CWE-807
AllowedReliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product uses a protection mechanism that relies on the existence or values of an input, but the input can be modified by an untrusted actor in a way that bypasses the protection mechanism.
149 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-82FF-HG59-8X73
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-29 20:23 – Updated: 2025-08-29 20:23Hosts listed in TrustedOrigins implicitly allow requests from the corresponding HTTP origins, allowing network MitMs to perform CSRF attacks.
After the CVE-2025-24358 fix, a network attacker that places a form at http://example.com can't get it to submit to https://example.com because the Origin header is checked with sameOrigin against a synthetic URL.
However, if a host is added to TrustedOrigins, both its HTTP and HTTPS origins will be allowed, because the schema of the synthetic URL is ignored and only the host is checked. For example, if an application is hosted on https://example.com and adds example.net to TrustedOrigins, a network attacker can serve a form at http://example.net to perform the attack.
Applications should migrate to net/http.CrossOriginProtection, introduced in Go 1.25. If that is not an option, a backport is available as a module at filippo.io/csrf, and a drop-in replacement for the github.com/gorilla/csrf API is available at filippo.io/csrf/gorilla.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/gorilla/csrf"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.7.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-47909"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-08-29T20:23:16Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-29T16:15:35Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Hosts listed in TrustedOrigins implicitly allow requests from the corresponding HTTP origins, allowing network MitMs to perform CSRF attacks.\n\nAfter the CVE-2025-24358 fix, a network attacker that places a form at http://example.com can\u0027t get it to submit to https://example.com because the Origin header is checked with sameOrigin against a synthetic URL.\n\nHowever, if a host is added to TrustedOrigins, both its HTTP and HTTPS origins will be allowed, because the schema of the synthetic URL is ignored and only the host is checked. For example, if an application is hosted on https://example.com and adds example.net to TrustedOrigins, a network attacker can serve a form at http://example.net to perform the attack.\n\nApplications should migrate to net/http.CrossOriginProtection, introduced in Go 1.25. If that is not an option, a backport is available as a module at filippo.io/csrf, and a drop-in replacement for the github.com/gorilla/csrf API is available at filippo.io/csrf/gorilla.",
"id": "GHSA-82ff-hg59-8x73",
"modified": "2025-08-29T20:23:17Z",
"published": "2025-08-29T20:23:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-47909"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/golang/vulndb/issues/3884"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/gorilla/csrf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3884"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "github.com/gorilla/csrf improperly validates TrustedOrigins allowing CSRF attacks"
}
GHSA-84XF-F99R-6PRW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-21 15:30 – Updated: 2025-07-21 15:30A business logic vulnerability in the Up2Date component of Sophos Firewall older than version 21.0 MR1 (20.0.1) can lead to attackers controlling the firewall’s DNS environment to achieve remote code execution.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-13974"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-21T14:15:29Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A business logic vulnerability in the Up2Date component of Sophos Firewall older than version 21.0 MR1 (20.0.1) can lead to attackers controlling the firewall\u2019s DNS environment to achieve remote code execution.",
"id": "GHSA-84xf-f99r-6prw",
"modified": "2025-07-21T15:30:30Z",
"published": "2025-07-21T15:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-13974"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.sophos.com/en-us/security-advisories/sophos-sa-20250721-sfos-rce"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8HJ2-W4C9-FJFQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-16 21:32 – Updated: 2026-06-18 20:32Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-8j37-5w68-wj2g. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
OpenClaw before 2026.5.7 contains a sender policy bypass vulnerability in BlueBubbles that allows participants to match allowlist entries through conversation metadata rather than stable sender identity. Attackers can influence conversation-level identifiers to receive agent responses intended for configured senders, potentially bypassing access controls.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2026.5.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-18T20:32:05Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-16T19:17:03Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "## Duplicate Advisory\n\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of\u00a0GHSA-8j37-5w68-wj2g. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\nOpenClaw before 2026.5.7 contains a sender policy bypass vulnerability in BlueBubbles that allows participants to match allowlist entries through conversation metadata rather than stable sender identity. Attackers can influence conversation-level identifiers to receive agent responses intended for configured senders, potentially bypassing access controls.",
"id": "GHSA-8hj2-w4c9-fjfq",
"modified": "2026-06-18T20:32:05Z",
"published": "2026-06-16T21:32:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-8j37-5w68-wj2g"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53860"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-sender-policy-bypass-via-mutable-conversation-identifiers-in-bluebubbles"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: BlueBubbles sender policy could match mutable conversation identifiers",
"withdrawn": "2026-06-18T20:32:05Z"
}
