are\nnegated by punch_hole/truncate which uses gfs2_quota_hold and\ngfs2_quota_unhold rather than block allocations that use gfs2_quota_lock\nand gfs2_quota_unlock which automatically do quota sync.\r\n\r\nThis patch solves the problem by adding a check to qd_check_sync such\nthat net-zero quota changes already added to the transaction are no\nlonger deemed necessary to be synced, and skipped.\r\n\r\nIn this case references are taken for the qd and the slot from do_qc\nso those need to be put. The normal sequence of events for a normal\nnon-zero quota change is as follows:\r\n\r\ngfs2_quota_change\n do_qc\n qd_hold\n slot_hold\r\n\r\nLater, when the changes are to be synced:\r\n\r\ngfs2_quota_sync\n qd_fish\n qd_check_sync\n gets qd ref via lockref_get_not_dead\n do_sync\n do_qc(QC_SYNC)\n qd_put\n\t lockref_put_or_lock\n qd_unlock\n qd_put\n lockref_put_or_lock\r\n\r\nIn the net-zero change case, we add a check to qd_check_sync so it puts\nthe qd and slot references acquired in gfs2_quota_change and skip the\nunneeded sync.(CVE-2023-52759)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/dasd: protect device queue against concurrent access\r\n\r\nIn dasd_profile_start() the amount of requests on the device queue are\ncounted. The access to the device queue is unprotected against\nconcurrent access. With a lot of parallel I/O, especially with alias\ndevices enabled, the device queue can change while dasd_profile_start()\nis accessing the queue. In the worst case this leads to a kernel panic\ndue to incorrect pointer accesses.\r\n\r\nFix this by taking the device lock before accessing the queue and\ncounting the requests. Additionally the check for a valid profile data\npointer can be done earlier to avoid unnecessary locking in a hot path.(CVE-2023-52774)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntty: vcc: Add check for kstrdup() in vcc_probe()\r\n\r\nAdd check for the return value of kstrdup() and return the error, if it\nfails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52789)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nvhost-vdpa: fix use after free in vhost_vdpa_probe()\r\n\r\nThe put_device() calls vhost_vdpa_release_dev() which calls\nida_simple_remove() and frees \u0026quot;v\u0026quot;. So this call to\nida_simple_remove() is a use after free and a double free.(CVE-2023-52795)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipvlan: add ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() helper\r\n\r\nInspired by syzbot reports using a stack of multiple ipvlan devices.\r\n\r\nReduce stack size needed in ipvlan_process_v6_outbound() by moving\nthe flowi6 struct used for the route lookup in an non inlined\nhelper. ipvlan_route_v6_outbound() needs 120 bytes on the stack,\nimmediately reclaimed.\r\n\r\nAlso make sure ipvlan_process_v4_outbound() is not inlined.\r\n\r\nWe might also have to lower MAX_NEST_DEV, because only syzbot uses\nsetups with more than four stacked devices.\r\n\r\nBUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at ffffc9000e803ff8 (stack is ffffc9000e804000..ffffc9000e808000)\nstack guard page: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN\nCPU: 0 PID: 13442 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.1.52-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/09/2023\nRIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x4/0x2a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:188\nCode: 48 01 c6 48 89 c7 e8 db 4e c1 03 31 c0 5d c3 cc 0f 0b eb 02 0f 0b b8 ea ff ff ff 5d c3 cc 00 00 cc cc 00 00 cc cc 55 48 89 e5 \u0026lt;41\u0026gt; 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 b0 01 48 85 f6 0f 84 a4 01 00 00 48 89\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000e804000 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff817e5bf2\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffffffff887c6568\nRBP: ffffc9000e804000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: dffffc0000000001 R12: 1ffff92001d0080c\nR13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff87e6b100 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 00007fd0c55826c0(0000) GS:ffff8881f6800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: ffffc9000e803ff8 CR3: 0000000170ef7000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n\u0026lt;#DF\u0026gt;\n\u0026lt;/#DF\u0026gt;\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff81f281d1\u0026gt;] __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/shadow.c:31\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:72 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] cpumask_test_cpu include/linux/cpumask.h:506 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] cpu_online include/linux/cpumask.h:1092 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:24 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff817e5bf2\u0026gt;] lock_acquire+0xe2/0x590 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5632\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8563221e\u0026gt;] rcu_lock_acquire+0x2e/0x40 include/linux/rcupdate.h:306\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8561464d\u0026gt;] rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:747 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8561464d\u0026gt;] ip6_pol_route+0x15d/0x1440 net/ipv6/route.c:2221\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff85618120\u0026gt;] ip6_pol_route_output+0x50/0x80 net/ipv6/route.c:2606\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff856f65b5\u0026gt;] pol_lookup_func include/net/ip6_fib.h:584 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff856f65b5\u0026gt;] fib6_rule_lookup+0x265/0x620 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:116\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff85618009\u0026gt;] ip6_route_output_flags_noref+0x2d9/0x3a0 net/ipv6/route.c:2638\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8561821a\u0026gt;] ip6_route_output_flags+0xca/0x340 net/ipv6/route.c:2651\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ip6_route_output include/net/ip6_route.h:100 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_process_v6_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:473 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_process_outbound drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:529 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_xmit_mode_l3 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:602 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838bd5a3\u0026gt;] ipvlan_queue_xmit+0xc33/0x1be0 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:677\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff838c2909\u0026gt;] ipvlan_start_xmit+0x49/0x100 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c:229\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d03900\u0026gt;] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4966 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d03900\u0026gt;] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3644 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d03900\u0026gt;] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x320/0x980 net/core/dev.c:3660\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff84d080e2\u0026gt;] __dev_queue_xmit+0x16b2/0x3370 net/core/dev.c:4324\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff855ce4cd\u0026gt;] dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3067 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff855ce4cd\u0026gt;] neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:529 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;f\n---truncated---(CVE-2023-52796)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: ath11k: fix dfs radar event locking\r\n\r\nThe ath11k active pdevs are protected by RCU but the DFS radar event\nhandling code calling ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_pdev_id() was not marked as a\nread-side critical section.\r\n\r\nMark the code in question as an RCU read-side critical section to avoid\nany potential use-after-free issues.\r\n\r\nCompile tested only.(CVE-2023-52798)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbFindLeaf\r\n\r\nCurrently while searching for dmtree_t for sufficient free blocks there\nis an array out of bounds while getting element in tp-\u0026gt;dm_stree. To add\nthe required check for out of bound we first need to determine the type\nof dmtree. Thus added an extra parameter to dbFindLeaf so that the type\nof tree can be determined and the required check can be applied.(CVE-2023-52799)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: ath11k: fix htt pktlog locking\r\n\r\nThe ath11k active pdevs are protected by RCU but the htt pktlog handling\ncode calling ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_pdev_id() was not marked as a\nread-side critical section.\r\n\r\nMark the code in question as an RCU read-side critical section to avoid\nany potential use-after-free issues.\r\n\r\nCompile tested only.(CVE-2023-52800)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\niio: adc: stm32-adc: harden against NULL pointer deref in stm32_adc_probe()\r\n\r\nof_match_device() may fail and returns a NULL pointer.\r\n\r\nIn practice there is no known reasonable way to trigger this, but\nin case one is added in future, harden the code by adding the check(CVE-2023-52802)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Fix potential null pointer derefernce\r\n\r\nThe amdgpu_ras_get_context may return NULL if device\nnot support ras feature, so add check before using.(CVE-2023-52814)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd: Fix UBSAN array-index-out-of-bounds for Polaris and Tonga\r\n\r\nFor pptable structs that use flexible array sizes, use flexible arrays.(CVE-2023-52819)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/panel/panel-tpo-tpg110: fix a possible null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nIn tpg110_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is\nassigned to mode, which will lead to a NULL pointer dereference on\nfailure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2023-52826)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncpu/hotplug: Don\u0026apos;t offline the last non-isolated CPU\r\n\r\nIf a system has isolated CPUs via the \u0026quot;isolcpus=\u0026quot; command line parameter,\nthen an attempt to offline the last housekeeping CPU will result in a\nWARN_ON() when rebuilding the scheduler domains and a subsequent panic due\nto and unhandled empty CPU mas in partition_sched_domains_locked().\r\n\r\ncpuset_hotplug_workfn()\n rebuild_sched_domains_locked()\n ndoms = generate_sched_domains(\u0026amp;doms, \u0026amp;attr);\n cpumask_and(doms[0], top_cpuset.effective_cpus, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_DOMAIN));\r\n\r\nThus results in an empty CPU mask which triggers the warning and then the\nsubsequent crash:\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 80 at kernel/sched/topology.c:2366 build_sched_domains+0x120c/0x1408\nCall trace:\n build_sched_domains+0x120c/0x1408\n partition_sched_domains_locked+0x234/0x880\n rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x37c/0x798\n rebuild_sched_domains+0x30/0x58\n cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x2a8/0x930\r\n\r\nUnable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffe80027ab37080\n partition_sched_domains_locked+0x318/0x880\n rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x37c/0x798\r\n\r\nAside of the resulting crash, it does not make any sense to offline the last\nlast housekeeping CPU.\r\n\r\nPrevent this by masking out the non-housekeeping CPUs when selecting a\ntarget CPU for initiating the CPU unplug operation via the work queue.(CVE-2023-52831)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: mac80211: don\u0026apos;t return unset power in ieee80211_get_tx_power()\r\n\r\nWe can get a UBSAN warning if ieee80211_get_tx_power() returns the\nINT_MIN value mac80211 internally uses for \u0026quot;unset power level\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\n UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in net/wireless/nl80211.c:3816:5\n -2147483648 * 100 cannot be represented in type \u0026apos;int\u0026apos;\n CPU: 0 PID: 20433 Comm: insmod Tainted: G WC OE\n Call Trace:\n dump_stack+0x74/0x92\n ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x50\n handle_overflow+0x8d/0xd0\n __ubsan_handle_mul_overflow+0xe/0x10\n nl80211_send_iface+0x688/0x6b0 [cfg80211]\n [...]\n cfg80211_register_wdev+0x78/0xb0 [cfg80211]\n cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x200/0x620 [cfg80211]\n [...]\n ieee80211_if_add+0x60e/0x8f0 [mac80211]\n ieee80211_register_hw+0xda5/0x1170 [mac80211]\r\n\r\nIn this case, simply return an error instead, to indicate\nthat no data is available.(CVE-2023-52832)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nlocking/ww_mutex/test: Fix potential workqueue corruption\r\n\r\nIn some cases running with the test-ww_mutex code, I was seeing\nodd behavior where sometimes it seemed flush_workqueue was\nreturning before all the work threads were finished.\r\n\r\nOften this would cause strange crashes as the mutexes would be\nfreed while they were being used.\r\n\r\nLooking at the code, there is a lifetime problem as the\ncontrolling thread that spawns the work allocates the\n\u0026quot;struct stress\u0026quot; structures that are passed to the workqueue\nthreads. Then when the workqueue threads are finished,\nthey free the stress struct that was passed to them.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately the workqueue work_struct node is in the stress\nstruct. Which means the work_struct is freed before the work\nthread returns and while flush_workqueue is waiting.\r\n\r\nIt seems like a better idea to have the controlling thread\nboth allocate and free the stress structures, so that we can\nbe sure we don\u0026apos;t corrupt the workqueue by freeing the structure\nprematurely.\r\n\r\nSo this patch reworks the test to do so, and with this change\nI no longer see the early flush_workqueue returns.(CVE-2023-52836)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfbdev: imsttfb: fix a resource leak in probe\r\n\r\nI\u0026apos;ve re-written the error handling but the bug is that if init_imstt()\nfails we need to call iounmap(par-\u0026gt;cmap_regs).(CVE-2023-52838)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nplatform/x86: wmi: Fix opening of char device\r\n\r\nSince commit fa1f68db6ca7 (\u0026quot;drivers: misc: pass miscdevice pointer via\nfile private data\u0026quot;), the miscdevice stores a pointer to itself inside\nfilp-\u0026gt;private_data, which means that private_data will not be NULL when\nwmi_char_open() is called. This might cause memory corruption should\nwmi_char_open() be unable to find its driver, something which can\nhappen when the associated WMI device is deleted in wmi_free_devices().\r\n\r\nFix the problem by using the miscdevice pointer to retrieve the WMI\ndevice data associated with a char device using container_of(). This\nalso avoids wmi_char_open() picking a wrong WMI device bound to a\ndriver with the same name as the original driver.(CVE-2023-52864)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: mediatek: clk-mt6797: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data\r\n\r\nAdd the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to\navoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52865)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: qcom: llcc: Handle a second device without data corruption\r\n\r\nUsually there is only one llcc device. But if there were a second, even\na failed probe call would modify the global drv_data pointer. So check\nif drv_data is valid before overwriting it.(CVE-2023-52871)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: mediatek: clk-mt2701: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data\r\n\r\nAdd the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to\navoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52875)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncan: dev: can_put_echo_skb(): don\u0026apos;t crash kernel if can_priv::echo_skb is accessed out of bounds\r\n\r\nIf the \u0026quot;struct can_priv::echoo_skb\u0026quot; is accessed out of bounds, this\nwould cause a kernel crash. Instead, issue a meaningful warning\nmessage and return with an error.