CWE-94
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
8376 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-4QGW-F8FJ-66QH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-05 06:30 – Updated: 2025-02-05 06:30NETGEAR XR1000 before 1.0.0.74, XR1000v2 before 1.1.0.22, and XR500 before 2.3.2.134 allow remote code execution by unauthenticated users.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-25246"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-05T05:15:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "NETGEAR XR1000 before 1.0.0.74, XR1000v2 before 1.1.0.22, and XR500 before 2.3.2.134 allow remote code execution by unauthenticated users.",
"id": "GHSA-4qgw-f8fj-66qh",
"modified": "2025-02-05T06:30:26Z",
"published": "2025-02-05T06:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25246"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.netgear.com/000066558/Security-Advisory-for-Unauthenticated-RCE-on-Some-WiFi-Routers-PSV-2023-0039"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4QJ7-WJ4W-HRR9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:38 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:38PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in engine/oldnews.inc.php in CM68 News 12.02.06 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the addpath parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-6462"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-12-11T18:28:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in engine/oldnews.inc.php in CM68 News 12.02.06 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the addpath parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-4qj7-wj4w-hrr9",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:38:09Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:38:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-6462"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/30785"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/2897"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://cm68.de/?cm68news_download"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/23326"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21499"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/4911"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-4QMV-5234-QG32
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-19 18:31 – Updated: 2025-11-19 18:31Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Progress DataDirect Connect for JDBC drivers, Progress DataDirect Open Access JDBC driver and Hybrid Data Pipeline allows Remote Code Inclusion.
The SpyAttribute connection option implemented by the DataDirect Connect for JDBC drivers, DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline JDBC driver and the DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC driver supports an undocumented syntax construct for the option value that if discovered can be used by an attacker. If an application allows an end user to specify a value for the SpyAttributes connection option then an attacker can use the undocumented syntax to cause the driver to load an arbitrary class on the class path and execute a constructor on that class.
This issue affects:
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Amazon Redshift: through 6.0.0.001392, fixed in 6.0.0.001541
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache Cassandra: through 6.0.0.000805, fixed in 6.0.0.000833
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Hive: through 6.0.1.001499, fixed in 6.0.1.001628
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache Impala: through 6.0.0.001155, fixed in 6.0.0.001279
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache SparkSQL: through 6.0.1.001222, fixed in 6.0.1.001344
DataDirect Connect for JDBC Autonomous REST Connector: through 6.0.1.006961, fixed in 6.0.1.007063
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for DB2: through 6.0.0.000717, fixed in 6.0.0.000964
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Google Analytics 4: through 6.0.0.000454, fixed in 6.0.0.000525
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Google BigQuery: through 6.0.0.002279, fixed in 6.0.0.002410 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Greenplum: through 6.0.0.001712, fixed in 6.0.0.001727 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Informix: through 6.0.0.000690, fixed in 6.0.0.0851
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft Dynamics 365: through 6.0.0.003161, fixed in 6.0.0.3198
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft SQLServer: through 6.0.0.001936, fixed in 6.0.0.001957
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft Sharepoint: through 6.0.0.001559, fixed in 6.0.0.001587
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for MongoDB: through 6.1.0.001654, fixed in 6.1.0.001669
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for MySQL: through 5.1.4.000330, fixed in 5.1.4.000364
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Database: through 6.0.0.001747, fixed in 6.0.0.001776
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Eloqua: through 6.0.0.001438, fixed in 6.0.0.001458
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Sales Cloud: through 6.0.0.001225, fixed in 6.0.0.001316
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Service Cloud: through 5.1.4.000298, fixed in 5.1.4.000309 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for PostgreSQL: through 6.0.0.001843, fixed in 6.0.0.001856
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Progress OpenEdge: through 5.1.4.000187, fixed in 5.1.4.000189
