Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-1288

Allowed

Improper Validation of Consistency within Input

Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete

The product receives a complex input with multiple elements or fields that must be consistent with each other, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input is actually consistent.

48 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

CVE-2021-41531 (GCVE-0-2021-41531)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-09-21 13:23 – Updated: 2024-09-16 20:27
VLAI
Title
Invalid RPKI data could disable Route Origin Validation on RTR clients.
Summary
NLnet Labs Routinator prior to 0.10.0 produces invalid RTR payload if an RPKI CA uses too large values in the max-length parameter in a ROA. This will lead to RTR clients such as routers to reject the RPKI data set, effectively disabling Route Origin Validation.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • CWE-1288 - Improper Validation of Consistency within Input
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
NLnet Labs Routinator Affected: unspecified , ≤ 0.9.0 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2021-09-21 00:00
Credits
We would like to thank Job Snijders for reporting the issue.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T03:15:29.202Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2021-41531.txt"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "Routinator",
          "vendor": "NLnet Labs",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "0.9.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "We would like to thank Job Snijders for reporting the issue."
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2021-09-21T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NLnet Labs Routinator prior to 0.10.0 produces invalid RTR payload if an RPKI CA uses too large values in the max-length parameter in a ROA. This will lead to RTR clients such as routers to reject the RPKI data set, effectively disabling Route Origin Validation."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1288",
              "description": "CWE-1288: Improper Validation of Consistency within Input",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2021-09-21T13:23:17.000Z",
        "orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
        "shortName": "NLnet Labs"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2021-41531.txt"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Invalid RPKI data could disable Route Origin Validation on RTR clients.",
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
          "DATE_PUBLIC": "2021-09-21T00:00:00.000Z",
          "ID": "CVE-2021-41531",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC",
          "TITLE": "Invalid RPKI data could disable Route Origin Validation on RTR clients."
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "Routinator",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_affected": "\u003c=",
                            "version_value": "0.9.0"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "NLnet Labs"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "credit": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "We would like to thank Job Snijders for reporting the issue."
          }
        ],
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "NLnet Labs Routinator prior to 0.10.0 produces invalid RTR payload if an RPKI CA uses too large values in the max-length parameter in a ROA. This will lead to RTR clients such as routers to reject the RPKI data set, effectively disabling Route Origin Validation."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-1288: Improper Validation of Consistency within Input"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2021-41531.txt",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2021-41531.txt"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
    "assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
    "cveId": "CVE-2021-41531",
    "datePublished": "2021-09-21T13:23:17.982Z",
    "dateReserved": "2021-09-20T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T20:27:40.850Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

GHSA-2274-3HGR-WXV6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-22 09:31 – Updated: 2026-07-14 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place

This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data.

There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-31431"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1288",
      "CWE-669"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-22T09:16:21Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncrypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place\n\nThis mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of\nthe associated data.\n\nThere is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the\nsource and destination come from different mappings.  Get rid of\nall the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the\nAD directly.",
  "id": "GHSA-2274-3hgr-wxv6",
  "modified": "2026-07-14T15:31:52Z",
  "published": "2026-04-22T09:31:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31431"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13565"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16208"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16209"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16210"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19074"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19225"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33486"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-31431"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2026-31431#cve-details-mitigation"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2460538"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://copy.fail"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19d43105a97be0810edbda875f2cd03f30dc130c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3115af9644c342b356f3f07a4dd1c8905cd9a6fc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/893d22e0135fa394db81df88697fba6032747667"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b88d99341f139e23bdeb1027a2a3ae10d341d82"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/961cfa271a918ad4ae452420e7c303149002875b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a664bf3d603dc3bdcf9ae47cc21e0daec706d7a5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce42ee423e58dffa5ec03524054c9d8bfd4f6237"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fafe0fa2995a0f7073c1c358d7d3145bcc9aedd8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/theori-io/copy-fail-CVE-2026-31431"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2026042214-CVE-2026-31431-3d65@gregkh"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-31431.json"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://websec.net/blog/cve-2026-31431-linux-algifaead-page-cache-write-to-root-69f38a4ccddd2db1f520f170"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-31431"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/260001"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://xint.io/blog/copy-fail-linux-distributions#the-fix-6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13566"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13577"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13578"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13681"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13690"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13727"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13729"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13734"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13811"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13862"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13885"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13887"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13932"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13936"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14097"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14112"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14137"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14165"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14230"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14301"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14339"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14773"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14926"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:15087"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:15976"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:15978"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16018"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16063"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16111"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/29/23"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/29/25"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/29/26"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/10"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/14"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/15"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/16"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/17"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/18"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/20"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/30/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/10"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/15"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/16"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/17"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/18"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/22"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/23"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/24"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/14"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/15"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/16"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/17"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/18"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/19"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/20"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/21"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/23"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/24"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/25"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/03/10"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/03/12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/03/13"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/03/3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/03/4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/03/5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/03/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/10"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/13"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/14"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/24"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/27"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/28"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/29"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/31"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/04/9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/06/5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/07/12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/07/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/08/13"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/18/3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-287X-2333-6CMC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-26 09:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:09
VLAI
Details

