CVE-2007-0823
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2007-02-07 20:00
Modified
2024-08-07 12:34
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
xterm on Slackware Linux 10.2 stores information that had been displayed for a different user account using the same xterm process, which might allow local users to bypass file permissions and read other users' files, or obtain other sensitive information, by reading the xterm process memory. NOTE: it could be argued that this is an expected consequence of multiple users sharing the same interactive process, in which case this is not a vulnerability.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T12:34:21.151Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "name": "20070201 umount crash and xterm (kind of) information leak!", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_FULLDISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2007-02/0012.html" }, { "name": "33651", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_OSVDB", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://osvdb.org/33651" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://gotfault.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/a-funny-case/" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2007-02-01T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "xterm on Slackware Linux 10.2 stores information that had been displayed for a different user account using the same xterm process, which might allow local users to bypass file permissions and read other users\u0027 files, or obtain other sensitive information, by reading the xterm process memory. NOTE: it could be argued that this is an expected consequence of multiple users sharing the same interactive process, in which case this is not a vulnerability." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2008-11-15T10:00:00", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "name": "20070201 umount crash and xterm (kind of) information leak!", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_FULLDISC" ], "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2007-02/0012.html" }, { "name": "33651", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_OSVDB" ], "url": "http://osvdb.org/33651" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "http://gotfault.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/a-funny-case/" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2007-0823", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "xterm on Slackware Linux 10.2 stores information that had been displayed for a different user account using the same xterm process, which might allow local users to bypass file permissions and read other users\u0027 files, or obtain other sensitive information, by reading the xterm process memory. NOTE: it could be argued that this is an expected consequence of multiple users sharing the same interactive process, in which case this is not a vulnerability." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "20070201 umount crash and xterm (kind of) information leak!", "refsource": "FULLDISC", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2007-02/0012.html" }, { "name": "33651", "refsource": "OSVDB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/33651" }, { "name": "http://gotfault.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/a-funny-case/", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://gotfault.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/a-funny-case/" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2007-0823", "datePublished": "2007-02-07T20:00:00", "dateReserved": "2007-02-07T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T12:34:21.151Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2007-0823\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2007-02-07T20:28:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T00:26:49.670\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"xterm on Slackware Linux 10.2 stores information that had been displayed for a different user account using the same xterm process, which might allow local users to bypass file permissions and read other users\u0027 files, or obtain other sensitive information, by reading the xterm process memory. NOTE: it could be argued that this is an expected consequence of multiple users sharing the same interactive process, in which case this is not a vulnerability.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"xterm en Slackware Linux 10.2 almacena informaci\u00f3n que ha sido visualizada por una cuenta de usuario diferente usando el mismo proceso xterm, lo que permite a usuarios locales evitar los permisos del fichero y leer los ficheros de otros usuarios u obtener informaci\u00f3n sensible mediante la lectura de la memoria del proceso xterm. NOTA: puede ser expuesto que esta es una consecuencia esperada de que m\u00faltiples usuarios compartan el mismo proceso interactivo, en cuyo caso esto no ser\u00eda una vulnerabilidad.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":1.9,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.4,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:slackware:slackware_linux:10.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"70440F49-AEE9-41BE-8E1A-43AB657C8E09\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2007-02/0012.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://gotfault.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/a-funny-case/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://osvdb.org/33651\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2007-02/0012.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://gotfault.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/a-funny-case/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://osvdb.org/33651\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}],\"vendorComments\":[{\"organization\":\"Red Hat\",\"comment\":\"Red Hat does not consider this issue to be a security vulnerability. It is correct and expected behavior for xterm not to zero-fill its scrollback buffer upon reception of terminal clear excape sequence.\",\"lastModified\":\"2007-02-09T00:00:00\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.