CWE-94
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
8531 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-9GH8-877R-G477
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-02 03:30 – Updated: 2024-02-12 15:35Before Beetl v3.15.13.RELEASE, the rendering template has a server-side template injection (SSTI) vulnerability. When the incoming template is controllable, it will be filtered by the DefaultNativeSecurityManager blacklist. Because blacklist filtering is not strict, the blacklist can be bypassed, leading to arbitrary code execution.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.ibeetl:beetl-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.15.13.RELEASE"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-22533"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-02-02T18:10:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-02T03:15:11Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Before Beetl v3.15.13.RELEASE, the rendering template has a server-side template injection (SSTI) vulnerability. When the incoming template is controllable, it will be filtered by the DefaultNativeSecurityManager blacklist. Because blacklist filtering is not strict, the blacklist can be bypassed, leading to arbitrary code execution.",
"id": "GHSA-9gh8-877r-g477",
"modified": "2024-02-12T15:35:28Z",
"published": "2024-02-02T03:30:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22533"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://gitee.com/xiandafu/beetl"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitee.com/xiandafu/beetl/issues/I8RU01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Beetl Server-Side Template Injection vulnerability"
}
GHSA-9GM2-28FM-HW6C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-15 21:30 – Updated: 2024-07-08 15:31An issue discovered in silex technology DS-600 Firmware v.1.4.1 allows a remote attacker to edit device settings via the SAVE EEP_DATA command.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-24486"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-15T19:15:09Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An issue discovered in silex technology DS-600 Firmware v.1.4.1 allows a remote attacker to edit device settings via the SAVE EEP_DATA command.",
"id": "GHSA-9gm2-28fm-hw6c",
"modified": "2024-07-08T15:31:54Z",
"published": "2024-04-15T21:30:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-24486"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MostafaSoliman/Security-Advisories/master/CVE-2024-24486"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9GM2-7MPC-RWC6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:32 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:32Remote Code Execution in the following products Hybrid Cloud Management Containerized Suite HCM2017.11, HCM2018.02, HCM2018.05, Operations Bridge Containerized Suite 2017.11, 2018.02, 2018.05, Data Center Automation Containerized Suite 2017.01 until 2018.05, Service Management Automation Suite 2017.11, 2018.02, 2018.05, Service Virtualization (SV) with floating licenses using Any version using APLS older than 10.7, Unified Functional Testing (UFT) with floating licenses using Any version using APLS older than 10.7, Network Virtualization (NV) with floating licenses using Any version using APLS older than 10.7 and Network Operations Management (NOM) Suite CDF 2017.11, 2018.02, 2018.05 will allow Remote Code Execution.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-6499"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-08-30T21:29:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Remote Code Execution in the following products Hybrid Cloud Management Containerized Suite HCM2017.11, HCM2018.02, HCM2018.05, Operations Bridge Containerized Suite 2017.11, 2018.02, 2018.05, Data Center Automation Containerized Suite 2017.01 until 2018.05, Service Management Automation Suite 2017.11, 2018.02, 2018.05, Service Virtualization (SV) with floating licenses using Any version using APLS older than 10.7, Unified Functional Testing (UFT) with floating licenses using Any version using APLS older than 10.7, Network Virtualization (NV) with floating licenses using Any version using APLS older than 10.7 and Network Operations Management (NOM) Suite CDF 2017.11, 2018.02, 2018.05 will allow Remote Code Execution.",
"id": "GHSA-9gm2-7mpc-rwc6",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:32:00Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:32:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-6499"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://softwaresupport.softwaregrp.com/document/-/facetsearch/document/KM03236632?lang=en\u0026cc=us\u0026hpappid=206728_SSO_PRO"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://softwaresupport.softwaregrp.com/document/-/facetsearch/document/KM03236648"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://softwaresupport.softwaregrp.com/document/-/facetsearch/document/KM03236667"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://softwaresupport.softwaregrp.com/document/-/facetsearch/document/KM03236669"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://softwaresupport.softwaregrp.com/document/-/facetsearch/document/KM03236722"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://softwaresupport.softwaregrp.com/document/-/facetsearch/document/KM03236726"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9GM8-6RQ9-QJ6F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-16 18:31 – Updated: 2025-12-16 21:30Apache Commons Text versions prior to 1.10.0 included interpolation features that could be abused when applications passed untrusted input into the text-substitution API. Because some interpolators could trigger actions like executing commands or accessing external resources, an attacker could potentially achieve remote code execution. This vulnerability has been fully addressed in FileMaker Server 22.0.4.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-46295"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-16T18:16:12Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Apache Commons Text versions prior to 1.10.0 included interpolation features that could be abused when applications passed untrusted input into the text-substitution API. Because some interpolators could trigger actions like executing commands or accessing external resources, an attacker could potentially achieve remote code execution. This vulnerability has been fully addressed in FileMaker Server 22.0.4.",
"id": "GHSA-9gm8-6rq9-qj6f",
"modified": "2025-12-16T21:30:54Z",
"published": "2025-12-16T18:31:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-46295"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.claris.com/s/answerview?anum=000049059\u0026language=en_US"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9GP2-WWX4-F276
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-02 15:31 – Updated: 2026-03-03 03:32An issue was discovered in Tenda W20E V4.0br_V15.11.0.6. Failure to validate the value of usbPartitionName, which is directly used in doSystemCmd, may lead to critical command injection vulnerabilities.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-24107"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-02T15:16:33Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Tenda W20E V4.0br_V15.11.0.6. Failure to validate the value of `usbPartitionName`, which is directly used in `doSystemCmd`, may lead to critical command injection vulnerabilities.",