Multiple WAGO devices in multiple versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to DoS the device by sending a malformed packet.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-1619"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1288",
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-06-26T07:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Multiple WAGO devices in multiple versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to DoS the device by sending a malformed packet.",
  "id": "GHSA-287x-2333-6cmc",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T05:09:40Z",
  "published": "2023-06-26T09:30:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1619"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2023-006"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-2FJX-8HXJ-4456

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-28 15:30 – Updated: 2024-03-28 15:30
VLAI
Details

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2024.03 2FA could be bypassed by providing a special URL parameter

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-31136"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1288"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-03-28T15:15:47Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In JetBrains TeamCity before 2024.03 2FA could be bypassed by providing a special URL parameter",
  "id": "GHSA-2fjx-8hxj-4456",
  "modified": "2024-03-28T15:30:34Z",
  "published": "2024-03-28T15:30:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31136"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.jetbrains.com/privacy-security/issues-fixed"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-2PJM-P377-MW3C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-09 06:30 – Updated: 2024-03-09 06:30
VLAI
Details

A command injection vulnerability exists in local RACADM. A malicious authenticated user could gain control of the underlying operating system.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-25951"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1288",
      "CWE-77"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-03-09T06:15:50Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A command injection vulnerability exists in local RACADM. A malicious authenticated user could gain control of the underlying operating system.",
  "id": "GHSA-2pjm-p377-mw3c",
  "modified": "2024-03-09T06:30:42Z",
  "published": "2024-03-09T06:30:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-25951"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000222591/dsa-2024-089-security-update-for-dell-idrac8-local-racadm-vulnerability"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-37P7-MHJW-VWH9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-14 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-14 18:31
VLAI
Details

Improper validation of consistency within input in Windows Secure Kernel Mode allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-42982"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1288"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-14T17:16:48Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper validation of consistency within input in Windows Secure Kernel Mode allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.",
  "id": "GHSA-37p7-mhjw-vwh9",
  "modified": "2026-07-14T18:31:58Z",
  "published": "2026-07-14T18:31:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42982"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-5556-PPCW-GHH5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-09 21:31 – Updated: 2024-10-09 21:31
VLAI
Details

An Improper Validation of Consistency within Input vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-based attacker sending a specifically malformed BGP packet to cause rpd to crash and restart, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition.

In some cases, rpd fails to restart requiring a manual restart via the 'restart routing' CLI command.

This issue only affects systems with BGP traceoptions enabled and

requires a BGP session to be already established. Systems without BGP traceoptions enabled are not affected by this issue.

This issue affects iBGP and eBGP, and both IPv4 and IPv6 are affected by this vulnerability.

This issue affects:

Junos OS: 

  • All versions before 21.4R3-S8, 
  • 22.2 before 22.2R3-S5, 
  • 22.3 before 22.3R3-S4, 
  • 22.4 before 22.4R3-S3, 
  • 23.2 before 23.2R2-S2, 
  • 23.4 before 23.4R2; 

Junos OS Evolved: 

  • All versions before 21.4R3-S8-EVO, 
  • 22.2-EVO before 22.2R3-S5-EVO, 
  • 22.3-EVO before 22.3R3-S4-EVO, 
  • 22.4-EVO before 22.4R3-S3-EVO, 
  • 23.2-EVO before 23.2R2-S2-EVO, 
  • 23.4-EVO before 23.4R2-EVO.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-39515"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1288"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-09T20:15:08Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An Improper Validation of Consistency within Input vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-based attacker sending a specifically malformed BGP packet to cause rpd to crash and restart, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition.\n\nIn some cases, rpd fails to restart requiring a manual restart via the \u0027restart routing\u0027 CLI command.\n\nThis issue only affects systems with BGP traceoptions enabled and \n\nrequires a BGP session to be already established.  Systems without BGP traceoptions enabled are not affected by this issue.\n\nThis issue affects iBGP and eBGP, and both IPv4 and IPv6 are affected by this vulnerability.\n\nThis issue affects:\n\nJunos OS:\u00a0\n\n  *  All versions before 21.4R3-S8,\u00a0\n  *  22.2 before 22.2R3-S5,\u00a0\n  *  22.3 before 22.3R3-S4,\u00a0\n  *  22.4 before 22.4R3-S3,\u00a0\n  *  23.2 before 23.2R2-S2,\u00a0\n  *  23.4 before 23.4R2;\u00a0\n\n\nJunos OS Evolved:\u00a0\n\n  *  All versions before 21.4R3-S8-EVO,\u00a0\n  *  22.2-EVO before 22.2R3-S5-EVO,\u00a0\n  *  22.3-EVO before 22.3R3-S4-EVO,\u00a0\n  *  22.4-EVO before 22.4R3-S3-EVO,\u00a0\n  *  23.2-EVO before 23.2R2-S2-EVO,\u00a0\n  *  23.4-EVO before 23.4R2-EVO.",
  "id": "GHSA-5556-ppcw-ghh5",
  "modified": "2024-10-09T21:31:08Z",
  "published": "2024-10-09T21:31:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39515"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA88099"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/cli-reference/topics/ref/statement/traceoptions-edit-protocols-bgp.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:U/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-5VHQ-C669-FMGR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-05 21:31 – Updated: 2024-06-05 21:31
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, and Exynos 1330. In the function slsi_nan_followup_get_nl_params(), there is no input validation check on hal_req->service_specific_info_len coming from userspace, which can lead to a heap overwrite.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-27371"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1288",
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-06-05T19:15:12Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, and Exynos 1330. In the function slsi_nan_followup_get_nl_params(), there is no input validation check on hal_req-\u003eservice_specific_info_len coming from userspace, which can lead to a heap overwrite.",
  "id": "GHSA-5vhq-c669-fmgr",
  "modified": "2024-06-05T21:31:27Z",
  "published": "2024-06-05T21:31:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27371"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://semiconductor.samsung.com/support/quality-support/product-security-updates"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-5VMP-M5V2-HX47

