CWE-863
Allowed-with-ReviewIncorrect Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
5659 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-5JVJ-HXMH-6H6J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-29 15:46 – Updated: 2026-04-10 17:26Summary
Gateway HTTP Session History Route Bypasses Operator Read Scope
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw - Affected versions:
<= 2026.3.24 - First patched version:
2026.3.25 - Latest published npm version at verification time:
2026.3.24
Details
The HTTP /sessions/:sessionKey/history route previously authenticated bearer tokens but skipped the same operator.read check used by chat.history over WebSocket. Commit 1c45123231516fa50f8cf8522ba5ff2fb2ca7aea makes HTTP callers declare operator scopes and rejects history reads that do not include operator.read.
Verified vulnerable on tag v2026.3.24 and fixed on main by commit 1c45123231516fa50f8cf8522ba5ff2fb2ca7aea.
Fix Commit(s)
1c45123231516fa50f8cf8522ba5ff2fb2ca7aea
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.3.24"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.3.25"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-35657"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-639",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-29T15:46:40Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nGateway HTTP Session History Route Bypasses Operator Read Scope\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n\n- Package: `openclaw`\n- Affected versions: `\u003c= 2026.3.24`\n- First patched version: `2026.3.25`\n- Latest published npm version at verification time: `2026.3.24`\n\n## Details\n\nThe HTTP `/sessions/:sessionKey/history` route previously authenticated bearer tokens but skipped the same `operator.read` check used by `chat.history` over WebSocket. Commit `1c45123231516fa50f8cf8522ba5ff2fb2ca7aea` makes HTTP callers declare operator scopes and rejects history reads that do not include `operator.read`.\n\nVerified vulnerable on tag `v2026.3.24` and fixed on `main` by commit `1c45123231516fa50f8cf8522ba5ff2fb2ca7aea`.\n\n## Fix Commit(s)\n\n- `1c45123231516fa50f8cf8522ba5ff2fb2ca7aea`",
"id": "GHSA-5jvj-hxmh-6h6j",
"modified": "2026-04-10T17:26:09Z",
"published": "2026-03-29T15:46:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-5jvj-hxmh-6h6j"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/1c45123231516fa50f8cf8522ba5ff2fb2ca7aea"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Gateway HTTP Session History Route Bypasses Operator Read Scope"
}
GHSA-5JVP-M9H4-253H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-26 19:40 – Updated: 2026-02-26 19:40Summary
A broken authorization check in Fleet’s certificate template deletion API could allow a team administrator to delete certificate templates belonging to other teams within the same Fleet instance.
Impact
Fleet supports certificate templates that are scoped to individual teams. In affected versions, the batch deletion endpoint validated authorization using a user-supplied team identifier but did not verify that the certificate template IDs being deleted actually belonged to that team.
As a result, a team administrator could delete certificate templates associated with other teams, potentially disrupting certificate-based workflows such as device enrollment, Wi-Fi authentication, VPN access, or other certificate-dependent configurations for the affected teams.
This issue does not allow privilege escalation, access to sensitive data, or compromise of Fleet’s control plane. Impact is limited to integrity and availability of certificate templates across teams.
Patches
- v4.80.1
Workarounds
If an immediate upgrade is not possible, administrators should restrict access to certificate template management to trusted users and avoid delegating team administrator permissions where not strictly required.
