CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14178 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-6QP7-WV56-688P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:38 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:38Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in php/user_account.php in Silver Peak VX through 6.2.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create administrative accounts.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-2974"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-07-28T17:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in php/user_account.php in Silver Peak VX through 6.2.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create administrative accounts.",
"id": "GHSA-6qp7-wv56-688p",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:38:56Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:38:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-2974"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/867980"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-6QP8-6RCJ-28RX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-09 06:30 – Updated: 2024-10-09 18:313DSecure 2.0 allows CSRF in the Authorization Method via modified Origin and Referer HTTP headers.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-25286"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-09T04:15:07Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "3DSecure 2.0 allows CSRF in the Authorization Method via modified Origin and Referer HTTP headers.",
"id": "GHSA-6qp8-6rcj-28rx",
"modified": "2024-10-09T18:31:42Z",
"published": "2024-10-09T06:30:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-25286"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Sep/31"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6QPQ-J4Q7-X5CR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-11 09:31 – Updated: 2026-03-11 09:31The Modular DS: Monitor, update, and backup multiple websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the postConfirmOauth() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disconnect the plugin's OAuth/SSO connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-3903"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-11T08:16:04Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Modular DS: Monitor, update, and backup multiple websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the postConfirmOauth() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disconnect the plugin\u0027s OAuth/SSO connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-6qpq-j4q7-x5cr",
"modified": "2026-03-11T09:31:54Z",
"published": "2026-03-11T09:31:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3903"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3441222"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/913a94ad-f425-4d24-9e23-7074ecfed8ad?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6QPX-RMJ4-MCJ5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-20 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Martin Gibson IdeaPush allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects IdeaPush: from n/a through 8.69.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-49275"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-20T11:15:03Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Martin Gibson IdeaPush allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects IdeaPush: from n/a through 8.69.",
"id": "GHSA-6qpx-rmj4-mcj5",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:08Z",
"published": "2024-10-20T12:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49275"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/ideapush/vulnerability/wordpress-ideapush-plugin-8-69-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/ideapush/wordpress-ideapush-plugin-8-69-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6QQJ-RX4W-R3CJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-08-31 22:48 – Updated: 2021-09-23 19:45Versions 1.0.3 and earlier of jquery-ujs are vulnerable to an information leakage attack that may enable attackers to launch CSRF attacks, as it allows attackers to send CSRF tokens to external domains.
When an attacker controls the href attribute of an anchor tag, or the action attribute of a form tag triggering a POST action, the attacker can set the href or action to " https://attacker.com". By prepending a space to the external domain, it causes jQuery to consider it a same origin request, resulting in the user's CSRF token being sent to the external domain.
Recommendation
Upgrade jquery-ujs to version 1.0.4 or later.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.0.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "jquery-ujs"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-08-31T18:07:52Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Versions 1.0.3 and earlier of jquery-ujs are vulnerable to an information leakage attack that may enable attackers to launch CSRF attacks, as it allows attackers to send CSRF tokens to external domains.\n\nWhen an attacker controls the href attribute of an anchor tag, or\nthe action attribute of a form tag triggering a POST action, the attacker can set the\nhref or action to \" https://attacker.com\". By prepending a space to the external domain, it causes jQuery to consider it a same origin request, resulting in the user\u0027s CSRF token being sent to the external domain.\n\n\n## Recommendation\n\nUpgrade jquery-ujs to version 1.0.4 or later.",
"id": "GHSA-6qqj-rx4w-r3cj",
"modified": "2021-09-23T19:45:13Z",
"published": "2020-08-31T22:48:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/49935"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rubyonrails-security/XIZPbobuwaY/fqnzzpuOlA4J"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:jquery-ujs:20150624"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/15"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "CSRF Vulnerability in jquery-ujs"
}
GHSA-6QRG-7XMR-HJ3W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-12 12:30 – Updated: 2025-02-12 12:30The WP Abstracts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on multiple functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-12386"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-12T12:15:28Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The WP Abstracts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on multiple functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-6qrg-7xmr-hj3w",
