CWE-346
Allowed-with-ReviewOrigin Validation Error
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product does not properly verify that the source of data or communication is valid.
789 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-3QXP-588W-RMQG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-29 15:32 – Updated: 2024-10-29 15:32A CORS misconfiguration in parisneo/lollms-webui prior to version 10 allows attackers to steal sensitive information such as logs, browser sessions, and settings containing private API keys from other services. This vulnerability can also enable attackers to perform actions on behalf of a user, such as deleting a project or sending a message. The issue impacts the confidentiality and integrity of the information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-6674"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-29T13:15:08Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A CORS misconfiguration in parisneo/lollms-webui prior to version 10 allows attackers to steal sensitive information such as logs, browser sessions, and settings containing private API keys from other services. This vulnerability can also enable attackers to perform actions on behalf of a user, such as deleting a project or sending a message. The issue impacts the confidentiality and integrity of the information.",
"id": "GHSA-3qxp-588w-rmqg",
"modified": "2024-10-29T15:32:05Z",
"published": "2024-10-29T15:32:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6674"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/parisneo/lollms-webui/commit/c1bb1ad19752aa7541675b398495eaf98fd589f1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/e688f71b-a3a4-4f6d-b48a-837073fa6908"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3R58-XJCH-5XJP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-18 06:30 – Updated: 2024-11-25 21:30The Kossy module before 0.60 for Perl allows JSON hijacking because of X-Requested-With mishandling.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-47157"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-18T05:15:06Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The Kossy module before 0.60 for Perl allows JSON hijacking because of X-Requested-With mishandling.",
"id": "GHSA-3r58-xjch-5xjp",
"modified": "2024-11-25T21:30:48Z",
"published": "2024-03-18T06:30:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47157"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/kazeburo/Kossy/pull/16"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://metacpan.org/dist/Kossy/changes"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3VCP-CHFH-F6R2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-14 20:15 – Updated: 2026-06-09 10:19Summary
Default kuma-cp config leaks the admin bootstrap token and signing keys to any webpage the operator visits while the control plane is reachable from their browser. CorsAllowedDomains: [".*"] reflects any Origin, and LocalhostIsAdmin: true promotes requests from 127.0.0.1 to mesh-system:admin. A cross-origin fetch() from a malicious page returns the admin JWT and signing material.
Am I affected?
You are affected if all of these hold:
kuma-cpruns with default config (CorsAllowedDomains: [".*"]andLocalhostIsAdmin: true).- The control plane is reachable from a browser on the same machine:
kuma-cp runon a developer laptop- Docker
--network hostor port-publish on a workstation kubectl port-forwardfrom a machine that also browses the web- The operator visits a page running attacker JavaScript while the control plane is reachable.
You are not affected if:
- The control plane runs on a Kubernetes cluster accessed via ClusterIP, NodePort, or LoadBalancer from a remote client.
- The control plane runs on an SSH-administered VM with no browser on the host.
KUMA_API_SERVER_AUTHN_LOCALHOST_IS_ADMIN=falseis set (see https://kuma.io/docs/latest/production/secure-deployment/api-server-auth/).KUMA_API_SERVER_CORS_ALLOWED_DOMAINSis set to an explicit allowlist that excludes attacker origins.
Mitigation
- Set
KUMA_API_SERVER_AUTHN_LOCALHOST_IS_ADMIN=falseafter retrieving the admin token. - Set
KUMA_API_SERVER_CORS_ALLOWED_DOMAINSto an explicit allowlist, for examplehttp://localhost:5681,http://127.0.0.1:5681. - Do not run
kuma-cpon a machine where you browse untrusted sites.
Fix
Fixed in #16416, backported to all supported release branches (#16423, #16424, #16425, #16426, #16427).
Changes in patched versions:
CorsAllowedDomainsdefault changed from[".*"]to[]— CORS is now opt-in; set the env var explicitly if you need GUI access.LocalhostIsAdminhardened: now requires direct loopbackRemoteAddrandHost, and rejects requests carrying proxy-hop headers (X-Forwarded-For), cross-site fetch metadata (Sec-Fetch-Site), or a non-localhostOrigin.
Upgrade to a patched version:
- 2.7.25
- 2.9.15
- 2.11.13
- 2.12.10
- 2.13.5
Credits
Reported by eldudareeno.