For more information
If there are any questions or comments about this advisory:
Email Fleet at security@fleetdm.com
Join #fleet in osquery Slack
Credits
Fleet thanks @secfox-ai for responsibly reporting this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.80.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-25963"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-26T19:40:10Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-26T03:16:04Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nA broken authorization check in Fleet\u2019s certificate template deletion API could allow a team administrator to delete certificate templates belonging to other teams within the same Fleet instance.\n\n### Impact\n\nFleet supports certificate templates that are scoped to individual teams. In affected versions, the batch deletion endpoint validated authorization using a user-supplied team identifier but did not verify that the certificate template IDs being deleted actually belonged to that team.\n\nAs a result, a team administrator could delete certificate templates associated with other teams, potentially disrupting certificate-based workflows such as device enrollment, Wi-Fi authentication, VPN access, or other certificate-dependent configurations for the affected teams.\n\nThis issue does not allow privilege escalation, access to sensitive data, or compromise of Fleet\u2019s control plane. Impact is limited to integrity and availability of certificate templates across teams.\n\n### Patches\n\n- v4.80.1\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf an immediate upgrade is not possible, administrators should restrict access to certificate template management to trusted users and avoid delegating team administrator permissions where not strictly required.\n\n### For more information\n\nIf there are any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\nEmail Fleet at [security@fleetdm.com](mailto:security@fleetdm.com) \nJoin #fleet in [osquery Slack](https://join.slack.com/t/osquery/shared_invite/zt-h29zm0gk-s2DBtGUTW4CFel0f0IjTEw)\n\n### Credits\n\nFleet thanks @secfox-ai for responsibly reporting this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-5jvp-m9h4-253h",
"modified": "2026-02-26T19:40:10Z",
"published": "2026-02-26T19:40:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet/security/advisories/GHSA-5jvp-m9h4-253h"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25963"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet/commit/d27d0362db390fe835e3b5328525f25018df0fb7"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Fleet: Authorization Bypass in certificate template batch deletion for team administrators"
}
GHSA-5M8H-WGCR-7X2W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:09 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:43mod_lua.c in the mod_lua module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.3.x and 2.4.x through 2.4.10 does not support an httpd configuration in which the same Lua authorization provider is used with different arguments within different contexts, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by leveraging multiple Require directives, as demonstrated by a configuration that specifies authorization for one group to access a certain directory, and authorization for a second group to access a second directory.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-8109"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-12-29T23:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "mod_lua.c in the mod_lua module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.3.x and 2.4.x through 2.4.10 does not support an httpd configuration in which the same Lua authorization provider is used with different arguments within different contexts, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by leveraging multiple Require directives, as demonstrated by a configuration that specifies authorization for one group to access a certain directory, and authorization for a second group to access a second directory.",
"id": "GHSA-5m8h-wgcr-7x2w",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:43:30Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:09:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-8109"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/3f1693d558d0758f829c8b53993f1749ddf6ffcb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/kb/HT205031"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/HT205219"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf6449464fd8b7437704c55f88361b66f12d5b5f90bcce66af4be4ba9@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf6449464fd8b7437704c55f88361b66f12d5b5f90bcce66af4be4ba9%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re3d27b6250aa8548b8845d314bb8a350b3df326cacbbfdfe4d455234@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re3d27b6250aa8548b8845d314bb8a350b3df326cacbbfdfe4d455234%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd18c3c43602e66f9cdcf09f1de233804975b9572b0456cc582390b6f@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd18c3c43602e66f9cdcf09f1de233804975b9572b0456cc582390b6f%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcc44594d4d6579b90deccd4536b5d31f099ef563df39b094be286b9e@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcc44594d4d6579b90deccd4536b5d31f099ef563df39b094be286b9e%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc998b18880df98bafaade071346690c2bc1444adaa1a1ea464b93f0a@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc998b18880df98bafaade071346690c2bc1444adaa1a1ea464b93f0a%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb14daf9cc4e28d18cdc15d6a6ca74e565672fabf7ad89541071d008b@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb14daf9cc4e28d18cdc15d6a6ca74e565672fabf7ad89541071d008b%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra7f6aeb28661fbf826969526585f16856abc4615877875f9d3b35ef4@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra7f6aeb28661fbf826969526585f16856abc4615877875f9d3b35ef4%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9f93cf6dde308d42a9c807784e8102600d0397f5f834890708bf6920@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9f93cf6dde308d42a9c807784e8102600d0397f5f834890708bf6920%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r83109088737656fa6307bd99ab40f8ff0269ae58d3f7272d7048494a@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r83109088737656fa6307bd99ab40f8ff0269ae58d3f7272d7048494a%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r76142b8c5119df2178be7c2dba88fde552eedeec37ea993dfce68d1d@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r76142b8c5119df2178be7c2dba88fde552eedeec37ea993dfce68d1d%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/84a3714f0878781f6ed84473d1a503d2cc382277e100450209231830@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/84a3714f0878781f6ed84473d1a503d2cc382277e100450209231830%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7fd3e7e80293cde02fcd65286ba@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7fd3e7e80293cde02fcd65286ba%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57204"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174077"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2015-0011.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00004.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-June/159352.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/28/5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2016-2367955.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73040"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2523-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-5MCP-H82R-F9V7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-27 03:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 03:42An issue was discovered in the Hyundai Gen5W_L in-vehicle infotainment system AE_E_PE_EUR.S5W_L001.001.211214. The AppUpgrade binary file, which is used during the firmware installation process, can be modified by an attacker to bypass the version check in order to install any firmware version (e.g., newer, older, or customized). This indirectly allows an attacker to install custom firmware in the IVI system.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-26245"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-04-27T01:15:08Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in the Hyundai Gen5W_L in-vehicle infotainment system AE_E_PE_EUR.S5W_L001.001.211214. The AppUpgrade binary file, which is used during the firmware installation process, can be modified by an attacker to bypass the version check in order to install any firmware version (e.g., newer, older, or customized). This indirectly allows an attacker to install custom firmware in the IVI system.",
