CWE-284
DiscouragedImproper Access Control
Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Incomplete
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
8604 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-GW88-WF4R-9CFJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-27 18:31 – Updated: 2025-10-27 18:31A vulnerability was found in ashymuzuro Full-Ecommece-Website and Muzuro Ecommerce System up to 1.1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/index.php?add_product of the component Add Product Page. The manipulation results in unrestricted upload. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-12291"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-27T16:15:38Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in ashymuzuro Full-Ecommece-Website and Muzuro Ecommerce System up to 1.1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/index.php?add_product of the component Add Product Page. The manipulation results in unrestricted upload. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
"id": "GHSA-gw88-wf4r-9cfj",
"modified": "2025-10-27T18:31:10Z",
"published": "2025-10-27T18:31:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-12291"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Lianhaorui/Report/blob/main/FileUpload-1.docx"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.329959"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.329959"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.675846"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-GWQ9-WPWC-V9CF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-12 15:31 – Updated: 2026-01-05 18:30Incorrect access control in SIMICAM v1.16.41-20250725, KEVIEW v1.14.92-20241120, ASECAM v1.14.10-20240725 allows attackers to access sensitive API endpoints without authentication.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-63667"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-12T15:15:38Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Incorrect access control in SIMICAM v1.16.41-20250725, KEVIEW v1.14.92-20241120, ASECAM v1.14.10-20240725 allows attackers to access sensitive API endpoints without authentication.",
"id": "GHSA-gwq9-wpwc-v9cf",
"modified": "2026-01-05T18:30:21Z",
"published": "2025-11-12T15:31:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-63667"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Remenis/CVE-2025-63667"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Remenis/Vatilon_evidence/releases/download/Evidence/Vatilon_vulnerability_evidence_2025.zip"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vatilon.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GWR5-JM6X-GFH6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-08 09:30 – Updated: 2024-01-11 18:31In default installations of Microchip maxView Storage Manager (for Adaptec Smart Storage Controllers) where Redfish server is configured for remote system management, unauthorized access can occur, with data modification and information disclosure. This affects 3.00.23484 through 4.14.00.26064 (except for the patched versions 3.07.23980 and 4.07.00.25339).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-22216"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-08T07:15:11Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In default installations of Microchip maxView Storage Manager (for Adaptec Smart Storage Controllers) where Redfish server is configured for remote system management, unauthorized access can occur, with data modification and information disclosure. This affects 3.00.23484 through 4.14.00.26064 (except for the patched versions 3.07.23980 and 4.07.00.25339).",
"id": "GHSA-gwr5-jm6x-gfh6",
"modified": "2024-01-11T18:31:24Z",
"published": "2024-01-08T09:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22216"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.microchip.com/en-us/solutions/embedded-security/how-to-report-potential-product-security-vulnerabilities/maxview-storage-manager-redfish-server-vulnerability"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GWRH-W4F9-FFC9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-18 21:31 – Updated: 2026-02-18 21:31A vulnerability was detected in huanzi-qch base-admin up to 57a8126bb3353a004f3c7722089e3b926ea83596. Impacted is the function Upload of the file SysFileController.java of the component JSP Parser. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in unrestricted upload. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-2665"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-18T20:18:37Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was detected in huanzi-qch base-admin up to 57a8126bb3353a004f3c7722089e3b926ea83596. Impacted is the function Upload of the file SysFileController.java of the component JSP Parser. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in unrestricted upload. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.",
"id": "GHSA-gwrh-w4f9-ffc9",
"modified": "2026-02-18T21:31:23Z",
"published": "2026-02-18T21:31:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-2665"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/huanzi-qch/base-admin/issues/38"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/huanzi-qch/base-admin/issues/38#issue-3905100373"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/huanzi-qch/base-admin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.346462"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.346462"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.753240"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-GWV4-HQ6G-656M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-17 18:35 – Updated: 2026-06-17 18:35Vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Asset Management product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Enterprise Asset Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Enterprise Asset Management accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Enterprise Asset Management. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.1 (Confidentiality and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-46932"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-17T10:54:12Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Asset Management product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Enterprise Asset Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Enterprise Asset Management accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Enterprise Asset Management. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.1 (Confidentiality and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L).",
"id": "GHSA-gwv4-hq6g-656m",
"modified": "2026-06-17T18:35:38Z",
