CWE-918
AllowedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
4650 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-QG93-CPF3-386G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-20 09:30 – Updated: 2024-01-12 09:30It was possible to call filesystem and network references using the local LibreOffice instance using manipulated ODT documents. Attackers could discover restricted network topology and services as well as including local files with read permissions of the open-xchange system user. This was limited to specific file-types, like images. We have improved existing content filters and validators to avoid including any local resources. No publicly available exploits are known.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-26435"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-06-20T08:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "It was possible to call filesystem and network references using the local LibreOffice instance using manipulated ODT documents. Attackers could discover restricted network topology and services as well as including local files with read permissions of the open-xchange system user. This was limited to specific file-types, like images. We have improved existing content filters and validators to avoid including any local resources. No publicly available exploits are known.\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-qg93-cpf3-386g",
"modified": "2024-01-12T09:30:27Z",
"published": "2023-06-20T09:30:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-26435"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://documentation.open-xchange.com/appsuite/security/advisories/csaf/2023/oxas-adv-2023-0002.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://documentation.open-xchange.com/security/advisories/csaf/oxas-adv-2023-0002.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://software.open-xchange.com/products/appsuite/doc/Release_Notes_for_Patch_Release_6219_7.10.6_2023-03-20.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/173083/OX-App-Suite-SSRF-Resource-Consumption-Command-Injection.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Jun/8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QGQH-6WPP-27C4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-15 03:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 03:29OX App Suite before 7.10.6-rev30 allows SSRF because e-mail account discovery disregards the deny-list and thus can be attacked by an adversary who controls the DNS records of an external domain (found in the host part of an e-mail address).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-43699"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-04-15T02:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "OX App Suite before 7.10.6-rev30 allows SSRF because e-mail account discovery disregards the deny-list and thus can be attacked by an adversary who controls the DNS records of an external domain (found in the host part of an e-mail address).",
"id": "GHSA-qgqh-6wpp-27c4",
"modified": "2024-04-04T03:29:02Z",
"published": "2023-04-15T03:30:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-43699"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://open-xchange.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Feb/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QH4C-XF7M-GXFC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-28 16:14 – Updated: 2026-07-17 16:17Summary
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the MediaConnector class within the vLLM project's multimodal feature set. The load_from_url and load_from_url_async methods obtain and process media from URLs provided by users, using different Python parsing libraries when restricting the target host. These two parsing libraries have different interpretations of backslashes, which allows the host name restriction to be bypassed. This allows an attacker to coerce the vLLM server into making arbitrary requests to internal network resources.
This vulnerability is particularly critical in containerized environments like llm-d, where a compromised vLLM pod could be used to scan the internal network, interact with other pods, and potentially cause Denial of Service or access sensitive data. For example, an attacker could make the vLLM pod send malicious requests to an internal llm-d management endpoint, leading to system instability by falsely reporting metrics like the KV cache state.
Details
The core of the vulnerability lies in the MediaConnector.load_from_url method and its asynchronous counterpart. These methods accept a URL string to fetch media content (images, audio, video).
def load_from_url( self, url: str, media_io: MediaIO[_M], *, fetch_timeout: int | None = None, ) -> _M: # type: ignore[type-var] url_spec = urlparse(url) if url_spec.scheme.startswith("http"): self._assert_url_in_allowed_media_domains(url_spec) connection = self.connection data = connection.get_bytes( url, timeout=fetch_timeout, allow_redirects=envs.VLLM_MEDIA_URL_ALLOW_REDIRECTS, ) return media_io.load_bytes(data)
The URL validation uses the urlparse function from Python's urllib module, while the request is made using the request function from Python's requests module. The requests module's underlying URL parsing is implemented using the parse_url function from Python's urllib3. These two parsing functions follow different URL specifications; one is implemented according to the RFC 3986 specification, and the other is implemented according to the WHATWG Living Standard. There is a difference in how the two functions handle backslashes (\) in URLs, which allows the hostname restriction to be bypassed.
