GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-88

Allowed

Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

The product constructs a string for a command to be executed by a separate component in another control sphere, but it does not properly delimit the intended arguments, options, or switches within that command string.

632 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-G8JQ-RX5F-94Q7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-22 15:34 – Updated: 2025-06-05 15:31
VLAI
Details

Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection') vulnerability in Tridium Niagara Framework on QNX, Tridium Niagara Enterprise Security on QNX allows Command Delimiters. This issue affects Niagara Framework: before 4.14.2, before 4.15.1, before 4.10.11; Niagara Enterprise Security: before 4.14.2, before 4.15.1, before 4.10.11. Tridium recommends upgrading to Niagara Framework and Enterprise Security versions 4.14.2u2, 4.15.u1, or 4.10u.11.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-3945"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-88"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-22T13:15:57Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command (\u0027Argument Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Tridium Niagara Framework on QNX, Tridium Niagara Enterprise Security on QNX allows Command Delimiters. This issue affects Niagara Framework: before 4.14.2, before 4.15.1, before 4.10.11; Niagara Enterprise Security: before 4.14.2, before 4.15.1, before 4.10.11.\u00a0Tridium recommends upgrading to Niagara Framework and Enterprise Security versions 4.14.2u2, 4.15.u1, or 4.10u.11.",
  "id": "GHSA-g8jq-rx5f-94q7",
  "modified": "2025-06-05T15:31:26Z",
  "published": "2025-05-22T15:34:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3945"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.niagara-community.com/category/tech_bull"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://honeywell.com/us/en/product-security#security-notices"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-G96F-3WFX-54P9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:59 – Updated: 2024-04-04 02:32
VLAI
Details

The Sangoma Session Border Controller (SBC) 2.3.23-119 GA web interface is vulnerable to an authentication bypass via an argument injection vulnerability involving special characters in the username field. Upon successful exploitation, a remote unauthenticated user can login into the device's admin web portal without providing any credentials. This affects /var/webconfig/gui/Webconfig.inc.php.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-12148"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-88"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-10-22T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "The Sangoma Session Border Controller (SBC) 2.3.23-119 GA web interface is vulnerable to an authentication bypass via an argument injection vulnerability involving special characters in the username field. Upon successful exploitation, a remote unauthenticated user can login into the device\u0027s admin web portal without providing any credentials. This affects /var/webconfig/gui/Webconfig.inc.php.",
  "id": "GHSA-g96f-3wfx-54p9",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T02:32:32Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T16:59:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12148"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154915/Sangoma-SBC-2.3.23-119-GA-Authentication-Bypass.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Oct/41"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-G986-JP62-5XQ6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:19 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:19
VLAI
Details

Git before 2.14.5, 2.15.x before 2.15.3, 2.16.x before 2.16.5, 2.17.x before 2.17.2, 2.18.x before 2.18.1, and 2.19.x before 2.19.1 allows remote code execution during processing of a recursive "git clone" of a superproject if a .gitmodules file has a URL field beginning with a '-' character.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-17456"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-88"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-10-06T14:29:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Git before 2.14.5, 2.15.x before 2.15.3, 2.16.x before 2.16.5, 2.17.x before 2.17.2, 2.18.x before 2.18.1, and 2.19.x before 2.19.1 allows remote code execution during processing of a recursive \"git clone\" of a superproject if a .gitmodules file has a URL field beginning with a \u0027-\u0027 character.",
  "id": "GHSA-g986-jp62-5xq6",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:19:25Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:19:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-17456"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/git/git/commit/1a7fd1fb2998002da6e9ff2ee46e1bdd25ee8404"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/git/git/commit/a124133e1e6ab5c7a9fef6d0e6bcb084e3455b46"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3408"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3541"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0316"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://marc.info/?l=git\u0026m=153875888916397\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Mar/30"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3791-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4311"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45548"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45631"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/10/06/3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-05/msg00003.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152173/Sourcetree-Git-Arbitrary-Code-Execution-URL-Handling.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105523"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107511"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041811"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GC5X-4WFJ-5F6H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:45 – Updated: 2023-04-20 15:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco FXOS Software and Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker with administrator credentials to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of an affected device with elevated privileges. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments passed to certain CLI commands. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by including malicious input as the argument of an affected command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with elevated privileges. An attacker would need valid administrator credentials to exploit this vulnerability. NX-OS versions prior to 8.3(1) are affected. NX-OS versions prior to 8.3(1) are affected.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-1780"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-77",
      "CWE-88"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-05-16T17:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco FXOS Software and Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker with administrator credentials to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of an affected device with elevated privileges. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments passed to certain CLI commands. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by including malicious input as the argument of an affected command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with elevated privileges. An attacker would need valid administrator credentials to exploit this vulnerability. NX-OS versions prior to 8.3(1) are affected. NX-OS versions prior to 8.3(1) are affected.",
  "id": "GHSA-gc5x-4wfj-5f6h",
  "modified": "2023-04-20T15:30:20Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T16:45:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-1780"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190515-nxos-fxos-cmdinj-1780"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108392"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GF8C-VH34-8JV5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:01 – Updated: 2022-07-13 00:00
VLAI
Details