(CVE-2023-52878)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Fix memory leak in dm_sw_fini()\r\n\r\nAfter destroying dmub_srv, the memory associated with it is\nnot freed, causing a memory leak:\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff896302b45800 (size 1024):\n comm \u0026quot;(udev-worker)\u0026quot;, pid 222, jiffies 4294894636\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n backtrace (crc 6265fd77):\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff993495ed\u0026gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x29d/0x340\n [\u0026lt;ffffffffc0ea4a94\u0026gt;] dm_dmub_sw_init+0xb4/0x450 [amdgpu]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffffc0ea4e55\u0026gt;] dm_sw_init+0x15/0x2b0 [amdgpu]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffffc0ba8557\u0026gt;] amdgpu_device_init+0x1417/0x24e0 [amdgpu]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffffc0bab285\u0026gt;] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x15/0x190 [amdgpu]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffffc0ba09c7\u0026gt;] amdgpu_pci_probe+0x187/0x4e0 [amdgpu]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff9968fd1e\u0026gt;] local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff996918a3\u0026gt;] pci_device_probe+0xc3/0x230\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff99805872\u0026gt;] really_probe+0xe2/0x480\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff99805c98\u0026gt;] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x160\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff99805daf\u0026gt;] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0x90\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff9980601e\u0026gt;] __driver_attach+0xce/0x1c0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff99803170\u0026gt;] bus_for_each_dev+0x70/0xc0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff99804822\u0026gt;] bus_add_driver+0x112/0x210\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff99807245\u0026gt;] driver_register+0x55/0x100\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff990012d1\u0026gt;] do_one_initcall+0x41/0x300\r\n\r\nFix this by freeing dmub_srv after destroying it.(CVE-2024-26833)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: xilinx - call finalize with bh disabled\r\n\r\nWhen calling crypto_finalize_request, BH should be disabled to avoid\ntriggering the following calltrace:\r\n\r\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 74 at crypto/crypto_engine.c:58 crypto_finalize_request+0xa0/0x118\n Modules linked in: cryptodev(O)\n CPU: 2 PID: 74 Comm: firmware:zynqmp Tainted: G O 6.8.0-rc1-yocto-standard #323\n Hardware name: ZynqMP ZCU102 Rev1.0 (DT)\n pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : crypto_finalize_request+0xa0/0x118\n lr : crypto_finalize_request+0x104/0x118\n sp : ffffffc085353ce0\n x29: ffffffc085353ce0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffffff8808ea8688\n x26: ffffffc081715038 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffffff880100db00\n x23: ffffff880100da80 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 0000000000000000\n x20: ffffff8805b14000 x19: ffffff880100da80 x18: 0000000000010450\n x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000\n x14: 0000000000000003 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: ffffff880100dad0\n x11: 0000000000000000 x10: ffffffc0832dcd08 x9 : ffffffc0812416d8\n x8 : 00000000000001f4 x7 : ffffffc0830d2830 x6 : 0000000000000001\n x5 : ffffffc082091000 x4 : ffffffc082091658 x3 : 0000000000000000\n x2 : ffffffc7f9653000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffff8802d20000\n Call trace:\n crypto_finalize_request+0xa0/0x118\n crypto_finalize_aead_request+0x18/0x30\n zynqmp_handle_aes_req+0xcc/0x388\n crypto_pump_work+0x168/0x2d8\n kthread_worker_fn+0xfc/0x3a0\n kthread+0x118/0x138\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n irq event stamp: 40\n hardirqs last enabled at (39): [\u0026lt;ffffffc0812416f8\u0026gt;] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x70/0xb0\n hardirqs last disabled at (40): [\u0026lt;ffffffc08122d208\u0026gt;] el1_dbg+0x28/0x90\n softirqs last enabled at (36): [\u0026lt;ffffffc080017dec\u0026gt;] kernel_neon_begin+0x8c/0xf0\n softirqs last disabled at (34): [\u0026lt;ffffffc080017dc0\u0026gt;] kernel_neon_begin+0x60/0xf0\n ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-26877)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nUSB: core: Fix deadlock in usb_deauthorize_interface()\r\n\r\nAmong the attribute file callback routines in\ndrivers/usb/core/sysfs.c, the interface_authorized_store() function is\nthe only one which acquires a device lock on an ancestor device: It\ncalls usb_deauthorize_interface(), which locks the interface\u0026apos;s parent\nUSB device.\r\n\r\nThe will lead to deadlock if another process already owns that lock\nand tries to remove the interface, whether through a configuration\nchange or because the device has been disconnected. As part of the\nremoval procedure, device_del() waits for all ongoing sysfs attribute\ncallbacks to complete. But usb_deauthorize_interface() can\u0026apos;t complete\nuntil the device lock has been released, and the lock won\u0026apos;t be\nreleased until the removal has finished.\r\n\r\nThe mechanism provided by sysfs to prevent this kind of deadlock is\nto use the sysfs_break_active_protection() function, which tells sysfs\nnot to wait for the attribute callback.\r\n\r\nReported-and-tested by: Yue Sun \u0026lt;samsun1006219@gmail.com\u0026gt;\nReported by: xingwei lee \u0026lt;xrivendell7@gmail.com\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-26934)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_expr_type_get()\r\n\r\nnft_unregister_expr() can concurrent with __nft_expr_type_get(),\nand there is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_expressions\nlist in __nft_expr_type_get(). Therefore, there is potential data-race\nof nf_tables_expressions list entry.\r\n\r\nUse list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_expressions\nlist in __nft_expr_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller\nnft_expr_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-27020)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: l2cap: fix null-ptr-deref in l2cap_chan_timeout\r\n\r\nThere is a race condition between l2cap_chan_timeout() and\nl2cap_chan_del(). When we use l2cap_chan_del() to delete the\nchannel, the chan-\u0026gt;conn will be set to null. But the conn could\nbe dereferenced again in the mutex_lock() of l2cap_chan_timeout().\nAs a result the null pointer dereference bug will happen. The\nKASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:\r\n\r\n[ 472.074580] ==================================================================\n[ 472.075284] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000158 by task kworker/0:0/7\n[ 472.075308]\n[ 472.075308] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36\n[ 472.075308] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4\n[ 472.075308] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout\n[ 472.075308] Call Trace:\n[ 472.075308] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 472.075308] dump_stack_lvl+0x137/0x1a0\n[ 472.075308] print_report+0x101/0x250\n[ 472.075308] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x77/0x160\n[ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] kasan_report+0x139/0x170\n[ 472.075308] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] kasan_check_range+0x2c3/0x2e0\n[ 472.075308] mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.075308] l2cap_chan_timeout+0x181/0x300\n[ 472.075308] process_one_work+0x5d2/0xe00\n[ 472.075308] worker_thread+0xe1d/0x1660\n[ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0\n[ 472.075308] kthread+0x2b7/0x350\n[ 472.075308] ? pr_cont_work+0x5e0/0x5e0\n[ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 472.075308] ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n[ 472.075308] ? kthread_blkcg+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 472.075308] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n[ 472.075308] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 472.075308] ==================================================================\n[ 472.094860] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint\n[ 472.096136] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000158\n[ 472.096136] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode\n[ 472.096136] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page\n[ 472.096136] PGD 0 P4D 0\n[ 472.096136] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\n[ 472.096136] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G B 6.9.0-rc5-00356-g78c0094a146b #36\n[ 472.096136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu4\n[ 472.096136] Workqueue: events l2cap_chan_timeout\n[ 472.096136] RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] Code: be 08 00 00 00 e8 f8 23 1f fd 4c 89 f7 be 08 00 00 00 e8 eb 23 1f fd 42 80 3c 23 00 74 08 48 88\n[ 472.096136] RSP: 0018:ffff88800744fc78 EFLAGS: 00000246\n[ 472.096136] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 1ffff11000e89f8f RCX: ffffffff8457c865\n[ 472.096136] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff88800744fc78\n[ 472.096136] RBP: 0000000000000158 R08: ffff88800744fc7f R09: 1ffff11000e89f8f\n[ 472.096136] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed1000e89f90 R12: dffffc0000000000\n[ 472.096136] R13: 0000000000000158 R14: ffff88800744fc78 R15: ffff888007405a00\n[ 472.096136] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88806d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 472.096136] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 472.096136] CR2: 0000000000000158 CR3: 000000000da32000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\n[ 472.096136] Call Trace:\n[ 472.096136] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 472.096136] ? __die_body+0x8d/0xe0\n[ 472.096136] ? page_fault_oops+0x6b8/0x9a0\n[ 472.096136] ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x20c/0x2a0\n[ 472.096136] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1027/0x1340\n[ 472.096136] ? _printk+0x7a/0xa0\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x68/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] ? add_taint+0x42/0xd0\n[ 472.096136] ? exc_page_fault+0x6a/0x1b0\n[ 472.096136] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x88/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] ? mutex_lock+0x75/0xc0\n[ 472.096136] l2cap_chan_timeo\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-27399)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfirewire: nosy: ensure user_length is taken into account when fetching packet contents\r\n\r\nEnsure that packet_buffer_get respects the user_length provided. If\nthe length of the head packet exceeds the user_length, packet_buffer_get\nwill now return 0 to signify to the user that no data were read\nand a larger buffer size is required. Helps prevent user space overflows.(CVE-2024-27401)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nefi/capsule-loader: fix incorrect allocation size\r\n\r\ngcc-14 notices that the allocation with sizeof(void) on 32-bit architectures\nis not enough for a 64-bit phys_addr_t:\r\n\r\ndrivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c: In function \u0026apos;efi_capsule_open\u0026apos;:\ndrivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c:295:24: error: allocation of insufficient size \u0026apos;4\u0026apos; for type \u0026apos;phys_addr_t\u0026apos; {aka \u0026apos;long long unsigned int\u0026apos;} with size \u0026apos;8\u0026apos; [-Werror=alloc-size]\n 295 | cap_info-\u0026gt;phys = kzalloc(sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);\n | ^\r\n\r\nUse the correct type instead here.(CVE-2024-27413)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack\r\n\r\nconntrack nf_confirm logic cannot handle cloned skbs referencing\nthe same nf_conn entry, which will happen for multicast (broadcast)\nframes on bridges.\r\n\r\n Example:\n macvlan0\n |\n br0\n / \\\n ethX ethY\r\n\r\n ethX (or Y) receives a L2 multicast or broadcast packet containing\n an IP packet, flow is not yet in conntrack table.\r\n\r\n 1. skb passes through bridge and fake-ip (br_netfilter)Prerouting.\n -\u0026gt; skb-\u0026gt;_nfct now references a unconfirmed entry\n 2. skb is broad/mcast packet. bridge now passes clones out on each bridge\n interface.\n 3. skb gets passed up the stack.\n 4. In macvlan case, macvlan driver retains clone(s) of the mcast skb\n and schedules a work queue to send them out on the lower devices.\r\n\r\n The clone skb-\u0026gt;_nfct is not a copy, it is the same entry as the\n original skb. The macvlan rx handler then returns RX_HANDLER_PASS.\n 5. Normal conntrack hooks (in NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) confirm the orig skb.\r\n\r\nThe Macvlan broadcast worker and normal confirm path will race.\r\n\r\nThis race will not happen if step 2 already confirmed a clone. In that\ncase later steps perform skb_clone() with skb-\u0026gt;_nfct already confirmed (in\nhash table). This works fine.\r\n\r\nBut such confirmation won\u0026apos;t happen when eb/ip/nftables rules dropped the\npackets before they reached the nf_confirm step in postrouting.\r\n\r\nPablo points out that nf_conntrack_bridge doesn\u0026apos;t allow use of stateful\nnat, so we can safely discard the nf_conn entry and let inet call\nconntrack again.\r\n\r\nThis doesn\u0026apos;t work for bridge netfilter: skb could have a nat\ntransformation. Also bridge nf prevents re-invocation of inet prerouting\nvia \u0026apos;sabotage_in\u0026apos; hook.\r\n\r\nWork around this problem by explicit confirmation of the entry at LOCAL_IN\ntime, before upper layer has a chance to clone the unconfirmed entry.\r\n\r\nThe downside is that this disables NAT and conntrack helpers.\r\n\r\nAlternative fix would be to add locking to all code parts that deal with\nunconfirmed packets, but even if that could be done in a sane way this\nopens up other problems, for example:\r\n\r\n-m physdev --physdev-out eth0 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.4\n-m physdev --physdev-out eth1 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.5\r\n\r\nFor multicast case, only one of such conflicting mappings will be\ncreated, conntrack only handles 1:1 NAT mappings.\r\n\r\nUsers should set create a setup that explicitly marks such traffic\nNOTRACK (conntrack bypass) to avoid this, but we cannot auto-bypass\nthem, ruleset might have accept rules for untracked traffic already,\nso user-visible behaviour would change.(CVE-2024-27415)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: mac80211: check/clear fast rx for non-4addr sta VLAN changes\r\n\r\nWhen moving a station out of a VLAN and deleting the VLAN afterwards, the\nfast_rx entry still holds a pointer to the VLAN\u0026apos;s netdev, which can cause\nuse-after-free bugs. Fix this by immediately calling ieee80211_check_fast_rx\nafter the VLAN change.(CVE-2024-35789)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmd/dm-raid: don\u0026apos;t call md_reap_sync_thread() directly\r\n\r\nCurrently md_reap_sync_thread() is called from raid_message() directly\nwithout holding \u0026apos;reconfig_mutex\u0026apos;, this is definitely unsafe because\nmd_reap_sync_thread() can change many fields that is protected by\n\u0026apos;reconfig_mutex\u0026apos;.\r\n\r\nHowever, hold \u0026apos;reconfig_mutex\u0026apos; here is still problematic because this\nwill cause deadlock, for example, commit 130443d60b1b (\u0026quot;md: refactor\nidle/frozen_sync_thread() to fix deadlock\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nFix this problem by using stop_sync_thread() to unregister sync_thread,\nlike md/raid did.