CWE-285
DiscouragedImproper Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
2305 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-JXJ7-G6GM-49J7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-10 16:05 – Updated: 2026-07-10 16:05Summary
tarteaucitron provides a list of cookies and buttons to delete them. If an attacker can write HTML with data attributes, they could create an element that silently deletes a cookie when clicked and trick a user to delete this cookie.
Details
tarteaucitron.cookie.purge() is called on any element with the purgeBtn class. It does not check if the element is a legitimate tarteaucitron button or if the cookie corresponds to a service handled by tarteaucitron.
PoC
<a class="purgeBtn" data-cookie="foo">Click me!</a>
If someone has a cookie with this name and clicks on the link, the cookie is silently deleted.
Impact
The impact is limited because this only works on cookies without HttpOnly=true and the attacker has to know the name of the cookie.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "tarteaucitronjs"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.33.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-49977"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-285"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-10T16:05:00Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\ntarteaucitron provides a list of cookies and buttons to delete them. If an attacker can write HTML with data attributes, they could create an element that silently deletes a cookie when clicked and trick a user to delete this cookie.\n\n### Details\n\n`tarteaucitron.cookie.purge()` is called on any element with the `purgeBtn` class. It does not check if the element is a legitimate tarteaucitron button or if the cookie corresponds to a service handled by tarteaucitron.\n\n### PoC\n\n```html\n\u003ca class=\"purgeBtn\" data-cookie=\"foo\"\u003eClick me!\u003c/a\u003e\n```\n\nIf someone has a cookie with this name and clicks on the link, the cookie is silently deleted.\n\n### Impact\n\nThe impact is limited because this only works on cookies without HttpOnly=true and the attacker has to know the name of the cookie.",
"id": "GHSA-jxj7-g6gm-49j7",
"modified": "2026-07-10T16:05:00Z",
"published": "2026-07-10T16:05:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/AmauriC/tarteaucitron.js/security/advisories/GHSA-jxj7-g6gm-49j7"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/AmauriC/tarteaucitron.js"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "tarteaucitron: data-cookie attribute can be used to delete arbitrary cookies"
}
GHSA-M297-3JV9-M927
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-05 21:30 – Updated: 2026-03-06 22:28A security flaw in the IdentityBrokerService.performLogin endpoint of Keycloak allows authentication to proceed using an Identity Provider (IdP) even after it has been disabled by an administrator. An attacker who knows the IdP alias can reuse a previously generated login request to bypass the administrative restriction. This undermines access control enforcement and may allow unauthorized authentication through a disabled external provider.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-services"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "26.5.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-3009"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-285",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-06T22:28:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-05T19:16:18Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A security flaw in the IdentityBrokerService.performLogin endpoint of Keycloak allows authentication to proceed using an Identity Provider (IdP) even after it has been disabled by an administrator. An attacker who knows the IdP alias can reuse a previously generated login request to bypass the administrative restriction. This undermines access control enforcement and may allow unauthorized authentication through a disabled external provider.",
"id": "GHSA-m297-3jv9-m927",
"modified": "2026-03-06T22:28:28Z",
"published": "2026-03-05T21:30:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3009"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/issues/46911"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/4fd5367e6cc28cfa68fb2240fc459c12b1fdbf2a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3947"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3948"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3009"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2441867"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/releases/tag/26.5.5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Keycloak allows authentication using an Identity Provider (IdP) even after it has been disabled by an administrator"
}
GHSA-M2Q7-5G93-322P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-01-11 00:00 – Updated: 2023-06-27 21:30Improper authorization in TelephonyManager prior to SMR Jan-2022 Release 1 allows attackers to get IMSI without READ_PRIVILEGED_PHONE_STATE permission
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-22272"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-285",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-01-10T14:12:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Improper authorization in TelephonyManager prior to SMR Jan-2022 Release 1 allows attackers to get IMSI without READ_PRIVILEGED_PHONE_STATE permission",
"id": "GHSA-m2q7-5g93-322p",
"modified": "2023-06-27T21:30:43Z",
"published": "2022-01-11T00:00:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22272"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/securityUpdate.smsb?year=2022\u0026month=1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M3FM-H5JP-Q79P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-12-20 16:58 – Updated: 2023-02-03 20:37Openshift allows remote attackers to gain privileges by updating a build configuration that was created with an allowed type to a type that is not allowed.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/openshift/origin"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-1906"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-285"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-19T22:01:34Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2016-02-03T18:59:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Openshift allows remote attackers to gain privileges by updating a build configuration that was created with an allowed type to a type that is not allowed.",
"id": "GHSA-m3fm-h5jp-q79p",
"modified": "2023-02-03T20:37:11Z",
"published": "2021-12-20T16:58:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-1906"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/6556"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/6576"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openshift/origin/commit/d95ec085f03ecf10e8c424a4f0340ddb38891406"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0070"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:0351"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1906"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297916"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2016-1906"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Authorization bypass in Openshift"
}
GHSA-M3Q4-7QMJ-657M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-20 19:33 – Updated: 2022-12-20 19:33Overview
During our internal security assessment, it was discovered that OpenFGA versions v0.3.0 is vulnerable to authorization bypass under certain conditions.