Exim 4 before 4.94.2 has Improper Neutralization of Line Delimiters, relevant in non-default configurations that enable Delivery Status Notification (DSN). Certain uses of ORCPT= can place a newline into a spool header file, and indirectly allow unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-28026"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-88"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-05-06T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Exim 4 before 4.94.2 has Improper Neutralization of Line Delimiters, relevant in non-default configurations that enable Delivery Status Notification (DSN). Certain uses of ORCPT= can place a newline into a spool header file, and indirectly allow unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root.",
  "id": "GHSA-gf8c-vh34-8jv5",
  "modified": "2022-07-13T00:00:50Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:01:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-28026"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exim.org/static/doc/security/CVE-2020-qualys/CVE-2020-28026-FGETS.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GH85-7C93-RFH2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-24 03:30 – Updated: 2026-01-26 18:31
VLAI
Details

Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection') vulnerability in Salesforce Marketing Cloud Engagement (CloudPagesUrl module) allows Web Services Protocol Manipulation. This issue affects Marketing Cloud Engagement: before January 21st, 2026.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-22583"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-88"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-24T01:15:50Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command (\u0027Argument Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Salesforce Marketing Cloud Engagement (CloudPagesUrl module) allows Web Services Protocol Manipulation. This issue affects Marketing Cloud Engagement: before January 21st, 2026.",
  "id": "GHSA-gh85-7c93-rfh2",
  "modified": "2026-01-26T18:31:29Z",
  "published": "2026-01-24T03:30:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22583"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=005299346\u0026type=1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GP9C-4VXW-XPGQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-10 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-19 00:00
VLAI
Details

An argument injection vulnerability in the browser-based authentication component of the Magnitude Simba Amazon Athena ODBC Driver 1.1.1 through 1.1.x before 1.1.17 may allow a local user to execute arbitrary code.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-29971"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-88"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-05-09T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An argument injection vulnerability in the browser-based authentication component of the Magnitude Simba Amazon Athena ODBC Driver 1.1.1 through 1.1.x before 1.1.17 may allow a local user to execute arbitrary code.",
  "id": "GHSA-gp9c-4vxw-xpgq",
  "modified": "2022-05-19T00:00:19Z",
  "published": "2022-05-10T00:00:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29971"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://insightsoftware.com/trust/security/advisories/redshift-and-athena-driver-vulnerability"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.magnitude.com/products/data-connectivity"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GRXH-VGG4-3PFF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:55 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:55
VLAI
Details

Argument injection vulnerability in Microsoft Outlook 2003 SP1 allows user-assisted remote attackers to modify command line arguments to an invoked mail client via " (double quote) characters in a mailto: scheme handler, as demonstrated by launching Microsoft Outlook with an arbitrary filename as an attachment. NOTE: it is not clear whether this issue is implementation-specific or a problem in the Microsoft API.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-2055"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-88"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-04-26T20:06:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Argument injection vulnerability in Microsoft Outlook 2003 SP1 allows user-assisted remote attackers to modify command line arguments to an invoked mail client via \" (double quote) characters in a mailto: scheme handler, as demonstrated by launching Microsoft Outlook with an arbitrary filename as an attachment.  NOTE: it is not clear whether this issue is implementation-specific or a problem in the Microsoft API.",
  "id": "GHSA-grxh-vgg4-3pff",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T06:55:21Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T06:55:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2055"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26118"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://ingehenriksen.blogspot.com/2006/04/office-2003-file-attachment-exploit.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19819"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/25003"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/432009/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1538"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-GV7V-RGG6-548H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-12 22:08 – Updated: 2024-12-21 18:30
VLAI
Summary
Laravel environment manipulation via query string
Details

Description

When the register_argc_argv php directive is set to on , and users call any URL with a special crafted query string, they are able to change the environment used by the framework when handling the request.