CVSS
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N = 5.1 Medium.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/kumahq/kuma"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.7.25"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/kumahq/kuma"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.9.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.9.15"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/kumahq/kuma"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.11.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.11.13"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/kumahq/kuma"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.12.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.12.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/kumahq/kuma"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.13.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.13.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-45021"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346",
"CWE-942"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-14T20:15:08Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-28T18:16:34Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nDefault `kuma-cp` config leaks the admin bootstrap token and signing keys to any webpage the operator visits while the control plane is reachable from their browser. `CorsAllowedDomains: [\".*\"]` reflects any `Origin`, and `LocalhostIsAdmin: true` promotes requests from `127.0.0.1` to `mesh-system:admin`. A cross-origin `fetch()` from a malicious page returns the admin JWT and signing material.\n\n## Am I affected?\n\nYou are affected if all of these hold:\n\n1. `kuma-cp` runs with default config (`CorsAllowedDomains: [\".*\"]` and `LocalhostIsAdmin: true`).\n2. The control plane is reachable from a browser on the same machine:\n - `kuma-cp run` on a developer laptop\n - Docker `--network host` or port-publish on a workstation\n - `kubectl port-forward` from a machine that also browses the web\n3. The operator visits a page running attacker JavaScript while the control plane is reachable.\n\nYou are not affected if:\n\n- The control plane runs on a Kubernetes cluster accessed via ClusterIP, NodePort, or LoadBalancer from a remote client.\n- The control plane runs on an SSH-administered VM with no browser on the host.\n- `KUMA_API_SERVER_AUTHN_LOCALHOST_IS_ADMIN=false` is set (see https://kuma.io/docs/latest/production/secure-deployment/api-server-auth/).\n- `KUMA_API_SERVER_CORS_ALLOWED_DOMAINS` is set to an explicit allowlist that excludes attacker origins.\n\n## Mitigation\n\n1. Set `KUMA_API_SERVER_AUTHN_LOCALHOST_IS_ADMIN=false` after retrieving the admin token.\n2. Set `KUMA_API_SERVER_CORS_ALLOWED_DOMAINS` to an explicit allowlist, for example `http://localhost:5681,http://127.0.0.1:5681`.\n3. Do not run `kuma-cp` on a machine where you browse untrusted sites.\n\n## Fix\n\nFixed in [#16416](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16416), backported to all supported release branches ([#16423](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16423), [#16424](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16424), [#16425](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16425), [#16426](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16426), [#16427](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16427)).\n\nChanges in patched versions:\n\n- `CorsAllowedDomains` default changed from `[\".*\"]` to `[]` \u2014 CORS is now opt-in; set the env var explicitly if you need GUI access.\n- `LocalhostIsAdmin` hardened: now requires direct loopback `RemoteAddr` and `Host`, and rejects requests carrying proxy-hop headers (`X-Forwarded-For`), cross-site fetch metadata (`Sec-Fetch-Site`), or a non-localhost `Origin`.\n\nUpgrade to a patched version:\n\n- 2.7.25\n- 2.9.15\n- 2.11.13\n- 2.12.10\n- 2.13.5\n\n## Credits\n\nReported by `eldudareeno`.\n\n## CVSS\n\n`CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N` = 5.1 Medium.",
"id": "GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2",
"modified": "2026-06-09T10:19:22Z",
"published": "2026-05-14T20:15:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/security/advisories/GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45021"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16416"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16423"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16424"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16425"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16426"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/pull/16427"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/commit/8fefa8595d44eb68d922405702ed7a0826322907"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/kumahq/kuma"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Default kuma-cp leaks admin token cross-origin via CORS wildcard + LocalhostIsAdmin"
}
GHSA-3VV5-8XXP-4F55
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-17 14:10 – Updated: 2026-06-17 14:10Summary
The chat message listener allows non-same-origin input:prompt and action:submit messages, so an external site can set prompt text and trigger submitPrompt() in an authenticated victim session. I validated this with a cross-origin attacker page that auto-posted messages and caused unauthorized POST /api/v1/chats/new and POST /api/chat/completions requests containing attacker-controlled prompts. This enables cross-site forced actions and model/tool execution under victim privileges without consent.
Details
The chat page's window message listener in src/lib/components/chat/Chat.svelte processes message types including input:prompt and action:submit without adequately enforcing same-origin restrictions. Based on code around lines ~597-616, input text is set directly from event.data.text; action:submit proceeds to submitPrompt() on the current prompt. The logic does not apply a strict origin allowlist and permits non-same-origin control of the chat input and submission flow, leading to cross-origin command execution in the victim's authenticated UI context. As a result, backend API calls (e.g., POST /api/v1/chats/new, POST /api/chat/completions) are sent under victim credentials.