GHSA-C7FV-2WX9-32WH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-12 09:31 – Updated: 2026-06-12 09:31The connection confirmation pop-up of a specific feature in the PcSuite can be bypassed.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-12058"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-12T09:16:29Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The connection confirmation pop-up of a specific feature in the PcSuite can be bypassed.",
"id": "GHSA-c7fv-2wx9-32wh",
"modified": "2026-06-12T09:31:55Z",
"published": "2026-06-12T09:31:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12058"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vivo.com/en/support/security-advisory-detail?id=23"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-CH84-H92G-MW93
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-26 18:31 – Updated: 2026-02-10 15:30Reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-21509"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-26T18:16:38Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.",
"id": "GHSA-ch84-h92g-mw93",
"modified": "2026-02-10T15:30:21Z",
"published": "2026-01-26T18:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-21509"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21509"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-21509"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/cve-2026-21509-detection-script-microsoft-office-security-feature-bypass-vulnerability"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/cve-2026-21509-mitigation-script-microsoft-office-security-feature-bypass-vulnerability"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-CJJ3-M869-748G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-10 18:30 – Updated: 2026-02-10 21:31Reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-21514"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-10T18:16:33Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.",
"id": "GHSA-cjj3-m869-748g",
"modified": "2026-02-10T21:31:29Z",
"published": "2026-02-10T18:30:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-21514"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21514"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-21514"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-CQWV-9QJX-VXW2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-02 16:38 – Updated: 2026-07-02 16:38Summary
Skill Workshop apply flow could override pending approval. In affected versions, an agent tool call reaching the affected Skill Workshop apply path could set apply: true despite approvalPolicy: pending.
This advisory is scoped to the named feature and configuration. It does not change OpenClaw's trusted-operator model: authenticated Gateway operators, installed plugins, and intentional local execution surfaces remain trusted unless a separate policy, approval, allowlist, sandbox, or auth boundary is crossed.
Impact
When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, this could apply a workshop change before the expected approval step. Practical impact depends on the operator's configuration and whether lower-trust input can reach that path.
Patched Versions
The first stable patched version is 2026.5.6.
Mitigations
review Skill Workshop changes manually and keep the tool restricted until patched. As general hardening, keep channel and tool allowlists narrow, avoid sharing one Gateway between mutually untrusted users, and disable the affected feature when it is not needed.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.5.5"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.5.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-02T16:38:03Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nSkill Workshop apply flow could override pending approval. In affected versions, an agent tool call reaching the affected Skill Workshop apply path could set `apply: true` despite `approvalPolicy: pending`.\n\nThis advisory is scoped to the named feature and configuration. It does not change OpenClaw\u0027s trusted-operator model: authenticated Gateway operators, installed plugins, and intentional local execution surfaces remain trusted unless a separate policy, approval, allowlist, sandbox, or auth boundary is crossed.\n\n### Impact\n\nWhen the affected feature is enabled and reachable, this could apply a workshop change before the expected approval step. Practical impact depends on the operator\u0027s configuration and whether lower-trust input can reach that path.\n\n### Patched Versions\n\nThe first stable patched version is `2026.5.6`.\n\n### Mitigations\n\nreview Skill Workshop changes manually and keep the tool restricted until patched. As general hardening, keep channel and tool allowlists narrow, avoid sharing one Gateway between mutually untrusted users, and disable the affected feature when it is not needed.",
"id": "GHSA-cqwv-9qjx-vxw2",
"modified": "2026-07-02T16:38:03Z",
"published": "2026-07-02T16:38:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-cqwv-9qjx-vxw2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Skill Workshop apply flow could override pending approval"
}
GHSA-CRRM-44JR-89J8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-14 18:30 – Updated: 2026-04-14 18:30Reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision in Windows Boot Loader allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-0390"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-14T18:16:42Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision in Windows Boot Loader allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.",
"id": "GHSA-crrm-44jr-89j8",
"modified": "2026-04-14T18:30:36Z",
"published": "2026-04-14T18:30:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0390"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-0390"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F5MF-3R52-R83W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-13 20:54 – Updated: 2026-03-13 20:54Summary
OpenClaw's Zalouser allowlist mode accepted mutable group names and normalized slugs as authorization matches instead of requiring stable group IDs. In deployments that used name-based channels.zalouser.groups entries together with permissive sender allowlists, a different group could be accepted by reusing the same display name as an allowlisted group.