Am I Affected?
You are affected by this vulnerability if all of the following applies:
- You are using OpenFGA v0.3.0
- You created a model using modeling language v1.1 that applies a type restriction to an object e.g.
define viewer: [user] - You created tuples based on the aforementioned model, e.g.
document:1#viewer@user:jon - You updated the previous model by adding a new type and replacing the previous restriction with the newly added type e.g.
define viewer: [employee] - You use the tuples created against the first model (step 3) and issue checks against the updated model e.g.
user=user:jon, relation=viewer, object:document:1
How to fix that?
Upgrade to version v0.3.1
Backward Compatibility
This update is backward compatible.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/openfga/openfga"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.3.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.3.0"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-23542"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-285"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-20T19:33:27Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-12-20T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Overview\nDuring our internal security assessment, it was discovered that OpenFGA versions v0.3.0 is vulnerable to authorization bypass under certain conditions.\n\n### Am I Affected?\nYou are affected by this vulnerability if **all** of the following applies:\n\n1. You are using OpenFGA v0.3.0\n2. You created a model using modeling language v1.1 that applies a type restriction to an object e.g. `define viewer: [user]`\n3. You created tuples based on the aforementioned model, e.g. `document:1#viewer@user:jon`\n4. You updated the previous model by adding a new type and replacing the previous restriction with the newly added type e.g. `define viewer: [employee]`\n5. You use the tuples created against the first model (step 3) and issue checks against the updated model e.g. `user=user:jon, relation=viewer, object:document:1`\n\n### How to fix that?\nUpgrade to version v0.3.1\n\n### Backward Compatibility\nThis update is backward compatible.",
"id": "GHSA-m3q4-7qmj-657m",
"modified": "2022-12-20T19:33:27Z",
"published": "2022-12-20T19:33:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/security/advisories/GHSA-m3q4-7qmj-657m"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-23542"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/pull/422"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/releases/tag/v0.3.1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "OpenFGA Authorization Bypass"
}
GHSA-M449-VH5F-574G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-26 19:33 – Updated: 2025-12-01 16:02Summary
A low-permission user can create new accounts through a direct API request instead of being restricted to the intended interface.
PoC
A low-permission user sends a crafted API request to the user-creation endpoint and the system creates the account successfully.
Impact
This allows attackers to create unauthorized accounts.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@oneuptime/common"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.1.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-65966"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-285"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-26T19:33:08Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-26T19:15:50Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\nA low-permission user can create new accounts through a direct API request instead of being restricted to the intended interface.\n\n### PoC\nA low-permission user sends a crafted API request to the user-creation endpoint and the system creates the account successfully.\n\n\n### Impact\nThis allows attackers to create unauthorized accounts.",
"id": "GHSA-m449-vh5f-574g",
"modified": "2025-12-01T16:02:30Z",
"published": "2025-11-26T19:33:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/OneUptime/oneuptime/security/advisories/GHSA-m449-vh5f-574g"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-65966"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/OneUptime/oneuptime/commit/07bc6d4edde7397ea6b88f889c065ec392052ab4"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/OneUptime/oneuptime"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OneUptime Unauthorized User Creation via API"
}
GHSA-M46G-8PC6-M8Q7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-29 21:30 – Updated: 2023-04-06 21:30A vulnerability was found in the device-mapper-multipath. The device-mapper-multipath allows local users to obtain root access, exploited alone or in conjunction with CVE-2022-41973. Local users that are able to write to UNIX domain sockets can bypass access controls and manipulate the multipath setup. This issue occurs because an attacker can repeat a keyword, which is mishandled when arithmetic ADD is used instead of bitwise OR. This could lead to local privilege escalation to root.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-3787"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-285"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-03-29T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in the device-mapper-multipath. The device-mapper-multipath allows local users to obtain root access, exploited alone or in conjunction with CVE-2022-41973. Local users that are able to write to UNIX domain sockets can bypass access controls and manipulate the multipath setup. This issue occurs because an attacker can repeat a keyword, which is mishandled when arithmetic ADD is used instead of bitwise OR. This could lead to local privilege escalation to root.",
"id": "GHSA-m46g-8pc6-m8q7",
"modified": "2023-04-06T21:30:20Z",
"published": "2023-03-29T21:30:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3787"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138959"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M4HC-M2V6-HFW8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-25 17:19 – Updated: 2024-10-26 22:53Impact
An authenticated user can download a debug or artifact bundle from arbitrary organizations and projects with a known bundle ID. The user does not need to be a member of the organization or have permissions on the project.