Resolution

The framework now ignores argv values for environment detection on non-cli SAPIs.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "laravel/framework"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.20.45"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "laravel/framework"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "7.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "7.30.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "laravel/framework"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "8.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.83.28"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "laravel/framework"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "9.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "9.52.17"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "laravel/framework"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "10.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "10.48.23"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "laravel/framework"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "11.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "11.31.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-52301"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-88"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-11-12T22:08:42Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-12T20:15:14Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Description\n\nWhen the `register_argc_argv php` directive is set to `on` , and users call any URL with a special crafted query string, they are able to change the environment used by the framework when handling the request.\n\n## Resolution\n\nThe framework now ignores argv values for environment detection on non-cli SAPIs.",
  "id": "GHSA-gv7v-rgg6-548h",
  "modified": "2024-12-21T18:30:49Z",
  "published": "2024-11-12T22:08:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/laravel/framework/security/advisories/GHSA-gv7v-rgg6-548h"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-52301"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/laravel/framework/CVE-2024-52301.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-gv7v-rgg6-548h"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/laravel/framework"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/12/msg00019.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Laravel environment manipulation via query string"
}

GHSA-GV89-CMJ2-J2R6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:57 – Updated: 2022-04-29 02:57
VLAI
Details

Argument injection vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes 6.0.3 and 6.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a notes: URI that uses a UNC network share pathname to provide an alternate notes.ini configuration file to notes.exe.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0480"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-88"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-12-06T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Argument injection vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes 6.0.3 and 6.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a notes: URI that uses a UNC network share pathname to provide an alternate notes.ini configuration file to notes.exe.",
  "id": "GHSA-gv89-cmj2-j2r6",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:57:47Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:57:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0480"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16496"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=108843896506099\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475/context=SSKTWP\u0026uid=swg21169510"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=111\u0026type=vulnerabilities"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10600"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

Mitigation
Implementation

Strategy: Parameterization

Where possible, avoid building a single string that contains the command and its arguments. Some languages or frameworks have functions that support specifying independent arguments, e.g. as an array, which is used to automatically perform the appropriate quoting or escaping while building the command. For example, in PHP, escapeshellarg() can be used to escape a single argument to system(), or exec() can be called with an array of arguments. In C, code can often be refactored from using system() - which accepts a single string - to using exec(), which requires separate function arguments for each parameter.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Input Validation

Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your product: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, request headers as well as content, URL components, e-mail, files, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Perform input validation at well-defined interfaces.

Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation
Implementation

Directly convert your input type into the expected data type, such as using a conversion function that translates a string into a number. After converting to the expected data type, ensure that the input's values fall within the expected range of allowable values and that multi-field consistencies are maintained.

Mitigation
Implementation
  • Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180, CWE-181). Make sure that your application does not inadvertently decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use libraries such as the OWASP ESAPI Canonicalization control.
  • Consider performing repeated canonicalization until your input does not change any more. This will avoid double-decoding and similar scenarios, but it might inadvertently modify inputs that are allowed to contain properly-encoded dangerous content.
Mitigation
Implementation

When exchanging data between components, ensure that both components are using the same character encoding. Ensure that the proper encoding is applied at each interface. Explicitly set the encoding you are using whenever the protocol allows you to do so.

Mitigation
Implementation

When your application combines data from multiple sources, perform the validation after the sources have been combined. The individual data elements may pass the validation step but violate the intended restrictions after they have been combined.

Mitigation
Testing

Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.

CAPEC-137: Parameter Injection

An adversary manipulates the content of request parameters for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. Some parameter encodings use text characters as separators. For example, parameters in a HTTP GET message are encoded as name-value pairs separated by an ampersand (&). If an attacker can supply text strings that are used to fill in these parameters, then they can inject special characters used in the encoding scheme to add or modify parameters. For example, if user input is fed directly into an HTTP GET request and the user provides the value "myInput&new_param=myValue", then the input parameter is set to myInput, but a new parameter (new_param) is also added with a value of myValue. This can significantly change the meaning of the query that is processed by the server. Any encoding scheme where parameters are identified and separated by text characters is potentially vulnerable to this attack - the HTTP GET encoding used above is just one example.

CAPEC-174: Flash Parameter Injection

An adversary takes advantage of improper data validation to inject malicious global parameters into a Flash file embedded within an HTML document. Flash files can leverage user-submitted data to configure the Flash document and access the embedding HTML document.

CAPEC-41: Using Meta-characters in E-mail Headers to Inject Malicious Payloads

This type of attack involves an attacker leveraging meta-characters in email headers to inject improper behavior into email programs. Email software has become increasingly sophisticated and feature-rich. In addition, email applications are ubiquitous and connected directly to the Web making them ideal targets to launch and propagate attacks. As the user demand for new functionality in email applications grows, they become more like browsers with complex rendering and plug in routines. As more email functionality is included and abstracted from the user, this creates opportunities for attackers. Virtually all email applications do not list email header information by default, however the email header contains valuable attacker vectors for the attacker to exploit particularly if the behavior of the email client application is known. Meta-characters are hidden from the user, but can contain scripts, enumerations, probes, and other attacks against the user's system.

CAPEC-460: HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP)

An adversary adds duplicate HTTP GET/POST parameters by injecting query string delimiters. Via HPP it may be possible to override existing hardcoded HTTP parameters, modify the application behaviors, access and, potentially exploit, uncontrollable variables, and bypass input validation checkpoints and WAF rules.

CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection

In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.