Normally, via the input:prompt:submit postMessage type, this results in a "Confirm Prompt from Embed" confirmation dialog:
https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/9bd84258d09eefe7bf975878fb0e31a5dadfe0f8/src/lib/components/chat/Chat.svelte#L604-L622
However, combining the two other types, it is possible to achieve the same effect without this confirmation:
https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/9bd84258d09eefe7bf975878fb0e31a5dadfe0f8/src/lib/components/chat/Chat.svelte#L584-L602
PoC
- Set up a local Open WebUI instance and log in to it, making sure a model is configured
- Host the following HTML anywhere and visit it (optionally change http://127.0.0.1:14000 to your instance Base URL):
<h1>Click anywhere</h1>
<script>
function sleep(ms) {
return new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, ms));
}
onclick = async () => {
w = window.open('http://127.0.0.1:14000');
await sleep(2000);
w.postMessage({ type: 'input:prompt', text: "INJECTED PROMPT" }, '*');
await sleep(500);
w.postMessage({ type: 'action:submit' }, '*');
}
</script>
- Click anywhere on the page, then notice without further interaction the "INJECTED PROMPT" is executed on the Open WebUI instance
Impact
Conditions required: The victim must be authenticated to Open WebUI in the browser (token cookie present).
This issue enables cross-site forced actions under the victim's identity. An attacker can silently inject prompts and trigger model/tool execution (e.g., code interpreter, web search, retrieval, terminal/tool servers) as the victim without confirmation.
Original Agent Report
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.9.5"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "open-webui"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.9.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-54007"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-17T14:10:35Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nThe chat message listener allows non-same-origin `input:prompt` and `action:submit` messages, so an external site can set prompt text and trigger `submitPrompt()` in an authenticated victim session. I validated this with a cross-origin attacker page that auto-posted messages and caused unauthorized `POST /api/v1/chats/new` and `POST /api/chat/completions` requests containing attacker-controlled prompts. This enables cross-site forced actions and model/tool execution under victim privileges without consent.\n\n### Details\n\nThe chat page\u0027s window message listener in `src/lib/components/chat/Chat.svelte` processes message types including `input:prompt` and `action:submit` without adequately enforcing same-origin restrictions. Based on code around lines ~597-616, input text is set directly from `event.data.text`; `action:submit` proceeds to `submitPrompt()` on the current prompt. The logic does not apply a strict origin allowlist and permits non-same-origin control of the chat input and submission flow, leading to cross-origin command execution in the victim\u0027s authenticated UI context. As a result, backend API calls (e.g., `POST /api/v1/chats/new`, `POST /api/chat/completions`) are sent under victim credentials.\n\nNormally, via the `input:prompt:submit` postMessage type, this results in a \"Confirm Prompt from Embed\" confirmation dialog:\n\nhttps://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/9bd84258d09eefe7bf975878fb0e31a5dadfe0f8/src/lib/components/chat/Chat.svelte#L604-L622\n\nHowever, combining the two other types, it is possible to achieve the same effect without this confirmation:\n\nhttps://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/9bd84258d09eefe7bf975878fb0e31a5dadfe0f8/src/lib/components/chat/Chat.svelte#L584-L602\n\n### PoC\n\n1. Set up a local Open WebUI instance and log in to it, making sure a model is configured\n2. Host the following HTML anywhere and visit it (optionally change http://127.0.0.1:14000 to your instance Base URL):\n\n```html\n\u003ch1\u003eClick anywhere\u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cscript\u003e\n function sleep(ms) {\n return new Promise(r =\u003e setTimeout(r, ms));\n }\n \n onclick = async () =\u003e {\n w = window.open(\u0027http://127.0.0.1:14000\u0027);\n await sleep(2000);\n w.postMessage({ type: \u0027input:prompt\u0027, text: \"INJECTED PROMPT\" }, \u0027*\u0027);\n await sleep(500);\n w.postMessage({ type: \u0027action:submit\u0027 }, \u0027*\u0027);\n }\n\u003c/script\u003e\n```\n\n3. Click anywhere on the page, then notice without further interaction the \"INJECTED PROMPT\" is executed on the Open WebUI instance\n\n\u003cimg width=\"874\" height=\"264\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/244d9015-0dbf-47e0-a30e-1c2fbbde5e58\" /\u003e\n\n### Impact\n\nConditions required: The victim must be authenticated to Open WebUI in the browser (token cookie present).\n\nThis issue enables cross-site forced actions under the victim\u0027s identity. An attacker can silently inject prompts and trigger model/tool execution (e.g., code interpreter, web search, retrieval, terminal/tool servers) as the victim without confirmation.\n\n### Original Agent Report\n\n\u003cimg width=\"400\" alt=\"app aikido dev_ai-pentests_projects_116389_assessments_019d67d4-81c8-7dd2-bb9e-0a4a774b2c78_issues_sidebarIssue=20439940 (4)\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7b6521ed-d08b-446d-a918-103523d08a1e\" /\u003e",
"id": "GHSA-3vv5-8xxp-4f55",
"modified": "2026-06-17T14:10:35Z",
"published": "2026-06-17T14:10:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-3vv5-8xxp-4f55"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Open WebUI: Cross-origin postMessage confirmation bypass via action:submit"
}
GHSA-3VWF-8MRH-29C3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-27 09:30 – Updated: 2025-03-27 09:30A code execution vulnerability exists in the Xiaomi shop applicationproduct. The vulnerability is caused by improper input validation and can be exploited by attackers to execute malicious code.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-45354"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T07:15:38Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A code execution vulnerability exists in the Xiaomi shop applicationproduct. The vulnerability is caused by improper input validation and can be exploited by attackers to execute malicious code.",
"id": "GHSA-3vwf-8mrh-29c3",
"modified": "2025-03-27T09:30:31Z",