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Salesforce: through 6.0.0.003020, fixed in 6.0.0.003125 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for SAP HANA: through 6.0.0.000879, product retired
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for SAP S/4 HANA: through 6.0.1.001818, fixed in 6.0.1.001858
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Sybase ASE: through 5.1.4.000161, fixed in 5.1.4.000162
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Snowflake: through 6.0.1.001821, fixed in 6.0.1.001856
DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline Server: through 4.6.2.3309, fixed in 4.6.2.3430
DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline JDBC Driver: through 4.6.2.0607, fixed in 4.6.2.1023
DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline On Premises Connector: through 4.6.2.1223, fixed in 4.6.2.1339 DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline Docker: through 4.6.2.3316, fixed in 4.6.2.3430
DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC Driver: through 8.1.0.0177, fixed in 8.1.0.0183
DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC Driver: through 9.0.0.0019, fixed in 9.0.0.0022
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-10702"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-19T16:15:46Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Progress DataDirect Connect for JDBC drivers, Progress DataDirect Open Access JDBC driver and Hybrid Data Pipeline allows Remote Code Inclusion.\n\n\nThe SpyAttribute connection option implemented by the DataDirect Connect for JDBC drivers, DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline JDBC driver and the DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC driver supports an undocumented syntax construct for the option value that if discovered can be used by an attacker. If an application allows an end user to specify a value for the SpyAttributes connection option then an attacker can use the undocumented syntax to cause the driver to load an arbitrary class on the class path and execute a constructor on that class. \u00a0\n\n\nThis issue affects:\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Amazon Redshift: through 6.0.0.001392, fixed in 6.0.0.001541\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache Cassandra: through 6.0.0.000805, fixed in 6.0.0.000833\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Hive: through 6.0.1.001499, fixed in 6.0.1.001628\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache Impala: through 6.0.0.001155, fixed in 6.0.0.001279\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache SparkSQL: through 6.0.1.001222, fixed in 6.0.1.001344\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC Autonomous REST Connector: through 6.0.1.006961, fixed in 6.0.1.007063\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for DB2: through 6.0.0.000717, fixed in 6.0.0.000964\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Google Analytics 4: through 6.0.0.000454, fixed in 6.0.0.000525\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Google BigQuery: through 6.0.0.002279, fixed in 6.0.0.002410\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Greenplum: through 6.0.0.001712, fixed in 6.0.0.001727\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Informix: through 6.0.0.000690, fixed in 6.0.0.0851\n\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft Dynamics 365: through 6.0.0.003161, fixed in 6.0.0.3198\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft SQLServer: through 6.0.0.001936, fixed in 6.0.0.001957\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft Sharepoint: through 6.0.0.001559, fixed in 6.0.0.001587\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for MongoDB: through 6.1.0.001654, fixed in 6.1.0.001669\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for MySQL: through 5.1.4.000330, fixed in 5.1.4.000364\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Database: through 6.0.0.001747, fixed in 6.0.0.001776\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Eloqua: through 6.0.0.001438, fixed in 6.0.0.001458\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Sales Cloud: through 6.0.0.001225, fixed in 6.0.0.001316\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Service Cloud: through 5.1.4.000298, fixed in 5.1.4.000309\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for PostgreSQL: through 6.0.0.001843, fixed in 6.0.0.001856\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Progress OpenEdge: through 5.1.4.000187, fixed in 5.1.4.000189\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Salesforce: through 6.0.0.003020, fixed in 6.0.0.003125\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for SAP HANA: through 6.0.0.000879, product retired\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for SAP S/4 HANA: through 6.0.1.001818, fixed in 6.0.1.001858\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Sybase ASE: through 5.1.4.000161, fixed in 5.1.4.000162\n\nDataDirect Connect for JDBC for Snowflake: through 6.0.1.001821, fixed in 6.0.1.001856\n\nDataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline Server: through 4.6.2.3309, fixed in 4.6.2.3430\n\nDataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline JDBC Driver: through 4.6.2.0607, fixed in 4.6.2.1023\n\nDataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline On Premises Connector: through 4.6.2.1223, fixed in 4.6.2.1339\nDataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline Docker: through 4.6.2.3316, fixed in 4.6.2.3430\n\nDataDirect OpenAccess JDBC Driver: through 8.1.0.0177, fixed in 8.1.0.0183\n\nDataDirect OpenAccess JDBC Driver: through 9.0.0.0019, fixed in 9.0.0.0022",