"published": "2026-06-17T18:35:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46932"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspujun2026.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GWV7-X72M-Q3CM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-13 18:31 – Updated: 2026-01-13 18:31Improper access control in Windows Client-Side Caching (CSC) Service allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-20839"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-13T18:16:12Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Improper access control in Windows Client-Side Caching (CSC) Service allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.",
"id": "GHSA-gwv7-x72m-q3cm",
"modified": "2026-01-13T18:31:09Z",
"published": "2026-01-13T18:31:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-20839"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20839"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GWWM-449R-PFPX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-16 15:30 – Updated: 2026-03-16 15:30Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Campus Educativa specifically at the endpoint '/administracion/admin_usuarios.cgi?filtro_estado=T&wAccion=listado_xlsx&wBuscar=&wFiltrar=&wOrden=alta_usuario&wid_cursoActual=[ID]' where the data of users enrolled in the course is exported. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated attacker to access user data (e.g., usernames, first and last names, email addresses, and phone numbers) and retrieve the data of all users enrolled in courses by performing a brute-force attack on the course ID via a manipulated URL.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-3110"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-16T14:19:46Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Campus Educativa specifically at the endpoint \u0027/administracion/admin_usuarios.cgi?filtro_estado=T\u0026wAccion=listado_xlsx\u0026wBuscar=\u0026wFiltrar=\u0026wOrden=alta_usuario\u0026wid_cursoActual=[ID]\u0027 where the data of users enrolled in the course is exported. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated attacker to access user data (e.g., usernames, first and last names, email addresses, and phone numbers) and retrieve the data of all users enrolled in courses by performing a brute-force attack on the course ID via a manipulated URL.",
"id": "GHSA-gwwm-449r-pfpx",
"modified": "2026-03-16T15:30:44Z",
"published": "2026-03-16T15:30:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3110"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/multiple-vulnerabilities-educativa-campus"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-GX42-HF7V-VHVG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:14 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:33The route manager in FlightGear before 2016.4.4 allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a crafted Nasal script.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-9956"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-02-22T16:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The route manager in FlightGear before 2016.4.4 allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a crafted Nasal script.",
"id": "GHSA-gx42-hf7v-vhvg",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:33:20Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:14:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9956"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BZKAN7V6UOHSRFWO567XMN4O6WXTSL32"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DB3B5XBB2NL2O2U4WNYGH7ZL45Q4UHGG"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BZKAN7V6UOHSRFWO567XMN4O6WXTSL32"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DB3B5XBB2NL2O2U4WNYGH7ZL45Q4UHGG"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/flightgear/ci/280cd523686fbdb175d50417266d2487a8ce67d2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/projects/flightgear/files/release-2016.4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4588-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3742"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/14/11"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/15/10"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/16/5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94945"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GX55-F84R-V3R7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-30 18:19 – Updated: 2026-06-30 18:19Summary
Fission's Environment CRD exposes spec.runtime.podSpec and spec.builder.podSpec, which are merged into the Kubernetes pod specs for runtime and builder pods. The merge logic propagated hostNetwork, hostPID, hostIPC, container
privileged, and serviceAccountName from the user-supplied podspec with no filtering, and Environment.Validate performed no security-relevant checks on these fields.
Details
A namespace user with create/update on environments.fission.io could produce privileged, host-network, hostPID pods in the Fission function or builder namespace. Because the Helm chart created the fission-function and
fission-builder namespaces with no pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce labels, Kubernetes Pod Security Admission did not catch the escape either.
From a host-network privileged pod with hostPID, the attacker could nsenter into the host, read cloud-metadata credentials, access the container-runtime socket, pivot to other namespaces, and fully compromise the node.
Impact
environments.fission.io create/update RBAC is escalated to node compromise — host filesystem and network access on the scheduling node, and from there potential cluster-wide takeover.
Fix
Fixed in #3391 and released in v1.24.0. Denylist at admission (the primary defence) plus belt-and-braces at the merge layer.
Admission denylist (pkg/apis/core/v1/podspec_safety.go::ValidatePodSpecSafety), called from Environment.Validate for both Runtime.PodSpec and Builder.PodSpec:
- pod-level:
HostNetwork,HostPID,HostIPC,ServiceAccountName/DeprecatedServiceAccountoverride, hostPath volumes; - per-container:
SecurityContext.Privileged=true,SecurityContext.AllowPrivilegeEscalation=true, dangerous capabilities (SYS_ADMIN,NET_ADMIN,SYS_PTRACE,SYS_MODULE,DAC_READ_SEARCH,DAC_OVERRIDE).
Update-bypass closed: the Environment validating-webhook marker is extended from verbs=create to verbs=create;update (chart and envtest manifests aligned).
Merge-layer belt-and-braces (pkg/executor/util/merge.go): even if admission is bypassed (failurePolicy=Ignore or stale pre-webhook objects), the denylisted pod-level fields are stripped and per-container dangerous settings are
sanitized before the merge (with SecurityContext deep-copied first so cached informer objects are not mutated). Legitimate operator hardening via the chart's pod-level securityContext (fsGroup, runAsNonRoot, runAsUser) still flows
through.
Behavioural change
Environments that explicitly set any denylisted field are now rejected at admission. There is no legitimate Fission use case — these primitives exist for cluster operators, not Environment authors.