(CVE-2024-35808)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: udc: remove warning when queue disabled ep\r\n\r\nIt is possible trigger below warning message from mass storage function,\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 3839 at drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c:294 usb_ep_queue+0x7c/0x104\npc : usb_ep_queue+0x7c/0x104\nlr : fsg_main_thread+0x494/0x1b3c\r\n\r\nRoot cause is mass storage function try to queue request from main thread,\nbut other thread may already disable ep when function disable.\r\n\r\nAs there is no function failure in the driver, in order to avoid effort\nto fix warning, change WARN_ON_ONCE() in usb_ep_queue() to pr_debug().(CVE-2024-35822)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nvt: fix unicode buffer corruption when deleting characters\r\n\r\nThis is the same issue that was fixed for the VGA text buffer in commit\n39cdb68c64d8 (\u0026quot;vt: fix memory overlapping when deleting chars in the\nbuffer\u0026quot;). The cure is also the same i.e. replace memcpy() with memmove()\ndue to the overlaping buffers.(CVE-2024-35823)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmptcp: use OPTION_MPTCP_MPJ_SYNACK in subflow_finish_connect()\r\n\r\nsubflow_finish_connect() uses four fields (backup, join_id, thmac, none)\nthat may contain garbage unless OPTION_MPTCP_MPJ_SYNACK has been set\nin mptcp_parse_option()(CVE-2024-35840)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix possible use-after-free during activity update\r\n\r\nThe rule activity update delayed work periodically traverses the list of\nconfigured rules and queries their activity from the device.\r\n\r\nAs part of this task it accesses the entry pointed by \u0026apos;ventry-\u0026gt;entry\u0026apos;,\nbut this entry can be changed concurrently by the rehash delayed work,\nleading to a use-after-free [1].\r\n\r\nFix by closing the race and perform the activity query under the\n\u0026apos;vregion-\u0026gt;lock\u0026apos; mutex.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_flower_rule_activity_get+0x121/0x140\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff8881054ed808 by task kworker/0:18/181\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-custom-00781-gd5ab772d32f7 #2\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_activity_update_work\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc6/0x120\n print_report+0xce/0x670\n kasan_report+0xd7/0x110\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_flower_rule_activity_get+0x121/0x140\n mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_activity_update_work+0x219/0x400\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 1039:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30\n __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0\n __kmalloc+0x19c/0x360\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x7b/0x1f0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x30d/0xb50\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\r\n\r\nFreed by task 1039:\n kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60\n kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30\n kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60\n poison_slab_object+0x102/0x170\n __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x30\n kfree+0xc1/0x290\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x3d7/0xb50\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x157/0x1300\n process_one_work+0x8eb/0x19b0\n worker_thread+0x6c9/0xf70\n kthread+0x2c9/0x3b0\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30(CVE-2024-35855)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nx86/mm/pat: fix VM_PAT handling in COW mappings\r\n\r\nPAT handling won\u0026apos;t do the right thing in COW mappings: the first PTE (or,\nin fact, all PTEs) can be replaced during write faults to point at anon\nfolios. Reliably recovering the correct PFN and cachemode using\nfollow_phys() from PTEs will not work in COW mappings.\r\n\r\nUsing follow_phys(), we might just get the address+protection of the anon\nfolio (which is very wrong), or fail on swap/nonswap entries, failing\nfollow_phys() and triggering a WARN_ON_ONCE() in untrack_pfn() and\ntrack_pfn_copy(), not properly calling free_pfn_range().\r\n\r\nIn free_pfn_range(), we either wouldn\u0026apos;t call memtype_free() or would call\nit with the wrong range, possibly leaking memory.\r\n\r\nTo fix that, let\u0026apos;s update follow_phys() to refuse returning anon folios,\nand fallback to using the stored PFN inside vma-\u0026gt;vm_pgoff for COW mappings\nif we run into that.\r\n\r\nWe will now properly handle untrack_pfn() with COW mappings, where we\ndon\u0026apos;t need the cachemode. We\u0026apos;ll have to fail fork()-\u0026gt;track_pfn_copy() if\nthe first page was replaced by an anon folio, though: we\u0026apos;d have to store\nthe cachemode in the VMA to make this work, likely growing the VMA size.\r\n\r\nFor now, lets keep it simple and let track_pfn_copy() just fail in that\ncase: it would have failed in the past with swap/nonswap entries already,\nand it would have done the wrong thing with anon folios.\r\n\r\nSimple reproducer to trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE() in untrack_pfn():\r\n\r\n\u0026lt;--- C reproducer ---\u0026gt;\n #include \u0026lt;stdio.h\u0026gt;\n #include \u0026lt;sys/mman.h\u0026gt;\n #include \u0026lt;unistd.h\u0026gt;\n #include \u0026lt;liburing.h\u0026gt;\r\n\r\n int main(void)\n {\n struct io_uring_params p = {};\n int ring_fd;\n size_t size;\n char *map;\r\n\r\n ring_fd = io_uring_setup(1, \u0026amp;p);\n if (ring_fd \u0026lt; 0) {\n perror(\u0026quot;io_uring_setup\u0026quot;);\n return 1;\n }\n size = p.sq_off.array + p.sq_entries * sizeof(unsigned);\r\n\r\n /* Map the submission queue ring MAP_PRIVATE */\n map = mmap(0, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE,\n ring_fd, IORING_OFF_SQ_RING);\n if (map == MAP_FAILED) {\n perror(\u0026quot;mmap\u0026quot;);\n return 1;\n }\r\n\r\n /* We have at least one page. Let\u0026apos;s COW it. */\n *map = 0;\n pause();\n return 0;\n }\n\u0026lt;--- C reproducer ---\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nOn a system with 16 GiB RAM and swap configured:\n # ./iouring \u0026amp;\n # memhog 16G\n # killall iouring\n[ 301.552930] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 301.553285] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1402 at arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:1060 untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100\n[ 301.553989] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_g\n[ 301.558232] CPU: 7 PID: 1402 Comm: iouring Not tainted 6.7.5-100.fc38.x86_64 #1\n[ 301.558772] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebu4\n[ 301.559569] RIP: 0010:untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100\n[ 301.559893] Code: 75 c4 eb cf 48 8b 43 10 8b a8 e8 00 00 00 3b 6b 28 74 b8 48 8b 7b 30 e8 ea 1a f7 000\n[ 301.561189] RSP: 0018:ffffba2c0377fab8 EFLAGS: 00010282\n[ 301.561590] RAX: 00000000ffffffea RBX: ffff9208c8ce9cc0 RCX: 000000010455e047\n[ 301.562105] RDX: 07fffffff0eb1e0a RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9208c391d200\n[ 301.562628] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffba2c0377fab8 R09: 0000000000000000\n[ 301.563145] R10: ffff9208d2292d50 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 00007fea890e0000\n[ 301.563669] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffba2c0377fc08 R15: 0000000000000000\n[ 301.564186] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff920c2fbc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 301.564773] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 301.565197] CR2: 00007fea88ee8a20 CR3: 00000001033a8000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0\n[ 301.565725] PKRU: 55555554\n[ 301.565944] Call Trace:\n[ 301.566148] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 301.566325] ? untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100\n[ 301.566618] ? __warn+0x81/0x130\n[ 301.566876] ? untrack_pfn+0xf4/0x100\n[ 3\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35877)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: reject new basechain after table flag update\r\n\r\nWhen dormant flag is toggled, hooks are disabled in the commit phase by\niterating over current chains in table (existing and new).\r\n\r\nThe following configuration allows for an inconsistent state:\r\n\r\n add table x\n add chain x y { type filter hook input priority 0; }\n add table x { flags dormant; }\n add chain x w { type filter hook input priority 1; }\r\n\r\nwhich triggers the following warning when trying to unregister chain w\nwhich is already unregistered.\r\n\r\n[ 127.322252] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1211 at net/netfilter/core.c:50 1 __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260\n[...]\n[ 127.322519] Call Trace:\n[ 127.322521] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 127.322524] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 127.322531] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260\n[ 127.322537] ? report_bug+0x1b1/0x1e0\n[ 127.322545] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70\n[ 127.322552] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40\n[ 127.322556] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n[ 127.322563] ? kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60\n[ 127.322570] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x6a/0x260\n[ 127.322577] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x21a/0x260\n[ 127.322583] ? __nf_unregister_net_hook+0x6a/0x260\n[ 127.322590] ? __nf_tables_unregister_hook+0x8a/0xe0 [nf_tables]\n[ 127.322655] nft_table_disable+0x75/0xf0 [nf_tables]\n[ 127.322717] nf_tables_commit+0x2571/0x2620 [nf_tables](CVE-2024-35900)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nselinux: avoid dereference of garbage after mount failure\r\n\r\nIn case kern_mount() fails and returns an error pointer return in the\nerror branch instead of continuing and dereferencing the error pointer.\r\n\r\nWhile on it drop the never read static variable selinuxfs_mount.(CVE-2024-35904)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblock: prevent division by zero in blk_rq_stat_sum()\r\n\r\nThe expression dst-\u0026gt;nr_samples + src-\u0026gt;nr_samples may\nhave zero value on overflow. It is necessary to add\na check to avoid division by zero.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.(CVE-2024-35925)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndma-direct: Leak pages on dma_set_decrypted() failure\r\n\r\nOn TDX it is possible for the untrusted host to cause\nset_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an\nerror is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to\ntake care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared)\nmemory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security\nissues.\r\n\r\nDMA could free decrypted/shared pages if dma_set_decrypted() fails. This\nshould be a rare case. Just leak the pages in this case instead of\nfreeing them.(CVE-2024-35939)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/client: Fully protect modes[] with dev-\u0026gt;mode_config.mutex\r\n\r\nThe modes[] array contains pointers to modes on the connectors\u0026apos;\nmode lists, which are protected by dev-\u0026gt;mode_config.mutex.\nThus we need to extend modes[] the same protection or by the\ntime we use it the elements may already be pointing to\nfreed/reused memory.(CVE-2024-35950)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: qgroup: fix qgroup prealloc rsv leak in subvolume operations\r\n\r\nCreate subvolume, create snapshot and delete subvolume all use\nbtrfs_subvolume_reserve_metadata() to reserve metadata for the changes\ndone to the parent subvolume\u0026apos;s fs tree, which cannot be mediated in the\nnormal way via start_transaction. When quota groups (squota or qgroups)\nare enabled, this reserves qgroup metadata of type PREALLOC. Once the\noperation is associated to a transaction, we convert PREALLOC to\nPERTRANS, which gets cleared in bulk at the end of the transaction.\r\n\r\nHowever, the error paths of these three operations were not implementing\nthis lifecycle correctly. They unconditionally converted the PREALLOC to\nPERTRANS in a generic cleanup step regardless of errors or whether the\noperation was fully associated to a transaction or not. This resulted in\nerror paths occasionally converting this rsv to PERTRANS without calling\nrecord_root_in_trans successfully, which meant that unless that root got\nrecorded in the transaction by some other thread, the end of the\ntransaction would not free that root\u0026apos;s PERTRANS, leaking it. Ultimately,\nthis resulted in hitting a WARN in CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG builds at unmount\nfor the leaked reservation.\r\n\r\nThe fix is to ensure that every qgroup PREALLOC reservation observes the\nfollowing properties:\r\n\r\n1. any failure before record_root_in_trans is called successfully\n results in freeing the PREALLOC reservation.\n2. after record_root_in_trans, we convert to PERTRANS, and now the\n transaction owns freeing the reservation.\r\n\r\nThis patch enforces those properties on the three operations. Without\nit, generic/269 with squotas enabled at mkfs time would fail in ~5-10\nruns on my system. With this patch, it ran successfully 1000 times in a\nrow.(CVE-2024-35956)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ena: Fix incorrect descriptor free behavior\r\n\r\nENA has two types of TX queues:\n- queues which only process TX packets arriving from the network stack\n- queues which only process TX packets forwarded to it by XDP_REDIRECT\n or XDP_TX instructions\r\n\r\nThe ena_free_tx_bufs() cycles through all descriptors in a TX queue\nand unmaps + frees every descriptor that hasn\u0026apos;t been acknowledged yet\nby the device (uncompleted TX transactions).\nThe function assumes that the processed TX queue is necessarily from\nthe first category listed above and ends up using napi_consume_skb()\nfor descriptors belonging to an XDP specific queue.\r\n\r\nThis patch solves a bug in which, in case of a VF reset, the\ndescriptors aren\u0026apos;t freed correctly, leading to crashes.(CVE-2024-35958)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5: Properly link new fs rules into the tree\r\n\r\nPreviously, add_rule_fg would only add newly created rules from the\nhandle into the tree when they had a refcount of 1. On the other hand,\ncreate_flow_handle tries hard to find and reference already existing\nidentical rules instead of creating new ones.\r\n\r\nThese two behaviors can result in a situation where create_flow_handle\n1) creates a new rule and references it, then\n2) in a subsequent step during the same handle creation references it\n again,\nresulting in a rule with a refcount of 2 that is not linked into the\ntree, will have a NULL parent and root and will result in a crash when\nthe flow group is deleted because del_sw_hw_rule, invoked on rule\ndeletion, assumes node-\u0026gt;parent is != NULL.\r\n\r\nThis happened in the wild, due to another bug related to incorrect\nhandling of duplicate pkt_reformat ids, which lead to the code in\ncreate_flow_handle incorrectly referencing a just-added rule in the same\nflow handle, resulting in the problem described above. Full details are\nat [1].\r\n\r\nThis patch changes add_rule_fg to add new rules without parents into\nthe tree, properly initializing them and avoiding the crash. This makes\nit more consistent with how rules are added to an FTE in\ncreate_flow_handle.(CVE-2024-35960)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: Fix memory leak in hci_req_sync_complete()\r\n\r\nIn \u0026apos;hci_req_sync_complete()\u0026apos;, always free the previous sync\nrequest state before assigning reference to a new one.