CWE-1285
AllowedImproper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product receives input that is expected to specify an index, position, or offset into an indexable resource such as a buffer or file, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the specified index/position/offset has the required properties.
104 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-9R4W-JG96-92MV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-12 15:04 – Updated: 2026-08-28 20:48Summary
parseEfiSignatureList() in attest/internal/events.go does not skip
SignatureHeaderSize vendor bytes before reading EFI_SIGNATURE_LIST
signature entries, violating UEFI specification section 31.4.1.
Impact
For hashSHA256SigGUID lists, attacker-controlled vendor header bytes are appended directly to the trusted SHA256 hash list. A crafted TPM event log can inject arbitrary SHA256 hashes into the verifier's trusted measurement database, allowing a remote attestation verifier to accept a compromised boot state as legitimate — breaking the core integrity guarantee of remote attestation.
Root Cause
After binary.Read(&signatures.Header) reads 28 bytes, buf points to the start of the SignatureHeaderSize vendor bytes. Both entry loops start at sigOffset := 0 instead of sigOffset := SignatureHeaderSize, causing vendor bytes to be read as signature entries.
Affected versions
All versions through commit f877374 (2026-05-15).
Fix
Pull request: https://github.com/google/go-attestation/pull/502
- Add bound check:
SignatureHeaderSizemust not exceed remaining list space - Skip
SignatureHeaderSizebytes before both entry loops - Regression test:
TestParseEfiSignatureListNonZeroSignatureHeaderSize
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.6.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/google/go-attestation"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.6.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-12681"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20",
"CWE-1285"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-12T15:04:43Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T02:16:28Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n`parseEfiSignatureList()` in `attest/internal/events.go` does not skip\n`SignatureHeaderSize` vendor bytes before reading `EFI_SIGNATURE_LIST`\nsignature entries, violating UEFI specification section 31.4.1.\n\n## Impact\n\nFor `hashSHA256SigGUID` lists, attacker-controlled vendor header bytes are appended directly to the trusted SHA256 hash list. A crafted TPM event log can inject arbitrary SHA256 hashes into the verifier\u0027s trusted measurement database, allowing a remote attestation verifier to accept a compromised boot state as legitimate \u2014 breaking the core integrity guarantee of remote attestation.\n\n## Root Cause\n\nAfter `binary.Read(\u0026signatures.Header)` reads 28 bytes, `buf` points to the start of the `SignatureHeaderSize` vendor bytes. Both entry loops start at `sigOffset := 0` instead of `sigOffset := SignatureHeaderSize`, causing vendor bytes to be read as signature entries.\n\n## Affected versions\n\nAll versions through commit `f877374` (2026-05-15).\n\n## Fix\n\nPull request: https://github.com/google/go-attestation/pull/502\n\n- Add bound check: `SignatureHeaderSize` must not exceed remaining list space\n- Skip `SignatureHeaderSize` bytes before both entry loops\n- Regression test: `TestParseEfiSignatureListNonZeroSignatureHeaderSize`",
"id": "GHSA-9r4w-jg96-92mv",
"modified": "2026-08-28T20:48:40Z",
"published": "2026-06-12T15:04:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/google/go-attestation/security/advisories/GHSA-9r4w-jg96-92mv"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12681"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/google/go-attestation/pull/502"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/google/go-attestation/commit/b6e905e7ae52937f02b5ca494dd1c6a3ac7a1003"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/google/go-attestation"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/google/go-attestation/releases/tag/v0.6.1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Go-Attestation: Hash injection into trusted measurement list via unskipped SignatureHeaderSize vendor bytes in parseEfiSignatureList()"
}
GHSA-C85W-X26Q-CH87
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-01 00:11 – Updated: 2026-02-18 23:47Summary
Improper validation of select fields allows attackers to craft an input that crashes the system, resulting in a 500 status and making the entire site and administration panel unavailable. This clearly impacts the Availability aspect of the CIA triad (confidentiality, integrity, and availability), although the attack still has certain limitations.
Details
The attack involves injecting any invalid user role value. Doing this will change the users data in a way that prevents users and then the entire site from loading. Even though the actual data change is minimal, the error is unrecoverable until a valid role parameter is restored by direct modification of the user account file. Proper validation of select fields will prevent extraneous valid from being accepted and making the entire site and administration panel unavailable.