"id": "GHSA-5mcp-h82r-f9v7",
"modified": "2024-04-04T03:42:32Z",
"published": "2023-04-27T03:30:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-26245"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sowhat.iit.cnr.it"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sowhat.iit.cnr.it:8443/can-work/chimaera"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sowhat.iit.cnr.it:8443/can-work/chimaera/-/blob/main/Report/IIT-01-2023.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5MGF-9MWF-M64W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-22 21:30 – Updated: 2025-04-15 21:31Internal URLs are protected by a secret UUID key, which could have been leaked to web page through the Referrer header. This vulnerability affects Firefox for iOS < 102.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-31746"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-12-22T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Internal URLs are protected by a secret UUID key, which could have been leaked to web page through the Referrer header. This vulnerability affects Firefox for iOS \u003c 102.",
"id": "GHSA-5mgf-9mwf-m64w",
"modified": "2025-04-15T21:31:24Z",
"published": "2022-12-22T21:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-31746"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1654416"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-27"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5MPW-4546-2WCR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-17 21:30 – Updated: 2024-12-17 22:30An issue was discovered where improper authorization controls affected certain queries that could allow a malicious actor to circumvent Document Level Security in Elasticsearch and get access to documents that their roles would normally not allow.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.16.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.16.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-12539"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-12-17T22:30:17Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-17T21:15:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered where improper authorization controls affected certain queries that could allow a malicious actor to circumvent Document Level Security in Elasticsearch and get access to documents that their roles would normally not allow.",
"id": "GHSA-5mpw-4546-2wcr",
"modified": "2024-12-17T22:30:17Z",
"published": "2024-12-17T21:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12539"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-8-16-2-8-17-0-security-update/372091"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Elasticsearch Incorrect Authorization vulnerability"
}
GHSA-5MRG-PM7P-G34V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:17 – Updated: 2022-07-13 00:01Projectsend version r1295 is affected by sensitive information disclosure. Because of not checking authorization in ids parameter in files-edit.php and id parameter in process.php function, a user with uploader role can download and edit all files of users in application.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-40884"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-10-11T11:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Projectsend version r1295 is affected by sensitive information disclosure. Because of not checking authorization in ids parameter in files-edit.php and id parameter in process.php function, a user with uploader role can download and edit all files of users in application.",
"id": "GHSA-5mrg-pm7p-g34v",
"modified": "2022-07-13T00:01:40Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:17:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40884"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/projectsend/projectsend/issues/992"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5MX9-VCF9-4HVC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-12 21:31 – Updated: 2025-02-12 21:31Nomad Community and Nomad Enterprise ("Nomad") event stream configured with a wildcard namespace can bypass the ACL Policy allowing reads on other namespaces.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-0937"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-12T19:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Nomad Community and Nomad Enterprise (\"Nomad\") event stream configured with a wildcard namespace can bypass the ACL Policy allowing reads on other namespaces.",
"id": "GHSA-5mx9-vcf9-4hvc",
"modified": "2025-02-12T21:31:53Z",
"published": "2025-02-12T21:31:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-0937"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2025-02-nomad-vulnerable-to-event-stream-namespace-acl-policy-bypass-through-wildcard-namespace/73191"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5P22-M2JF-CQ84
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:49 – Updated: 2022-08-06 00:00A vulnerability was discovered in Management component of Avaya Equinox Conferencing that could potentially allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain access to screen sharing and whiteboard sessions. The affected versions of Management component of Avaya Equinox Conferencing include all 3.x versions before 3.17. Avaya Equinox Conferencing is now offered as Avaya Meetings Server.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-7038"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-04-28T22:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was discovered in Management component of Avaya Equinox Conferencing that could potentially allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain access to screen sharing and whiteboard sessions. The affected versions of Management component of Avaya Equinox Conferencing include all 3.x versions before 3.17. Avaya Equinox Conferencing is now offered as Avaya Meetings Server.",
"id": "GHSA-5p22-m2jf-cq84",
"modified": "2022-08-06T00:00:41Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:49:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-7038"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.avaya.com/css/P8/documents/101075574"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5P26-VM69-MJXQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:18 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:18The /profile/deleteWatch.do resource in Atlassian Fisheye and Crucible before version 4.8.1 allows remote attackers to remove another user's watching settings for a repository via an improper authorization vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-4014"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-06-01T07:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The /profile/deleteWatch.do resource in Atlassian Fisheye and Crucible before version 4.8.1 allows remote attackers to remove another user\u0027s watching settings for a repository via an improper authorization vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-5p26-vm69-mjxq",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:18:55Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:18:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-4014"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CRUC-8467"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/FE-7283"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.