Fix
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32746
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "vllm"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.14.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-24779"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-28T16:14:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-27T22:15:57Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\nA Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the `MediaConnector` class within the vLLM project\u0027s multimodal feature set. The load_from_url and load_from_url_async methods obtain and process media from URLs provided by users, using different Python parsing libraries when restricting the target host. These two parsing libraries have different interpretations of backslashes, which allows the host name restriction to be bypassed. This allows an attacker to coerce the vLLM server into making arbitrary requests to internal network resources.\n\nThis vulnerability is particularly critical in containerized environments like `llm-d`, where a compromised vLLM pod could be used to scan the internal network, interact with other pods, and potentially cause Denial of Service or access sensitive data. For example, an attacker could make the vLLM pod send malicious requests to an internal `llm-d` management endpoint, leading to system instability by falsely reporting metrics like the KV cache state.\n\n### Details\nThe core of the vulnerability lies in the `MediaConnector.load_from_url` method and its asynchronous counterpart. These methods accept a URL string to fetch media content (images, audio, video).\n\n\u003e def load_from_url(\n\u003e self,\n\u003e url: str,\n\u003e media_io: MediaIO[_M],\n\u003e *,\n\u003e fetch_timeout: int | None = None,\n\u003e ) -\u003e _M: # type: ignore[type-var]\n\u003e url_spec = urlparse(url)\n\u003e \n\u003e if url_spec.scheme.startswith(\"http\"):\n\u003e self._assert_url_in_allowed_media_domains(url_spec)\n\u003e \n\u003e connection = self.connection\n\u003e data = connection.get_bytes(\n\u003e url,\n\u003e timeout=fetch_timeout,\n\u003e allow_redirects=envs.VLLM_MEDIA_URL_ALLOW_REDIRECTS,\n\u003e )\n\u003e \n\u003e return media_io.load_bytes(data)\n\nThe URL validation uses the `urlparse` function from Python\u0027s `urllib` module, while the request is made using the `request` function from Python\u0027s `requests` module. The `requests` module\u0027s underlying URL parsing is implemented using the `parse_url` function from Python\u0027s `urllib3`. These two parsing functions follow different URL specifications; one is implemented according to the RFC 3986 specification, and the other is implemented according to the WHATWG Living Standard. There is a difference in how the two functions handle backslashes (`\\`) in URLs, which allows the hostname restriction to be bypassed.\n\n### Fix\n\n* https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32746",
"id": "GHSA-qh4c-xf7m-gxfc",
"modified": "2026-07-17T16:17:31Z",
"published": "2026-01-28T16:14:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-qh4c-xf7m-gxfc"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24779"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32746"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/f46d576c54fb8aeec5fc70560e850bed38ef17d7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-24779.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pypi.org/project/vllm"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/vllm/PYSEC-2026-2020.yaml"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qh4c-xf7m-gxfc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2433624"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-24779"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3782"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3462"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3461"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30089"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30088"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30087"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19712"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10184"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "vLLM vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through MediaConnector"
}
GHSA-QHHW-MFX6-CMWX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:52 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:35Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) exists in Zoho ManageEngine AssetExplorer 6.2.0 and before for the ClientUtilServlet servlet via a URL in a parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-12959"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-08-08T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) exists in Zoho ManageEngine AssetExplorer 6.2.0 and before for the ClientUtilServlet servlet via a URL in a parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-qhhw-mfx6-cmwx",
"modified": "2024-04-04T01:35:25Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:52:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12959"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://excellium-services.com/cert-xlm-advisory/cve-2019-12959"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QHJ3-R7HP-QWC2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-14 06:31 – Updated: 2024-03-14 06:32This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the PaperCut NG/MF server-side module that allows an attacker to induce the server-side application to make HTTP requests to an arbitrary domain of the attacker's choosing.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-1884"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-14T04:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the PaperCut NG/MF server-side module that allows an attacker to induce the server-side application to make HTTP requests to an arbitrary domain of the attacker\u0027s choosing.",
"id": "GHSA-qhj3-r7hp-qwc2",
"modified": "2024-03-14T06:32:00Z",
"published": "2024-03-14T06:31:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1884"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.papercut.com/kb/Main/Security-Bulletin-March-2024"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QJ55-R89P-JWVV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-20 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Angelo Mandato PowerPress Podcasting allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects PowerPress Podcasting: from n/a through 11.12.11.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-49984"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-20T15:15:24Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Angelo Mandato PowerPress Podcasting allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects PowerPress Podcasting: from n/a through 11.12.11.",
"id": "GHSA-qj55-r89p-jwvv",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:31Z",
"published": "2025-06-20T15:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-49984"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/powerpress/vulnerability/wordpress-powerpress-podcasting-plugin-11-12-11-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QJ64-GVR6-H7QX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-02 15:31 – Updated: 2025-07-02 18:30A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in HPE StoreOnce Software.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-37090"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-02T14:15:23Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A server-side request forgery vulnerability\u00a0exists in HPE StoreOnce Software.",
"id": "GHSA-qj64-gvr6-h7qx",
"modified": "2025-07-02T18:30:32Z",
"published": "2025-06-02T15:31:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37090"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbst04847en_us\u0026docLocale=en_US"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-QJP4-4JVR-XQG3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-18 13:29 – Updated: 2026-06-09 10:29Summary
The mcp-security framework fails to implement the mandatory SSRF mitigations outlined in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) security specifications. Specifically, it processes untrusted URLs for OAuth-related discovery and metadata without verifying if the targets are malicious or internal to the network.