(CVE-2024-35978)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndmaengine: idxd: Fix oops during rmmod on single-CPU platforms\r\n\r\nDuring the removal of the idxd driver, registered offline callback is\ninvoked as part of the clean up process. However, on systems with only\none CPU online, no valid target is available to migrate the\nperf context, resulting in a kernel oops:\r\n\r\n BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 000000000002a2b8\n #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page\n PGD 1470e1067 P4D 0\n Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n CPU: 0 PID: 20 Comm: cpuhp/0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc6-dsa+ #57\n Hardware name: Intel Corporation AvenueCity/AvenueCity, BIOS BHSDCRB1.86B.2492.D03.2307181620 07/18/2023\n RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x2e/0x50\n ...\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __die+0x24/0x70\n page_fault_oops+0x82/0x160\n do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x6b0\n __pfx___rdmsr_safe_on_cpu+0x10/0x10\n exc_page_fault+0x7d/0x170\n asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30\n mutex_lock+0x2e/0x50\n mutex_lock+0x1e/0x50\n perf_pmu_migrate_context+0x87/0x1f0\n perf_event_cpu_offline+0x76/0x90 [idxd]\n cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xa2/0x4f0\n __pfx_perf_event_cpu_offline+0x10/0x10 [idxd]\n cpuhp_thread_fun+0x98/0x150\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x27/0x260\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x1af/0x260\n __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10\n kthread+0x103/0x140\n __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50\n __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nFix the issue by preventing the migration of the perf context to an\ninvalid target.(CVE-2024-35989)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge\r\n\r\nThere is a recent report on UFFDIO_COPY over hugetlb:\r\n\r\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000ee06de0616177560@google.com/\r\n\r\n350:\tlockdep_assert_held(\u0026amp;hugetlb_lock);\r\n\r\nShould be an issue in hugetlb but triggered in an userfault context, where\nit goes into the unlikely path where two threads modifying the resv map\ntogether. Mike has a fix in that path for resv uncharge but it looks like\nthe locking criteria was overlooked: hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd()\nwill update the cgroup pointer, so it requires to be called with the lock\nheld.(CVE-2024-36000)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni40e: Do not use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag for workqueue\r\n\r\nIssue reported by customer during SRIOV testing, call trace:\nWhen both i40e and the i40iw driver are loaded, a warning\nin check_flush_dependency is being triggered. This seems\nto be because of the i40e driver workqueue is allocated with\nthe WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag, and the i40iw one is not.\r\n\r\nSimilar error was encountered on ice too and it was fixed by\nremoving the flag. Do the same for i40e too.\r\n\r\n[Feb 9 09:08] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ +0.000004] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM i40e:i40e_service_task [i40e] is\nflushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM infiniband:0x0\n[ +0.000060] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 937 at kernel/workqueue.c:2966\ncheck_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000007] Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq\nsnd_timer snd_seq_device snd soundcore nls_utf8 cifs cifs_arc4\nnls_ucs2_utils rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm cifs_md4 dns_resolver netfs qrtr\nrfkill sunrpc vfat fat intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common irdma\nintel_uncore_frequency intel_uncore_frequency_common ice ipmi_ssif\nisst_if_common skx_edac nfit libnvdimm x86_pkg_temp_thermal\nintel_powerclamp gnss coretemp ib_uverbs rapl intel_cstate ib_core\niTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support acpi_ipmi mei_me ipmi_si intel_uncore\nioatdma i2c_i801 joydev pcspkr mei ipmi_devintf lpc_ich\nintel_pch_thermal i2c_smbus ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter acpi_pad\nxfs libcrc32c ast sd_mod drm_shmem_helper t10_pi drm_kms_helper sg ixgbe\ndrm i40e ahci crct10dif_pclmul libahci crc32_pclmul igb crc32c_intel\nlibata ghash_clmulni_intel i2c_algo_bit mdio dca wmi dm_mirror\ndm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse\n[ +0.000050] CPU: 0 PID: 937 Comm: kworker/0:3 Kdump: loaded Not\ntainted 6.8.0-rc2-Feb-net_dev-Qiueue-00279-gbd43c5687e05 #1\n[ +0.000003] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600BPB/S2600BPB, BIOS\nSE5C620.86B.02.01.0013.121520200651 12/15/2020\n[ +0.000001] Workqueue: i40e i40e_service_task [i40e]\n[ +0.000024] RIP: 0010:check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000003] Code: ff 49 8b 54 24 18 48 8d 8b b0 00 00 00 49 89 e8 48\n81 c6 b0 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 b0 97 fa 9f c6 05 8a cc 1f 02 01 e8 35 b3 fd\nff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e9 10 ff ff ff 80 3d 78 cc 1f 02 00 75 94 e9 46 ff ff ff 90\n[ +0.000002] RSP: 0018:ffffbd294976bcf8 EFLAGS: 00010282\n[ +0.000002] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff94d4c483c000 RCX:\n0000000000000027\n[ +0.000001] RDX: ffff94d47f620bc8 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI:\nffff94d47f620bc0\n[ +0.000001] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:\n00000000ffff7fff\n[ +0.000001] R10: ffffbd294976bb98 R11: ffffffffa0be65e8 R12:\nffff94c5451ea180\n[ +0.000001] R13: ffff94c5ab5e8000 R14: ffff94c5c20b6e05 R15:\nffff94c5f1330ab0\n[ +0.000001] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff94d47f600000(0000)\nknlGS:0000000000000000\n[ +0.000002] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ +0.000001] CR2: 00007f9e6f1fca70 CR3: 0000000038e20004 CR4:\n00000000007706f0\n[ +0.000000] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:\n0000000000000000\n[ +0.000001] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:\n0000000000000400\n[ +0.000001] PKRU: 55555554\n[ +0.000001] Call Trace:\n[ +0.000001] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ +0.000002] ? __warn+0x80/0x130\n[ +0.000003] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000002] ? report_bug+0x195/0x1a0\n[ +0.000005] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70\n[ +0.000003] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70\n[ +0.000002] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20\n[ +0.000006] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000002] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000002] __flush_workqueue+0x126/0x3f0\n[ +0.000015] ib_cache_cleanup_one+0x1c/0xe0 [ib_core]\n[ +0.000056] __ib_unregister_device+0x6a/0xb0 [ib_core]\n[ +0.000023] ib_unregister_device_and_put+0x34/0x50 [ib_core]\n[ +0.000020] i40iw_close+0x4b/0x90 [irdma]\n[ +0.000022] i40e_notify_client_of_netdev_close+0x54/0xc0 [i40e]\n[ +0.000035] i40e_service_task+0x126/0x190 [i40e]\n[ +0.000024] process_one_work+0x174/0x340\n[ +0.000003] worker_th\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-36004)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix warning during rehash\r\n\r\nAs previously explained, the rehash delayed work migrates filters from\none region to another. This is done by iterating over all chunks (all\nthe filters with the same priority) in the region and in each chunk\niterating over all the filters.\r\n\r\nWhen the work runs out of credits it stores the current chunk and entry\nas markers in the per-work context so that it would know where to resume\nthe migration from the next time the work is scheduled.\r\n\r\nUpon error, the chunk marker is reset to NULL, but without resetting the\nentry markers despite being relative to it. This can result in migration\nbeing resumed from an entry that does not belong to the chunk being\nmigrated. In turn, this will eventually lead to a chunk being iterated\nover as if it is an entry. Because of how the two structures happen to\nbe defined, this does not lead to KASAN splats, but to warnings such as\n[1].\r\n\r\nFix by creating a helper that resets all the markers and call it from\nall the places the currently only reset the chunk marker. For good\nmeasures also call it when starting a completely new rehash. Add a\nwarning to avoid future cases.\r\n\r\n[1]\nWARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1076 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core_acl_flex_keys.c:407 mlxsw_afk_encode+0x242/0x2f0\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 7 PID: 1076 Comm: kworker/7:24 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc3-custom-00880-g29e61d91b77b #29\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work\nRIP: 0010:mlxsw_afk_encode+0x242/0x2f0\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xd9/0x3c0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x109/0x290\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x6c/0x470\n process_one_work+0x151/0x370\n worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0\n kthread+0xd0/0x100\n ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-36007)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nppdev: Add an error check in register_device\r\n\r\nIn register_device, the return value of ida_simple_get is unchecked,\nin witch ida_simple_get will use an invalid index value.\r\n\r\nTo address this issue, index should be checked after ida_simple_get. When\nthe index value is abnormal, a warning message should be printed, the port\nshould be dropped, and the value should be recorded.(CVE-2024-36015)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npinctrl: core: delete incorrect free in pinctrl_enable()\r\n\r\nThe \u0026quot;pctldev\u0026quot; struct is allocated in devm_pinctrl_register_and_init().\nIt\u0026apos;s a devm_ managed pointer that is freed by devm_pinctrl_dev_release(),\nso freeing it in pinctrl_enable() will lead to a double free.\r\n\r\nThe devm_pinctrl_dev_release() function frees the pindescs and destroys\nthe mutex as well.(CVE-2024-36940)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1694",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:09Z",
"published": "2024-06-07T11:07:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1694"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47265"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47356"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47370"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47427"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47489"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48689"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52677"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52696"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52750"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52756"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52802"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52831"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26833"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26877"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27415"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35840"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36940"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47265",
"CVE-2021-47356",
"CVE-2021-47370",
"CVE-2021-47427",
"CVE-2021-47489",
"CVE-2022-48689",
"CVE-2023-52654",
"CVE-2023-52669",
"CVE-2023-52677",
"CVE-2023-52696",
"CVE-2023-52699",
"CVE-2023-52750",
"CVE-2023-52752",
"CVE-2023-52753",
"CVE-2023-52756",
"CVE-2023-52759",
"CVE-2023-52774",
"CVE-2023-52789",
"CVE-2023-52795",
"CVE-2023-52796",
"CVE-2023-52798",
"CVE-2023-52799",
"CVE-2023-52800",
"CVE-2023-52802",
"CVE-2023-52814",
"CVE-2023-52819",
"CVE-2023-52826",
"CVE-2023-52831",
"CVE-2023-52832",
"CVE-2023-52836",
"CVE-2023-52838",
"CVE-2023-52864",
"CVE-2023-52865",
"CVE-2023-52871",
"CVE-2023-52875",
"CVE-2023-52878",
"CVE-2024-26833",
"CVE-2024-26877",
"CVE-2024-26934",
"CVE-2024-27020",
"CVE-2024-27399",
"CVE-2024-27401",
"CVE-2024-27413",
"CVE-2024-27415",
"CVE-2024-35789",
"CVE-2024-35808",
"CVE-2024-35822",
"CVE-2024-35823",
"CVE-2024-35840",
"CVE-2024-35855",
"CVE-2024-35877",
"CVE-2024-35900",
"CVE-2024-35904",
"CVE-2024-35925",
"CVE-2024-35939",
"CVE-2024-35950",
"CVE-2024-35956",
"CVE-2024-35958",
"CVE-2024-35960",
"CVE-2024-35978",
"CVE-2024-35989",
"CVE-2024-36000",
"CVE-2024-36004",
"CVE-2024-36007",
"CVE-2024-36015",
"CVE-2024-36940"
]
}
OESA-2024-1768 (CVE-2021-47381)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-06-28 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: SOF: Fix DSP oops stack dump output contents
Fix @buf arg given to hex_dump_to_buffer() and stack address used in dump error output.(CVE-2021-47381)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free
Commit d39df158518c ("scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn") added iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but then also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already completed task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup code. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common cleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.
This reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we've checked if the iscsi_task is valid.(CVE-2021-47427)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on SPI buses
Currently we have a global spi_add_lock which we take when adding new devices so that we can check that we're not trying to reuse a chip select that's already controlled. This means that if the SPI device is itself a SPI controller and triggers the instantiation of further SPI devices we trigger a deadlock as we try to register and instantiate those devices while in the process of doing so for the parent controller and hence already holding the global spi_add_lock. Since we only care about concurrency within a single SPI bus move the lock to be per controller, avoiding the deadlock.
This can be easily triggered in the case of spi-mux.(CVE-2021-47469)
(CVE-2023-39180)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/powernv: Add a null pointer check in opal_powercap_init()
kasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory which can be NULL upon failure.(CVE-2023-52696)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i2c: core: Run atomic i2c xfer when !preemptible
Since bae1d3a05a8b, i2c transfers are non-atomic if preemption is disabled. However, non-atomic i2c transfers require preemption (e.g. in wait_for_completion() while waiting for the DMA).
panic() calls preempt_disable_notrace() before calling emergency_restart(). Therefore, if an i2c device is used for the restart, the xfer should be atomic. This avoids warnings like:
[ 12.667612] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:318 rcu_note_context_switch+0x33c/0x6b0 [ 12.676926] Voluntary context switch within RCU read-side critical section! ... [ 12.742376] schedule_timeout from wait_for_completion_timeout+0x90/0x114 [ 12.749179] wait_for_completion_timeout from tegra_i2c_wait_completion+0x40/0x70 ... [ 12.994527] atomic_notifier_call_chain from machine_restart+0x34/0x58 [ 13.001050] machine_restart from panic+0x2a8/0x32c
Use !preemptible() instead, which is basically the same check as pre-v5.2.(CVE-2023-52791)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hid: cp2112: Fix duplicate workqueue initialization
Previously the cp2112 driver called INIT_DELAYED_WORK within cp2112_gpio_irq_startup, resulting in duplicate initilizations of the workqueue on subsequent IRQ startups following an initial request. This resulted in a warning in set_work_data in workqueue.c, as well as a rare NULL dereference within process_one_work in workqueue.c.
Initialize the workqueue within _probe instead.(CVE-2023-52853)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: fix UAF issue in ksmbd_tcp_new_connection()
The race is between the handling of a new TCP connection and
its disconnection. It leads to UAF on struct tcp_transport in
ksmbd_tcp_new_connection() function.(CVE-2024-26592)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/ipv6: avoid possible UAF in ip6_route_mpath_notify()
syzbot found another use-after-free in ip6_route_mpath_notify() [1]
Commit f7225172f25a ("net/ipv6: prevent use after free in ip6_route_mpath_notify") was not able to fix the root cause.
