CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14229 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-8W2Q-MH8V-WHX2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-04 15:30 – Updated: 2024-06-06 15:30idccms V1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component admin/vpsClass_deal.php?mudi=add
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-36547"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-04T15:15:47Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "idccms V1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component admin/vpsClass_deal.php?mudi=add",
"id": "GHSA-8w2q-mh8v-whx2",
"modified": "2024-06-06T15:30:36Z",
"published": "2024-06-04T15:30:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36547"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/da271133/cms/blob/main/32/csrf.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8W3P-594J-WQCJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-15 00:00 – Updated: 2022-06-24 00:00Employee Leaves Management System (ELMS) V 2.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /myprofile.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-30931"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-06-14T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Employee Leaves Management System (ELMS) V 2.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /myprofile.php.",
"id": "GHSA-8w3p-594j-wqcj",
"modified": "2022-06-24T00:00:33Z",
"published": "2022-06-15T00:00:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-30931"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://medium.com/@niteshbiwal2011/my-first-cve-2022-30931-e70b9cbecbba"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.acunetix.com/vulnerabilities/web/possible-csrf-cross-site-request-forgery"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8W4Q-8PR2-RFRQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-16 21:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Artem Anikeev Slider for Writers allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Slider for Writers: from n/a through 1.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-23692"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-16T20:15:44Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Artem Anikeev Slider for Writers allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Slider for Writers: from n/a through 1.3.",
"id": "GHSA-8w4q-8pr2-rfrq",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:13Z",
"published": "2025-01-16T21:31:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23692"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/slider-for-writers/vulnerability/wordpress-slider-for-writers-plugin-1-3-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8W4V-GWWM-C5MP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-05-08 15:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 03:50The Sloth Logo Customizer WordPress plugin through 2.0.2 does not have CSRF check when updating its settings, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-0603"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-08T14:15:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Sloth Logo Customizer WordPress plugin through 2.0.2 does not have CSRF check when updating its settings, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-8w4v-gwwm-c5mp",
"modified": "2024-04-04T03:50:51Z",
"published": "2023-05-08T15:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0603"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/1c93ea8f-4e68-4da1-994e-35a5873278ba"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8W4W-MFG4-CVW8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-22 09:31 – Updated: 2026-04-22 09:31The Google PageRank Display plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.4. This is due to missing nonce validation in the gpdisplay_option() function, which handles the plugin settings page. The settings form does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the form handler does not call check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() before processing the POST request. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into submitting a crafted request that changes the plugin's settings (stored via update_option()), such as the display style used to render the PageRank badge.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-6294"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-22T09:16:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Google PageRank Display plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.4. This is due to missing nonce validation in the gpdisplay_option() function, which handles the plugin settings page. The settings form does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the form handler does not call check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() before processing the POST request. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into submitting a crafted request that changes the plugin\u0027s settings (stored via update_option()), such as the display style used to render the PageRank badge.",
"id": "GHSA-8w4w-mfg4-cvw8",
"modified": "2026-04-22T09:31:33Z",
"published": "2026-04-22T09:31:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6294"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/google-pagerank-display/tags/1.4/gpdisplay.php#L32"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/google-pagerank-display/tags/1.4/gpdisplay.php#L56"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/google-pagerank-display/trunk/gpdisplay.php#L32"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/google-pagerank-display/trunk/gpdisplay.php#L56"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/e39ebe27-7780-48b6-8dca-7da7a78fce69?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8W5M-HC8R-MMM9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-29 09:30 – Updated: 2026-01-20 15:31Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in colabrio Stockie Extra stockie-extra allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Stockie Extra: from n/a through <= 1.2.11.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-64226"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-29T09:15:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in colabrio Stockie Extra stockie-extra allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Stockie Extra: from n/a through \u003c= 1.2.11.",
"id": "GHSA-8w5m-hc8r-mmm9",
"modified": "2026-01-20T15:31:41Z",
"published": "2025-10-29T09:30:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-64226"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/stockie-extra/vulnerability/wordpress-stockie-extra-plugin-1-2-11-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/stockie-extra/vulnerability/wordpress-stockie-extra-plugin-1-2-11-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/stockie-extra/vulnerability/wordpress-stockie-extra-plugin-1-2-11-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8W67-CRQV-VPJM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-06 00:31 – Updated: 2026-06-06 00:31The LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the change_status function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the status of arbitrary invoices — including marking unpaid invoices as paid — without administrator consent via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-9719"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-06T00:16:42Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The LatePoint \u2013 Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the change_status function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the status of arbitrary invoices \u2014 including marking unpaid invoices as paid \u2014 without administrator consent via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-8w67-crqv-vpjm",
"modified": "2026-06-06T00:31:39Z",
"published": "2026-06-06T00:31:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-9719"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/latepoint/tags/5.3.0/lib/controllers/invoices_controller.php#L234"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/latepoint/tags/5.3.0/lib/controllers/invoices_controller.php#L246"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/latepoint/tags/5.3.0/lib/helpers/params_helper.php#L12"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/latepoint/tags/5.6.0/lib/controllers/invoices_controller.php#L234"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/latepoint/tags/5.6.0/lib/controllers/invoices_controller.php#L246"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/latepoint/tags/5.6.0/lib/helpers/params_helper.php#L12"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3553094/latepoint"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c720fffe-c089-450a-ac5f-1138c1c223d9?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8W6M-PGW2-JRGQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-18 12:30 – Updated: 2024-12-18 12:30The Peter’s Custom Anti-Spam plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the cas_register_post() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to blacklist emails via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-12554"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-18T10:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Peter\u2019s Custom Anti-Spam plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the cas_register_post() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to blacklist emails via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-8w6m-pgw2-jrgq",
"modified": "2024-12-18T12:30:54Z",
"published": "2024-12-18T12:30:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12554"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/peters-custom-anti-spam-image/trunk/custom_anti_spam.php#L1081"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3208894"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/peters-custom-anti-spam-image/#developers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/3c52ca89-4f13-41da-bc10-80d212c6219c?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8W7V-WG9W-C7JM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-27 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Soft8Soft LLC Verge3D allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Verge3D: from n/a through 4.8.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-30833"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T11:15:44Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Soft8Soft LLC Verge3D allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Verge3D: from n/a through 4.8.2.",
"id": "GHSA-8w7v-wg9w-c7jm",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:07Z",
"published": "2025-03-27T12:30:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30833"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/verge3d/vulnerability/wordpress-verge3d-publishing-and-e-commerce-plugin-4-8-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8W7X-RPX6-RGJ9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-06 18:32 – Updated: 2026-01-20 15:31Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Norbert Slick Google Map slick-google-map allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Slick Google Map: from n/a through <= 0.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-48078"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-06T16:15:51Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Norbert Slick Google Map slick-google-map allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Slick Google Map: from n/a through \u003c= 0.3.",
"id": "GHSA-8w7x-rpx6-rgj9",
"modified": "2026-01-20T15:31:47Z",
"published": "2025-11-06T18:32:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-48078"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/slick-google-map/vulnerability/wordpress-slick-google-map-plugin-0-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/slick-google-map/vulnerability/wordpress-slick-google-map-plugin-0-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/slick-google-map/vulnerability/wordpress-slick-google-map-plugin-0-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.