CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14228 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-8VGH-24MV-398Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:48 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:48SRCMS 3.0.0 allows CSRF via admin.php?m=Admin&c=manager&a=update to change the username and password of the super administrator account.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-19318"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-11-16T19:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "SRCMS 3.0.0 allows CSRF via admin.php?m=Admin\u0026c=manager\u0026a=update to change the username and password of the super administrator account.",
"id": "GHSA-8vgh-24mv-398q",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:48:06Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:48:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-19318"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/martinzhou2015/SRCMS-dev/issues/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8VGP-GHQG-22MG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-05 18:30 – Updated: 2026-02-05 18:30P5 FNIP-8x16A FNIP-4xSH 1.0.20 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user interaction. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to add new admin users, change passwords, and modify system configurations by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-37118"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-05T17:16:06Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "P5 FNIP-8x16A FNIP-4xSH 1.0.20 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user interaction. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to add new admin users, change passwords, and modify system configurations by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted page.",
"id": "GHSA-8vgp-ghqg-22mg",
"modified": "2026-02-05T18:30:31Z",
"published": "2026-02-05T18:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-37118"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/180253"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://packetstorm.news/files/id/157318"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48362"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.p5.hu"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/p-fnip-xa-fnip-xsh-cross-site-request-forgery-add-admin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.zeroscience.mk/en/vulnerabilities/ZSL-2020-5564.php"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-8VGQ-XC89-PG94
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-29 09:30 – Updated: 2024-03-29 09:30The WP-Eggdrop plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpegg_updateOptions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-2969"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-29T07:15:46Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WP-Eggdrop plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpegg_updateOptions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin\u0027s settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-8vgq-xc89-pg94",
"modified": "2024-03-29T09:30:43Z",
"published": "2024-03-29T09:30:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-2969"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-eggdrop/trunk/wp-eggdrop.php#L215"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2cd509f7-100a-4f28-8d5a-b6b906456c52?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8VJ7-CC5X-GRPV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:46 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:46A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in en/cfg_setpwd.html in Softing AG OPC Toolbox through 4.10.1.13035 allows attackers to reset the administrative password by inducing the Administrator user to browse a URL controlled by an attacker.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-29660"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-04-02T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in en/cfg_setpwd.html in Softing AG OPC Toolbox through 4.10.1.13035 allows attackers to reset the administrative password by inducing the Administrator user to browse a URL controlled by an attacker.",
"id": "GHSA-8vj7-cc5x-grpv",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:46:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:46:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-29660"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.gruppotim.it/redteam"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-8VJG-GR7V-8HV3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-16 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPFactory WP Currency Exchange Rates allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Currency Exchange Rates: from n/a through 1.2.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-54332"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-16T15:15:07Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPFactory WP Currency Exchange Rates allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Currency Exchange Rates: from n/a through 1.2.0.",
"id": "GHSA-8vjg-gr7v-8hv3",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:47Z",
"published": "2024-12-16T15:31:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-54332"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wp-currency-exchange-rates/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-currency-exchange-rates-plugin-1-2-0-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8VM8-W94H-5M67
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:22 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:22Subrion CMS 4.0.5 has CSRF in admin/blog/add/. The attacker can add any tag, and can optionally insert XSS via the tags parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-6069"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-03-27T02:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Subrion CMS 4.0.5 has CSRF in admin/blog/add/. The attacker can add any tag, and can optionally insert XSS via the tags parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-8vm8-w94h-5m67",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:22:02Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:22:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-6069"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.yiwang6.cn/Subrion-CSRF2.docx"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97196"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8VQQ-C5G5-395P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-11 12:00 – Updated: 2022-10-13 19:00The Simple File List WordPress plugin before 4.4.12 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin create new page and change it's content via a CSRF attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-3208"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-10-10T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Simple File List WordPress plugin before 4.4.12 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin create new page and change it\u0027s content via a CSRF attack.",
"id": "GHSA-8vqq-c5g5-395p",
"modified": "2022-10-13T19:00:21Z",
"published": "2022-10-11T12:00:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3208"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/80d475ca-b475-4789-8eef-9c4d880853b7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8VRF-7JXX-PH4G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-15 21:31 – Updated: 2025-07-15 21:31Vulnerability in the Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Device Integration). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.12-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-30745"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-15T20:15:28Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Device Integration). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.12-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).",
"id": "GHSA-8vrf-7jxx-ph4g",
"modified": "2025-07-15T21:31:39Z",
"published": "2025-07-15T21:31:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30745"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2025.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8VVP-525H-CXF9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-19 12:30 – Updated: 2025-02-13 19:05An error in the evaluation of the fetch metadata headers could allow a bypass of the CSRF protection in Apache Wicket. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 9.1.0 through 9.16.0, and the milestone releases for the 10.0 series. Apache Wicket 8.x does not support CSRF protection via the fetch metadata headers and as such is not affected.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.17.0 or 10.0.0, which fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.wicket:wicket"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "9.1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.17.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.wicket:wicket"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "10.0.0-M1"
},
{
"fixed": "10.0.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-27439"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-03-20T15:37:44Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-19T11:15:06Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An error in the evaluation of the fetch metadata headers could allow a bypass of the CSRF protection in Apache Wicket.\nThis issue affects Apache Wicket: from 9.1.0 through 9.16.0, and the milestone releases for the 10.0 series.\nApache Wicket 8.x does not support CSRF protection via the fetch metadata headers and as such is not affected.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 9.17.0 or 10.0.0, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-8vvp-525h-cxf9",
"modified": "2025-02-13T19:05:24Z",
"published": "2024-03-19T12:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27439"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/wicket"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/o825rvjjtmz3qv21ps5k7m2w9193g1lo"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/19/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Cross-Site Request Forgery in Apache Wicket"
}
GHSA-8W2F-4VQX-VPXQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-20 15:30 – Updated: 2025-11-20 15:30A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-62346"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-20T15:17:38Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user\u0027s web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint.",
"id": "GHSA-8w2f-4vqx-vpxq",
"modified": "2025-11-20T15:30:24Z",
"published": "2025-11-20T15:30:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62346"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article\u0026sysparm_article=KB0126459"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.