"id": "GHSA-4qmv-5234-qg32",
"modified": "2025-11-19T18:31:19Z",
"published": "2025-11-19T18:31:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-10702"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://community.progress.com/s/article/Progress-DataDirect-Critical-Security-Product-Alert-Bulletin-November-2025"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-4QQV-MF3R-GFF4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-18 00:00 – Updated: 2022-08-20 00:00DedeBIZ v6 was discovered to contain a remote code execution vulnerability in sys_info.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-36215"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-08-17T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "DedeBIZ v6 was discovered to contain a remote code execution vulnerability in sys_info.php.",
"id": "GHSA-4qqv-mf3r-gff4",
"modified": "2022-08-20T00:00:57Z",
"published": "2022-08-18T00:00:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-36215"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/whitehatl/Vulnerability/blob/main/web/dedebiz/6.0.0/sys_info.poc.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4QVC-25FF-JCMQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-27 00:30 – Updated: 2024-08-06 21:30A user with administrative privileges can create a compromised dll file of the same name as the original dll within the HP printer’s Firmware Update Utility (FUU) bundle and place it in the Microsoft Windows default downloads directory which can lead to potential arbitrary code execution.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-2209"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-27T00:15:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A user with administrative privileges can create a compromised dll file of the same name as the original dll within the HP printer\u2019s Firmware Update Utility (FUU) bundle and place it in the Microsoft Windows default downloads directory which can lead to potential arbitrary code execution.",
"id": "GHSA-4qvc-25ff-jcmq",
"modified": "2024-08-06T21:30:47Z",
"published": "2024-03-27T00:30:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-2209"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_10354903-10354932-16"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4QWP-7C67-JMCC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-03-29 20:23 – Updated: 2025-10-22 17:58Ignition before 2.5.2, as used in Laravel and other products, allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code because of insecure usage of file_get_contents() and file_put_contents(). This is exploitable on sites using debug mode with Laravel before 8.4.2.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "facade/ignition"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.5.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.5.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "facade/ignition"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.4.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "facade/ignition"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.7.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.16.14"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "facade/ignition"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.6.15"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-3129"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-03-23T00:13:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-01-12T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Ignition before 2.5.2, as used in Laravel and other products, allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code because of insecure usage of file_get_contents() and file_put_contents(). This is exploitable on sites using debug mode with Laravel before 8.4.2.",
"id": "GHSA-4qwp-7c67-jmcc",
"modified": "2025-10-22T17:58:58Z",
"published": "2021-03-29T20:23:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-3129"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/facade/ignition/pull/334"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/facade/ignition/commit/11ffca14abd22db779d90b12e193f8000f6d184b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/facade/ignition/CVE-2021-3129.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/facade/ignition"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ambionics.io/blog/laravel-debug-rce"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2021-3129"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/162094/Ignition-2.5.1-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165999/Ignition-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Unauthenticated remote code execution in Ignition"
}
GHSA-4R5X-X283-WM96
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-24 19:47 – Updated: 2023-10-24 19:47Impact
An authenticated user can exploit a vulnerability in MongoDB sessions to execute arbitrary commands, leading to remote code execution. This vulnerability may further be leveraged to gain root privileges on the host system.
Details
Through the WEB CLI interface provided by koko, a user logs into the authorized mongoDB database and exploits the MongoDB session to execute arbitrary commands.
admin> const { execSync } = require("child_process")
admin> console.log(execSync("id; hostname;").toString())
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
jms_koko
admin>
Patches
Safe versions: - v2.28.20 - v3.7.1
Workarounds
It is recommended to upgrade the safe versions.
