CWE-521
AllowedWeak Password Requirements
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not require that users should have strong passwords.
351 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-RWQJ-V7MX-C4X7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-30 21:30 – Updated: 2024-10-31 18:31D-Link DSL6740C v6.TR069.20211230 was discovered to use insecure default credentials for Administrator access, possibly allowing attackers to bypass authentication and escalate privileges on the device via a bruteforce attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-48271"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-521"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-30T20:15:04Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "D-Link DSL6740C v6.TR069.20211230 was discovered to use insecure default credentials for Administrator access, possibly allowing attackers to bypass authentication and escalate privileges on the device via a bruteforce attack.",
"id": "GHSA-rwqj-v7mx-c4x7",
"modified": "2024-10-31T18:31:18Z",
"published": "2024-10-30T21:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-48271"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/stevenyu113228/e264c145d6e6e6b59cf53fddc27409ad#1--predictable-administrator-credentials-in-d-link-dsl6740c-modem"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.dlink.com/en/security-bulletin"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-V34V-29JJ-8CV7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:19 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:19IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager Virtual Appliance 2.2.1 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 145236.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-1680"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-521"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-04-02T14:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager Virtual Appliance 2.2.1 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 145236.",
"id": "GHSA-v34v-29jj-8cv7",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:19:19Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:19:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1680"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/145236"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ibm10879093"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-V3VP-QQMJ-GGRJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:35 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:35Quick Heal Total Security before 19.0 allows attackers with local admin rights to obtain access to files in the File Vault via a brute-force attack on the password.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-27587"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-521"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-11-30T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Quick Heal Total Security before 19.0 allows attackers with local admin rights to obtain access to files in the File Vault via a brute-force attack on the password.",
"id": "GHSA-v3vp-qqmj-ggrj",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:35:11Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:35:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-27587"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cyberworldmirror.com/quick-heal-addressed-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-version-19-update-now"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-V483-XGFW-P6JF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-06 03:30 – Updated: 2025-06-06 03:30IBM Security Verify Governance 10.0.2 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-22330"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-521"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-06T02:15:21Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "IBM Security Verify Governance 10.0.2 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.",
"id": "GHSA-v483-xgfw-p6jf",
"modified": "2025-06-06T03:30:26Z",
"published": "2025-06-06T03:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22330"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7235779"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-V6VV-XH62-W9GV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-09-09 00:00 – Updated: 2022-09-15 00:00Inoda OnTrack v3.4 employs a weak password policy which allows attackers to potentially gain unauthorized access to the application via brute-force attacks. Additionally, user passwords are hashed without a salt or pepper making it much easier for tools like hashcat to crack the hashes.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-37164"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-521"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-09-08T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Inoda OnTrack v3.4 employs a weak password policy which allows attackers to potentially gain unauthorized access to the application via brute-force attacks. Additionally, user passwords are hashed without a salt or pepper making it much easier for tools like hashcat to crack the hashes.",
"id": "GHSA-v6vv-xh62-w9gv",
"modified": "2022-09-15T00:00:21Z",
"published": "2022-09-09T00:00:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-37164"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/inoda/ontrack/issues/78"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/521.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/916.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gainsec.com/2022/08/07/cve-2022-hardcoded-creds-weak-password-hauk-android-location-sharing"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VCPV-43P8-JH9J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-12 18:31 – Updated: 2025-09-12 18:31A vulnerability was detected in iteachyou Dreamer CMS up to 4.1.3.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/user/updatePwd. Performing manipulation results in weak password requirements. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-10320"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-521"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-12T16:15:33Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was detected in iteachyou Dreamer CMS up to 4.1.3.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/user/updatePwd. Performing manipulation results in weak password requirements. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
"id": "GHSA-vcpv-43p8-jh9j",
"modified": "2025-09-12T18:31:10Z",
"published": "2025-09-12T18:31:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-10320"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.323746"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.323746"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.643393"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cnblogs.com/aibot/p/19063320"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-VCV5-7XR7-WF5F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-19 12:30 – Updated: 2024-02-19 12:30Weak MySQL database root password in LaborOfficeFree affects version 19.10. This vulnerability allows an attacker to perform a brute force attack and easily discover the root password.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-1345"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-307",
"CWE-521"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-19T12:15:44Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Weak MySQL database root password in LaborOfficeFree affects version 19.10. This vulnerability allows an attacker to perform a brute force attack and easily discover the root password.",
"id": "GHSA-vcv5-7xr7-wf5f",
"modified": "2024-02-19T12:30:37Z",
"published": "2024-02-19T12:30:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1345"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/multiple-vulnerabilities-laborofficefree"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VCX4-4QXG-MFP4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 22:37 – Updated: 2026-04-18 00:45Summary
Telegram Webhook Missing Guess Rate Limiting Enables Brute-Force Guessing of Weak Webhook Secret
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw - Affected versions:
<= 2026.3.24 - First patched version:
2026.3.25 - Latest published npm version at verification time:
2026.3.24
Details
Telegram webhook auth previously rejected bad secrets but did not throttle repeated guesses, allowing brute-force attempts against weak webhook secrets. Commit c2c136ae9517ddd0789d742a0fdf4c10e8c729a7 adds repeated-guess throttling before auth failure responses.
