CERTA-2012-AVI-351

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Cinq vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans IBM Lotus Expeditor. Elles sont réparties comme suit :

  • (CVE-2012-0186) une URL spécialement conçue permet de lire arbitrairement des ressources sensibles ;
  • (CVE-2012-0191) en modifiant son en-tête HTTP un attaquant peut contourner les restrictions du serveur à certaines zones ;
  • (CVE-2012-0187) le chargement d'une bibliothèque (DLL) arbitraire lors du chargement de certains fichiers ;
  • (CVE-2008-7271 et CVE-2008-4647) deux injections de code indirecte à distance (XSS).

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Versions antérieures à IBM Lotus Expeditor 6.2 FP5+Security Pack.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003eVersions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 IBM Lotus Expeditor 6.2 FP5+Security  Pack.\u003c/P\u003e",
  "content": "## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2008-4647",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-4647"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-0186",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0186"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2008-7271",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-7271"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-0191",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0191"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-0187",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0187"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2012-AVI-351",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2012-06-25T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Cinq vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eIBM\nLotus Expeditor\u003c/span\u003e. Elles sont r\u00e9parties comme suit :\n\n-   (CVE-2012-0186) une URL sp\u00e9cialement con\u00e7ue permet de lire\n    arbitrairement des ressources sensibles ;\n-   (CVE-2012-0191) en modifiant son en-t\u00eate HTTP un attaquant peut\n    contourner les restrictions du serveur \u00e0 certaines zones ;\n-   (CVE-2012-0187) le chargement d\u0027une biblioth\u00e8que (DLL) arbitraire\n    lors du chargement de certains fichiers ;\n-   (CVE-2008-7271 et CVE-2008-4647) deux injections de code indirecte \u00e0\n    distance (XSS).\n",
  "title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans IBM Lotus Expeditor",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM swg21575642 du 21 juin 2012",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21575642"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.