CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14173 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-66PX-8GQR-866W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-12 18:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 08:36PHPJabbers Limo Booking Software 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) to add an admin user via the Add Users Function, aka an index.php?controller=pjAdminUsers&action=pjActionCreate URI.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-43147"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-10-12T16:15:12Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "PHPJabbers Limo Booking Software 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) to add an admin user via the Add Users Function, aka an index.php?controller=pjAdminUsers\u0026action=pjActionCreate URI.",
"id": "GHSA-66px-8gqr-866w",
"modified": "2024-04-04T08:36:03Z",
"published": "2023-10-12T18:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-43147"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/MinoTauro2020/CVE-2023-43147"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-66Q9-QHMH-C66J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:55 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:34Keekoon KK002 devices 1.8.12 HD have a Cross Site Request Forgery Vulnerability affecting goform/formChnUserPwd and goform/formUserMng (and the entire set of other pages).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-6180"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-03-13T06:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Keekoon KK002 devices 1.8.12 HD have a Cross Site Request Forgery Vulnerability affecting goform/formChnUserPwd and goform/formUserMng (and the entire set of other pages).",
"id": "GHSA-66q9-qhmh-c66j",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:34:02Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:55:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-6180"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hsw69.wordpress.com/2015/10/22/keekoon-kk002-ip-camera-csrf-exploitation"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-66RG-92Q4-6M8Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-22 00:31 – Updated: 2026-06-24 20:56Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to unauthorized file deletion due to an Inverted CSRF token check in the DeleteFile controller. The code throws an error when the token IS valid and proceeds with file deletion when the token is invalid or missing. This effectively disables CSRF protection for the file deletion endpoint, allowing cross-site request forgery attacks against users who have permission to edit conversation messages.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "concrete5/concrete5"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.5.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-7882"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-24T18:47:33Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-21T22:16:49Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to unauthorized file deletion due to an Inverted CSRF token check in the DeleteFile controller.\u00a0The code throws an error when the token IS valid and proceeds with file deletion when the token is invalid or missing. This effectively disables CSRF protection for the file deletion endpoint, allowing cross-site request forgery attacks against users who have permission to edit conversation messages.",
"id": "GHSA-66rg-92q4-6m8q",
"modified": "2026-06-24T20:56:21Z",
"published": "2026-05-22T00:31:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7882"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://documentation.concretecms.org/9-x/developers/introduction/version-history/951-release-notes"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/concretecms/concretecms"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Concrete CMS is vulnerable to unauthorized file deletion"
}
GHSA-66RM-WG7M-8PGV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:28 – Updated: 2023-10-27 14:10A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins ElasTest Plugin 1.2.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:elastest"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-2273"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-28T22:44:27Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-09-16T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins ElasTest Plugin 1.2.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials.",
"id": "GHSA-66rm-wg7m-8pgv",
"modified": "2023-10-27T14:10:16Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:28:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-2273"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/elastest-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2020-09-16/#SECURITY-1903"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/16/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins ElasTest Plugin"
}
GHSA-66RM-XHG7-8G94
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-31 00:30 – Updated: 2023-11-08 00:30Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DouHaocms v.3.3 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the adminAction.class.php file.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-42323"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-10-30T22:15:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DouHaocms v.3.3 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the adminAction.class.php file.",
"id": "GHSA-66rm-xhg7-8g94",
"modified": "2023-11-08T00:30:20Z",
"published": "2023-10-31T00:30:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-42323"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mnbvcxz131421/douhaocms/blob/main/README.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-66RW-8RF9-J94C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:55 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:55Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText ECM (formerly Livelink ECM) 9.7.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change folder and resource permissions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-5283"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-11-26T23:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText ECM (formerly Livelink ECM) 9.7.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change folder and resource permissions.",
"id": "GHSA-66rw-8rf9-j94c",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:55:46Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:55:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-5283"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/62057"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2010-09/0359.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/1009-exploits/opentext-xsrfxss.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/41553"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/68255"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-66WW-763P-X3J2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:33 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:33The Relish (Verve Connect) VH510 device with firmware before 1.0.1.6L0516 contains multiple CSRF vulnerabilities within its web management portal. Attackers can, for example, use this to update the TR-069 configuration server settings (responsible for managing devices remotely). This makes it possible to remotely reboot the device or upload malicious firmware.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-27692"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-11-04T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Relish (Verve Connect) VH510 device with firmware before 1.0.1.6L0516 contains multiple CSRF vulnerabilities within its web management portal. Attackers can, for example, use this to update the TR-069 configuration server settings (responsible for managing devices remotely). This makes it possible to remotely reboot the device or upload malicious firmware.",
"id": "GHSA-66ww-763p-x3j2",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:33:09Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:33:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-27692"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://6point6.co.uk/insights/security-advisory-relish-4g-hub-vh510"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://6point6.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Relish-4G-VH510-Hub-Full-Disclosure-v1.3.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-66WX-257C-489X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-19 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Danny Vink User Profile Meta Manager allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects User Profile Meta Manager: from n/a through 1.02.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-48340"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-19T21:15:22Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Danny Vink User Profile Meta Manager allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects User Profile Meta Manager: from n/a through 1.02.",
"id": "GHSA-66wx-257c-489x",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:13Z",
"published": "2025-05-19T21:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-48340"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/user-profile-meta/vulnerability/wordpress-user-profile-meta-manager-plugin-1-02-csrf-to-privilege-escalation-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-66X7-256J-6WF5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-06 21:15 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:46Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Plugincraft Mediamatic – Media Library Folders plugin <= 2.8.1 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-47144"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-25T12:15:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Plugincraft Mediamatic \u2013 Media Library Folders plugin \u003c=\u00a02.8.1 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-66x7-256j-6wf5",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:46:46Z",
"published": "2023-07-06T21:15:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-47144"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/mediamatic/wordpress-mediamatic-media-library-folders-plugin-2-8-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-66X8-MHF9-H5JC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-31 09:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zoho Mail Zoho ZeptoMail allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Zoho ZeptoMail: from n/a through 3.3.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-49028"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-31T09:15:50Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zoho Mail Zoho ZeptoMail allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Zoho ZeptoMail: from n/a through 3.3.1.",
"id": "GHSA-66x8-mhf9-h5jc",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:25Z",
"published": "2025-12-31T09:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-49028"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/transmail/vulnerability/wordpress-zoho-zeptomail-plugin-3-3-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/transmail/vulnerability/wordpress-zoho-zeptomail-plugin-3-3-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.