GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2026-09-02 14:37
Modified
2026-09-02 15:04
Summary
Ceph: AES-CBC misuse in CephX and RADOSGW enables authentication bypass and credential forgery
Details

Ceph is an open-source distributed storage platform providing object, block, and file storage. In versions prior to 20.2.4 and 19.2.6, the CephX authentication protocol encrypts tickets with AES-128-CBC in an unauthenticated mode that uses a hard-coded initialization vector and no message authentication, allowing an attacker to forge credentials and gain cluster-wide access. Because the ciphertext is malleable and the monitor will encrypt attacker-chosen entity names, an attacker holding one low-privilege key and able to observe CephX traffic can use the monitor as an encryption oracle and splice ciphertext blocks into valid tickets for privileged entities such as Manager, MDS, and OSD. The same lack of authentication also lets an attacker with CephX permissions escalate privileges by flipping a single bit in a service ticket to set its allow_all field to true. This issue is fixed in versions 20.2.4 and 19.2.6.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Bitnami",
        "name": "ceph",
        "purl": "pkg:bitnami/ceph"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "19.2.6"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "20.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "20.2.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "severity": [
        {
          "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
          "type": "CVSS_V3"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-30156"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cpes": [
      "cpe:2.3:a:linuxfoundation:ceph:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
    ],
    "severity": "High"
  },
  "details": "Ceph is an open-source distributed storage platform providing object, block, and file storage. In versions prior to 20.2.4 and 19.2.6, the CephX authentication protocol encrypts tickets with AES-128-CBC in an unauthenticated mode that uses a hard-coded initialization vector and no message authentication, allowing an attacker to forge credentials and gain cluster-wide access. Because the ciphertext is malleable and the monitor will encrypt attacker-chosen entity names, an attacker holding one low-privilege key and able to observe CephX traffic can use the monitor as an encryption oracle and splice ciphertext blocks into valid tickets for privileged entities such as Manager, MDS, and OSD. The same lack of authentication also lets an attacker with CephX permissions escalate privileges by flipping a single bit in a service ticket to set its allow_all field to true. This issue is fixed in versions 20.2.4 and 19.2.6.",
  "id": "BIT-ceph-2025-30156",
  "modified": "2026-09-02T15:04:30.450Z",
  "published": "2026-09-02T14:37:31.295Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2ba086255de09c8b95177717cc7e9dd4377e2f0f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3078188a7bdd89e2975280f2a906c71c2f6effd6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-7q3q-3975-qw3q"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30156"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.6.2",
  "summary": "Ceph: AES-CBC misuse in CephX and RADOSGW enables authentication bypass and credential forgery"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…