This only affects installations with Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) enabled:
spring.ai.mcp.client.authorization.dynamic-client-registration.enabled=true
DCR does not validate URLs exposed by MCP Servers (protected resource metadata URL, authorization server URL) and Authorization Servers (all OAuth2 endpoints).
Workaround
When users need to perform DCR, they may provide their own McpOAuth2ClientManager. Both McpMetadataDiscoveryService and DynamicClientRegistrationService are also affected, if used, users should provide their own subclasses.
Alternatively, users can provide the default implementations of these classes with a RestClient that implements URL filtering through ClientHttpRequestInterceptor.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.springaicommunity:mcp-client-security"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.1.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-45609"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-18T13:29:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-29T15:16:23Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nThe mcp-security framework fails to implement the mandatory SSRF mitigations outlined in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) [security specifications](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/tutorials/security/security_best_practices#mitigation-3). Specifically, it processes untrusted URLs for OAuth-related discovery and metadata without verifying if the targets are malicious or internal to the network.\n\nThis only affects installations with Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) enabled:\n\n```properties\nspring.ai.mcp.client.authorization.dynamic-client-registration.enabled=true\n```\n\nDCR does not validate URLs exposed by MCP Servers (protected resource metadata URL, authorization server URL) and Authorization Servers (all OAuth2 endpoints).\n\n### Workaround\n\nWhen users need to perform DCR, they may provide their own `McpOAuth2ClientManager`. Both `McpMetadataDiscoveryService` and `DynamicClientRegistrationService` are also affected, if used, users should provide their own subclasses.\n\nAlternatively, users can provide the default implementations of these classes with a `RestClient` that implements URL filtering through `ClientHttpRequestInterceptor`.",
"id": "GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3",
"modified": "2026-06-09T10:29:26Z",
"published": "2026-05-18T13:29:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/spring-ai-community/mcp-security/security/advisories/GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45609"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/spring-ai-community/mcp-security/pull/68"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/spring-ai-community/mcp-security/commit/e6b67d8a67cd7acbee6e4c0741c385d62e3ed576"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/spring-ai-community/mcp-security"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/spring-ai-community/mcp-security/releases/tag/v0.1.9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Spring AI MCP Security: Unvalidated URL Fetching (SSRF)"
}
GHSA-QM43-P27G-X33M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-24 09:30 – Updated: 2025-11-24 09:30A vulnerability was found in lKinderBueno Streamity Xtream IPTV Player up to 2.8. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file public/proxy.php. Performing manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 2.8.1 is sufficient to resolve this issue. The patch is named c70bfb8d36b47bfd64c5ec73917e1d9ddb97af92. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-13588"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-24T07:16:05Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in lKinderBueno Streamity Xtream IPTV Player up to 2.8. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file public/proxy.php. Performing manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 2.8.1 is sufficient to resolve this issue. The patch is named c70bfb8d36b47bfd64c5ec73917e1d9ddb97af92. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.",
"id": "GHSA-qm43-p27g-x33m",
"modified": "2025-11-24T09:30:26Z",
"published": "2025-11-24T09:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-13588"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lKinderBueno/Streamity-Xtream-IPTV-Web-player/commit/c70bfb8d36b47bfd64c5ec73917e1d9ddb97af92"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lKinderBueno/Streamity-Xtream-IPTV-Web-player/releases/tag/v2.8.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lakshayyverma/CVE-Discovery/blob/main/Streamity.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.333352"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.333352"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.687573"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-QM56-H2WG-G32X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-08 00:30 – Updated: 2026-06-08 00:30A flaw has been found in jishenghua jshERP up to 3.6. Impacted is the function insertPlatformConfig of the file jshERP-boot/src/main/java/com/jsh/erp/service/PlatformConfigService.java of the component platformConfig Add Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument platformValue can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-11469"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-08T00:16:42Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "A flaw has been found in jishenghua jshERP up to 3.6. Impacted is the function insertPlatformConfig of the file jshERP-boot/src/main/java/com/jsh/erp/service/PlatformConfigService.java of the component platformConfig Add Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument platformValue can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.",
"id": "GHSA-qm56-h2wg-g32x",
"modified": "2026-06-08T00:30:25Z",
"published": "2026-06-08T00:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11469"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jishenghua/jshERP/issues/155"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jishenghua/jshERP"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-11469"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/833815"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/369089"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/369089/cti"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery
An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.