We need to defer the fib6_info_release() calls after ip6_route_mpath_notify(), in the cleanup phase.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rt6_fill_node+0x1460/0x1ac0 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88809a07fc64 by task syz-executor.2/23037
CPU: 0 PID: 23037 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-01035-gea7f3cfaa588 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2e0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x167/0x540 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x142/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 rt6_fill_node+0x1460/0x1ac0 inet6_rt_notify+0x13b/0x290 net/ipv6/route.c:6184 ip6_route_mpath_notify net/ipv6/route.c:5198 [inline] ip6_route_multipath_add net/ipv6/route.c:5404 [inline] inet6_rtm_newroute+0x1d0f/0x2300 net/ipv6/route.c:5517 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x885/0x1040 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6597 netlink_rcv_skb+0x1e3/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2543 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1341 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x7ea/0x980 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1367 netlink_sendmsg+0xa3b/0xd70 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1908 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2584 _sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2638 [inline] __sys_sendmsg+0x2b0/0x3a0 net/socket.c:2667 do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7f73dd87dda9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f73de6550c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f73dd9ac050 RCX: 00007f73dd87dda9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000140 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007f73dd8ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000006e R14: 00007f73dd9ac050 R15: 00007ffdbdeb7858 </TASK>
Allocated by task 23037: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:372 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:389 kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline] __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline] __kmalloc+0x22e/0x490 mm/slub.c:3994 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:594 [inline] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:711 [inline] fib6_info_alloc+0x2e/0xf0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:155 ip6_route_info_create+0x445/0x12b0 net/ipv6/route.c:3758 ip6_route_multipath_add net/ipv6/route.c:5298 [inline] inet6_rtm_newroute+0x744/0x2300 net/ipv6/route.c:5517 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x885/0x1040 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6597 netlink_rcv_skb+0x1e3/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2543 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1341 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x7ea/0x980 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1367 netlink_sendmsg+0xa3b/0xd70 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1908 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2584 _sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2638 [inline] __sys_sendmsg+0x2b0/0x3a0 net/socket.c:2667 do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77
Freed by task 16: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x4e/0x60 mm/kasan/generic.c:640 poison_slab_object+0xa6/0xe0 m ---truncated---(CVE-2024-26852)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
inet: inet_defrag: prevent sk release while still in use
ip_local_out() and other functions can pass skb->sk as function argument.
If the skb is a fragment and reassembly happens before such function call returns, the sk must not be released.
This affects skb fragments reassembled via netfilter or similar modules, e.g. openvswitch or ct_act.c, when run as part of tx pipeline.
Eric Dumazet made an initial analysis of this bug. Quoting Eric: Calling ip_defrag() in output path is also implying skb_orphan(), which is buggy because output path relies on sk not disappearing.
A relevant old patch about the issue was : 8282f27449bf ("inet: frag: Always orphan skbs inside ip_defrag()")
[..]
net/ipv4/ip_output.c depends on skb->sk being set, and probably to an inet socket, not an arbitrary one.
If we orphan the packet in ipvlan, then downstream things like FQ packet scheduler will not work properly.
We need to change ip_defrag() to only use skb_orphan() when really needed, ie whenever frag_list is going to be used.
Eric suggested to stash sk in fragment queue and made an initial patch. However there is a problem with this:
If skb is refragmented again right after, ip_do_fragment() will copy head->sk to the new fragments, and sets up destructor to sock_wfree. IOW, we have no choice but to fix up sk_wmem accouting to reflect the fully reassembled skb, else wmem will underflow.
This change moves the orphan down into the core, to last possible moment. As ip_defrag_offset is aliased with sk_buff->sk member, we must move the offset into the FRAG_CB, else skb->sk gets clobbered.
This allows to delay the orphaning long enough to learn if the skb has to be queued or if the skb is completing the reasm queue.
In the former case, things work as before, skb is orphaned. This is safe because skb gets queued/stolen and won't continue past reasm engine.
In the latter case, we will steal the skb->sk reference, reattach it to the head skb, and fix up wmem accouting when inet_frag inflates truesize.(CVE-2024-26921)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression
Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release().
But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was allocated, but the call to scsi_add_host() didn't happen. And that pattern happens to exist in some error paths, for example.
Syzkaller causes that by using USB raw gadget device, error'ing on usb-storage driver, at usb_stor_probe2(). By checking that path, we can see that the BadDevice label leads to a scsi_host_put() after a SCSI host allocation, but there's no call to scsi_add_host() in such path. That leads to messages like this in dmesg (and a leak of the SCSI host proc structure):
usb-storage 4-1:87.51: USB Mass Storage device detected proc_dir_entry 'scsi/usb-storage' already registered WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3519 at fs/proc/generic.c:377 proc_register+0x347/0x4e0 fs/proc/generic.c:376
The proper fix seems to still call scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on dev_release(), but guard that with the state check for SHOST_CREATED; there is even a comment in scsi_host_dev_release() detailing that: such conditional is meant for cases where the SCSI host was allocated but there was no calls to {add,remove}_host(), like the usb-storage case.
This is what we propose here and with that, the error path of usb-storage does not trigger the warning anymore.(CVE-2024-26935)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
init/main.c: Fix potential static_command_line memory overflow
We allocate memory of size 'xlen + strlen(boot_command_line) + 1' for static_command_line, but the strings copied into static_command_line are extra_command_line and command_line, rather than extra_command_line and boot_command_line.
When strlen(command_line) > strlen(boot_command_line), static_command_line will overflow.
This patch just recovers strlen(command_line) which was miss-consolidated with strlen(boot_command_line) in the commit f5c7310ac73e ("init/main: add checks for the return value of memblock_alloc*()")(CVE-2024-26988)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to avoid potential panic during recovery
During recovery, if FAULT_BLOCK is on, it is possible that f2fs_reserve_new_block() will return -ENOSPC during recovery, then it may trigger panic.
Also, if fault injection rate is 1 and only FAULT_BLOCK fault type is on, it may encounter deadloop in loop of block reservation.
Let's change as below to fix these issues: - remove bug_on() to avoid panic. - limit the loop count of block reservation to avoid potential deadloop.(CVE-2024-27032)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: Fix clk_core_get NULL dereference
It is possible for clk_core_get to dereference a NULL in the following sequence:
clk_core_get() of_clk_get_hw_from_clkspec() __of_clk_get_hw_from_provider() __clk_get_hw()
__clk_get_hw() can return NULL which is dereferenced by clk_core_get() at hw->core.
Prior to commit dde4eff47c82 ("clk: Look for parents with clkdev based clk_lookups") the check IS_ERR_OR_NULL() was performed which would have caught the NULL.
Reading the description of this function it talks about returning NULL but that cannot be so at the moment.
Update the function to check for hw before dereferencing it and return NULL if hw is NULL.(CVE-2024-27038)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: phy: fix phy_get_internal_delay accessing an empty array
The phy_get_internal_delay function could try to access to an empty array in the case that the driver is calling phy_get_internal_delay without defining delay_values and rx-internal-delay-ps or tx-internal-delay-ps is defined to 0 in the device-tree. This will lead to "unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0". To avoid this kernel oops, the test should be delay >= 0. As there is already delay < 0 test just before, the test could only be size == 0.(CVE-2024-27047)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: rtl8xxxu: add cancel_work_sync() for c2hcmd_work
The workqueue might still be running, when the driver is stopped. To avoid a use-after-free, call cancel_work_sync() in rtl8xxxu_stop().(CVE-2024-27052)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: wilc1000: fix RCU usage in connect path
With lockdep enabled, calls to the connect function from cfg802.11 layer lead to the following warning:
============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.7.0-rc1-wt+ #333 Not tainted
drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/hif.c:386 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [...] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: wpa_supplicant Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1-wt+ #333 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48 dump_stack_lvl from wilc_parse_join_bss_param+0x7dc/0x7f4 wilc_parse_join_bss_param from connect+0x2c4/0x648 connect from cfg80211_connect+0x30c/0xb74 cfg80211_connect from nl80211_connect+0x860/0xa94 nl80211_connect from genl_rcv_msg+0x3fc/0x59c genl_rcv_msg from netlink_rcv_skb+0xd0/0x1f8 netlink_rcv_skb from genl_rcv+0x2c/0x3c genl_rcv from netlink_unicast+0x3b0/0x550 netlink_unicast from netlink_sendmsg+0x368/0x688 netlink_sendmsg from _syssendmsg+0x190/0x430 __sys_sendmsg from syssendmsg+0x110/0x158 _sys_sendmsg from sys_sendmsg+0xe8/0x150 sys_sendmsg from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
This warning is emitted because in the connect path, when trying to parse target BSS parameters, we dereference a RCU pointer whithout being in RCU critical section. Fix RCU dereference usage by moving it to a RCU read critical section. To avoid wrapping the whole wilc_parse_join_bss_param under the critical section, just use the critical section to copy ies data(CVE-2024-27053)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: fix potential "struct net" leak in inet6_rtm_getaddr()
It seems that if userspace provides a correct IFA_TARGET_NETNSID value but no IFA_ADDRESS and IFA_LOCAL attributes, inet6_rtm_getaddr() returns -EINVAL with an elevated "struct net" refcount.(CVE-2024-27417)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
genirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline
The absence of IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT prevents immediate effectiveness of interrupt affinity reconfiguration via procfs. Instead, the change is deferred until the next instance of the interrupt being triggered on the original CPU.
When the interrupt next triggers on the original CPU, the new affinity is enforced within __irq_move_irq(). A vector is allocated from the new CPU, but the old vector on the original CPU remains and is not immediately reclaimed. Instead, apicd->move_in_progress is flagged, and the reclaiming process is delayed until the next trigger of the interrupt on the new CPU.
Upon the subsequent triggering of the interrupt on the new CPU, irq_complete_move() adds a task to the old CPU's vector_cleanup list if it remains online. Subsequently, the timer on the old CPU iterates over its vector_cleanup list, reclaiming old vectors.
However, a rare scenario arises if the old CPU is outgoing before the interrupt triggers again on the new CPU.
In that case irq_force_complete_move() is not invoked on the outgoing CPU to reclaim the old apicd->prev_vector because the interrupt isn't currently affine to the outgoing CPU, and irq_needs_fixup() returns false. Even though __vector_schedule_cleanup() is later called on the new CPU, it doesn't reclaim apicd->prev_vector; instead, it simply resets both apicd->move_in_progress and apicd->prev_vector to 0.
As a result, the vector remains unreclaimed in vector_matrix, leading to a CPU vector leak.
To address this issue, move the invocation of irq_force_complete_move() before the irq_needs_fixup() call to reclaim apicd->prev_vector, if the interrupt is currently or used to be affine to the outgoing CPU.
Additionally, reclaim the vector in __vector_schedule_cleanup() as well, following a warning message, although theoretically it should never see apicd->move_in_progress with apicd->prev_cpu pointing to an offline CPU.(CVE-2024-31076)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: brcmfmac: Fix use-after-free bug in brcmf_cfg80211_detach
This is the candidate patch of CVE-2023-47233 : https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-47233
In brcm80211 driver,it starts with the following invoking chain to start init a timeout worker:
->brcmf_usb_probe ->brcmf_usb_probe_cb ->brcmf_attach ->brcmf_bus_started ->brcmf_cfg80211_attach ->wl_init_priv ->brcmf_init_escan ->INIT_WORK(&cfg->escan_timeout_work, brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker);
If we disconnect the USB by hotplug, it will call brcmf_usb_disconnect to make cleanup. The invoking chain is :
brcmf_usb_disconnect ->brcmf_usb_disconnect_cb ->brcmf_detach ->brcmf_cfg80211_detach ->kfree(cfg);
While the timeout woker may still be running. This will cause a use-after-free bug on cfg in brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker.
Fix it by deleting the timer and canceling the worker in brcmf_cfg80211_detach.
arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com: keep timer delete as is and cancel work just before free
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: amdgpu_ttm_gart_bind set gtt bound flag
Otherwise after the GTT bo is released, the GTT and gart space is freed but amdgpu_ttm_backend_unbind will not clear the gart page table entry and leave valid mapping entry pointing to the stale system page. Then if GPU access the gart address mistakely, it will read undefined value instead page fault, harder to debug and reproduce the real issue.(CVE-2024-35817)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: tc358743: register v4l2 async device only after successful setup
Ensure the device has been setup correctly before registering the v4l2 async device, thus allowing userspace to access.(CVE-2024-35830)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dyndbg: fix old BUG_ON in >control parser
Fix a BUG_ON from 2009. Even if it looks "unreachable" (I didn't really look), lets make sure by removing it, doing pr_err and return -EINVAL instead.(CVE-2024-35947)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix division by zero in setup_dsc_config
When slice_height is 0, the division by slice_height in the calculation of the number of slices will cause a division by zero driver crash. This leaves the kernel in a state that requires a reboot. This patch adds a check to avoid the division by zero.
The stack trace below is for the 6.8.4 Kernel. I reproduced the issue on a Z16 Gen 2 Lenovo Thinkpad with a Apple Studio Display monitor connected via Thunderbolt. The amdgpu driver crashed with this exception when I rebooted the system with the monitor connected.
kernel: ? die (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:421 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:434 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:447) kernel: ? do_trap (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:113 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:154) kernel: ? setup_dsc_config (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c:1053) amdgpu kernel: ? do_error_trap (./arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h:58 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:175) kernel: ? setup_dsc_config (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c:1053) amdgpu kernel: ? exc_divide_error (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:194 (discriminator 2)) kernel: ? setup_dsc_config (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c:1053) amdgpu kernel: ? asm_exc_divide_error (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:548) kernel: ? setup_dsc_config (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c:1053) amdgpu kernel: dc_dsc_compute_config (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c:1109) amdgpu
After applying this patch, the driver no longer crashes when the monitor is connected and the system is rebooted. I believe this is the same issue reported for 3113.(CVE-2024-36969)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: sched: sch_multiq: fix possible OOB write in multiq_tune()
q->bands will be assigned to qopt->bands to execute subsequent code logic after kmalloc. So the old q->bands should not be used in kmalloc. Otherwise, an out-of-bounds write will occur.(CVE-2024-36978)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: bridge: xmit: make sure we have at least eth header len bytes
syzbot triggered an uninit value[1] error in bridge device's xmit path by sending a short (less than ETH_HLEN bytes) skb. To fix it check if we can actually pull that amount instead of assuming.