After upgrade, you can use the same method to check whether the vulnerability is fixed.
admin> console.log(execSync("id; hostname;").toString())
/bin/sh: line 1: /bin/hostname: Permission denied
References
Thanks for Oskar Zeino-Mahmalat of Sonar found and report this vulnerability
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/jumpserver/koko"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.28.20"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/jumpserver/koko"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.7.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-43651"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-10-24T19:47:50Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-09-27T21:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nAn authenticated user can exploit a vulnerability in MongoDB sessions to execute arbitrary commands, leading to remote code execution. This vulnerability may further be leveraged to gain root privileges on the host system.\n\n### Details\nThrough the WEB CLI interface provided by koko, a user logs into the authorized mongoDB database and exploits the MongoDB session to execute arbitrary commands.\n\n```\nadmin\u003e const { execSync } = require(\"child_process\")\nadmin\u003e console.log(execSync(\"id; hostname;\").toString())\nuid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)\njms_koko\nadmin\u003e \n```\n\n### Patches\nSafe versions: \n- v2.28.20\n- v3.7.1 \n\n### Workarounds\nIt is recommended to upgrade the safe versions.\n\nAfter upgrade, you can use the same method to check whether the vulnerability is fixed.\n```\nadmin\u003e console.log(execSync(\"id; hostname;\").toString())\n/bin/sh: line 1: /bin/hostname: Permission denied\n```\n\n### References\nThanks for **Oskar Zeino-Mahmalat** of [Sonar](https://sonarsource.com/) found and report this vulnerability ",
"id": "GHSA-4r5x-x283-wm96",
"modified": "2023-10-24T19:47:50Z",
"published": "2023-10-24T19:47:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jumpserver/jumpserver/security/advisories/GHSA-4r5x-x283-wm96"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-43651"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jumpserver/koko/commit/7d80db95d17c8f42bdf50260dfc21dc2bd0452c2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jumpserver/koko/commit/857f8b9e41f0930dc6190a35d8601fffa5e884e7"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jumpserver/koko"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Jumpserver Koko vulnerable to remote code execution on the host system via MongoDB shell "
}
GHSA-4R7C-FR6M-VGJF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-22 18:30 – Updated: 2026-01-28 18:30Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Nelio Software Nelio AB Testing nelio-ab-testing allows Code Injection.This issue affects Nelio AB Testing: from n/a through <= 8.1.8.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-67944"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-22T17:16:04Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Nelio Software Nelio AB Testing nelio-ab-testing allows Code Injection.This issue affects Nelio AB Testing: from n/a through \u003c= 8.1.8.",
"id": "GHSA-4r7c-fr6m-vgjf",
"modified": "2026-01-28T18:30:41Z",
"published": "2026-01-22T18:30:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-67944"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/nelio-ab-testing/vulnerability/wordpress-nelio-ab-testing-plugin-8-1-8-arbitrary-code-execution-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4R8Q-2FRH-4J22
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:57 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:57AttacheCase ver.3.3.0.0 and earlier allows an arbitrary script execution via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-0675"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-09-04T13:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "AttacheCase ver.3.3.0.0 and earlier allows an arbitrary script execution via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-4r8q-2frh-4j22",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:57:33Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:57:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0675"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hibara.org/software/attachecase/?lang=en"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN02037158/index.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4RCF-F8M4-G24G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 17:59 – Updated: 2022-05-01 17:59Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in Turnkey Web Tools SunShop Shopping Cart before 3.5.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the abs_path parameter to (1) index.php or (2) checkout.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-2070"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-04-18T03:19:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in Turnkey Web Tools SunShop Shopping Cart before 3.5.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the abs_path parameter to (1) index.php or (2) checkout.php.",
"id": "GHSA-4rcf-f8m4-g24g",
"modified": "2022-05-01T17:59:44Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T17:59:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-2070"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/33670"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/3748"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/37414"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/37415"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23511"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1422"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Refactoring
Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Mitigation
- Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
- Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation
For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].
CAPEC-242: Code Injection
An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.