"modified": "2025-02-12T12:30:47Z",
"published": "2025-02-12T12:30:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12386"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3238664"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-abstracts-manuscripts-manager/#developers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/efd27466-f68e-4d8a-a1ec-90dbb6ff126b?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6QX4-RGM3-9GHW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-16 03:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bee BeePress allows Stored XSS.This issue affects BeePress: from n/a through 6.9.8.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-27197"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-16T02:15:08Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bee BeePress allows Stored XSS.This issue affects BeePress: from n/a through 6.9.8.",
"id": "GHSA-6qx4-rgm3-9ghw",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:34:05Z",
"published": "2024-03-16T03:30:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27197"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/beepress/wordpress-beepress-plugin-6-9-8-csrf-to-stored-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6R2V-76J8-X9VV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:40 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:40Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aterm WG2600HP firmware Ver1.0.2 and earlier, and Aterm WG2600HP2 firmware Ver1.0.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-20621"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-01-28T11:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aterm WG2600HP firmware Ver1.0.2 and earlier, and Aterm WG2600HP2 firmware Ver1.0.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-6r2v-76j8-x9vv",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:40:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:40:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20621"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jpn.nec.com/security-info/secinfo/nv21-005.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN38248512/index.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.aterm.jp/support/tech/2019/0328.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-6R2V-GRPR-6WV9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-25 09:32 – Updated: 2025-03-25 09:32The Estatebud – Properties & Listings plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'estatebud_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-13710"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-25T09:15:15Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Estatebud \u2013 Properties \u0026 Listings plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the \u0027estatebud_settings\u0027 page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin\u0027s settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-6r2v-grpr-6wv9",
"modified": "2025-03-25T09:32:07Z",
"published": "2025-03-25T09:32:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-13710"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/estatebud-properties-listings"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c43f4c91-329d-46b9-b2c8-f35e5baa38d7?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6R2V-HF4M-FXXV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-18 18:31 – Updated: 2026-03-19 15:31The update address CSRF vulnerability in MuraCMS through 10.1.10 allows attackers to manipulate user address information through CSRF. The vulnerable cUsers.updateAddress function lacks CSRF token validation, enabling malicious websites to forge requests that add, modify, or delete user addresses when an authenticated administrator visits a crafted webpage. Successful exploitation of the update address CSRF vulnerability results in unauthorized manipulation of user address information within the MuraCMS system, potentially compromising user data integrity and organizational communications. When an authenticated administrator visits a malicious webpage containing the CSRF exploit, their browser automatically submits a hidden form that can add malicious addresses with attacker-controlled email addresses and phone numbers, update existing addresses to redirect communications to attacker-controlled locations or deleted legitimate address records to disrupt business operations. This can lead to misdirected sensitive communications, compromise of user privacy through injection of attacker contact information, disruption of legitimate business correspondence, and potential social engineering attacks via the corrupted address data.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-55045"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-18T16:16:23Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The update address CSRF vulnerability in MuraCMS through 10.1.10 allows attackers to manipulate user address information through CSRF. The vulnerable cUsers.updateAddress function lacks CSRF token validation, enabling malicious websites to forge requests that add, modify, or delete user addresses when an authenticated administrator visits a crafted webpage. Successful exploitation of the update address CSRF vulnerability results in unauthorized manipulation of user address information within the MuraCMS system, potentially compromising user data integrity and organizational communications. When an authenticated administrator visits a malicious webpage containing the CSRF exploit, their browser automatically submits a hidden form that can add malicious addresses with attacker-controlled email addresses and phone numbers, update existing addresses to redirect communications to attacker-controlled locations or deleted legitimate address records to disrupt business operations. This can lead to misdirected sensitive communications, compromise of user privacy through injection of attacker contact information, disruption of legitimate business correspondence, and potential social engineering attacks via the corrupted address data.",
"id": "GHSA-6r2v-hf4m-fxxv",
"modified": "2026-03-19T15:31:15Z",
"published": "2026-03-18T18:31:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-55045"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.murasoftware.com/v10/release-notes"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.murasoftware.com/v10/release-notes/#section-version-1014"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.murasoftware.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.