"id": "GHSA-9gp2-wwx4-f276",
"modified": "2026-03-03T03:32:41Z",
"published": "2026-03-02T15:31:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24107"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/akuma-QAQ/CVEreport/tree/main/D-link/CVE-2026-24107"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.tenda.com.cn/material/show/2707"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9GQ6-6936-885W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-12 15:33 – Updated: 2024-09-16 22:32An arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in versions 23.12.4.0 up to 24.7.4.1 of the MindsDB platform, when the ChromaDB integration is installed on the server. If a specially crafted ‘INSERT’ query containing Python code is run against a database created with the ChromaDB engine, the code will be passed to an eval function and executed on the server.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "mindsdb"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "23.12.4.0"
},
{
"fixed": "24.7.4.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-45848"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94",
"CWE-95"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-09-12T17:03:57Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-12T13:15:13Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in versions 23.12.4.0 up to 24.7.4.1 of the MindsDB platform, when the ChromaDB integration is installed on the server. If a specially crafted \u2018INSERT\u2019 query containing Python code is run against a database created with the ChromaDB engine, the code will be passed to an eval function and executed on the server.",
"id": "GHSA-9gq6-6936-885w",
"modified": "2024-09-16T22:32:50Z",
"published": "2024-09-12T15:33:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mindsdb/mindsdb/commit/11a4db792ad36cf704f7307c7602128b17752c80"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/mindsdb/mindsdb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/mindsdb/PYSEC-2024-78.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hiddenlayer.com/sai-security-advisory/2024-09-mindsdb"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "MindsDB Eval Injection vulnerability"
}
GHSA-9GQR-XP86-F87H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-18 00:01 – Updated: 2022-03-25 16:13All versions of package git are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to missing sanitization in the Git.git method, which allows execution of OS commands rather than just git commands. At this time, there is no known workaround. There has been no patch released.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "git"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.1.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-23632"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-78",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-03-18T22:39:15Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-17T12:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "All versions of package git are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to missing sanitization in the Git.git method, which allows execution of OS commands rather than just git commands. At this time, there is no known workaround. There has been no patch released.",
"id": "GHSA-9gqr-xp86-f87h",
"modified": "2022-03-25T16:13:13Z",
"published": "2022-03-18T00:01:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-23632"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-GIT-1568518"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Code injection in npm git"
}
GHSA-9GRC-FQ62-5MG4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-11 00:32 – Updated: 2025-01-11 00:32The administrator is able to configure an insecure captive portal script
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-9132"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-10T22:15:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The administrator is able to configure an insecure captive portal script",
"id": "GHSA-9grc-fq62-5mg4",
"modified": "2025-01-11T00:32:06Z",
"published": "2025-01-11T00:32:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-9132"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisory/20454-security-advisory-0105"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9GVV-47X2-579H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-26 00:32 – Updated: 2024-08-01 15:32Tenda FH1201 v1.2.0.14 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the cmdinput parameter at /goform/exeCommand
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-41468"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-78",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-25T22:15:09Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Tenda FH1201 v1.2.0.14 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the cmdinput parameter at /goform/exeCommand",
"id": "GHSA-9gvv-47x2-579h",
"modified": "2024-08-01T15:32:11Z",
"published": "2024-07-26T00:32:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41468"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/iotresearch/iot-vuln/blob/main/Tenda/FH1201/exeCommand/README.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9GW3-6JGP-VR97
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:24 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:24** DISPUTED ** PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in inc-calcul.php3 in SPIP 1.7.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the squelette_cache parameter, a different vector than CVE-2006-1702. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by third party researchers, stating that the squelette_cache variable is initialized before use, and is only used within the scope of a function.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-4525"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-08-25T00:17:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "** DISPUTED ** PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in inc-calcul.php3 in SPIP 1.7.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the squelette_cache parameter, a different vector than CVE-2006-1702. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by third party researchers, stating that the squelette_cache variable is initialized before use, and is only used within the scope of a function.",
"id": "GHSA-9gw3-6jgp-vr97",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:24:25Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:24:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4525"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/36218"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3056"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/477423/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/477728/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25416"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Refactoring
Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Mitigation
- Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
- Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation
For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].
CAPEC-242: Code Injection
An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.