Tested with dropwatch: drop at: br_dev_xmit+0xb93/0x12d0 [bridge] (0xffffffffc06739b3) origin: software timestamp: Mon May 13 11:31:53 2024 778214037 nsec protocol: 0x88a8 length: 2 original length: 2 drop reason: PKT_TOO_SMALL
[1] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in br_dev_xmit+0x61d/0x1cb0 net/bridge/br_device.c:65 br_dev_xmit+0x61d/0x1cb0 net/bridge/br_device.c:65 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4903 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4917 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3531 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x247/0xa20 net/core/dev.c:3547 __dev_queue_xmit+0x34db/0x5350 net/core/dev.c:4341 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3091 [inline] __bpf_tx_skb net/core/filter.c:2136 [inline] __bpf_redirect_common net/core/filter.c:2180 [inline] __bpf_redirect+0x14a6/0x1620 net/core/filter.c:2187 _bpfclone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2460 [inline] bpf_clone_redirect+0x328/0x470 net/core/filter.c:2432 _bpf_prog_run+0x13fe/0xe0f0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1997 __bpf_prog_run512+0xb5/0xe0 kernel/bpf/core.c:2238 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline] __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline] bpf_test_run+0x499/0xc30 net/bpf/test_run.c:425 bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x14ea/0x1f20 net/bpf/test_run.c:1058 bpf_prog_test_run+0x6b7/0xad0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4269 __sys_bpf+0x6aa/0xd90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5678 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5767 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0xa0/0xe0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 x64_sys_call+0x96b/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:322 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-38538)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/hns: Fix UAF for cq async event
The refcount of CQ is not protected by locks. When CQ asynchronous events and CQ destruction are concurrent, CQ may have been released, which will cause UAF.
Use the xa_lock() to protect the CQ refcount.(CVE-2024-38545)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/mediatek: Add 0 size check to mtk_drm_gem_obj
Add a check to mtk_drm_gem_init if we attempt to allocate a GEM object of 0 bytes. Currently, no such check exists and the kernel will panic if a userspace application attempts to allocate a 0x0 GBM buffer.
Tested by attempting to allocate a 0x0 GBM buffer on an MT8188 and verifying that we now return EINVAL.(CVE-2024-38549)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Discard command completions in internal error
Fix use after free when FW completion arrives while device is in internal error state. Avoid calling completion handler in this case, since the device will flush the command interface and trigger all completions manually.
Kernel log: ------------[ cut here ]------------ refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. ... RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0 ... Call Trace: <IRQ> ? __warn+0x79/0x120 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0 ? report_bug+0x17c/0x190 ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x60 ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0 cmd_ent_put+0x13b/0x160 [mlx5_core] mlx5_cmd_comp_handler+0x5f9/0x670 [mlx5_core] cmd_comp_notifier+0x1f/0x30 [mlx5_core] notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0 atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 mlx5_eq_async_int+0xf6/0x290 [mlx5_core] notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0 atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 irq_int_handler+0x19/0x30 [mlx5_core] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x4b/0x160 handle_irq_event+0x2e/0x80 handle_edge_irq+0x98/0x230 __common_interrupt+0x3b/0xa0 common_interrupt+0x7b/0xa0 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40(CVE-2024-38555)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group
The perf tool allows users to create event groups through following cmd [1], but the driver does not check whether the array index is out of bounds when writing data to the event_group array. If the number of events in an event_group is greater than HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS, the memory write overflow of event_group array occurs.
Add array index check to fix the possible array out of bounds violation, and return directly when write new events are written to array bounds.
There are 9 different events in an event_group. [1] perf stat -e '{pmu/event1/, ... ,pmu/event9/}'(CVE-2024-38569)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/hns: Fix deadlock on SRQ async events.
xa_lock for SRQ table may be required in AEQ. Use xa_store_irq()/ xa_erase_irq() to avoid deadlock.(CVE-2024-38591)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ring-buffer: Fix a race between readers and resize checks
The reader code in rb_get_reader_page() swaps a new reader page into the ring buffer by doing cmpxchg on old->list.prev->next to point it to the new page. Following that, if the operation is successful, old->list.next->prev gets updated too. This means the underlying doubly-linked list is temporarily inconsistent, page->prev->next or page->next->prev might not be equal back to page for some page in the ring buffer.
The resize operation in ring_buffer_resize() can be invoked in parallel. It calls rb_check_pages() which can detect the described inconsistency and stop further tracing:
[ 190.271762] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 190.271771] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6186 at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:1467 rb_check_pages.isra.0+0x6a/0xa0 [ 190.271789] Modules linked in: [...] [ 190.271991] Unloaded tainted modules: intel_uncore_frequency(E):1 skx_edac(E):1 [ 190.272002] CPU: 1 PID: 6186 Comm: cmd.sh Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.9.0-rc6-default #5 158d3e1e6d0b091c34c3b96bfd99a1c58306d79f [ 190.272011] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552c-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 [ 190.272015] RIP: 0010:rb_check_pages.isra.0+0x6a/0xa0 [ 190.272023] Code: [...] [ 190.272028] RSP: 0018:ffff9c37463abb70 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 190.272034] RAX: ffff8eba04b6cb80 RBX: 0000000000000007 RCX: ffff8eba01f13d80 [ 190.272038] RDX: ffff8eba01f130c0 RSI: ffff8eba04b6cd00 RDI: ffff8eba0004c700 [ 190.272042] RBP: ffff8eba0004c700 R08: 0000000000010002 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 190.272045] R10: 00000000ffff7f52 R11: ffff8eba7f600000 R12: ffff8eba0004c720 [ 190.272049] R13: ffff8eba00223a00 R14: 0000000000000008 R15: ffff8eba067a8000 [ 190.272053] FS: 00007f1bd64752c0(0000) GS:ffff8eba7f680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 190.272057] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 190.272061] CR2: 00007f1bd6662590 CR3: 000000010291e001 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [ 190.272070] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 190.272073] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 190.272077] Call Trace: [ 190.272098] <TASK> [ 190.272189] ring_buffer_resize+0x2ab/0x460 [ 190.272199] __tracing_resize_ring_buffer.part.0+0x23/0xa0 [ 190.272206] tracing_resize_ring_buffer+0x65/0x90 [ 190.272216] tracing_entries_write+0x74/0xc0 [ 190.272225] vfs_write+0xf5/0x420 [ 190.272248] ksys_write+0x67/0xe0 [ 190.272256] do_syscall_64+0x82/0x170 [ 190.272363] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 190.272373] RIP: 0033:0x7f1bd657d263 [ 190.272381] Code: [...] [ 190.272385] RSP: 002b:00007ffe72b643f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 190.272391] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007f1bd657d263 [ 190.272395] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000555a6eb538e0 RDI: 0000000000000001 [ 190.272398] RBP: 0000555a6eb538e0 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 0000000000000000 [ 190.272401] R10: 0000555a6eb55190 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f1bd6662500 [ 190.272404] R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00007f1bd6667c00 R15: 0000000000000002 [ 190.272412] </TASK> [ 190.272414] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Note that ring_buffer_resize() calls rb_check_pages() only if the parent trace_buffer has recording disabled. Recent commit d78ab792705c ("tracing: Stop current tracer when resizing buffer") causes that it is now always the case which makes it more likely to experience this issue.
The window to hit this race is nonetheless very small. To help reproducing it, one can add a delay loop in rb_get_reader_page():
ret = rb_head_page_replace(reader, cpu_buffer->reader_page); if (!ret) goto spin; for (unsigned i = 0; i < 1U << 26; i++) / inserted delay loop / asm volatile ("" : : : "memory"); rb_list_head(reader->list.next)->prev = &cpu_buffer->reader_page->list;
.. ---truncated---(CVE-2024-38601)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: max3100: Lock port->lock when calling uart_handle_cts_change()
uart_handle_cts_change() has to be called with port lock taken, Since we run it in a separate work, the lock may not be taken at the time of running. Make sure that it's taken by explicitly doing that. Without it we got a splat:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3491 uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0 ... Workqueue: max3100-0 max3100_work [max3100] RIP: 0010:uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0 ... max3100_handlerx+0xc5/0x110 [max3100] max3100_work+0x12a/0x340 max3100
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Allow delete from sockmap/sockhash only if update is allowed
We have seen an influx of syzkaller reports where a BPF program attached to a tracepoint triggers a locking rule violation by performing a map_delete on a sockmap/sockhash.
We don't intend to support this artificial use scenario. Extend the existing verifier allowed-program-type check for updating sockmap/sockhash to also cover deleting from a map.
From now on only BPF programs which were previously allowed to update sockmap/sockhash can delete from these map types.(CVE-2024-38662)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-136.82.0.163.oe2203sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: SOF: Fix DSP oops stack dump output contents\r\n\r\nFix @buf arg given to hex_dump_to_buffer() and stack address used\nin dump error output.(CVE-2021-47381)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: iscsi: Fix iscsi_task use after free\r\n\r\nCommit d39df158518c (\u0026quot;scsi: iscsi: Have abort handler get ref to conn\u0026quot;)\nadded iscsi_get_conn()/iscsi_put_conn() calls during abort handling but\nthen also changed the handling of the case where we detect an already\ncompleted task where we now end up doing a goto to the common put/cleanup\ncode. This results in a iscsi_task use after free, because the common\ncleanup code will do a put on the iscsi_task.\r\n\r\nThis reverts the goto and moves the iscsi_get_conn() to after we\u0026apos;ve checked\nif the iscsi_task is valid.(CVE-2021-47427)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nspi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on SPI buses\r\n\r\nCurrently we have a global spi_add_lock which we take when adding new\ndevices so that we can check that we\u0026apos;re not trying to reuse a chip\nselect that\u0026apos;s already controlled. This means that if the SPI device is\nitself a SPI controller and triggers the instantiation of further SPI\ndevices we trigger a deadlock as we try to register and instantiate\nthose devices while in the process of doing so for the parent controller\nand hence already holding the global spi_add_lock. Since we only care\nabout concurrency within a single SPI bus move the lock to be per\ncontroller, avoiding the deadlock.\r\n\r\nThis can be easily triggered in the case of spi-mux.(CVE-2021-47469)\r\n\r\n(CVE-2023-39180)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npowerpc/powernv: Add a null pointer check in opal_powercap_init()\r\n\r\nkasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory\nwhich can be NULL upon failure.(CVE-2023-52696)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni2c: core: Run atomic i2c xfer when !preemptible\r\n\r\nSince bae1d3a05a8b, i2c transfers are non-atomic if preemption is\ndisabled. However, non-atomic i2c transfers require preemption (e.g. in\nwait_for_completion() while waiting for the DMA).\r\n\r\npanic() calls preempt_disable_notrace() before calling\nemergency_restart(). Therefore, if an i2c device is used for the\nrestart, the xfer should be atomic. This avoids warnings like:\r\n\r\n[ 12.667612] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:318 rcu_note_context_switch+0x33c/0x6b0\n[ 12.676926] Voluntary context switch within RCU read-side critical section!\n...\n[ 12.742376] schedule_timeout from wait_for_completion_timeout+0x90/0x114\n[ 12.749179] wait_for_completion_timeout from tegra_i2c_wait_completion+0x40/0x70\n...\n[ 12.994527] atomic_notifier_call_chain from machine_restart+0x34/0x58\n[ 13.001050] machine_restart from panic+0x2a8/0x32c\r\n\r\nUse !preemptible() instead, which is basically the same check as\npre-v5.2.(CVE-2023-52791)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhid: cp2112: Fix duplicate workqueue initialization\r\n\r\nPreviously the cp2112 driver called INIT_DELAYED_WORK within\ncp2112_gpio_irq_startup, resulting in duplicate initilizations of the\nworkqueue on subsequent IRQ startups following an initial request. This\nresulted in a warning in set_work_data in workqueue.c, as well as a rare\nNULL dereference within process_one_work in workqueue.c.\r\n\r\nInitialize the workqueue within _probe instead.(CVE-2023-52853)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nksmbd: fix UAF issue in ksmbd_tcp_new_connection()\r\n\r\nThe race is between the handling of a new TCP connection and\nits disconnection. It leads to UAF on `struct tcp_transport` in\nksmbd_tcp_new_connection() function.(CVE-2024-26592)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/ipv6: avoid possible UAF in ip6_route_mpath_notify()\r\n\r\nsyzbot found another use-after-free in ip6_route_mpath_notify() [1]\r\n\r\nCommit f7225172f25a (\u0026quot;net/ipv6: prevent use after free in\nip6_route_mpath_notify\u0026quot;) was not able to fix the root cause.\r\n\r\nWe need to defer the fib6_info_release() calls after\nip6_route_mpath_notify(), in the cleanup phase.