Patches
- Formwork 2.x (d9f0c1f) adds proper validation to select fields.
Impact
The condition for this attack is having high privileges or Admin access, which means it could be exploited by an Insider Threat. Alternatively, if an attacker gains access to a privileged user account, they can execute the attack as well. Overall, the attack is relatively difficult to carry out, but if successful, the impact and damage would be significant.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "getformwork/formwork"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0-beta.1"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.0-beta.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1285",
"CWE-248"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-03-01T00:11:52Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\nImproper validation of select fields allows attackers to craft an input that crashes the system, resulting in a 500 status and making the entire site and administration panel unavailable.\nThis clearly impacts the Availability aspect of the CIA triad (confidentiality, integrity, and availability), although the attack still has certain limitations.\n\n### Details\nThe attack involves injecting any invalid user role value. Doing this will change the users data in a way that prevents users and then the entire site from loading. Even though the actual data change is minimal, the error is unrecoverable until a valid role parameter is restored by direct modification of the user account file.\nProper validation of select fields will prevent extraneous valid from being accepted and making the entire site and administration panel unavailable.\n\n### Patches\n- [**Formwork 2.x** (d9f0c1f)](https://github.com/getformwork/formwork/commit/d9f0c1feb3b9855d5bdc8bb189c0aaab2792e7ca) adds proper validation to select fields.\n\n### Impact\nThe condition for this attack is having high privileges or Admin access, which means it could be exploited by an Insider Threat. Alternatively, if an attacker gains access to a privileged user account, they can execute the attack as well.\nOverall, the attack is relatively difficult to carry out, but if successful, the impact and damage would be significant.",
"id": "GHSA-c85w-x26q-ch87",
"modified": "2026-02-18T23:47:37Z",
"published": "2025-03-01T00:11:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/getformwork/formwork/security/advisories/GHSA-c85w-x26q-ch87"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/getformwork/formwork/commit/d9f0c1feb3b9855d5bdc8bb189c0aaab2792e7ca"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/getformwork/formwork"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Formwork improperly validates input of User role preventing site and panel availability"
}
GHSA-F5W7-CJPW-QQ45
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-28 15:34 – Updated: 2025-06-09 21:30IBM Tivoli Monitoring 6.3.0.7 through 6.3.0.7 Service Pack 19 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of an index value of a dynamically allocated array.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-3357"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1285",
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-28T15:15:24Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "IBM Tivoli Monitoring 6.3.0.7 through 6.3.0.7 Service Pack 19\u00a0could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of an index value of a dynamically allocated array.",
"id": "GHSA-f5w7-cjpw-qq45",
"modified": "2025-06-09T21:30:44Z",
"published": "2025-05-28T15:34:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3357"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7234923"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F62V-3898-QGWQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-30 00:32 – Updated: 2025-07-30 00:32A memory corruption vulnerability due to improper input validation in lvpict.cpp exists in NI LabVIEW that may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2025 Q1 and prior versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-7848"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1285"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-29T22:15:25Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A memory corruption vulnerability due to improper input validation in lvpict.cpp exists in NI LabVIEW that may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2025 Q1 and prior versions.",
"id": "GHSA-f62v-3898-qgwq",
"modified": "2025-07-30T00:32:18Z",
"published": "2025-07-30T00:32:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-7848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ni.com/en/support/security/available-critical-and-security-updates-for-ni-software/memory-corruption-vulnerabilities-in-ni-labview.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-FCJQ-PRHJ-CC4C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-23 15:30 – Updated: 2026-03-23 15:30Paint Studio 2.17 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by providing malformed input through the key entry mechanism. Attackers can create a text file with a large buffer of characters and trigger the application to read it, causing the application to crash and become unavailable.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-25622"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1285"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-23T14:16:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Paint Studio 2.17 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by providing malformed input through the key entry mechanism. Attackers can create a text file with a large buffer of characters and trigger the application to read it, causing the application to crash and become unavailable.",
"id": "GHSA-fcjq-prhj-cc4c",
"modified": "2026-03-23T15:30:44Z",
"published": "2026-03-23T15:30:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-25622"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46126"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/paint-studio-denial-of-service-via-malformed-input"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.pixarra.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.pixarra.com/uploads/9/4/6/3/94635436/tbpaintstudio_install.exe"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-FCXW-9X6M-FRW4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-02 21:30 – Updated: 2025-09-02 21:30There is an out of bounds write vulnerability due to improper bounds checking in displ2.dll when parsing a DSB file with Digilent DASYLab. This vulnerability may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted DSB file. The vulnerability affects all versions of DASYLab.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-57777"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1285",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-02T19:15:32Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "There is an out of bounds write vulnerability due to improper bounds checking in displ2.dll when parsing a DSB file with Digilent DASYLab. This vulnerability may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted DSB file. The vulnerability affects all versions of DASYLab.",