"published": "2025-03-27T09:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45354"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://trust.mi.com/zh-CN/misrc/bulletins/advisory?cveId=552"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3W6J-GJ2M-VH4C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:45 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:45A malicious extension with the 'search' permission could have installed a new search engine whose favicon referenced a cross-origin URL. The response to this cross-origin request could have been read by the extension, allowing a same-origin policy bypass by the extension, which should not have cross-origin permissions. This cross-origin request was made without cookies, so the sensitive information disclosed by the violation was limited to local-network resources or resources that perform IP-based authentication. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 87.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-23986"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-03-31T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A malicious extension with the \u0027search\u0027 permission could have installed a new search engine whose favicon referenced a cross-origin URL. The response to this cross-origin request could have been read by the extension, allowing a same-origin policy bypass by the extension, which should not have cross-origin permissions. This cross-origin request was made without cookies, so the sensitive information disclosed by the violation was limited to local-network resources or resources that perform IP-based authentication. This vulnerability affects Firefox \u003c 87.",
"id": "GHSA-3w6j-gj2m-vh4c",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:45:59Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:45:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-23986"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1692623"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202104-10"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2021-10"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-3WF5-983H-CCWQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:47 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:47An Origin Validation Error vulnerability in Bitdefender Safepay allows an attacker to manipulate the browser's file upload capability into accessing other files in the same directory or sub-directories. This issue affects: Bitdefender Safepay versions prior to 25.0.7.29.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-15734"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-04-12T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An Origin Validation Error vulnerability in Bitdefender Safepay allows an attacker to manipulate the browser\u0027s file upload capability into accessing other files in the same directory or sub-directories. This issue affects: Bitdefender Safepay versions prior to 25.0.7.29.",
"id": "GHSA-3wf5-983h-ccwq",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:47:06Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:47:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15734"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.bitdefender.com/support/security-advisories/origin-policy-vulnerability-bitdefender-safepay"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-3WRW-XRXR-8WG7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-04 09:31 – Updated: 2025-07-08 18:30Whale browser before 4.32.315.22 allow an attacker to bypass the Same-Origin Policy in a dual-tab environment.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-53600"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-04T08:15:25Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Whale browser before 4.32.315.22 allow an attacker to bypass the Same-Origin Policy in a dual-tab environment.",
"id": "GHSA-3wrw-xrxr-8wg7",
"modified": "2025-07-08T18:30:56Z",
"published": "2025-07-04T09:31:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-53600"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cve.naver.com/detail/cve-2025-53600.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3XF9-QWXV-R3R4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-19 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-29 00:01A cross-origin issue in the IndexDB API was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 15.3 and iPadOS 15.3, watchOS 8.4, tvOS 15.3, Safari 15.3, macOS Monterey 12.2. A website may be able to track sensitive user information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-22594"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-18T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A cross-origin issue in the IndexDB API was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 15.3 and iPadOS 15.3, watchOS 8.4, tvOS 15.3, Safari 15.3, macOS Monterey 12.2. A website may be able to track sensitive user information.",
"id": "GHSA-3xf9-qwxv-r3r4",
"modified": "2022-03-29T00:01:34Z",
"published": "2022-03-19T00:00:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22594"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213053"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213054"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213057"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213058"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213059"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-42MR-84R3-CV5M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:20 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:20A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly handles requests of different origins, aka "Microsoft Edge Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-8112"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-346"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-05-09T19:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly handles requests of different origins, aka \"Microsoft Edge Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability.\" This affects Microsoft Edge.",
"id": "GHSA-42mr-84r3-cv5m",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:20:40Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:20:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-8112"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2018-8112"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103963"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040844"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-141: Cache Poisoning
An attacker exploits the functionality of cache technologies to cause specific data to be cached that aids the attackers' objectives. This describes any attack whereby an attacker places incorrect or harmful material in cache. The targeted cache can be an application's cache (e.g. a web browser cache) or a public cache (e.g. a DNS or ARP cache). Until the cache is refreshed, most applications or clients will treat the corrupted cache value as valid. This can lead to a wide range of exploits including redirecting web browsers towards sites that install malware and repeatedly incorrect calculations based on the incorrect value.