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rt6_fill_node+0x1460/0x1ac0\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff88809a07fc64 by task syz-executor.2/23037\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 23037 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-01035-gea7f3cfaa588 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2e0 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x167/0x540 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x142/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n rt6_fill_node+0x1460/0x1ac0\n inet6_rt_notify+0x13b/0x290 net/ipv6/route.c:6184\n ip6_route_mpath_notify net/ipv6/route.c:5198 [inline]\n ip6_route_multipath_add net/ipv6/route.c:5404 [inline]\n inet6_rtm_newroute+0x1d0f/0x2300 net/ipv6/route.c:5517\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x885/0x1040 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6597\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x1e3/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2543\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1341 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0x7ea/0x980 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1367\n netlink_sendmsg+0xa3b/0xd70 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1908\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2584\n ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2638 [inline]\n __sys_sendmsg+0x2b0/0x3a0 net/socket.c:2667\n do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77\nRIP: 0033:0x7f73dd87dda9\nCode: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007f73de6550c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f73dd9ac050 RCX: 00007f73dd87dda9\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000140 RDI: 0000000000000005\nRBP: 00007f73dd8ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 000000000000006e R14: 00007f73dd9ac050 R15: 00007ffdbdeb7858\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 23037:\n kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline]\n kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:372 [inline]\n __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:389\n kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline]\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]\n __kmalloc+0x22e/0x490 mm/slub.c:3994\n kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:594 [inline]\n kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:711 [inline]\n fib6_info_alloc+0x2e/0xf0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:155\n ip6_route_info_create+0x445/0x12b0 net/ipv6/route.c:3758\n ip6_route_multipath_add net/ipv6/route.c:5298 [inline]\n inet6_rtm_newroute+0x744/0x2300 net/ipv6/route.c:5517\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x885/0x1040 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6597\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x1e3/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2543\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1341 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0x7ea/0x980 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1367\n netlink_sendmsg+0xa3b/0xd70 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1908\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2584\n ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2638 [inline]\n __sys_sendmsg+0x2b0/0x3a0 net/socket.c:2667\n do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77\r\n\r\nFreed by task 16:\n kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline]\n kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n kasan_save_free_info+0x4e/0x60 mm/kasan/generic.c:640\n poison_slab_object+0xa6/0xe0 m\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-26852)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ninet: inet_defrag: prevent sk release while still in use\r\n\r\nip_local_out() and other functions can pass skb-\u0026gt;sk as function argument.\r\n\r\nIf the skb is a fragment and reassembly happens before such function call\nreturns, the sk must not be released.\r\n\r\nThis affects skb fragments reassembled via netfilter or similar\nmodules, e.g. openvswitch or ct_act.c, when run as part of tx pipeline.\r\n\r\nEric Dumazet made an initial analysis of this bug. Quoting Eric:\n Calling ip_defrag() in output path is also implying skb_orphan(),\n which is buggy because output path relies on sk not disappearing.\r\n\r\n A relevant old patch about the issue was :\n 8282f27449bf (\u0026quot;inet: frag: Always orphan skbs inside ip_defrag()\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\n [..]\r\n\r\n net/ipv4/ip_output.c depends on skb-\u0026gt;sk being set, and probably to an\n inet socket, not an arbitrary one.\r\n\r\n If we orphan the packet in ipvlan, then downstream things like FQ\n packet scheduler will not work properly.\r\n\r\n We need to change ip_defrag() to only use skb_orphan() when really\n needed, ie whenever frag_list is going to be used.\r\n\r\nEric suggested to stash sk in fragment queue and made an initial patch.\nHowever there is a problem with this:\r\n\r\nIf skb is refragmented again right after, ip_do_fragment() will copy\nhead-\u0026gt;sk to the new fragments, and sets up destructor to sock_wfree.\nIOW, we have no choice but to fix up sk_wmem accouting to reflect the\nfully reassembled skb, else wmem will underflow.\r\n\r\nThis change moves the orphan down into the core, to last possible moment.\nAs ip_defrag_offset is aliased with sk_buff-\u0026gt;sk member, we must move the\noffset into the FRAG_CB, else skb-\u0026gt;sk gets clobbered.\r\n\r\nThis allows to delay the orphaning long enough to learn if the skb has\nto be queued or if the skb is completing the reasm queue.\r\n\r\nIn the former case, things work as before, skb is orphaned. This is\nsafe because skb gets queued/stolen and won\u0026apos;t continue past reasm engine.\r\n\r\nIn the latter case, we will steal the skb-\u0026gt;sk reference, reattach it to\nthe head skb, and fix up wmem accouting when inet_frag inflates truesize.(CVE-2024-26921)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression\r\n\r\nCommit fc663711b944 (\u0026quot;scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name}\ndirectory earlier\u0026quot;) fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by\nadding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led\nto a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it\u0026apos;s also\ncalled from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report,\nwhich was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe (\u0026quot;scsi: core: Fix a procfs host\ndirectory removal regression\u0026quot;). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call\nfrom dev_release().\r\n\r\nBut it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(),\nand that function \u0026quot;pairs\u0026quot; with scsi_host_dev_release(), while\nscsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the\nreason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover\ncases in which a SCSI host structure was allocated, but the call to\nscsi_add_host() didn\u0026apos;t happen. And that pattern happens to exist in some\nerror paths, for example.\r\n\r\nSyzkaller causes that by using USB raw gadget device, error\u0026apos;ing on\nusb-storage driver, at usb_stor_probe2(). By checking that path, we can see\nthat the BadDevice label leads to a scsi_host_put() after a SCSI host\nallocation, but there\u0026apos;s no call to scsi_add_host() in such path. That leads\nto messages like this in dmesg (and a leak of the SCSI host proc\nstructure):\r\n\r\nusb-storage 4-1:87.51: USB Mass Storage device detected\nproc_dir_entry \u0026apos;scsi/usb-storage\u0026apos; already registered\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3519 at fs/proc/generic.c:377 proc_register+0x347/0x4e0 fs/proc/generic.c:376\r\n\r\nThe proper fix seems to still call scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on dev_release(),\nbut guard that with the state check for SHOST_CREATED; there is even a\ncomment in scsi_host_dev_release() detailing that: such conditional is\nmeant for cases where the SCSI host was allocated but there was no calls to\n{add,remove}_host(), like the usb-storage case.\r\n\r\nThis is what we propose here and with that, the error path of usb-storage\ndoes not trigger the warning anymore.(CVE-2024-26935)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ninit/main.c: Fix potential static_command_line memory overflow\r\n\r\nWe allocate memory of size \u0026apos;xlen + strlen(boot_command_line) + 1\u0026apos; for\nstatic_command_line, but the strings copied into static_command_line are\nextra_command_line and command_line, rather than extra_command_line and\nboot_command_line.\r\n\r\nWhen strlen(command_line) \u0026gt; strlen(boot_command_line), static_command_line\nwill overflow.\r\n\r\nThis patch just recovers strlen(command_line) which was miss-consolidated\nwith strlen(boot_command_line) in the commit f5c7310ac73e (\u0026quot;init/main: add\nchecks for the return value of memblock_alloc*()\u0026quot;)(CVE-2024-26988)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: fix to avoid potential panic during recovery\r\n\r\nDuring recovery, if FAULT_BLOCK is on, it is possible that\nf2fs_reserve_new_block() will return -ENOSPC during recovery,\nthen it may trigger panic.\r\n\r\nAlso, if fault injection rate is 1 and only FAULT_BLOCK fault\ntype is on, it may encounter deadloop in loop of block reservation.\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s change as below to fix these issues:\n- remove bug_on() to avoid panic.\n- limit the loop count of block reservation to avoid potential\ndeadloop.(CVE-2024-27032)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: Fix clk_core_get NULL dereference\r\n\r\nIt is possible for clk_core_get to dereference a NULL in the following\nsequence:\r\n\r\nclk_core_get()\n of_clk_get_hw_from_clkspec()\n __of_clk_get_hw_from_provider()\n __clk_get_hw()\r\n\r\n__clk_get_hw() can return NULL which is dereferenced by clk_core_get() at\nhw-\u0026gt;core.\r\n\r\nPrior to commit dde4eff47c82 (\u0026quot;clk: Look for parents with clkdev based\nclk_lookups\u0026quot;) the check IS_ERR_OR_NULL() was performed which would have\ncaught the NULL.\r\n\r\nReading the description of this function it talks about returning NULL but\nthat cannot be so at the moment.\r\n\r\nUpdate the function to check for hw before dereferencing it and return NULL\nif hw is NULL.(CVE-2024-27038)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: phy: fix phy_get_internal_delay accessing an empty array\r\n\r\nThe phy_get_internal_delay function could try to access to an empty\narray in the case that the driver is calling phy_get_internal_delay\nwithout defining delay_values and rx-internal-delay-ps or\ntx-internal-delay-ps is defined to 0 in the device-tree.\nThis will lead to \u0026quot;unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at\nvirtual address 0\u0026quot;. To avoid this kernel oops, the test should be delay\n\u0026gt;= 0. As there is already delay \u0026lt; 0 test just before, the test could\nonly be size == 0.(CVE-2024-27047)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: rtl8xxxu: add cancel_work_sync() for c2hcmd_work\r\n\r\nThe workqueue might still be running, when the driver is stopped. To\navoid a use-after-free, call cancel_work_sync() in rtl8xxxu_stop().(CVE-2024-27052)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: wilc1000: fix RCU usage in connect path\r\n\r\nWith lockdep enabled, calls to the connect function from cfg802.11 layer\nlead to the following warning:\r\n\r\n=============================\nWARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n6.7.0-rc1-wt+ #333 Not tainted\n-----------------------------\ndrivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/hif.c:386\nsuspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!\n[...]\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: wpa_supplicant Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1-wt+ #333\nHardware name: Atmel SAMA5\n unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c\n show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48\n dump_stack_lvl from wilc_parse_join_bss_param+0x7dc/0x7f4\n wilc_parse_join_bss_param from connect+0x2c4/0x648\n connect from cfg80211_connect+0x30c/0xb74\n cfg80211_connect from nl80211_connect+0x860/0xa94\n nl80211_connect from genl_rcv_msg+0x3fc/0x59c\n genl_rcv_msg from netlink_rcv_skb+0xd0/0x1f8\n netlink_rcv_skb from genl_rcv+0x2c/0x3c\n genl_rcv from netlink_unicast+0x3b0/0x550\n netlink_unicast from netlink_sendmsg+0x368/0x688\n netlink_sendmsg from ____sys_sendmsg+0x190/0x430\n ____sys_sendmsg from ___sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x158\n ___sys_sendmsg from sys_sendmsg+0xe8/0x150\n sys_sendmsg from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c\r\n\r\nThis warning is emitted because in the connect path, when trying to parse\ntarget BSS parameters, we dereference a RCU pointer whithout being in RCU\ncritical section.\nFix RCU dereference usage by moving it to a RCU read critical section. To\navoid wrapping the whole wilc_parse_join_bss_param under the critical\nsection, just use the critical section to copy ies data(CVE-2024-27053)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: fix potential \u0026quot;struct net\u0026quot; leak in inet6_rtm_getaddr()\r\n\r\nIt seems that if userspace provides a correct IFA_TARGET_NETNSID value\nbut no IFA_ADDRESS and IFA_LOCAL attributes, inet6_rtm_getaddr()\nreturns -EINVAL with an elevated \u0026quot;struct net\u0026quot; refcount.(CVE-2024-27417)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngenirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline\r\n\r\nThe absence of IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT prevents immediate effectiveness of\ninterrupt affinity reconfiguration via procfs. Instead, the change is\ndeferred until the next instance of the interrupt being triggered on the\noriginal CPU.\r\n\r\nWhen the interrupt next triggers on the original CPU, the new affinity is\nenforced within __irq_move_irq(). A vector is allocated from the new CPU,\nbut the old vector on the original CPU remains and is not immediately\nreclaimed. Instead, apicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress is flagged, and the reclaiming\nprocess is delayed until the next trigger of the interrupt on the new CPU.\r\n\r\nUpon the subsequent triggering of the interrupt on the new CPU,\nirq_complete_move() adds a task to the old CPU\u0026apos;s vector_cleanup list if it\nremains online. Subsequently, the timer on the old CPU iterates over its\nvector_cleanup list, reclaiming old vectors.\r\n\r\nHowever, a rare scenario arises if the old CPU is outgoing before the\ninterrupt triggers again on the new CPU.\r\n\r\nIn that case irq_force_complete_move() is not invoked on the outgoing CPU\nto reclaim the old apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector because the interrupt isn\u0026apos;t currently\naffine to the outgoing CPU, and irq_needs_fixup() returns false. Even\nthough __vector_schedule_cleanup() is later called on the new CPU, it\ndoesn\u0026apos;t reclaim apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector; instead, it simply resets both\napicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress and apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector to 0.\r\n\r\nAs a result, the vector remains unreclaimed in vector_matrix, leading to a\nCPU vector leak.\r\n\r\nTo address this issue, move the invocation of irq_force_complete_move()\nbefore the irq_needs_fixup() call to reclaim apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector, if the\ninterrupt is currently or used to be affine to the outgoing CPU.\r\n\r\nAdditionally, reclaim the vector in __vector_schedule_cleanup() as well,\nfollowing a warning message, although theoretically it should never see\napicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress with apicd-\u0026gt;prev_cpu pointing to an offline CPU.(CVE-2024-31076)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: brcmfmac: Fix use-after-free bug in brcmf_cfg80211_detach\r\n\r\nThis is the candidate patch of CVE-2023-47233 :\nhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-47233\r\n\r\nIn brcm80211 driver,it starts with the following invoking chain\nto start init a timeout worker:\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt;brcmf_usb_probe\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_usb_probe_cb\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_attach\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_bus_started\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_cfg80211_attach\n -\u0026gt;wl_init_priv\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_init_escan\n -\u0026gt;INIT_WORK(\u0026amp;cfg-\u0026gt;escan_timeout_work,\n\t\t brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker);\r\n\r\nIf we disconnect the USB by hotplug, it will call\nbrcmf_usb_disconnect to make cleanup. The invoking chain is :\r\n\r\nbrcmf_usb_disconnect\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_usb_disconnect_cb\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_detach\n -\u0026gt;brcmf_cfg80211_detach\n -\u0026gt;kfree(cfg);\r\n\r\nWhile the timeout woker may still be running. This will cause\na use-after-free bug on cfg in brcmf_cfg80211_escan_timeout_worker.\r\n\r\nFix it by deleting the timer and canceling the worker in\nbrcmf_cfg80211_detach.\r\n\r\n[arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com: keep timer delete as is and cancel work just before free](CVE-2024-35811)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: amdgpu_ttm_gart_bind set gtt bound flag\r\n\r\nOtherwise after the GTT bo is released, the GTT and gart space is freed\nbut amdgpu_ttm_backend_unbind will not clear the gart page table entry\nand leave valid mapping entry pointing to the stale system page. Then\nif GPU access the gart address mistakely, it will read undefined value\ninstead page fault, harder to debug and reproduce the real issue.