Patches
A patch was issued to ensure authorization checks are properly scoped on requests to retrieve debug or artifact bundles. Authenticated users who do not have the necessary permissions on the particular project are no longer able to download them.
Sentry SaaS users do not need to take any action. Self-Hosted Sentry users should upgrade to version 23.5.2 or higher.
References
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "sentry"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.21.0"
},
{
"fixed": "23.5.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-36826"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-285"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-25T17:19:48Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-07-25T19:15:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nAn authenticated user can download a debug or artifact bundle from arbitrary organizations and projects with a known bundle ID. The user does not need to be a member of the organization or have permissions on the project.\n\n### Patches\n\nA patch was issued to ensure authorization checks are properly scoped on requests to retrieve debug or artifact bundles. Authenticated users who do not have the necessary permissions on the particular project are no longer able to download them.\n\n**Sentry SaaS users do not need to take any action. [Self-Hosted Sentry](https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted) users should upgrade to version 23.5.2 or higher.**\n\n### References\n\n- [Restrict file downloads to Project](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/pull/49680)",
"id": "GHSA-m4hc-m2v6-hfw8",
"modified": "2024-10-26T22:53:43Z",
"published": "2023-07-25T17:19:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hc-m2v6-hfw8"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-36826"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/pull/49680"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/commit/e932b15435bf36239431eaa3790a6bcfa47046a9"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/getsentry/sentry"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/sentry/PYSEC-2023-130.yaml"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Improper authorization on debug and artifact file downloads"
}
GHSA-M4JJ-VWGJ-QPJF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-06 12:30 – Updated: 2024-02-06 12:30In JetBrains TeamCity before 2023.11.2 access control at the S3 Artifact Storage plugin endpoint was missed
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-24936"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-285"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-06T10:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In JetBrains TeamCity before 2023.11.2 access control at the S3 Artifact Storage plugin endpoint was missed",
"id": "GHSA-m4jj-vwgj-qpjf",
"modified": "2024-02-06T12:30:30Z",
"published": "2024-02-06T12:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-24936"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jetbrains.com/privacy-security/issues-fixed"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M4V8-WQVR-P9F7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-04 14:20 – Updated: 2025-11-04 19:44Impact
Undici cleared Authorization and Proxy-Authorization headers for fetch(), but did not clear them for undici.request().
Patches
This has been patched in https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/6805746680d27a5369d7fb67bc05f95a28247d75. Fixes has been released in v5.28.4 and v6.11.1.
Workarounds
use fetch() or disable maxRedirections.
References
Linzi Shang reported this.
- https://hackerone.com/reports/2408074
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-3787-6prv-h9w3
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "undici"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.28.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "undici"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.11.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-30260"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200",
"CWE-285",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-04T14:20:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-04T16:15:08Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nUndici cleared Authorization and Proxy-Authorization headers for `fetch()`, but did not clear them for `undici.request()`.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis has been patched in https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/6805746680d27a5369d7fb67bc05f95a28247d75.\nFixes has been released in v5.28.4 and v6.11.1.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nuse `fetch()` or disable `maxRedirections`.\n\n### References\n\nLinzi Shang reported this.\n\n* https://hackerone.com/reports/2408074\n* https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-3787-6prv-h9w3",
"id": "GHSA-m4v8-wqvr-p9f7",
"modified": "2025-11-04T19:44:28Z",
"published": "2024-04-04T14:20:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-m4v8-wqvr-p9f7"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-30260"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/64e3402da4e032e68de46acb52800c9a06aaea3f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/6805746680d27a5369d7fb67bc05f95a28247d75"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2408074"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HQVHWAS6WDXXIU7F72XI55VZ2LTZUB33"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NC3V3HFZ5MOJRZDY5ZELL6REIRSPFROJ"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/P6Q4RGETHVYVHDIQGTJGU5AV6NJEI67E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240905-0008"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Undici\u0027s Proxy-Authorization header not cleared on cross-origin redirect for dispatch, request, stream, pipeline"
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that you perform access control checks related to your business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that you apply to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-1: Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs
In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by an authorization framework. This framework maps Access Control Lists (ACLs) to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application, or can run queries for data that they otherwise not supposed to.
