CWE-294
AllowedAuthentication Bypass by Capture-replay
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
A capture-replay flaw exists when the design of the product makes it possible for a malicious user to sniff network traffic and bypass authentication by replaying it to the server in question to the same effect as the original message (or with minor changes).
342 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-82M4-8QR7-3GP9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-07 18:31 – Updated: 2024-10-07 21:33IoT Haat Smart Plug IH-IN-16A-S v5.16.1 is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-46041"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-07T16:15:05Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "IoT Haat Smart Plug IH-IN-16A-S v5.16.1 is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay.",
"id": "GHSA-82m4-8qr7-3gp9",
"modified": "2024-10-07T21:33:30Z",
"published": "2024-10-07T18:31:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46041"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Anonymous120386/Anonymous"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.iothaat.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-836G-2RJM-JCVV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-13 18:31 – Updated: 2024-06-13 18:31Transmitted data is logged between the device and the backend service. An attacker could use these logs to perform a replay attack to replicate calls.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38284"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-13T18:15:11Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "Transmitted data is logged between the device and the backend service. An attacker could use these logs to perform a replay attack to replicate calls.",
"id": "GHSA-836g-2rjm-jcvv",
"modified": "2024-06-13T18:31:59Z",
"published": "2024-06-13T18:31:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38284"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-24-165-19"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-84PM-G9XR-PQCM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:33 – Updated: 2025-11-04 21:30Authentication bypass by capture-replay in RPMB protocol message authentication subsystem in Intel(R) TXE versions before 4.0.30 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-12355"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-11-12T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Authentication bypass by capture-replay in RPMB protocol message authentication subsystem in Intel(R) TXE versions before 4.0.30 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access.",
"id": "GHSA-84pm-g9xr-pqcm",
"modified": "2025-11-04T21:30:24Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:33:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-12355"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20201113-0005"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00391"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/231329"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-85CW-M46V-23X6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-13 09:30 – Updated: 2025-06-13 09:30Salt's request server is vulnerable to replay attacks when not using a TLS encrypted transport.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38823"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-13T07:15:20Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Salt\u0027s request server is vulnerable to replay attacks when not using a TLS encrypted transport.",
"id": "GHSA-85cw-m46v-23x6",
"modified": "2025-06-13T09:30:33Z",
"published": "2025-06-13T09:30:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38823"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.saltproject.io/en/3006/topics/releases/3006.12.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.saltproject.io/en/3007/topics/releases/3007.4.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-85Q8-MJFV-GJFX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-25 00:00 – Updated: 2026-04-06 15:31The Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) receiving unit on certain Nissan, Kia, and Hyundai vehicles through 2017 allows remote attackers to perform unlock operations and force a resynchronization after capturing two consecutive valid key fob signals over the radio, aka a RollBack attack. The attacker retains the ability to unlock indefinitely.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-37418"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-08-24T06:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) receiving unit on certain Nissan, Kia, and Hyundai vehicles through 2017 allows remote attackers to perform unlock operations and force a resynchronization after capturing two consecutive valid key fob signals over the radio, aka a RollBack attack. The attacker retains the ability to unlock indefinitely.",
"id": "GHSA-85q8-mjfv-gjfx",
"modified": "2026-04-06T15:31:19Z",
"published": "2022-08-25T00:00:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-37418"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackaday.com/2022/08/17/rollback-breaks-into-your-car"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://medium.com/codex/rollback-a-new-time-agnostic-replay-attack-against-the-automotive-remote-keyless-entry-systems-df5f99ba9490"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.blackhat.com/us-22/briefings/schedule/#rollback---a-new-time-agnostic-replay-attack-against-the-automotive-remote-keyless-entry-systems-27185"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.pcmag.com/news/is-your-car-key-fob-vulnerable-to-this-simple-replay-attack"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYodcy84oQL1gxwiuRm13xRXxTQL9cO5t"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-866C-WWM5-4RJ7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-19 03:30 – Updated: 2026-03-19 18:21Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-r9q5-c7qc-p26w. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.25 lack durable replay state for Nextcloud Talk webhook events, allowing valid signed webhook requests to be replayed without suppression. Attackers can capture and replay previously valid signed webhook requests to trigger duplicate inbound message processing and cause integrity or availability issues.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2026.2.24"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-19T18:21:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-19T02:16:02Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Duplicate Advisory\n\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-r9q5-c7qc-p26w. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\nOpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.25 lack durable replay state for Nextcloud Talk webhook events, allowing valid signed webhook requests to be replayed without suppression. Attackers can capture and replay previously valid signed webhook requests to trigger duplicate inbound message processing and cause integrity or availability issues.",
"id": "GHSA-866c-wwm5-4rj7",
"modified": "2026-03-19T18:21:59Z",
"published": "2026-03-19T03:30:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-r9q5-c7qc-p26w"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28449"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/d512163d686ad6741783e7119ddb3437f493dbbc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-webhook-replay-attack-via-missing-durable-replay-suppression"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: OpenClaw\u0027s Nextcloud Talk webhook replay could trigger duplicate inbound processing",
"withdrawn": "2026-03-19T18:21:59Z"
}
GHSA-8689-GM9G-JGR6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-31 23:50 – Updated: 2026-04-28 18:21Summary
Plivo V3 signature verification canonicalized query ordering, but replay detection hashed the raw verification URL. Reordering query parameters preserved a valid signature while producing a fresh replay-cache key.