(CVE-2024-35817)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: tc358743: register v4l2 async device only after successful setup\r\n\r\nEnsure the device has been setup correctly before registering the v4l2\nasync device, thus allowing userspace to access.(CVE-2024-35830)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndyndbg: fix old BUG_ON in \u0026gt;control parser\r\n\r\nFix a BUG_ON from 2009. Even if it looks \u0026quot;unreachable\u0026quot; (I didn\u0026apos;t\nreally look), lets make sure by removing it, doing pr_err and return\n-EINVAL instead.(CVE-2024-35947)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Fix division by zero in setup_dsc_config\r\n\r\nWhen slice_height is 0, the division by slice_height in the calculation\nof the number of slices will cause a division by zero driver crash. This\nleaves the kernel in a state that requires a reboot. This patch adds a\ncheck to avoid the division by zero.\r\n\r\nThe stack trace below is for the 6.8.4 Kernel. I reproduced the issue on\na Z16 Gen 2 Lenovo Thinkpad with a Apple Studio Display monitor\nconnected via Thunderbolt. The amdgpu driver crashed with this exception\nwhen I rebooted the system with the monitor connected.\r\n\r\nkernel: ? die (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:421 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:434 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:447)\nkernel: ? do_trap (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:113 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:154)\nkernel: ? setup_dsc_config (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c:1053) amdgpu\nkernel: ? do_error_trap (./arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h:58 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:175)\nkernel: ? setup_dsc_config (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c:1053) amdgpu\nkernel: ? exc_divide_error (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:194 (discriminator 2))\nkernel: ? setup_dsc_config (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c:1053) amdgpu\nkernel: ? asm_exc_divide_error (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:548)\nkernel: ? setup_dsc_config (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c:1053) amdgpu\nkernel: dc_dsc_compute_config (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c:1109) amdgpu\r\n\r\nAfter applying this patch, the driver no longer crashes when the monitor\nis connected and the system is rebooted. I believe this is the same\nissue reported for 3113.(CVE-2024-36969)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: sched: sch_multiq: fix possible OOB write in multiq_tune()\r\n\r\nq-\u0026gt;bands will be assigned to qopt-\u0026gt;bands to execute subsequent code logic\nafter kmalloc. So the old q-\u0026gt;bands should not be used in kmalloc.\nOtherwise, an out-of-bounds write will occur.(CVE-2024-36978)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: bridge: xmit: make sure we have at least eth header len bytes\r\n\r\nsyzbot triggered an uninit value[1] error in bridge device\u0026apos;s xmit path\nby sending a short (less than ETH_HLEN bytes) skb. To fix it check if\nwe can actually pull that amount instead of assuming.\r\n\r\nTested with dropwatch:\n drop at: br_dev_xmit+0xb93/0x12d0 [bridge] (0xffffffffc06739b3)\n origin: software\n timestamp: Mon May 13 11:31:53 2024 778214037 nsec\n protocol: 0x88a8\n length: 2\n original length: 2\n drop reason: PKT_TOO_SMALL\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in br_dev_xmit+0x61d/0x1cb0 net/bridge/br_device.c:65\n br_dev_xmit+0x61d/0x1cb0 net/bridge/br_device.c:65\n __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4903 [inline]\n netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4917 [inline]\n xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3531 [inline]\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0x247/0xa20 net/core/dev.c:3547\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x34db/0x5350 net/core/dev.c:4341\n dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3091 [inline]\n __bpf_tx_skb net/core/filter.c:2136 [inline]\n __bpf_redirect_common net/core/filter.c:2180 [inline]\n __bpf_redirect+0x14a6/0x1620 net/core/filter.c:2187\n ____bpf_clone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2460 [inline]\n bpf_clone_redirect+0x328/0x470 net/core/filter.c:2432\n ___bpf_prog_run+0x13fe/0xe0f0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1997\n __bpf_prog_run512+0xb5/0xe0 kernel/bpf/core.c:2238\n bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]\n __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]\n bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]\n bpf_test_run+0x499/0xc30 net/bpf/test_run.c:425\n bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x14ea/0x1f20 net/bpf/test_run.c:1058\n bpf_prog_test_run+0x6b7/0xad0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4269\n __sys_bpf+0x6aa/0xd90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5678\n __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5767 [inline]\n __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 [inline]\n __x64_sys_bpf+0xa0/0xe0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765\n x64_sys_call+0x96b/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:322\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-38538)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA/hns: Fix UAF for cq async event\r\n\r\nThe refcount of CQ is not protected by locks. When CQ asynchronous\nevents and CQ destruction are concurrent, CQ may have been released,\nwhich will cause UAF.\r\n\r\nUse the xa_lock() to protect the CQ refcount.(CVE-2024-38545)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/mediatek: Add 0 size check to mtk_drm_gem_obj\r\n\r\nAdd a check to mtk_drm_gem_init if we attempt to allocate a GEM object\nof 0 bytes. Currently, no such check exists and the kernel will panic if\na userspace application attempts to allocate a 0x0 GBM buffer.\r\n\r\nTested by attempting to allocate a 0x0 GBM buffer on an MT8188 and\nverifying that we now return EINVAL.(CVE-2024-38549)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5: Discard command completions in internal error\r\n\r\nFix use after free when FW completion arrives while device is in\ninternal error state. Avoid calling completion handler in this case,\nsince the device will flush the command interface and trigger all\ncompletions manually.\r\n\r\nKernel log:\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nrefcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n...\nRIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0\n...\nCall Trace:\n\u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n? __warn+0x79/0x120\n? refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0\n? report_bug+0x17c/0x190\n? handle_bug+0x3c/0x60\n? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70\n? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20\n? refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0\ncmd_ent_put+0x13b/0x160 [mlx5_core]\nmlx5_cmd_comp_handler+0x5f9/0x670 [mlx5_core]\ncmd_comp_notifier+0x1f/0x30 [mlx5_core]\nnotifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0\natomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20\nmlx5_eq_async_int+0xf6/0x290 [mlx5_core]\nnotifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0\natomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20\nirq_int_handler+0x19/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x4b/0x160\nhandle_irq_event+0x2e/0x80\nhandle_edge_irq+0x98/0x230\n__common_interrupt+0x3b/0xa0\ncommon_interrupt+0x7b/0xa0\n\u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\nasm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40(CVE-2024-38555)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group\r\n\r\nThe perf tool allows users to create event groups through following\ncmd [1], but the driver does not check whether the array index is out of\nbounds when writing data to the event_group array. If the number of events\nin an event_group is greater than HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS, the memory write\noverflow of event_group array occurs.\r\n\r\nAdd array index check to fix the possible array out of bounds violation,\nand return directly when write new events are written to array bounds.\r\n\r\nThere are 9 different events in an event_group.\n[1] perf stat -e \u0026apos;{pmu/event1/, ... ,pmu/event9/}\u0026apos;(CVE-2024-38569)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA/hns: Fix deadlock on SRQ async events.\r\n\r\nxa_lock for SRQ table may be required in AEQ. Use xa_store_irq()/\nxa_erase_irq() to avoid deadlock.(CVE-2024-38591)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nring-buffer: Fix a race between readers and resize checks\r\n\r\nThe reader code in rb_get_reader_page() swaps a new reader page into the\nring buffer by doing cmpxchg on old-\u0026gt;list.prev-\u0026gt;next to point it to the\nnew page. Following that, if the operation is successful,\nold-\u0026gt;list.next-\u0026gt;prev gets updated too. This means the underlying\ndoubly-linked list is temporarily inconsistent, page-\u0026gt;prev-\u0026gt;next or\npage-\u0026gt;next-\u0026gt;prev might not be equal back to page for some page in the\nring buffer.\r\n\r\nThe resize operation in ring_buffer_resize() can be invoked in parallel.\nIt calls rb_check_pages() which can detect the described inconsistency\nand stop further tracing:\r\n\r\n[ 190.271762] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 190.271771] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6186 at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:1467 rb_check_pages.isra.0+0x6a/0xa0\n[ 190.271789] Modules linked in: [...]\n[ 190.271991] Unloaded tainted modules: intel_uncore_frequency(E):1 skx_edac(E):1\n[ 190.272002] CPU: 1 PID: 6186 Comm: cmd.sh Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.9.0-rc6-default #5 158d3e1e6d0b091c34c3b96bfd99a1c58306d79f\n[ 190.272011] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552c-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014\n[ 190.272015] RIP: 0010:rb_check_pages.isra.0+0x6a/0xa0\n[ 190.272023] Code: [...]\n[ 190.272028] RSP: 0018:ffff9c37463abb70 EFLAGS: 00010206\n[ 190.272034] RAX: ffff8eba04b6cb80 RBX: 0000000000000007 RCX: ffff8eba01f13d80\n[ 190.272038] RDX: ffff8eba01f130c0 RSI: ffff8eba04b6cd00 RDI: ffff8eba0004c700\n[ 190.272042] RBP: ffff8eba0004c700 R08: 0000000000010002 R09: 0000000000000000\n[ 190.272045] R10: 00000000ffff7f52 R11: ffff8eba7f600000 R12: ffff8eba0004c720\n[ 190.272049] R13: ffff8eba00223a00 R14: 0000000000000008 R15: ffff8eba067a8000\n[ 190.272053] FS: 00007f1bd64752c0(0000) GS:ffff8eba7f680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 190.272057] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 190.272061] CR2: 00007f1bd6662590 CR3: 000000010291e001 CR4: 0000000000370ef0\n[ 190.272070] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n[ 190.272073] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n[ 190.272077] Call Trace:\n[ 190.272098] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 190.272189] ring_buffer_resize+0x2ab/0x460\n[ 190.272199] __tracing_resize_ring_buffer.part.0+0x23/0xa0\n[ 190.272206] tracing_resize_ring_buffer+0x65/0x90\n[ 190.272216] tracing_entries_write+0x74/0xc0\n[ 190.272225] vfs_write+0xf5/0x420\n[ 190.272248] ksys_write+0x67/0xe0\n[ 190.272256] do_syscall_64+0x82/0x170\n[ 190.272363] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n[ 190.272373] RIP: 0033:0x7f1bd657d263\n[ 190.272381] Code: [...]\n[ 190.272385] RSP: 002b:00007ffe72b643f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001\n[ 190.272391] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007f1bd657d263\n[ 190.272395] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000555a6eb538e0 RDI: 0000000000000001\n[ 190.272398] RBP: 0000555a6eb538e0 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 0000000000000000\n[ 190.272401] R10: 0000555a6eb55190 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f1bd6662500\n[ 190.272404] R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00007f1bd6667c00 R15: 0000000000000002\n[ 190.272412] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 190.272414] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\r\n\r\nNote that ring_buffer_resize() calls rb_check_pages() only if the parent\ntrace_buffer has recording disabled. Recent commit d78ab792705c\n(\u0026quot;tracing: Stop current tracer when resizing buffer\u0026quot;) causes that it is\nnow always the case which makes it more likely to experience this issue.\r\n\r\nThe window to hit this race is nonetheless very small. To help\nreproducing it, one can add a delay loop in rb_get_reader_page():\r\n\r\n ret = rb_head_page_replace(reader, cpu_buffer-\u0026gt;reader_page);\n if (!ret)\n \tgoto spin;\n for (unsigned i = 0; i \u0026lt; 1U \u0026lt;\u0026lt; 26; i++) /* inserted delay loop */\n \t__asm__ __volatile__ (\u0026quot;\u0026quot; : : : \u0026quot;memory\u0026quot;);\n rb_list_head(reader-\u0026gt;list.next)-\u0026gt;prev = \u0026amp;cpu_buffer-\u0026gt;reader_page-\u0026gt;list;\r\n\r\n.. \n---truncated---(CVE-2024-38601)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: max3100: Lock port-\u0026gt;lock when calling uart_handle_cts_change()\r\n\r\nuart_handle_cts_change() has to be called with port lock taken,\nSince we run it in a separate work, the lock may not be taken at\nthe time of running. Make sure that it\u0026apos;s taken by explicitly doing\nthat. Without it we got a splat:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3491 uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0\n ...\n Workqueue: max3100-0 max3100_work [max3100]\n RIP: 0010:uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0\n ...\n max3100_handlerx+0xc5/0x110 [max3100]\n max3100_work+0x12a/0x340 [max3100](CVE-2024-38634)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Allow delete from sockmap/sockhash only if update is allowed\r\n\r\nWe have seen an influx of syzkaller reports where a BPF program attached to\na tracepoint triggers a locking rule violation by performing a map_delete\non a sockmap/sockhash.\r\n\r\nWe don\u0026apos;t intend to support this artificial use scenario. Extend the\nexisting verifier allowed-program-type check for updating sockmap/sockhash\nto also cover deleting from a map.\r\n\r\nFrom now on only BPF programs which were previously allowed to update\nsockmap/sockhash can delete from these map types.(CVE-2024-38662)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1768",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:14Z",
"published": "2024-06-28T11:07:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1768"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47381"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47427"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47469"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-39180"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52696"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26592"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27032"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27038"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27047"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27052"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27053"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35830"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36969"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38538"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38545"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38569"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38662"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47381",
"CVE-2021-47427",
"CVE-2021-47469",
"CVE-2023-39180",
"CVE-2023-52696",
"CVE-2023-52791",
"CVE-2023-52853",
"CVE-2024-26592",
"CVE-2024-26852",
"CVE-2024-26921",
"CVE-2024-26935",
"CVE-2024-26988",
"CVE-2024-27032",
"CVE-2024-27038",
"CVE-2024-27047",
"CVE-2024-27052",
"CVE-2024-27053",
"CVE-2024-27417",
"CVE-2024-31076",
"CVE-2024-35811",
"CVE-2024-35817",
"CVE-2024-35830",
"CVE-2024-35947",
"CVE-2024-36969",
"CVE-2024-36978",
"CVE-2024-38538",
"CVE-2024-38545",
"CVE-2024-38549",
"CVE-2024-38555",
"CVE-2024-38569",
"CVE-2024-38591",
"CVE-2024-38601",
"CVE-2024-38634",
"CVE-2024-38662"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.