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-28 22:12 – Updated: 2025-10-14 21:58
VLAI
Summary
tough root metadata version is not checked for sequential versioning
Details

Summary

When updating the root role, a TUF client must establish a trusted line of continuity to the latest set of keys. While sequentially downloading new versions of the root metadata file, tough will not check that the root object version it received was the next sequential version from the previously trusted root metadata.

Impact

The tough client will trust an outdated or rotated root role in the event that an actor with control of the storage medium of a trusted TUF repository inappropriately replaced the contents of one of the root metadata files with an adequately signed previous version. As a result, tough could trust content associated with a previous root role.

Impacted versions: < v0.20.0

Patches

A fix for this issue is available in tough version 0.20.0 and later. Customers are advised to upgrade to version 0.20.0 or later and ensure any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes.

Workarounds

There is no recommended work around. Customers are advised to upgrade to version 0.20.0 or the latest version.

References

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory we ask that you contact AWS/Amazon Security via our vulnerability reporting page [1] or directly via email to aws-security@amazon.com. Please do not create a public GitHub issue.

[1] Vulnerability reporting page: https://aws.amazon.com/security/vulnerability-reporting

Acknowledgement

These issues were identified by the TUF-Conformance project. We would like to thank Google for collaborating on this issue through the coordinated vulnerability disclosure process.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "tough"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.20.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-2885"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1288"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-03-28T22:12:36Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T23:15:35Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nWhen updating the root role, a TUF client must establish a trusted line of continuity to the latest set of keys. While sequentially downloading new versions of the root metadata file, tough will not check that the root object version it received was the next sequential version from the previously trusted root metadata.\n\n## Impact\n\nThe tough client will trust an outdated or rotated root role in the event that an actor with control of the storage medium of a trusted TUF repository inappropriately replaced the contents of one of the root metadata files with an adequately signed previous version. As a result, tough could trust content associated with a previous root role.\n\nImpacted versions: \u003c v0.20.0\n\n## Patches\n\nA fix for this issue is available in tough version 0.20.0 and later. Customers are advised to upgrade to version 0.20.0 or later and ensure any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nThere is no recommended work around. Customers are advised to upgrade to version 0.20.0 or the latest version.\n\n## References\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory we ask that you contact AWS/Amazon Security via our vulnerability reporting page [1] or directly via email to [aws-security@amazon.com](mailto:aws-security@amazon.com). Please do not create a public GitHub issue.\n\n\n[1] Vulnerability reporting page: https://aws.amazon.com/security/vulnerability-reporting\n\n## Acknowledgement\n\nThese issues were identified by the [TUF-Conformance project](https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf-conformance). We would like to thank Google for collaborating on this issue through the coordinated vulnerability disclosure process.",
  "id": "GHSA-5vmp-m5v2-hx47",
  "modified": "2025-10-14T21:58:49Z",
  "published": "2025-03-28T22:12:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/awslabs/tough/security/advisories/GHSA-5vmp-m5v2-hx47"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-2885"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/awslabs/tough/commit/0eeb60aefe27f00b65730634b788a1aafb8bf3c6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/AWS-2025-007"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/awslabs/tough"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/awslabs/tough/releases/tag/tough-v0.20.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "tough root metadata version is not checked for sequential versioning"
}

GHSA-6QP2-4FQ6-H4PV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-05 21:31 – Updated: 2024-06-05 21:31
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, and Exynos 1330. In the function slsi_nan_followup_get_nl_params(), there is no input validation check on hal_req->sdea_service_specific_info_len coming from userspace, which can lead to a heap overwrite.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-27375"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1288",
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-06-05T19:15:13Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, and Exynos 1330. In the function slsi_nan_followup_get_nl_params(), there is no input validation check on hal_req-\u003esdea_service_specific_info_len coming from userspace, which can lead to a heap overwrite.",
  "id": "GHSA-6qp2-4fq6-h4pv",
  "modified": "2024-06-05T21:31:27Z",
  "published": "2024-06-05T21:31:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27375"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://semiconductor.samsung.com/support/quality-support/product-security-updates"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.