CVE-2013-1622 (GCVE-0-2013-1622)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2013-02-08 19:00 – Updated: 2013-02-13 10:00
VLAI

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate is not a security issue. Further investigation showed that, because of RFC noncompliance, no version or configuration of the product had the vulnerability previously associated with this ID. Notes: none

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2013-02-13T10:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: none.  Reason: This candidate is not a security issue.  Further investigation showed that, because of RFC noncompliance, no version or configuration of the product had the vulnerability previously associated with this ID. Notes: none"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2013-1622",
    "datePublished": "2013-02-08T19:00:00.000Z",
    "dateRejected": "2013-02-13T10:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2013-02-05T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2013-02-13T10:00:00.000Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.0",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: none.  Reason: This candidate is not a security issue.  Further investigation showed that, because of RFC noncompliance, no version or configuration of the product had the vulnerability previously associated with this ID. Notes: none\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2013-1622",
      "lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:14:46.613",
      "published": "2013-02-08T19:55:01.327",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2013-1622\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2013-02-08T19:55:01.327\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T02:14:46.613\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: none.  Reason: This candidate is not a security issue.  Further investigation showed that, because of RFC noncompliance, no version or configuration of the product had the vulnerability previously associated with this ID. Notes: none\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2025-11-21T17:20:23+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2013-1622",
      "id": "CVE-2013-1622",
      "initial_release_date": "2013-02-04T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "polarssl: improper MAC check if sanity check fails leads to DoS",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2013/cve-2013-1622.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-07-26T01:41:59Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2013-1622",
      "id": "CVE-2013-1622",
      "initial_release_date": "2023-02-15T05:40:40Z",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "322",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2013-1622",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2013-1622.json",
      "version": "14"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.