CAPEC-142: DNS Cache Poisoning
A domain name server translates a domain name (such as www.example.com) into an IP address that Internet hosts use to contact Internet resources. An adversary modifies a public DNS cache to cause certain names to resolve to incorrect addresses that the adversary specifies. The result is that client applications that rely upon the targeted cache for domain name resolution will be directed not to the actual address of the specified domain name but to some other address. Adversaries can use this to herd clients to sites that install malware on the victim's computer or to masquerade as part of a Pharming attack.
CAPEC-160: Exploit Script-Based APIs
Some APIs support scripting instructions as arguments. Methods that take scripted instructions (or references to scripted instructions) can be very flexible and powerful. However, if an attacker can specify the script that serves as input to these methods they can gain access to a great deal of functionality. For example, HTML pages support <script> tags that allow scripting languages to be embedded in the page and then interpreted by the receiving web browser. If the content provider is malicious, these scripts can compromise the client application. Some applications may even execute the scripts under their own identity (rather than the identity of the user providing the script) which can allow attackers to perform activities that would otherwise be denied to them.
CAPEC-21: Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers
An adversary guesses, obtains, or "rides" a trusted identifier (e.g. session ID, resource ID, cookie, etc.) to perform authorized actions under the guise of an authenticated user or service.
CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages. Performing this attack can allow the attacker to gain unauthorized privileges within the application, or conduct attacks such as phishing, deceptive strategies to spread malware, or traditional web-application attacks. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to perform adversary-in-the-middle (CAPEC-94) communications between the web browser and the remote system. Despite the use of AiTH software, the attack is actually directed at the server, as the client is one node in a series of content brokers that pass information along to the application framework. Additionally, it is not true "Adversary-in-the-Middle" attack at the network layer, but an application-layer attack the root cause of which is the master applications trust in the integrity of code supplied by the client.
CAPEC-385: Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API Manipulation
An attacker hosts or joins an event or transaction within an application framework in order to change the content of messages or items that are being exchanged. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that look authentic but may contain deceptive links, substitute one item or another, spoof an existing item and conduct a false exchange, or otherwise change the amounts or identity of what is being exchanged. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to man-in-the-middle communications between the web browser and the remote system in order to change the content of various application elements. Often, items exchanged in game can be monetized via sales for coin, virtual dollars, etc. The purpose of the attack is for the attack to scam the victim by trapping the data packets involved the exchange and altering the integrity of the transfer process.
CAPEC-386: Application API Navigation Remapping
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of links/buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains links/buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination. Some applications make navigation remapping more difficult to detect because the actual HREF values of images, profile elements, and links/buttons are masked. One example would be to place an image in a user's photo gallery that when clicked upon redirected the user to an off-site location. Also, traditional web vulnerabilities (such as CSRF) can be constructed with remapped buttons or links. In some cases navigation remapping can be used for Phishing attacks or even means to artificially boost the page view, user site reputation, or click-fraud.
CAPEC-387: Navigation Remapping To Propagate Malicious Content
An adversary manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages and thereby circumvent the expected application logic.
CAPEC-388: Application API Button Hijacking
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination.
CAPEC-510: SaaS User Request Forgery
An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, performs malicious actions against a third-party Software as a Service (SaaS) application (also known as a cloud based application) by leveraging the persistent and implicit trust placed on a trusted user's session. This attack is executed after a trusted user is authenticated into a cloud service, "piggy-backing" on the authenticated session, and exploiting the fact that the cloud service believes it is only interacting with the trusted user. If successful, the actions embedded in the malicious application will be processed and accepted by the targeted SaaS application and executed at the trusted user's privilege level.
CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
CAPEC-75: Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files
Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.
CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls
An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.
CAPEC-89: Pharming
A pharming attack occurs when the victim is fooled into entering sensitive data into supposedly trusted locations, such as an online bank site or a trading platform. An attacker can impersonate these supposedly trusted sites and have the victim be directed to their site rather than the originally intended one. Pharming does not require script injection or clicking on malicious links for the attack to succeed.