"id": "GHSA-fcxw-9x6m-frw4",
"modified": "2025-09-02T21:30:58Z",
"published": "2025-09-02T21:30:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-57777"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ni.com/en/support/security/available-critical-and-security-updates-for-ni-software/memory-corruption-vulnerabilities-in-digilent-dasylab.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-FF23-PX5J-G8QQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-03 18:30 – Updated: 2024-10-03 18:30NVIDIA CUDA toolkit for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the nvdisasm command line tool where an attacker may cause an improper validation in input issue by tricking the user into running nvdisasm on a malicious ELF file. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to denial of service.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-0123"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1285"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-03T17:15:14Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "NVIDIA CUDA toolkit for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the nvdisasm command line tool where an attacker may cause an improper validation in input issue by tricking the user into running nvdisasm on a malicious ELF file. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to denial of service.",
"id": "GHSA-ff23-px5j-g8qq",
"modified": "2024-10-03T18:30:36Z",
"published": "2024-10-03T18:30:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0123"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5577"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FJ3Q-J3Q4-V62V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-10 18:31 – Updated: 2024-12-10 18:31An out of bounds read due to improper input validation in BuildFontMap in fontmgr.cpp in NI LabVIEW may disclose information or result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to provide a user with a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects LabVIEW 2024 Q3 and prior versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-10496"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1285"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-10T16:15:22Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An out of bounds read due to improper input validation in BuildFontMap in fontmgr.cpp in NI LabVIEW may disclose information or result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to provide a user with a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects LabVIEW 2024 Q3 and prior versions.",
"id": "GHSA-fj3q-j3q4-v62v",
"modified": "2024-12-10T18:31:07Z",
"published": "2024-12-10T18:31:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-10496"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ni.com/en/support/security/available-critical-and-security-updates-for-ni-software/out-of-bounds-read-vulnerabilities-in-ni-labview-.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-FMV8-PJV5-9R92
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-02 21:30 – Updated: 2025-09-02 21:30There is an out of bounds write vulnerability due to improper bounds checking resulting in an invalid source address when parsing a DSB file with Digilent DASYLab. This vulnerability may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted DSB file. The vulnerability affects all versions of DASYLab.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-57778"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1285",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-02T19:15:32Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "There is an out of bounds write vulnerability due to improper bounds checking resulting in an invalid source address when parsing a DSB file with Digilent DASYLab. This vulnerability may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted DSB file. The vulnerability affects all versions of DASYLab.",
"id": "GHSA-fmv8-pjv5-9r92",
"modified": "2025-09-02T21:30:58Z",
"published": "2025-09-02T21:30:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-57778"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ni.com/en/support/security/available-critical-and-security-updates-for-ni-software/memory-corruption-vulnerabilities-in-digilent-dasylab.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-G638-6X55-M5Q5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-12 15:30 – Updated: 2026-08-12 15:30A maliciously crafted input, when processed by the Autodesk Installer IPC frame parser, may trigger improper validation of an input-specified position or offset, resulting in an out-of-range substring operation. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM service to terminate unexpectedly, resulting in a denial-of-service condition.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-14479"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1285"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-12T15:17:31Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A maliciously crafted input, when processed by the Autodesk Installer IPC frame parser, may trigger improper validation of an input-specified position or offset, resulting in an out-of-range substring operation. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause the NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM service to terminate unexpectedly, resulting in a denial-of-service condition.",
"id": "GHSA-g638-6x55-m5q5",
"modified": "2026-08-12T15:30:46Z",
"published": "2026-08-12T15:30:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14479"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://emsfs.autodesk.com/utility/odis/1/installer/latest/AdODIS-installer.exe"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.autodesk.com/trust/security-advisories/adsk-sa-2026-0013"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.