CVE-2012-6580
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2013-07-24 10:00
Modified
2024-09-17 02:11
Severity ?
Summary
Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled, does not ensure that the UI labels unencrypted messages as unencrypted, which might make it easier for remote attackers to spoof details of a message's origin or interfere with encryption-policy auditing via an e-mail message to a queue's address.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a n/a Version: n/a
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T21:36:01.367Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "[rt-announce] 20121025 Security vulnerabilities in RT",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-October/000212.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled, does not ensure that the UI labels unencrypted messages as unencrypted, which might make it easier for remote attackers to spoof details of a message\u0027s origin or interfere with encryption-policy auditing via an e-mail message to a queue\u0027s address."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2013-07-24T10:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "[rt-announce] 20121025 Security vulnerabilities in RT",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-October/000212.html"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2012-6580",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled, does not ensure that the UI labels unencrypted messages as unencrypted, which might make it easier for remote attackers to spoof details of a message\u0027s origin or interfere with encryption-policy auditing via an e-mail message to a queue\u0027s address."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "[rt-announce] 20121025 Security vulnerabilities in RT",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-October/000212.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2012-6580",
    "datePublished": "2013-07-24T10:00:00Z",
    "dateReserved": "2013-07-23T00:00:00Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-17T02:11:50.976Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-6580\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2013-07-24T12:01:45.100\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:46:25.633\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled, does not ensure that the UI labels unencrypted messages as unencrypted, which might make it easier for remote attackers to spoof details of a message\u0027s origin or interfere with encryption-policy auditing via an e-mail message to a queue\u0027s address.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x anterior a 3.8.15 y 4.0.x anterior a 4.0.8, cuando GnuPG est\u00e1 activado, no se asegura que las etiquetas UI descifradas se encuentren en este estado, lo que podr\u00eda facilitar a atacantes remotos suplantar los detalles del origen del mensaje o interferir con la auditor\u00eda de pol\u00edtica de cifrado a trav\u00e9s de un mensaje hacia una cola de direcciones.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-310\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E751355A-5C27-47D5-A501-BE0033BB8E06\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"FB660C2B-9EAB-45E7-83D4-C61B71A70704\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6149929E-AC54-484C-9914-BE5B9011B6C2\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"96D2D87E-2C68-44F7-B8C5-922452742A4B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"FDD49949-14EC-4023-8FC5-6BDC5EC64991\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8BF47625-80E7-4B73-8C93-8E022AC2703B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C24F467B-2654-4ED4-B1C9-66BE6D263C72\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5947B639-9DA1-401A-A227-31A065B4C1A7\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E53B005E-8714-4E5D-B026-E22C7FA6DCEA\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"44234832-170D-43E0-9643-19CE57378721\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"38CFCCD6-6C5D-41CD-B7FB-D925A46E615C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"814172FB-6F34-4356-8105-70AEBE0B6F6B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D282AC9F-E087-4D8D-B467-1D9480B3ABDA\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"42F21EB3-8CE6-4F87-A5DE-A01AA32B943F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5EDB4AD7-96B5-4D72-8C51-23D744D10C46\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0096B700-17B5-4158-A736-ECFDF9E9935B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A0AF4515-6DB1-406A-878C-6DB32D021BA0\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-October/000212.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-October/000212.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.