Impact
This weakened channel authorization for Zalouser group routing and could allow messages from an unintended group to reach the agent when operators relied on group names instead of stable IDs.
Affected versions
openclaw <= 2026.3.11
Patch
Fixed in openclaw 2026.3.12. Allowlist authorization now matches stable group identifiers, and users should update to 2026.3.12 or later.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.3.11"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.3.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-13T20:54:00Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nOpenClaw\u0027s Zalouser allowlist mode accepted mutable group names and normalized slugs as authorization matches instead of requiring stable group IDs. In deployments that used name-based `channels.zalouser.groups` entries together with permissive sender allowlists, a different group could be accepted by reusing the same display name as an allowlisted group.\n\n### Impact\n\nThis weakened channel authorization for Zalouser group routing and could allow messages from an unintended group to reach the agent when operators relied on group names instead of stable IDs.\n\n### Affected versions\n\n`openclaw` `\u003c= 2026.3.11`\n\n### Patch\n\nFixed in `openclaw` `2026.3.12`. Allowlist authorization now matches stable group identifiers, and users should update to `2026.3.12` or later.",
"id": "GHSA-f5mf-3r52-r83w",
"modified": "2026-03-13T20:54:00Z",
"published": "2026-03-13T20:54:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-f5mf-3r52-r83w"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/releases/tag/v2026.3.12"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "OpenClaw\u0027s Zalouser allowlist authorization matched mutable group names by default"
}
GHSA-FWFM-V4VV-WGJ6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-22 21:30 – Updated: 2025-01-22 21:30By utilizing software-defined radios and a custom low-latency processing pipeline, RF signals with spoofed location data can be transmitted to aircraft targets. This can lead to the appearance of fake aircraft on displays and potentially trigger undesired Resolution Advisories (RAs).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-9310"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-22T19:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "By utilizing software-defined radios and a custom low-latency processing pipeline, RF signals with spoofed location data can be transmitted to aircraft targets. This can lead to the appearance of fake aircraft on displays and potentially trigger undesired Resolution Advisories (RAs).",
"id": "GHSA-fwfm-v4vv-wgj6",
"modified": "2025-01-22T21:30:57Z",
"published": "2025-01-22T21:30:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-9310"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-021-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-14
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
- Store state information and sensitive data on the server side only.
- Ensure that the system definitively and unambiguously keeps track of its own state and user state and has rules defined for legitimate state transitions. Do not allow any application user to affect state directly in any way other than through legitimate actions leading to state transitions.
- If information must be stored on the client, do not do so without encryption and integrity checking, or otherwise having a mechanism on the server side to catch tampering. Use a message authentication code (MAC) algorithm, such as Hash Message Authentication Code (HMAC) [REF-529]. Apply this against the state or sensitive data that has to be exposed, which can guarantee the integrity of the data - i.e., that the data has not been modified. Ensure that a strong hash function is used (CWE-328).
Mitigation MIT-4.2
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- With a stateless protocol such as HTTP, use a framework that maintains the state for you.
- Examples include ASP.NET View State [REF-756] and the OWASP ESAPI Session Management feature [REF-45].
- Be careful of language features that provide state support, since these might be provided as a convenience to the programmer and may not be considering security.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-16
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
Mitigation MIT-6
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
- Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
- Identify all inputs that are used for security decisions and determine if you can modify the design so that you do not have to rely on submitted inputs at all. For example, you may be able to keep critical information about the user's session on the server side instead of recording it within external data.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.