Verified vulnerable on tag v2026.3.24 and fixed on main by commit c2c136ae9517ddd0789d742a0fdf4c10e8c729a7.
Fix Commit(s)
c2c136ae9517ddd0789d742a0fdf4c10e8c729a7
Release Process Note
2026.3.25 is the next planned OpenClaw release version in package.json. This advisory is being published ahead of that npm release so the draft is no longer blocked; once 2026.3.25 is published, the structured patched-version metadata will match the released artifact.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2026.3.24"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-35628"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-307",
"CWE-521"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-27T22:37:35Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nTelegram Webhook Missing Guess Rate Limiting Enables Brute-Force Guessing of Weak Webhook Secret\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n\n- Package: `openclaw`\n- Affected versions: `\u003c= 2026.3.24`\n- First patched version: `2026.3.25`\n- Latest published npm version at verification time: `2026.3.24`\n\n## Details\n\nTelegram webhook auth previously rejected bad secrets but did not throttle repeated guesses, allowing brute-force attempts against weak webhook secrets. Commit `c2c136ae9517ddd0789d742a0fdf4c10e8c729a7` adds repeated-guess throttling before auth failure responses.\n\nVerified vulnerable on tag `v2026.3.24` and fixed on `main` by commit `c2c136ae9517ddd0789d742a0fdf4c10e8c729a7`.\n\n## Fix Commit(s)\n\n- `c2c136ae9517ddd0789d742a0fdf4c10e8c729a7`\n\n## Release Process Note\n\n`2026.3.25` is the next planned OpenClaw release version in `package.json`. This advisory is being published ahead of that npm release so the draft is no longer blocked; once `2026.3.25` is published, the structured patched-version metadata will match the released artifact.",
"id": "GHSA-vcx4-4qxg-mfp4",
"modified": "2026-04-18T00:45:43Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T22:37:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-vcx4-4qxg-mfp4"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35628"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/c2c136ae9517ddd0789d742a0fdf4c10e8c729a7"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-brute-force-attack-via-missing-telegram-webhook-rate-limiting"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Telegram Webhook Missing Guess Rate Limiting Enables Brute-Force Guessing of Weak Webhook Secret"
}
GHSA-VF25-W4JQ-MHX2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-29 18:31 – Updated: 2025-01-29 18:31IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.10 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-37398"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-521"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-29T17:15:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.10 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.",
"id": "GHSA-vf25-w4jq-mhx2",
"modified": "2025-01-29T18:31:22Z",
"published": "2025-01-29T18:31:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-37398"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7181814"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VV6W-6FPX-Q4V9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-25 00:00 – Updated: 2022-07-06 00:00Weak default root user credentials allow remote attackers to easily obtain OS superuser privileges over the open TCP port for SSH.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-1668"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-521"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-06-24T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Weak default root user credentials allow remote attackers to easily obtain OS superuser privileges over the open TCP port for SSH.",
"id": "GHSA-vv6w-6fpx-q4v9",
"modified": "2022-07-06T00:00:30Z",
"published": "2022-06-25T00:00:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1668"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-22-174-03"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- A product's design should require adherance to an appropriate password policy. Specific password requirements depend strongly on contextual factors, but it is recommended to contain the following attributes:
- Depending on the threat model, the password policy may include several additional attributes.
- See NIST 800-63B [REF-1053] for further information on password requirements.
- {'xhtml:li': ['Enforcement of a minimum and maximum length', 'Restrictions against password reuse', 'Restrictions against using common passwords', 'Restrictions against using contextual string in the password (e.g., user id, app name)']}
- {'xhtml:li': [{'xhtml:ul': {'xhtml:li': ['Increasing the range of characters makes the password harder to crack and may be appropriate for systems relying on single factor authentication.', 'Unfortunately, a complex password may be difficult to memorize, encouraging a user to select a short password or to incorrectly manage the password (write it down).', "Another disadvantage of this approach is that it often does not result in a significant increases in overal password complexity due to people's predictable usage of various symbols."]}, '#text': 'Complex passwords requiring mixed character sets (alpha, numeric, special, mixed case)'}, {'xhtml:ul': {'xhtml:li': ['Increasing the number of characters makes the password harder to crack and may be appropriate for systems relying on single factor authentication.', 'A disadvantage of this approach is that selecting a good passphrase is not easy and poor passwords can still be generated. Some prompting may be needed to encourage long un-predictable passwords.']}, '#text': 'Large Minimum Length (encouraging passphrases instead of passwords)'}, {'xhtml:ul': {'xhtml:li': ['Generating a password for the user can help make sure that length and complexity requirements are met, and can result in secure passwords being used.', 'A disadvantage of this approach is that the resulting password or passpharse may be too difficult to memorize, encouraging them to be written down.']}, '#text': 'Randomly Chosen Secrets'}]}
Mitigation
Consider a second authentication factor beyond the password, which prevents the password from being a single point of failure. See CWE-308 for further information.