This is the same root cause and fix as GHSA-wmgg-3p4h-48x7.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.23.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/fission/fission"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.24.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-50564"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269",
"CWE-284",
"CWE-693"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-30T18:19:32Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-10T18:17:12Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nFission\u0027s `Environment` CRD exposes `spec.runtime.podSpec` and `spec.builder.podSpec`, which are merged into the Kubernetes pod specs for runtime and builder pods. The merge logic propagated `hostNetwork`, `hostPID`, `hostIPC`, container\n `privileged`, and `serviceAccountName` from the user-supplied podspec with no filtering, and `Environment.Validate` performed no security-relevant checks on these fields.\n\n### Details\n\nA namespace user with `create`/`update` on `environments.fission.io` could produce privileged, host-network, hostPID pods in the Fission function or builder namespace. Because the Helm chart created the `fission-function` and\n`fission-builder` namespaces with no `pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce` labels, Kubernetes Pod Security Admission did not catch the escape either.\n\nFrom a host-network privileged pod with hostPID, the attacker could `nsenter` into the host, read cloud-metadata credentials, access the container-runtime socket, pivot to other namespaces, and fully compromise the node.\n\n### Impact\n\n`environments.fission.io` create/update RBAC is escalated to node compromise \u2014 host filesystem and network access on the scheduling node, and from there potential cluster-wide takeover.\n\n### Fix\n\nFixed in [#3391](https://github.com/fission/fission/pull/3391) and released in [v1.24.0](https://github.com/fission/fission/releases/tag/v1.24.0). Denylist at admission (the primary defence) plus belt-and-braces at the merge layer.\n\n**Admission denylist** (`pkg/apis/core/v1/podspec_safety.go::ValidatePodSpecSafety`), called from `Environment.Validate` for both `Runtime.PodSpec` and `Builder.PodSpec`:\n\n- pod-level: `HostNetwork`, `HostPID`, `HostIPC`, `ServiceAccountName` / `DeprecatedServiceAccount` override, hostPath volumes;\n- per-container: `SecurityContext.Privileged=true`, `SecurityContext.AllowPrivilegeEscalation=true`, dangerous capabilities (`SYS_ADMIN`, `NET_ADMIN`, `SYS_PTRACE`, `SYS_MODULE`, `DAC_READ_SEARCH`, `DAC_OVERRIDE`).\n\n**Update-bypass closed:** the `Environment` validating-webhook marker is extended from `verbs=create` to `verbs=create;update` (chart and envtest manifests aligned).\n\n**Merge-layer belt-and-braces** (`pkg/executor/util/merge.go`): even if admission is bypassed (`failurePolicy=Ignore` or stale pre-webhook objects), the denylisted pod-level fields are stripped and per-container dangerous settings are\nsanitized before the merge (with `SecurityContext` deep-copied first so cached informer objects are not mutated). Legitimate operator hardening via the chart\u0027s pod-level `securityContext` (fsGroup, runAsNonRoot, runAsUser) still flows\nthrough.\n\n### Behavioural change\n\nEnvironments that explicitly set any denylisted field are now rejected at admission. There is no legitimate Fission use case \u2014 these primitives exist for cluster operators, not Environment authors.\n\nThis is the same root cause and fix as GHSA-wmgg-3p4h-48x7.",
"id": "GHSA-gx55-f84r-v3r7",
"modified": "2026-06-30T18:19:32Z",
"published": "2026-06-30T18:19:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fission/fission/security/advisories/GHSA-gx55-f84r-v3r7"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50564"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fission/fission/pull/3391"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fission/fission/commit/e484df8460bb4e8026e24210120602aa7f181f64"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/fission/fission"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fission/fission/releases/tag/v1.24.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Fission Environment CRD podspec passthrough enables hostPID/hostNetwork/privileged pods, node escape"
}
GHSA-GX6W-379G-97R9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-13 21:30 – Updated: 2025-05-13 21:30Improper access control in the memory controller configurations for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processor with E-cores may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-20100"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-13T21:16:06Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Improper access control in the memory controller configurations for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processor with E-cores may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.",
"id": "GHSA-gx6w-379g-97r9",
"modified": "2025-05-13T21:30:56Z",
"published": "2025-05-13T21:30:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-20100"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01278.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-1
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Mitigation MIT-46
Strategy: Separation of Privilege
- Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
- Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CAPEC-19: Embedding Scripts within Scripts
An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.
CAPEC-441: Malicious Logic Insertion
An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.
CAPEC-478: Modification of Windows Service Configuration
An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.
CAPEC-479: Malicious Root Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.
CAPEC-502: Intent Spoof
An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.
CAPEC-503: WebView Exposure
An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.
CAPEC-536: Data Injected During Configuration
An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.
CAPEC-546: Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment
An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.
CAPEC-550: Install New Service
When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.
CAPEC-551: Modify Existing Service
When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.
CAPEC-552: Install Rootkit
An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.
CAPEC-556: Replace File Extension Handlers
When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.
CAPEC-558: Replace Trusted Executable
An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.
CAPEC-562: Modify Shared File
An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.
CAPEC-563: Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot
An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.
CAPEC-564: Run Software at Logon
Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.
CAPEC-578: Disable Security Software
An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.