Impact
An attacker who captured one valid signed Plivo V3 webhook could replay the same event by permuting query parameters and trigger duplicate voice-call processing.
Affected Component
extensions/voice-call/src/webhook-security.ts
Fixed Versions
- Affected:
<= 2026.3.24 - Patched:
>= 2026.3.28 - Latest stable
2026.3.28contains the fix.
Fix
Fixed by commit 85777e726c (Voice Call: canonicalize Plivo V3 replay key).
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.3.28"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-41395"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-31T23:50:02Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nPlivo V3 signature verification canonicalized query ordering, but replay detection hashed the raw verification URL. Reordering query parameters preserved a valid signature while producing a fresh replay-cache key.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who captured one valid signed Plivo V3 webhook could replay the same event by permuting query parameters and trigger duplicate voice-call processing.\n\n## Affected Component\n\n`extensions/voice-call/src/webhook-security.ts`\n\n## Fixed Versions\n\n- Affected: `\u003c= 2026.3.24`\n- Patched: `\u003e= 2026.3.28`\n- Latest stable `2026.3.28` contains the fix.\n\n## Fix\n\nFixed by commit `85777e726c` (`Voice Call: canonicalize Plivo V3 replay key`).",
"id": "GHSA-8689-gm9g-jgr6",
"modified": "2026-04-28T18:21:08Z",
"published": "2026-03-31T23:50:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-8689-gm9g-jgr6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/85777e726cb02c01a911b3ff832ddf4d664d5c94"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Voice-call Plivo V3 webhook replay key uses unsorted URL, allowing replay via query-parameter reordering"
}
GHSA-882M-QG83-2RHQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:32 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:32In JUUKO K-808, an attacker could specially craft a packet that encodes an arbitrary command, which could be executed on the K-808 (Firmware versions prior to numbers ending ...9A, ...9B, ...9C, etc.).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-19025"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-11-02T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In JUUKO K-808, an attacker could specially craft a packet that encodes an arbitrary command, which could be executed on the K-808 (Firmware versions prior to numbers ending ...9A, ...9B, ...9C, etc.).",
"id": "GHSA-882m-qg83-2rhq",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:32:48Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:32:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-19025"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-20-301-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-89R3-6X4J-V7WF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-02 20:57 – Updated: 2026-05-06 23:22Summary
Voice-call Plivo replay mutates in-process callback origin before replay rejection
Current Maintainer Triage
- Status: narrow
- Normalized severity: low
- Assessment: v2026.3.28 can still mutate Plivo callback origin before replay rejection, but this needs a captured valid callback for a live call so medium is overstated.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Latest published npm version:
2026.3.31 - Vulnerable version range:
<=2026.3.28 - Patched versions:
>= 2026.3.31 - First stable tag containing the fix:
v2026.3.31
Fix Commit(s)
efe9183f9d2fd5e01c8068fa01f4a07a58a63c0b— 2026-03-31T19:50:35+09:00
Release Process Note
- The fix is already present in released version
2026.3.31. - This draft looks ready for final maintainer disposition or publication, not additional code-fix work.