Mitigation
Consider implementing a password complexity meter to inform users when a chosen password meets the required attributes.
Mitigation
Previously, "password expiration" was widely advocated as a defense-in-depth approach to minimize the risk of weak passwords, and it has become a common practice. Password expiration requires a password to be changed within a fixed time window (such as every 90 days). However, this approach has significant limitations in the current threat landscape, and its utility has been reduced in light of the adoption of related protection mechanisms (such as password complexity and computational effort), along with the recognition that regular password changes often caused users to generate more predictable passwords. As a result, this is now a Discouraged Common Practice [REF-1488] [REF-1489], especially as the sole factor in protecting passwords. It is still strongly encouraged to force password changes in case of evidence of compromise, but this is not the same as a forced "expiration" on an arbitrary time frame.
CAPEC-112: Brute Force
In this attack, some asset (information, functionality, identity, etc.) is protected by a finite secret value. The attacker attempts to gain access to this asset by using trial-and-error to exhaustively explore all the possible secret values in the hope of finding the secret (or a value that is functionally equivalent) that will unlock the asset.
CAPEC-16: Dictionary-based Password Attack
An attacker tries each of the words in a dictionary as passwords to gain access to the system via some user's account. If the password chosen by the user was a word within the dictionary, this attack will be successful (in the absence of other mitigations). This is a specific instance of the password brute forcing attack pattern.
Dictionary Attacks differ from similar attacks such as Password Spraying (CAPEC-565) and Credential Stuffing (CAPEC-600), since they leverage unknown username/password combinations and don't care about inducing account lockouts.
CAPEC-49: Password Brute Forcing
An adversary tries every possible value for a password until they succeed. A brute force attack, if feasible computationally, will always be successful because it will essentially go through all possible passwords given the alphabet used (lower case letters, upper case letters, numbers, symbols, etc.) and the maximum length of the password.
CAPEC-509: Kerberoasting
Through the exploitation of how service accounts leverage Kerberos authentication with Service Principal Names (SPNs), the adversary obtains and subsequently cracks the hashed credentials of a service account target to exploit its privileges. The Kerberos authentication protocol centers around a ticketing system which is used to request/grant access to services and to then access the requested services. As an authenticated user, the adversary may request Active Directory and obtain a service ticket with portions encrypted via RC4 with the private key of the authenticated account. By extracting the local ticket and saving it disk, the adversary can brute force the hashed value to reveal the target account credentials.
CAPEC-55: Rainbow Table Password Cracking
An attacker gets access to the database table where hashes of passwords are stored. They then use a rainbow table of pre-computed hash chains to attempt to look up the original password. Once the original password corresponding to the hash is obtained, the attacker uses the original password to gain access to the system.
CAPEC-555: Remote Services with Stolen Credentials
This pattern of attack involves an adversary that uses stolen credentials to leverage remote services such as RDP, telnet, SSH, and VNC to log into a system. Once access is gained, any number of malicious activities could be performed.
CAPEC-561: Windows Admin Shares with Stolen Credentials
An adversary guesses or obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate Windows administrator credentials (e.g. userID/password) to access Windows Admin Shares on a local machine or within a Windows domain.
CAPEC-565: Password Spraying
In a Password Spraying attack, an adversary tries a small list (e.g. 3-5) of common or expected passwords, often matching the target's complexity policy, against a known list of user accounts to gain valid credentials. The adversary tries a particular password for each user account, before moving onto the next password in the list. This approach assists the adversary in remaining undetected by avoiding rapid or frequent account lockouts. The adversary may then reattempt the process with additional passwords, once enough time has passed to prevent inducing a lockout.
CAPEC-70: Try Common or Default Usernames and Passwords
An adversary may try certain common or default usernames and passwords to gain access into the system and perform unauthorized actions. An adversary may try an intelligent brute force using empty passwords, known vendor default credentials, as well as a dictionary of common usernames and passwords. Many vendor products come preconfigured with default (and thus well-known) usernames and passwords that should be deleted prior to usage in a production environment. It is a common mistake to forget to remove these default login credentials. Another problem is that users would pick very simple (common) passwords (e.g. "secret" or "password") that make it easier for the attacker to gain access to the system compared to using a brute force attack or even a dictionary attack using a full dictionary.