CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14175 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-66X8-MHF9-H5JC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-31 09:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zoho Mail Zoho ZeptoMail allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Zoho ZeptoMail: from n/a through 3.3.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-49028"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-31T09:15:50Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zoho Mail Zoho ZeptoMail allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Zoho ZeptoMail: from n/a through 3.3.1.",
"id": "GHSA-66x8-mhf9-h5jc",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:25Z",
"published": "2025-12-31T09:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-49028"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/transmail/vulnerability/wordpress-zoho-zeptomail-plugin-3-3-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/transmail/vulnerability/wordpress-zoho-zeptomail-plugin-3-3-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-66XV-MWQH-8QMP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-01 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NiteoThemes CLP – Custom Login Page by NiteoThemes allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects CLP – Custom Login Page by NiteoThemes: from n/a through 1.5.5.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-31769"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-01T15:16:13Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NiteoThemes CLP \u2013 Custom Login Page by NiteoThemes allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects CLP \u2013 Custom Login Page by NiteoThemes: from n/a through 1.5.5.",
"id": "GHSA-66xv-mwqh-8qmp",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:20Z",
"published": "2025-04-01T15:31:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31769"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/clp-custom-login-page/vulnerability/wordpress-clp-custom-login-page-by-niteothemes-plugin-1-5-5-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-673G-CRRQ-7X55
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-25 06:30 – Updated: 2025-03-25 15:31The does not sanitise and escape some parameters when outputting them back in a page, allowing unauthenticated users the ability to perform stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-1798"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-25T06:15:40Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The does not sanitise and escape some parameters when outputting them back in a page, allowing unauthenticated users the ability to perform stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks.",
"id": "GHSA-673g-crrq-7x55",
"modified": "2025-03-25T15:31:28Z",
"published": "2025-03-25T06:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-1798"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/c5c30191-857c-419c-9096-d1fe14d34eaa"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6753-4JPX-JV2W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:37 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:37An issue was discovered in the PageLayer plugin before 1.1.2 for WordPress. The pagelayer_settings_page function is vulnerable to CSRF, which can lead to XSS.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-35944"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-01-01T04:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in the PageLayer plugin before 1.1.2 for WordPress. The pagelayer_settings_page function is vulnerable to CSRF, which can lead to XSS.",
"id": "GHSA-6753-4jpx-jv2w",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:37:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:37:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-35944"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/10240"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2020/05/high-severity-vulnerabilities-in-pagelayer-plugin-affect-over-200000-wordpress-sites"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-6757-XXCC-3797
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-14 18:30 – Updated: 2026-04-08 21:32The Joli FAQ SEO – WordPress FAQ Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-4082"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-14T15:42:51Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Joli FAQ SEO \u2013 WordPress FAQ Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin\u0027s settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-6757-xxcc-3797",
"modified": "2026-04-08T21:32:35Z",
"published": "2024-05-14T18:30:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-4082"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026new=3081648%40joli-faq-seo%2Ftrunk\u0026old=3076380%40joli-faq-seo%2Ftrunk\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c45b6163-7ebf-4f18-afd6-735d02d9170d?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-675C-MQ76-7JV4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-22 15:30 – Updated: 2025-03-28 21:30flusity-CMS v2.33 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /core/tools/update_contact_form_settings.php
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-26350"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-22T14:15:47Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "flusity-CMS v2.33 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /core/tools/update_contact_form_settings.php",
"id": "GHSA-675c-mq76-7jv4",
"modified": "2025-03-28T21:30:35Z",
"published": "2024-02-22T15:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26350"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Icycu123/cms/blob/main/2.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6763-W38X-4MRV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:44 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:44Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the XC NCIP Provider module in the eXtensible Catalog (XC) Drupal Toolkit allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users with the "administer ncip providers" permission for requests that alter NCIP providers via a crafted request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-5508"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-08-18T18:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the XC NCIP Provider module in the eXtensible Catalog (XC) Drupal Toolkit allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users with the \"administer ncip providers\" permission for requests that alter NCIP providers via a crafted request.",
"id": "GHSA-6763-w38x-4mrv",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:44:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:44:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5508"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.drupal.org/node/2507619"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/04/4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75277"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-678M-5328-R677
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:33 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:33IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager 7.2.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 11029.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-1455"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-08-15T15:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager 7.2.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 11029.",
"id": "GHSA-678m-5328-r677",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:33:17Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:33:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1455"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/140090"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22016659"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105135"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-678X-XFP4-R92R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:12 – Updated: 2025-04-09 19:45Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web administration console in Apache Geronimo Application Server 2.1 through 2.1.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the web administration password, (2) upload applications, and perform unspecified other administrative actions, as demonstrated by (3) a Shutdown request to console/portal//Server/Shutdown.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.geronimo.plugins:console"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-0039"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-07-29T19:50:15Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2009-04-17T14:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web administration console in Apache Geronimo Application Server 2.1 through 2.1.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the web administration password, (2) upload applications, and perform unspecified other administrative actions, as demonstrated by (3) a Shutdown request to console/portal//Server/Shutdown.",
"id": "GHSA-678x-xfp4-r92r",
"modified": "2025-04-09T19:45:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:12:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/geronimo/commit/aa0c2c26dde8930cad924796af7c17a13d236b16"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://dsecrg.com/pages/vul/show.php?id=120"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html#2.1.xSecurityReport-214"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4597"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34715"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/502735/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34562"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1089"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Apache Geronimo Application Server CSRF vulnerabilities"
}
GHSA-67CC-QHR2-WWQR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:47 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:47An issue was discovered in MDaemon before 20.0.4. Remote Administration allows an attacker to perform a fixation of the anti-CSRF token. In order to exploit this issue, the user has to click on a malicious URL provided by the attacker and successfully authenticate into the application. Having the value of the anti-CSRF token, the attacker may trick the user into visiting his malicious page and performing any request with the privileges of attacked user.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-27181"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-04-14T23:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in MDaemon before 20.0.4. Remote Administration allows an attacker to perform a fixation of the anti-CSRF token. In order to exploit this issue, the user has to click on a malicious URL provided by the attacker and successfully authenticate into the application. Having the value of the anti-CSRF token, the attacker may trick the user into visiting his malicious page and performing any request with the privileges of attacked user.",
"id": "GHSA-67cc-qhr2-wwqr",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:47:42Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:47:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27181"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/chudyPB/MDaemon-Advisories"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.altn.com/Support/SecurityUpdate/MD011221_MDaemon_EN"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.