CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14167 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-6M9J-RG23-C25R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:49 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:12Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in GROWI v3.4.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via updating user's 'Basic Info'.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-5968"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-07-05T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in GROWI v3.4.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via updating user\u0027s \u0027Basic Info\u0027.",
"id": "GHSA-6m9j-rg23-c25r",
"modified": "2024-04-04T01:12:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:49:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-5968"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN84876282/index.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://weseek.co.jp/security/2019/06/04/growi-fix-jvn84876282"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6M9P-4F5J-W4X8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-10 18:31 – Updated: 2026-03-10 18:31The Court Reservation WordPress plugin before 1.10.9 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting events, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-1508"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-10T17:32:18Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Court Reservation WordPress plugin before 1.10.9 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting events, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-6m9p-4f5j-w4x8",
"modified": "2026-03-10T18:31:16Z",
"published": "2026-03-10T18:31:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1508"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/fc1d577b-abf9-4c15-a96d-14ebd894debc"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6M9R-7WRX-XMR6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-21 12:30 – Updated: 2024-11-21 21:36Apache Airflow, version 2.7.0 through 2.7.3, has a vulnerability that allows an attacker to trigger a DAG in a GET request without CSRF validation. As a result, it was possible for a malicious website opened in the same browser - by the user who also had Airflow UI opened - to trigger the execution of DAGs without the user's consent. Users are advised to upgrade to version 2.8.0 or later which is not affected
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "apache-airflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.7.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.8.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-49920"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-12-21T18:13:50Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-12-21T10:15:36Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Apache Airflow, version 2.7.0 through 2.7.3, has a vulnerability that allows an attacker to trigger a DAG in a GET request without CSRF validation.\u00a0As a result, it was possible for a malicious website opened in the same browser - by the user who also had Airflow UI opened - to trigger the execution of DAGs without the user\u0027s consent.\nUsers are advised to upgrade to version 2.8.0 or later which is not affected",
"id": "GHSA-6m9r-7wrx-xmr6",
"modified": "2024-11-21T21:36:14Z",
"published": "2023-12-21T12:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-49920"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36026"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/f5d802791fa5f6b13b635f06a1ea2eccc22a9ba7"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/apache-airflow/PYSEC-2023-266.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/mnwd2vcfw3gms6ft6kl951vfbqrxsnjq"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/21/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Airflow Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability"
}
GHSA-6MC7-33X7-F5MR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:50 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:18SyGuestBook A5 Version 1.2 has no CSRF protection mechanism, as demonstrated by CSRF for an index.php?c=Administrator&a=update admin password change.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-13949"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-07-18T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "SyGuestBook A5 Version 1.2 has no CSRF protection mechanism, as demonstrated by CSRF for an index.php?c=Administrator\u0026a=update admin password change.",
"id": "GHSA-6mc7-33x7-f5mr",
"modified": "2024-04-04T01:18:38Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:50:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-13949"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://fragrant10.github.io/2019/02/22/SyGuestBookA5%E4%BB%A3%E7%A0%81%E5%AE%A1%E8%AE%A1.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fragrant10/fragrant10.github.io/blob/master/_posts/2019-02-22-SyGuestBookA5%E4%BB%A3%E7%A0%81%E5%AE%A1%E8%AE%A1.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6MFR-G9G7-CCPV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-21 12:30 – Updated: 2025-01-21 12:30The WP-BibTeX plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_bibtex_option_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-12005"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-21T10:15:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WP-BibTeX plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_bibtex_option_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-6mfr-g9g7-ccpv",
"modified": "2025-01-21T12:30:46Z",
"published": "2025-01-21T12:30:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12005"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-bibtex/trunk/wp-bibtex-options.php#L55"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3225023"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-bibtex/#developers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/077538e2-ef9a-490f-9188-31f9cb82aaf7?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6MG9-J83C-V67X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:29 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:29Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the xmlrpc.cgi service in IBM QRadar SIEM 7.1 before MR2 Patch 11 Interim Fix 02 and 7.2.x before 7.2.5 Patch 4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences via vectors related to webmin. IBM X-Force ID: 103921.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-2009"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-03-29T18:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the xmlrpc.cgi service in IBM QRadar SIEM 7.1 before MR2 Patch 11 Interim Fix 02 and 7.2.x before 7.2.5 Patch 4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences via vectors related to webmin. IBM X-Force ID: 103921.",
"id": "GHSA-6mg9-j83c-v67x",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:29:48Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:29:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2009"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21965821"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6MGM-2WJR-C3V5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:31 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:31Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ilient SysAid 4.5.03 and 4.5.04 allows remote attackers to perform some actions as administrators, as demonstrated by changing the administrator password. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-5259"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-10-06T17:17:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ilient SysAid 4.5.03 and 4.5.04 allows remote attackers to perform some actions as administrators, as demonstrated by changing the administrator password. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.",
"id": "GHSA-6mgm-2wjr-c3v5",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:31:35Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:31:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5259"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/37663"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/27026"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25885"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-6MGQ-VH7R-GCCC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:25 – Updated: 2024-01-30 21:41A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Chef Sinatra Plugin in the ChefBuilderConfiguration.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:sinatra-chef-builder"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.20"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-1003086"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-01-30T21:41:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2019-04-04T16:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Chef Sinatra Plugin in the ChefBuilderConfiguration.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.",
"id": "GHSA-6mgq-vh7r-gccc",
"modified": "2024-01-30T21:41:28Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:25:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-1003086"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jenkins.io/security/advisory/2019-04-03/#SECURITY-1037"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/12/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107790"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins sinatra-chef-builder Plugin"
}
GHSA-6MGR-3374-4P3C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-29 15:31 – Updated: 2025-11-05 20:52Jenkins Start Windocks Containers Plugin 1.4 and earlier does not perform a permission check in an HTTP endpoint.
This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL.
Additionally, this endpoint does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
As of publication of this advisory, there is no fix.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:windocks-start-container"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-64138"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-10-29T21:51:50Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-29T14:15:58Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Jenkins Start Windocks Containers Plugin 1.4 and earlier does not perform a permission check in an HTTP endpoint.\n\nThis allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL.\n\nAdditionally, this endpoint does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.\n\nAs of publication of this advisory, there is no fix.",
"id": "GHSA-6mgr-3374-4p3c",
"modified": "2025-11-05T20:52:20Z",
"published": "2025-10-29T15:31:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-64138"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/windocks-start-container-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2025-10-29/#SECURITY-3531"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/10/29/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Jenkins Start Windocks Containers Plugin vulnerable to cross-site request forgery"
}
GHSA-6MGR-XPX9-FG73
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:59 – Updated: 2024-04-04 02:32The ad-inserter plugin before 1.5.3 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via wp-admin/options-general.php?page=ad-inserter.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-9497"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-10-22T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The ad-inserter plugin before 1.5.3 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via wp-admin/options-general.php?page=ad-inserter.php.",
"id": "GHSA-6mgr-xpx9-fg73",
"modified": "2024-04-04T02:32:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:59:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-9497"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/131798"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpvulndb.com/vulnerabilities/7974"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.