CAPEC-104: Cross Zone Scripting
An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security.
CAPEC-127: Directory Indexing
An adversary crafts a request to a target that results in the target listing/indexing the content of a directory as output. One common method of triggering directory contents as output is to construct a request containing a path that terminates in a directory name rather than a file name since many applications are configured to provide a list of the directory's contents when such a request is received. An adversary can use this to explore the directory tree on a target as well as learn the names of files. This can often end up revealing test files, backup files, temporary files, hidden files, configuration files, user accounts, script contents, as well as naming conventions, all of which can be used by an attacker to mount additional attacks.
CAPEC-13: Subverting Environment Variable Values
The adversary directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The adversary's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the adversary.
CAPEC-17: Using Malicious Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an adversary to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an adversary to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.
CAPEC-39: Manipulating Opaque Client-based Data Tokens
In circumstances where an application holds important data client-side in tokens (cookies, URLs, data files, and so forth) that data can be manipulated. If client or server-side application components reinterpret that data as authentication tokens or data (such as store item pricing or wallet information) then even opaquely manipulating that data may bear fruit for an Attacker. In this pattern an attacker undermines the assumption that client side tokens have been adequately protected from tampering through use of encryption or obfuscation.
CAPEC-402: Bypassing ATA Password Security
An adversary exploits a weakness in ATA security on a drive to gain access to the information the drive contains without supplying the proper credentials. ATA Security is often employed to protect hard disk information from unauthorized access. The mechanism requires the user to type in a password before the BIOS is allowed access to drive contents. Some implementations of ATA security will accept the ATA command to update the password without the user having authenticated with the BIOS. This occurs because the security mechanism assumes the user has first authenticated via the BIOS prior to sending commands to the drive. Various methods exist for exploiting this flaw, the most common being installing the ATA protected drive into a system lacking ATA security features (a.k.a. hot swapping). Once the drive is installed into the new system the BIOS can be used to reset the drive password.
CAPEC-45: Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links
This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An adversary can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
CAPEC-5: Blue Boxing
This type of attack against older telephone switches and trunks has been around for decades. A tone is sent by an adversary to impersonate a supervisor signal which has the effect of rerouting or usurping command of the line. While the US infrastructure proper may not contain widespread vulnerabilities to this type of attack, many companies are connected globally through call centers and business process outsourcing. These international systems may be operated in countries which have not upgraded Telco infrastructure and so are vulnerable to Blue boxing. Blue boxing is a result of failure on the part of the system to enforce strong authorization for administrative functions. While the infrastructure is different than standard current applications like web applications, there are historical lessons to be learned to upgrade the access control for administrative functions.
{'xhtml:b': 'This attack pattern is included in CAPEC for historical purposes.'}
CAPEC-51: Poison Web Service Registry
SOA and Web Services often use a registry to perform look up, get schema information, and metadata about services. A poisoned registry can redirect (think phishing for servers) the service requester to a malicious service provider, provide incorrect information in schema or metadata, and delete information about service provider interfaces.
CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
CAPEC-647: Collect Data from Registries
An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization to gather system-specific data and sensitive information within a registry (e.g., Windows Registry, Mac plist). These contain information about the system configuration, software, operating system, and security. The adversary can leverage information gathered in order to carry out further attacks.
CAPEC-668: Key Negotiation of Bluetooth Attack (KNOB)
An adversary can exploit a flaw in Bluetooth key negotiation allowing them to decrypt information sent between two devices communicating via Bluetooth. The adversary uses an Adversary in the Middle setup to modify packets sent between the two devices during the authentication process, specifically the entropy bits. Knowledge of the number of entropy bits will allow the attacker to easily decrypt information passing over the line of communication.
CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls
An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.
CAPEC-87: Forceful Browsing
An attacker employs forceful browsing (direct URL entry) to access portions of a website that are otherwise unreachable. Usually, a front controller or similar design pattern is employed to protect access to portions of a web application. Forceful browsing enables an attacker to access information, perform privileged operations and otherwise reach sections of the web application that have been improperly protected.