Thanks @zsxsoft for reporting.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.3.28"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.3.31"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-41337"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-02T20:57:02Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\nVoice-call Plivo replay mutates in-process callback origin before replay rejection\n\n## Current Maintainer Triage\n- Status: narrow\n- Normalized severity: low\n- Assessment: v2026.3.28 can still mutate Plivo callback origin before replay rejection, but this needs a captured valid callback for a live call so medium is overstated.\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n- Package: `openclaw` (npm)\n- Latest published npm version: `2026.3.31`\n- Vulnerable version range: `\u003c=2026.3.28`\n- Patched versions: `\u003e= 2026.3.31`\n- First stable tag containing the fix: `v2026.3.31`\n\n## Fix Commit(s)\n- `efe9183f9d2fd5e01c8068fa01f4a07a58a63c0b` \u2014 2026-03-31T19:50:35+09:00\n\n## Release Process Note\n- The fix is already present in released version `2026.3.31`.\n- This draft looks ready for final maintainer disposition or publication, not additional code-fix work.\n\nThanks @zsxsoft for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-89r3-6x4j-v7wf",
"modified": "2026-05-06T23:22:29Z",
"published": "2026-04-02T20:57:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-89r3-6x4j-v7wf"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41337"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/efe9183f9d2fd5e01c8068fa01f4a07a58a63c0b"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/releases/tag/v2026.3.31"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-callback-origin-mutation-in-plivo-voice-call-replay"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Voice-call Plivo replay mutates in-process callback origin before replay rejection"
}
GHSA-8CGF-QVVJ-878C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-03 00:00 – Updated: 2022-04-09 00:00Use of Password Hash Instead of Password for Authentication vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U(C) CPU all versions and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ CPU all versions allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to login to the product by replaying an eavesdropped password hash.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-25155"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-04-01T23:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Use of Password Hash Instead of Password for Authentication vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U(C) CPU all versions and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ CPU all versions allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to login to the product by replaying an eavesdropped password hash.",
"id": "GHSA-8cgf-qvvj-878c",
"modified": "2022-04-09T00:00:40Z",
"published": "2022-04-03T00:00:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25155"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jvn.jp/vu/JVNVU96577897/index.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-22-090-04"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mitsubishielectric.com/en/psirt/vulnerability/pdf/2021-031_en.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Utilize some sequence or time stamping functionality along with a checksum which takes this into account in order to ensure that messages can be parsed only once.
Mitigation
Since any attacker who can listen to traffic can see sequence numbers, it is necessary to sign messages with some kind of cryptography to ensure that sequence numbers are not simply doctored along with content.
CAPEC-102: Session Sidejacking
Session sidejacking takes advantage of an unencrypted communication channel between a victim and target system. The attacker sniffs traffic on a network looking for session tokens in unencrypted traffic. Once a session token is captured, the attacker performs malicious actions by using the stolen token with the targeted application to impersonate the victim. This attack is a specific method of session hijacking, which is exploiting a valid session token to gain unauthorized access to a target system or information. Other methods to perform a session hijacking are session fixation, cross-site scripting, or compromising a user or server machine and stealing the session token.
CAPEC-509: Kerberoasting
Through the exploitation of how service accounts leverage Kerberos authentication with Service Principal Names (SPNs), the adversary obtains and subsequently cracks the hashed credentials of a service account target to exploit its privileges. The Kerberos authentication protocol centers around a ticketing system which is used to request/grant access to services and to then access the requested services. As an authenticated user, the adversary may request Active Directory and obtain a service ticket with portions encrypted via RC4 with the private key of the authenticated account. By extracting the local ticket and saving it disk, the adversary can brute force the hashed value to reveal the target account credentials.
CAPEC-555: Remote Services with Stolen Credentials
This pattern of attack involves an adversary that uses stolen credentials to leverage remote services such as RDP, telnet, SSH, and VNC to log into a system. Once access is gained, any number of malicious activities could be performed.
CAPEC-561: Windows Admin Shares with Stolen Credentials
An adversary guesses or obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate Windows administrator credentials (e.g. userID/password) to access Windows Admin Shares on a local machine or within a Windows domain.
CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
CAPEC-644: Use of Captured Hashes (Pass The Hash)
An adversary obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate Windows domain credential hash values to access systems within the domain that leverage the Lan Man (LM) and/or NT Lan Man (NTLM) authentication protocols.
CAPEC-645: Use of Captured Tickets (Pass The Ticket)
An adversary uses stolen Kerberos tickets to access systems/resources that leverage the Kerberos authentication protocol. The Kerberos authentication protocol centers around a ticketing system which is used to request/grant access to services and to then access the requested services. An adversary can obtain any one of these tickets (e.g. Service Ticket, Ticket Granting Ticket, Silver Ticket, or Golden Ticket) to authenticate to a system/resource without needing the account's credentials. Depending on the ticket obtained, the adversary may be able to access a particular resource or generate TGTs for any account within an Active Directory Domain.
CAPEC-652: Use of Known Kerberos Credentials
An adversary obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate Kerberos credentials (e.g. Kerberos service account userID/password or Kerberos Tickets) with the goal of achieving authenticated access to additional systems, applications, or services within the domain.
CAPEC-701: Browser in the Middle (BiTM)
An adversary exploits the inherent functionalities of a web browser, in order to establish an unnoticed remote desktop connection in the victim's browser to the adversary's system. The adversary must deploy a web client with a remote desktop session that the victim can access.
CAPEC-94: Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)
An adversary targets the communication between two components (typically client and server), in order to alter or obtain data from transactions. A general approach entails the adversary placing themself within the communication channel between the two components.